"The UI is very nice, and performance wise it's quite good too."
"The initial setup is very easy for small environments."
"Elasticsearch includes a graphical user interface (GUI) called Kibana. The GUI features are extremely beneficial to us."
"The solution has good security features. I have been happy with the dashboards and interface."
"The most valuable feature is the out of the box Kibana."
"I really like the visualization that you can do within it. That's really handy. Product-wise, it is a very good and stable product."
"It's a stable solution and we have not had any issues."
"Dashboard is very customizable."
"The product is at the forefront of auto-remediation networking. It's great."
"This is a good security product."
"The solution appears to be stable, although we haven't used it heavily."
"Could have more open source tools and testing."
"The price could be better. Kibana has some limitations in terms of the tablet to view event logs. I also have a high volume of data. On the initialization part, if you chose Kibana, you'll have some limitations. Kibana was primarily proposed as a log data reviewer to build applications to the viewer log data using Kibana. Then it became a virtualization tool, but it still has limitations from a developer's point of view."
"Something that could be improved is better integrations with Cortex and QRadar, for example."
"It should be easier to use. It has been getting better because many functions are pre-defined, but it still needs improvement."
"The reports could improve."
"Improving machine learning capabilities would be beneficial."
"There are a lot of manual steps on the operating system. It could be simplified in the user interface."
"There is an index issue in which the data starts to crash as it increases."
"Currently, a lot of network operations need improvement. We still need people to handle incidents. Our vision is to leverage status and convert it directly from the network devices. It would be ideal if we could take action using APIs and API code and remove manual processes."
"The price of Splunk UBA is too high."
"I'm not aware of any lacking features."
ELK Elasticsearch is ranked 1st in Anomaly Detection Tools with 19 reviews while Splunk User Behavior Analytics is ranked 2nd in Anomaly Detection Tools with 3 reviews. ELK Elasticsearch is rated 8.0, while Splunk User Behavior Analytics is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of ELK Elasticsearch writes "Good processing power, very scalable, and able to handle all data formats". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Splunk User Behavior Analytics writes "Stable, with good automation capabilities, however, we want to be able to automate even more". ELK Elasticsearch is most compared with Amazon Athena, Azure Search, Amazon AWS CloudSearch, Loom Systems and Solr, whereas Splunk User Behavior Analytics is most compared with Darktrace, Cisco Stealthwatch, Exabeam Fusion SIEM, IBM QRadar User Behavior Analytics and Varonis Datalert. See our ELK Elasticsearch vs. Splunk User Behavior Analytics report.
See our list of best Anomaly Detection Tools vendors.
We monitor all Anomaly Detection Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.