ElectroNeek vs OpenText Intelligent Capture comparison

ElectroNeek and OpenText are both solutions in the Intelligent Document Processing (IDP) category. ElectroNeek is ranked #14 with an average rating of 7.5, while OpenText is ranked #5 with an average rating of 8.5. ElectroNeek holds a 1.0% mindshare in IDP, compared to OpenText’s 7.5% mindshare. Additionally, 95% of ElectroNeek users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of OpenText users who would recommend it.

ElectroNeek

Read 9 ElectroNeek reviews

124 Views
63 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

OpenText Intelligent Capture

Read 7 OpenText Intelligent Capture reviews

1,696 Views
711 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

ElectroNeek

OpenText Intelligent Capture

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 10, 2024

ElectroNeek and OpenText Intelligent Capture are competing in the field of intelligent automation. ElectroNeek seems to have the upper hand for budget-conscious businesses due to its cost-effectiveness, while OpenText Intelligent Capture stands out for its comprehensive feature set aimed at organizations needing robust functionalities.

Features: ElectroNeek is known for ease of use, focusing on automation workflows and bot development, with support for unlimited bots and a user-friendly interface. OpenText Intelligent Capture offers advanced document recognition, automated vendor invoice management, and the ability to integrate CRM systems with its enterprise capturing feature.

Room for Improvement: ElectroNeek could enhance its machine learning capabilities and improve its extensive documentation for more technical users. Greater customization options and more integration capabilities would also be helpful. For OpenText Intelligent Capture, reducing deployment complexity, offering more cost-effective solutions, and simplifying the learning curve could present improvements.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: ElectroNeek's straightforward deployment and responsive customer support facilitate quick integration, ideal for businesses needing rapid solutions. OpenText Intelligent Capture supports sophisticated needs through a complex deployment model, appealing to enterprises with advanced requirements though requiring more time for setup and adaptation.

Pricing and ROI: ElectroNeek provides scalable pricing plans and manageable setup costs that result in a potentially quick ROI, appealing to businesses aiming to minimize expenses. OpenText Intelligent Capture, while demanding a larger initial investment, justifies its pricing through significant ROI owing to its expansive functionality, attracting those seeking feature depth despite higher upfront costs.

To learn more, read our detailed ElectroNeek vs. OpenText Intelligent Capture Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

ElectroNeek vs. OpenText Intelligent Capture

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 850,028 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

ElectroNeek

Ranking in Intelligent Document Processing (IDP)

14th

Average Rating

7.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Robotic Process Automation (RPA) (23rd)

OpenText Intelligent Capture

Ranking in Intelligent Document Processing (IDP)

5th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Intelligent Document Processing (IDP) category, the mindshare of ElectroNeek is 1.0%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText Intelligent Capture is 7.5%, down from 8.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Intelligent Document Processing (IDP)

Featured Reviews

Ishmael Munyai

Robotics Process Automation (RPA) Developer at Apollo Studios

With an easy initial setup phase in place, the tool needs to provide functionalities like web scraping to users

It is a very scalable solution. In ElectroNeek, you can build your project in modular programming or with the use of sub-programs. You can have a lot of sub-programs that make up a whole project. If you don't wanna use the drag-and-drop activities, you can use JavaScript or Python instead. So it's very useful when you are working with things such as SPS. Actually, you can write scripts to support all the product functionalities with Python and manage the product's functions. You will find a company named Apollo Studios on the website of ElectroNeek. I think they are one of the best companies in South Africa that entered into a partnership with ElectroNeek.

Read full review

Shital Funde

Managar at a computer software company with 1,001-5,000 employees

A powerful solution for custom scripting but .NET knowledge is required

Knowledge of .NET is required to effectively use the solution or it can be complicated. I was able to train customers to use the solution if they had some .NET experience. The solution should offer a lightweight version that includes the OCR or document scanning and does not include the entire enterprise package with custom scripting.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The product's initial setup phase was easy."

"The most valuable feature is the price."

"The cost is the best thing about ElectroNeek."

"ElectroNeek was extremely easy to use, especially its UI was easy to navigate with limited training."

"We find the OCR feature very valuable, due to the corrector recognition that it provides; this is very useful for document processing."

"The solution is user-friendly with a really good UI and ID."

"The drag and drop feature, which is no code, is very useful for me because I am not a technical person. It is very user-friendly."

"The product's setup is straightforward."

More ElectroNeek pros

"The automated version of the vendor invoice management is great."

"The solution is very powerful because it allows for custom scripting."

"Being able to have accurate extraction is most valuable. It has machine learning and other tools to make the extraction more accurate."

"We use it to capture documents coming through our product and mobile channels and make them available for our business to access and email. We use it to automate the email workflow in our applications, pull the documents, and email them to the users."

"The enterprise and capturing feature of OpenText is its valuable feature. As we have integrated CRM with OpenText."

"It allows you to image capture, scan documents and use machine learning to automatically index and tie them."

Cons

"The integrating capability of the product needs to be improved, to ensure that it works with all systems involved in a process."

"The solution needs to improve its stability."

"When I wanted to use web scraping for tables in web applications, I found through online forums that such functionality or activity is currently not working as it shows."

"It's not applicable to very large enterprises and for difficult work or more complex processes."

"I think that this solution could improve remote desktop interactions."

"The pricing is an area with a shortcoming, and from an improvement perspective, it needs to be made cheaper."

"ElectroNeek comes with three activities and we cannot add activities like we can with uiPADs."

"The solution works well with Google Chrome, but not with Microsoft Edge, which is the browser we use for automation."

More ElectroNeek cons

"Knowledge of .NET is required to effectively use the solution or it can be complicated."

"I would say what most of the document management solutions are lacking is smartness to detect the duplicate storage of the documents"

"The setup is medium complexity."

"We are using it to improve the image and the documentation for the cases. And sometimes, some cases have more than fifteen different types. We use some tools as fixed standard analysis and provide information to support the different types to take some decisions and help in an automated process. We choose the case type and subtype DNS scanning documents from the data entry up."

"It can be more user-friendly, and it should also have more reporting capabilities. There are also a few other things that need improvement."

"The area for improvement primarily centers around licensing concerns rather than technical issues. Captiva, intended for larger clients, poses challenges for medium and small businesses due to licensing costs. The current licensing model is based on volume, such as purchasing a volume for one million dollars per year for scanning. This pricing structure may be prohibitive for companies with constrained budgets. Another aspect requiring attention is the mobile capture feature, which, although experiencing recent enhancements in intelligent document processing through AI, could benefit from further improvements. Specifically, there is room for enhancement in enabling users to efficiently capture documents using their smartphones."

"If something is handwritten and attached to an email, it doesn't capture the information correctly."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Its price could definitely be lower. Its licensing is on a yearly basis. There is no additional cost to the standard licensing fees."

"On a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive, I rate the pricing a seven."

"It's very affordable and the licensing is billed on a yearly basis."

"I give the price an eight out of ten."

"I believe we had a Silver Membership or something similar annually."

"My company has made a payment towards the purchase of a license from ElectorNeek."

"OpenText is an expensive solution."

"Some customers say the solution can get costly because it requires licenses or enterprise packages."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Intelligent Document Processing (IDP) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Educational Organization

11%

Comms Service Provider

11%

Computer Software Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Financial Services Firm

16%

Computer Software Company

13%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Government

10%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

RPA that Bots can run without centralized control?

Yea there are. For example Electroneek.

See all answers

What do you like most about ElectroNeek?

The product's initial setup phase was easy.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ElectroNeek?

My company has made a payment towards the purchase of a license from ElectorNeek.

See all answers

What do you like most about OpenText Intelligent Capture?

The enterprise and capturing feature of OpenText is its valuable feature. As we have integrated CRM with OpenText.

See all answers

What needs improvement with OpenText Intelligent Capture?

The area for improvement primarily centers around licensing concerns rather than technical issues. Captiva, intended for larger clients, poses challenges for medium and small businesses due to lice...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for OpenText Intelligent Capture?

It is designed for the automated capture and recognition of documents. Whether obtained through scanning, emails, faxes, or other sources, documents can be captured and data automatically extracted...

See all answers

Comparisons

UiPath Platform vs ElectroNeek

Compared 68% of the time

Automation Anywhere vs ElectroNeek

Compared 18% of the time

Microsoft Power Automate vs ElectroNeek

Compared 14% of the time

More ElectroNeek Competitors

ABBYY Vantage vs OpenText Intelligent Capture

Compared 25% of the time

UiPath Document Understanding vs OpenText Intelligent Capture

Compared 16% of the time

Tungsten TotalAgility vs OpenText Intelligent Capture

Compared 13% of the time

Amazon Textract vs OpenText Intelligent Capture

Compared 11% of the time

Hyland Brainware vs OpenText Intelligent Capture

Compared 8% of the time

More OpenText Intelligent Capture Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Robotic Process Automation (RPA)

April 2025

Download ElectroNeek product report

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Intelligent Capture

April 2025

Download OpenText Intelligent Capture product report

Also Known As

ElectroNeek RPA

OpenText Captivas

Overview

ElectroNeek is an Intelligent Automation Platform transforming business process management in enterprises by integrating AI bots with employee workflows, automating routines, and helping humans to focus on more creative and strategic tasks. ElectroNeek provides a wide range of exciting low-code automation tools based on RPA, IDP, AI and GPT-4 (Conversational and Generative) technologies.

ElectroNeek

OpenText™ Intelligent Capture, formerly OpenText Captiva, is an enterprise capture platform, providing omni-channel capabilities for collecting everything from scanned paper to chatbots. It is not just for organizing content at the front door, but automating processes across the enterprise. It can automate processes for standard documents, such as Financial Accounts Payable and Accounts Receivable, or complex documents, such as contracts or partner requests that require action based on the document’s content.

OpenText

Sample Customers

UFP, Clariant, Ricoh, FMBCapital, RePower

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

ElectroNeek vs. OpenText Intelligent Capture

April 2025

Free Report: ElectroNeek vs. OpenText Intelligent Capture

Find out what your peers are saying about ElectroNeek vs. OpenText Intelligent Capture and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our ElectroNeek vs. OpenText Intelligent Capture report.

See our list of best Intelligent Document Processing (IDP) vendors.

We monitor all Intelligent Document Processing (IDP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.