Elastic Stack vs Logpoint comparison

Read 24 Logpoint reviews

5,046 Views
2,119 Comparison Views

86% willing to recommend

Elastic Stack

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

Logpoint and Elastic Stack are tools competing in the SIEM space. Logpoint often has an edge with its cost-effective pricing, whereas Elastic Stack stands out for its expansive feature set despite higher costs.

Features: Logpoint is favored for its simplicity and streamlined functionality, making it easy to implement. Elastic Stack is recognized for its versatility and scalability, offering robust analytic capabilities.

Room for Improvement: Logpoint users desire enhancements in analytics and customization flexibility. Elastic Stack users seek improvements in resource intensity, complexity handling, and usability, pointing to performance optimization needs.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Logpoint boasts an intuitive deployment process with efficient support. Elastic Stack, although more complex to deploy, is supported by extensive documentation and community resources, presenting a steeper learning curve.

Pricing and ROI: Logpoint is noted for affordability, providing quick ROI. Elastic Stack, despite a higher upfront cost, is viewed as a worthwhile investment for its comprehensive capabilities and long-term value.

To learn more, read our detailed Elastic Stack vs. Logpoint Report (Updated: June 2026).

Elastic Stack vs. Logpoint

Download the complete report

Helped 900,644 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Elastic Stack

Ranking in Log Management

15th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Logpoint

Ranking in Log Management

28th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) (30th), User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) (15th), Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) (36th), Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) (18th)

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2026, in the Log Management category, the mindshare of Elastic Stack is 2.2%, down from 5.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Logpoint is 1.0%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Log Management Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Elastic Stack	2.2%
Logpoint	1.0%
Other	96.8%

Log Management

Featured Reviews

Lakshmi Bodepu

Senior Consultant at Skillfield

Offers robust out-of-the-box integrations and streamlines logging processes effortlessly

There are improvements needed for Elastic Stack. It is mostly based on Lucene, and the heart of Elastic Stack is Lucene, which has some limitations. Anything built on top of Lucene often feels an add-on, and that includes vector databases. Elastic Stack can store vector embeddings as well and perform AI and machine learning tasks out of the box without excessive configuration. The main improvements involve increasing speed and compression capabilities; I have seen databases that claim to achieve significantly better compression. While Elastic Stack can manage vast amounts of data, if the mapping is not specified correctly, the indexing time can be slow, especially with many events per second. Improper mapping usually means that every document received gets indexed for all fields, which is not desired. Elastic consultants typically optimize this, but out of the box, as data volume increases, scaling becomes necessary. They are working on these improvements in new versions.

Read full review

Rifat Hasan

System Engineer at Corporate Projukti Limited

Has lacked proper integration and consistent support communication

I selected Logpoint for the pricing as it is reasonable. I am located in Bangladesh, South Asia, Dhaka. I have tried to contact Exabeam by mail repeatedly, but there has been no response. My company, Corporate Projukti Limited, including my Bangladesh area head, technical director, and team manager, have sent emails to contact Exabeam solution, but there is no response. There is already a distributor in Bangladesh. The weakness with Logpoint is UEBA. UEBA is recommended, but not extra. Exabeam's UEBA is an extra feature. SOAR is extra, but Logpoint's product measurement is 40 or 50. There is a 10% difference with the UEBA and SOAR, so Logpoint is weak there. I would appreciate extra features in Logpoint such as SOAR. SOAR and UEBA are included features in Logpoint. Logpoint's UEBA is a weak point, while Exabeam's UEBA has extra AI through automation. Exabeam has a license included, and the extra license is an add-on. In Logpoint, it is included, which makes it a weak point.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The only beneficial aspect of Elastic Stack is that it's open source."

"The tool's most powerful aspect is its search engine capability. It's a highly effective and powerful solution for searching. We use it in professional and student projects at universities, and it delivers promising results."

"The detection rules in Elastic Stack are the most valuable feature. The search capabilities are excellent and fast. As we collect logs from workstations and devices, the detection rules run on top of the logs and detect any suspicious activity, raising alerts accordingly. Integration with Elastic Stack depends on the specific integration. Elastic provides some bridging integrations that make it easy, but require custom integration. Most integrations are simple, but customization can be challenging because we need to do some parsing. There's something called Elastic Common Schema, and we need to parse the source logs to match this schema, which can be a bit challenging."

"The centralized logging capabilities of Elastic Stack have helped me streamline my logging processes significantly because there are many open-source tools available, such as Filebeat and Logstash, to collect the logs."

"I think the ecosystem is well supported, and for logs, it was faster compared to our previous previous log management."

"The tool is huge, and it performs brilliantly. I tested it for malware, and within two weeks of launching, the product alerted me about a network intrusion. This was a tough test for it, but it performed admirably. The alerting system is excellent, and searching through logs is incredibly efficient. What's impressive is that all three products or options are integrated into one solution. This means I don't need separate logging, monitoring, or antivirus solutions."

"The solution's technical support is good...Elastic Stack offers good value for value for money based on the product's features and what they offer."

"Prior to the latest updates, data lake management was a standout feature. The hybrid capability for on-premise and cloud integration was also crucial. Now, with Elastic Defense, the agent simplifies security monitoring, making it a key asset."

More Elastic Stack pros

"The solution's most valuable aspect is the combination of the software and the support that they have."

"I use the product for my research and development to enhance my work."

"What I like best about LogPoint is its cost-effectiveness compared to other solutions. LogPoint also has better dashboards which I find valuable. I also like that you can create use cases based on your assets."

"The main advantage of Logpoint is the support service. They reply within ten minutes to an hour to our queries."

"Log collection, dashboards and reporting are good."

"I would say that it's a good product; it's very stable, and the support is very good."

"They basically charge you in a better way."

"For on-premises, it is the best solution."

More Logpoint pros

Cons

"Elastic Stack should be more simplified with ready-to-use widgets."

"The tool's pricing can be improved."

"Agent deployment is a little tough in the on-premise version."

"The implementation of dashboards in the solution needs to be made easier...I had some issues with the ports and configuration since it was kind of complex to implement with Docker."

"The main issue related to Elastic Stack is in the area of its licensing."

"Elastic Stack should be more simplified with ready-to-use widgets. Also, incorporating AI capabilities is essential as monitoring and observability tools are now adding AI features."

"While Elastic Stack can manage vast amounts of data, if the mapping is not specified correctly, the indexing time can be slow, especially with many events per second."

"It should facilitate easier manual integration."

More Elastic Stack cons

"They are not in the US market, and the quality of support has declined."

"Our customers were not happy with firewalling and the endpoint antivirus."

"It needs to improve performance. That's somehow something that others do better."

"Customer Service: This is a HUGE problem."

"Logpoint's UEBA is a weak point, while Exabeam's UEBA has extra AI through automation."

"The thing that makes it a little bit challenging is when you run into a situation where you have logs that are not easily parsable. If a log has a very specific structure, it is very easy to parse and create a parser for it, but if a log has a free form, meaning that it is of any length or it can change at any time, handling such a log is very challenging, not just in LogPoint but also in everything else. Everybody struggles with that scenario, and LogPoint is also in the same boat. One-third of logs are of free form or not of a specific length, and you can run into situations where it is almost impossible to parse the log, even if they try to help you. It is just the nature of the beast."

"The general public wasn't looking for that type of product unless you had a company that was medical or financial and needed 24-hour responsiveness."

"Log management could be better because transporting the log from a password to the client system takes time."

More Logpoint cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Ultimately, the pricing depends upon the capacity planning that the enterprise architect does."

"We are using the open-source community version of the product."

"I used the open-source version of Elastic Stack, because of which I did not have to pay anything."

"I rate the solution's pricing a six out of ten."

"If I compare Elastic Stack to the other products in the market, I would say that the tool is available at a competitive price."

"The product is expensive."

"It depends on the specifics, but generally, Elastic is economical for certain use cases."

"The pricing is reasonable."

"On a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive, I would rate LogPoint's pricing a seven. It is not very expensive compared to some of the more costly products, and it is not very cheap compared to some of the cheaper products in the SIEM market."

"It has a fixed price, which is what I like about LogPoint. I bought the system and paid for it, and I pay maintenance. It is not a consumption model. Most SIEMs or most of the log management systems are consumption-based, which means that you pay for how many logs you have in the system. That's a real problem because logs can grow very quickly in different circumstances, and when you have a variable price model, you never know what you're going to pay. Splunk is notoriously expensive for that reason. If you use Splunk or QRadar, it becomes expensive because there are not just the logs; you also have to parse the logs and create indexes. Those indexes can be very expensive in terms of space. Therefore, if they charge you by this space, you can end up paying a significant amount of money. It can be more than what you expect to pay. I like the fact that LogPoint has a fixed cost. I know what I'm going to pay on a yearly basis. I pay that, and I pay the maintenance, and I just make it work."

"Our licensing fees are about $10,000 USD per month, which I think is fair."

"LogPoint seemed like it was a good product, but it was expensive and there wasn't any room to move the pricing when customers needed a lower-costing solution."

"It was on a yearly basis at about $100K. It was not a huge environment. We were running it on our own virtual server environment, which, of course, had a cost. There was hardware and some energy cost, and then there were Microsoft Windows licenses for servers. That's all, but there was nothing in comparison to the licensing costs."

"For a hundred user deployment the cost is about $10,000. The next year it would be the same because it's a subscription-based license. There are separate costs as well, for example, if a customer asks for training for their staff."

"It's less expensive than the competitors. The Logpoint marketing team is very accommodating and client-friendly. They offer very good reductions in price. They are pretty good in this aspect. They are transparent in their licensing and pricing."

"My company used to pay for LogPoint costs annually. It's a cost-effective solution. I'm not part of the Finance team, though, so I'm not sure exactly what the licensing fee is or what license my company had."

More Logpoint pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Log Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

900,644 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

10%

Computer Software Company

10%

Government

Manufacturing Company

Construction Company

15%

Computer Software Company

13%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	9
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	7

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	18
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	4

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Elastic Stack?

My experience with Elastic Stack pricing indicates that it is node-based. While I do not have complete pricing details, they are available online. If I choose Elastic Cloud, it includes licensing a...

What needs improvement with Elastic Stack?

I would like to improve Elastic Stack by addressing the current big problem we face with importing logs and log files, such as syslogs. To import these log files, we need to design the ingest pipel...

What is your primary use case for Elastic Stack?

Elastic Stack is primarily used for everything related to security, including security systems, checking the security system, and also servers and networks.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for LogPoint?

I rate the pricing at eight, suggesting it's relatively good or affordable.

What needs improvement with LogPoint?

What is your primary use case for LogPoint?

I had experience with Logpoint before, and I contacted the Exabeam solution, but there was no response; they did not contact me. Bangladesh already has a Logpoint distributor. In terms of complianc...

Security Onion vs Elastic Stack

Comparisons

Wazuh vs Elastic Stack

Compared 24% of the time

Compared 9% of the time

Grafana Loki vs Elastic Stack

Compared 5% of the time

Dynatrace vs Elastic Stack

Compared 5% of the time

Falcon LogScale vs Elastic Stack

Compared 4% of the time

More Elastic Stack Competitors

IBM Security QRadar vs Logpoint

Compared 8% of the time

Splunk Enterprise Security vs Logpoint

Compared 7% of the time

Elastic Security vs Logpoint

Compared 6% of the time

USM Anywhere vs Logpoint

Compared 3% of the time

Wazuh vs Logpoint

Compared 3% of the time

More Logpoint Competitors

Product Reports

Elastic Stack

Download Elastic Stack product report

Download Logpoint product report

Overview

Elastic Stack is a comprehensive tool for log management, observability, indexing, and security, widely adopted for managing logs, alert creation, SIEM, SOC, and threat analysis. It integrates with CloudStrike and Endpoint Security, enhancing search capabilities and Application Performance Monitoring.

Elastic Stack offers powerful solutions for logging, data storage, and visualization with Kibana. It allows MSSPs to efficiently manage security and assists companies with data analysis. It's known for its easy implementation, scalability, real-time monitoring, and extensive integrations. The open-source nature and community support add significant value, making it a popular choice across industries. While highly capable, there is a need for enhancement in dashboard implementation, data integration, and certain advanced features. Licensing, compatibility, and cost-related improvements can further elevate its efficacy.

What are the key features of Elastic Stack?

Powerful Search Capabilities: Offers robust, efficient searching across vast datasets
Scalability: Easily handles large volumes of data
Anomaly Detection: Identifies irregular patterns in data
Machine Learning: Enhances data analysis with intelligent insights
Real-Time Monitoring: Provides up-to-date monitoring of applications and systems
Extensive Integration: Supports diverse tools and solutions

What benefits should users consider?

Ease of Implementation: Quick setup and integration into existing systems
Robust Security: Comprehensive monitoring and analysis capabilities
Community Support: Ongoing improvements and guidance from a dedicated community
Hybrid Deployment: Flexibility in using both cloud and on-premise solutions

In healthcare, Elastic Stack enhances database search capabilities, aiding in patient record management and data retrieval. Managed Security Service Providers use it for comprehensive security management, integrating it with tools like firewalls and authentication systems. Companies benefit from its application in Application Performance Monitoring and its flexibility in adapting to hybrid environments.

Elastic

Logpoint offers a robust SIEM system tailored for compliance with regulations like PCI DSS and GDPR, enhancing security monitoring and enabling efficient incident response.

Logpoint strengthens cybersecurity by offering essential tools for log collection, security monitoring, and forensic analysis. Its features include an intuitive dashboard, a powerful correlation engine, and extensive third-party integrations, making it a versatile asset for security operations centers. Despite its advantages, areas for improvement include ransomware protection, cloud-native deployment, and more flexible pricing. Improvements in features like SOAR and UEBA functionality can boost its competitiveness.

What are the most important features of Logpoint?

Easy-to-use dashboard: Simplifies interaction with intuitive design.
Correlation engine: Connects data for in-depth security insights.
Comprehensive log collection: Facilitates extensive data gathering.
Third-party integrations: Connects seamlessly with other tools.
UEBA and SOAR components: Enhance threat response and automation.

What benefits and ROI should users consider?

Cost-effectiveness: Provides significant value for its pricing.
User-friendly interface: Enhances usability with straightforward design.
Compliance navigation: Eases PCI DSS and GDPR compliance.
Quick support service: Provides responsive customer assistance.

Many organizations utilize Logpoint across industries as part of their security infrastructure. It supports standard compliance, orchestrating incident responses and security threat monitoring. Logpoint empowers businesses by integrating and correlating security data, improving cybersecurity posture in varied environments.

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

AP Pension, Copenhagen Airports, KMD, Terma, DISA, Danish Crown, Durham City Council, Game, TopDanmark, Lahti Energia, Energi Midt, Synoptik, Eissmann Group Automotive, Aligro, CG50...

Elastic Stack vs. Logpoint