Eggplant Test vs FortiMonitor comparison

Keysight Technologies and Fortinet are both solutions in the Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM) category. Keysight Technologies is ranked #12 with an average rating of 7.3, while Fortinet is ranked #7 with an average rating of 8.8. Keysight Technologies holds a 0.7% mindshare in DEM, compared to Fortinet’s 2.4% mindshare. Additionally, 80% of Keysight Technologies users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Fortinet users who would recommend it.

Eggplant Test

Read 19 Eggplant Test reviews

3,806 Views
76 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

FortiMonitor

Read 15 FortiMonitor reviews

2,144 Views
279 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Eggplant Test

FortiMonitor

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 3, 2024

Eggplant Test and FortiMonitor compete in the software testing and monitoring landscape. Eggplant Test has the upper hand in automation and comprehensive testing, while FortiMonitor leads with its exceptional monitoring features.

Features: Eggplant Test provides scriptless testing and intelligent automation, making it suitable for teams with varied testing requirements. It also offers powerful optical character recognition and comprehensive cross-platform testing. FortiMonitor excels in real-time performance tracking, sophisticated alerting systems, and centralized management, suitable for users who prioritize infrastructure monitoring.

Room for Improvement: Eggplant Test could enhance ease of deployment and offer more intuitive configuration options to simplify advanced scenarios. It may also benefit from improved documentation. FortiMonitor can expand its initial vendor support, enhance automation integration, and provide more extensive training resources for users unfamiliar with monitoring tools.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: FortiMonitor offers straightforward deployment, facilitating quick setup and integration. It emphasizes comprehensive documentation and support frameworks. Eggplant Test faces challenges with more intricate configurations but offers support services to assist users in overcoming these hurdles.

Pricing and ROI: Eggplant Test's pricing reflects its extensive testing capabilities, with strong ROI for teams needing automated solutions. FortiMonitor presents competitive pricing, delivering ROI through real-time monitoring and enhanced oversight. Eggplant Test requires higher initial investment, while FortiMonitor offers quick returns through operational efficiency.

To learn more, read our detailed Eggplant Test vs. FortiMonitor Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Eggplant Test vs. FortiMonitor

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,757 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Eggplant Test

Ranking in Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM)

12th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Test Management Tools (9th), Test Automation Tools (12th)

FortiMonitor

Ranking in Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM)

7th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Network Monitoring Software (21st), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (23rd), IT Alerting and Incident Management (12th)

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM) category, the mindshare of Eggplant Test is 0.7%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of FortiMonitor is 2.4%, up from 1.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
FortiMonitor	2.4%
Eggplant Test	0.7%
Other	96.9%

Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM)

Featured Reviews

Mirza Hussain

Engineer at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees

Has required frequent manual adjustments due to screen resolution but supports simple automation with minimal effort

I would prefer more UFT because it has VB scripting capabilities. While Eggplant Test also has this feature, it's not very user-friendly. I prefer the features of UFT compared to Eggplant Test. When needing to do quick automation, I would prefer Eggplant Test, but otherwise, I would always choose UFT. It depends on the complexity of the tasks. For big problems and complex automation tasks, I would prefer UFT because it has more flexibility and is more effective. With Eggplant Test, if you have very low complexity automation, such as simple click sequences and validation, then it would be preferable; with more complexity, I would not recommend Eggplant Test.

Read full review

reviewer2677554

Network Engineer III at a energy/utilities company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Managing diverse networks with detailed alerts enhances device oversight

FortiManager is very helpful in managing our networks. We use it to manage 20 farms and various networks with hundreds of devices. The version we are using provides more detail than the older dashboard. We appreciate the alerting capabilities, which are integrated with SolarWinds to notify our team via SMS.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Eggplant Test is valuable due to its OCR technology, which is independent of underlying technologies and can identify applications based on labels such as 'username' and 'password'."

"DAI's newest release allows us to test via scripts rather than models, because we have done 95 percent of our development in functional, not through modeling. I am really happy that then we can use the controller to run scripts rather than having to translate things to models. There are lots of options."

"The features that we like the most are the developer interface and the ability to quickly develop and deploy tests."

"Everything is happening on the layout or display that is used by the user. Eggplant prompts processes, like 'click here,' or 'look for this image.' Eggplant makes it possible for QA people and BAs, working in the actual display, to check if the software is providing the right images, the right text, and the right results. They don't have to go inside the code or to the TCP/IP layer. Everything is happening at the highest level."

"The most valuable features of Eggplant Digital Automation Intelligence are bug hunting and OCR technology."

"The most valuable feature is the ability to create code from a flow chart, and then run the code through it."

"The solution is based on a Windows model, where adding users is just a few clicks. It is easy to manage users and add them."

"It provides very strong cross-platform support."

More Eggplant Test pros

"FortiMonitor is 100% stable."

"With FortiMonitor, you can get all the logs of the traffic information of the destination or the source."

"Fortinet's customer support is very good."

"In FortiMonitor, we're linked up with our Netgear, CactusServer, and NOC. It's really valuable because everything's migrating to one dashboard for us system engineers. We can keep an eye on traffic, blocked sites, and the health of our hardware. That last part, about knowing if something's going to fail soon, is super important. It gives us time to sort things out before any big problems happen. As a system engineer, I need to keep tabs on everything – temperature, monitoring systems, and network operations. This data is really handy because it helps me ensure our site runs smoothly, whether it's turning systems on or off. Just last night, there was a system failure, but thanks to real-time monitoring, I quickly identified the problem and got the necessary replacement parts."

"FortiMonitor has a very intuitive dashboard, which makes it particularly helpful for analyzing traffic, alerts, and other information."

"The most valuable feature of FortiMonitor is the overall ability to monitor the health of the environment."

"The tool continuously improves, adapting to support new vendors and technologies. Importantly, it automates the process, triggering alerts when devices require attention, and eliminating the need for manual intervention."

"The solution helps to see client infrastructure. It has many boxes and blinks green or red when the station goes up or down. We have different domains for the device groups that we monitor."

More FortiMonitor pros

Cons

"The language is too specific; it is just for Eggplant."

"They need to update the Linux. I think it's kind of an outdated Java Swing application."

"The solution would crash from time to time."

"Eggplant Digital Automation Intelligence could improve by lowering the price."

"I would like to see standardized actions already built into Eggplant. For example, "wait eight seconds". That way, I wouldn't need to create it as an action. Right now, I have to program that wait and describe it as an action so that everybody knows it is an action that waits eight seconds... That way, somebody who is not familiar with programming processes like "if-else", or "for", or "while", would be able, from the first moment, and without programming, to put some easy-to-use, standardized, actions in place."

"The IDE could be even more full-featured. Because I was a developer, I was very spoiled by either Visual Studio Code or Visual Studio for shortcuts. For example, I was able to say "ctor" and hit Tab and it would create a template of a constructor for me... It would be great, when I want to create a new function, if there were shortcut commands like those that helped create all of the functions, or if there were shortcut features to do any of the complex plans."

"If one area could be improved, it would be some of their documentation. In particular, some of their online help and user support documentation is a little bit out of date and could be revised and updated on a more frequent basis. Other than that, I haven't really found any issues or problems."

"Since there are very few customers in the Indian region, there is no training available, and it's challenging to find skilled talent."

More Eggplant Test cons

"Sometimes, during high CPU usage, we cannot access FortiMonitor and must refresh it."

"FortiMonitor's monitoring could be much better. It should be like, in Palo Alto."

"FortiMonitor could be improved by making it more convenient for smaller workloads, such as when configuring a few branches."

"There are no AI features in FortiMonitor, which might be an area for enhancement."

". Enhancements in the dashboard, such as clearer alerting, maintenance window management, software version tracking, and better visualization, would be beneficial."

"I think the current features are really good for me, nothing else comes to mind right now. Maybe some small improvements could be made in the customization and configuration part of the UI to make it easier or more intuitive. Customizable UI options, like we saw in the demo, could be helpful for everyone. But in our operational environment, having clear health status and system details is crucial for us system engineers. One feature I'd really like to see is a credential management system. It would help us keep track of who's logged in and how many times, which is important due to user restrictions. Sometimes, we need to manage logins more efficiently, like logging off other users to free up credentials. So having a feature like that would be really helpful."

"FortiMonitor could be improved by making it more convenient for smaller workloads, such as when configuring a few branches."

"The solution's initial setup process is time-consuming."

More FortiMonitor cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Eggplant Test is a very expensive solution."

"It is scalable, but it is a matter of money in the pocket. You can scale it, but then you have to have additional licenses. The licensing approach of eggPlant is not the best."

"This solution is expensive when compared to the market. However, the reason it is more expensive is because of its stability, high performance, and for its support of any technology."

"Make a smart decision about the number of developer- and execution-only licenses you purchase to maximize your budget. We found that going heavier on execution-only licenses has been a way to reduce our costs and maximize our ability to benefit from the software."

"End-to-end testing isn't possible for us because of the licensing problems. It's very expensive, so we only have two development/execution licenses."

"It probably has a yearly license."

"There are additional costs needed for certain functionality, such as scalability."

"The price of FortiMonitor is approximately $200 annually for 225 users. The price is competitive."

"We have a large customer base for Fortinet, and the additional buying power got us really great discounts."

"In terms of licensing, while it may not be the most expensive option on the market, it's relatively cost-effective. You can obtain licenses at a lower cost, with the calculation being straightforward. For example, if you onboard around 5,000 devices, you'll need approximately 5,000 licenses, as each device typically counts as one license."

"The tool's pricing model in Vietnam is a bit high. I rate the product price as an eight out of ten."

"On a scale from one to ten, I rate the pricing a nine since it is a good solution that is available at a cheap price."

"Compared to other solutions, FortiMonitor is a very expensive solution."

"FortiMonitor's price is very high."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,757 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Computer Software Company

11%

Healthcare Company

Computer Software Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

Healthcare Company

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	14

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	6

Questions from the Community

How do I choose between Selenium HQ and Eggplant Digital Automation Intelligence?

Selenium HQ’s biggest advantage is that it is customizable. Its other most valuable feature is that the driver interface is really helpful and user-friendly; Selenium HQ makes it easy to navigate t...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Eggplant Manager?

The price of Eggplant Test is on the higher side, but the benefits it provides make it worth using.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Eggplant Manager?

See all answers

What is the best network monitoring software for large enterprises?

I have a clear bias because I work for Panopta. We aren't a fit for everyone, but I can confirm that Panopta is a lot less work to stand up and maintain. It's also a lot easier to use and onboard n...

See all answers

What do you like most about FortiMonitor?

In FortiMonitor, we're linked up with our Netgear, CactusServer, and NOC. It's really valuable because everything's migrating to one dashboard for us system engineers. We can keep an eye on traffic...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for FortiMonitor?

FortiMonitor does save time but not significantly on costs, as there are still expenses related to procurement, installation, and licensing.

See all answers

Comparisons

Tricentis Tosca vs Eggplant Test

Compared 18% of the time

SmartBear TestComplete vs Eggplant Test

Compared 17% of the time

Qt Squish vs Eggplant Test

Compared 8% of the time

Ranorex Studio vs Eggplant Test

Compared 6% of the time

Selenium HQ vs Eggplant Test

Compared 6% of the time

More Eggplant Test Competitors

ThousandEyes vs FortiMonitor

Compared 14% of the time

SolarWinds Network Device Monitor vs FortiMonitor

Compared 10% of the time

PRTG Network Monitor vs FortiMonitor

Compared 7% of the time

Zabbix vs FortiMonitor

Compared 6% of the time

Datadog vs FortiMonitor

Compared 6% of the time

More FortiMonitor Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Eggplant Test

February 2026

Download Eggplant Test product report

Buyer's Guide

Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM)

January 2026

Download FortiMonitor product report

Also Known As

Eggplant Digital Automation Intelligence, Eggplant DAI, Eggplant Automation Cloud, Eggplant Manager, Eggplant Mobile, Eggplant Customer Experience Insights

Panopta

Overview

Across every industry, digital transformation is top of mind. New methods of developing software are driving fast change, and test teams are feeling the pressure. Increasing demand to release faster while maintaining the highest levels of quality is making the testing process more complex and harder to scale.

With AI-powered testing, Eggplant’s test and automation intelligence delivers the coverage you need to optimize the user experience, speed up release cycles, and improve your quality assurance process. Discover a fast, secure, and easy-to-use solution that tests any kind of software on any platform or device.

Keysight Technologies

FortiMonitor is a comprehensive, SaaS-based digital experience monitoring (DEM) platform that helps organizations modernize their performance-monitoring tools. It provides visibility into endpoint application performance and digital experience—no matter where the user resides or where the application is hosted.

Fortinet

Sample Customers

FUJIFILM Group, NEC Personal Computers

SONY, GoDaddy, HCL, ING, ARMOR, billboard

Buyer's Guide

Eggplant Test vs. FortiMonitor

December 2025

Free Report: Eggplant Test vs. FortiMonitor

Find out what your peers are saying about Eggplant Test vs. FortiMonitor and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,757 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Eggplant Test vs. FortiMonitor report.

See our list of best Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM) vendors.

We monitor all Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.