

OpenText Application Quality Management and Eggplant Test are significant competitors in the application testing category. Despite OpenText's comprehensive lifecycle management, Eggplant's advanced AI-driven test automation and OCR capabilities often give it an edge in innovation and flexibility.
Features: OpenText Application Quality Management provides an easy-to-use GUI, detailed test scripting, and traceability features. It supports modular storage of test cases and defect linking, integrating seamlessly with other test management systems. Eggplant Test excels in OCR and image recognition, offering AI-driven test automation for a user-centric experience. Its system-independent testing allows for flexible use across different environments.
Room for Improvement: OpenText Application Quality Management has high licensing costs, lacks a watch feature for issue tracking, and needs better Agile support and browser compatibility. Its interface could also be improved for speed and usability. Eggplant Test could improve its integration with other tools, offer more scripting language options, and enhance its documentation and system event support.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText Application Quality Management offers both on-premises and cloud solutions, including private and hybrid cloud options. Customer service is generally responsive, though technical issues sometimes require escalation. Eggplant Test also provides on-premises and public cloud options, with stable fixed licensing. Its technical support is well-regarded, though the response speed can vary.
Pricing and ROI: Both products have high licensing costs that can be a barrier for smaller businesses. OpenText Application Quality Management is particularly expensive, while Eggplant Test's pricing is justified by its high performance and expansive support capabilities. Both tools offer significant ROI for enterprises investing in robust test management solutions, often resulting in long-term cost savings.
It acts as an enabler for effective test and program management.
I'm not impressed because it depends on the resolution of the screen, so I wouldn't highly recommend this tool.
Eggplant Test offers 24x7 support.
Technical support has been excellent.
Quality is always high yet not perfect.
I am mostly happy with the technical support from OpenText ALM _ Quality Center.
OpenText ALM Quality Center is definitely scalable.
From a stability standpoint, OpenText ALM Quality Center has been pretty good.
For big problems and complex automation tasks, I would prefer UFT because it has more flexibility and is more effective.
The two-system architecture that we currently follow could be better replaced with a one-system architecture.
Improvements are needed so that the system can continue running without creating a new run.
I see a stable tool that remains relevant in the market.
HPLM has one of the best UIs compared to other test management tools, allowing for efficient navigation between test pieces, test folders, test suites, and test execution.
It would be cheaper to use a cloud model with a pay-per-use licensing model.
It can integrate with GitHub, allowing you to work with DevOps pipelines, so whenever you make changes in GitHub, it runs and checks the smoke testing on the server.
It can auto-heal the test cases and suggest new paths for testing, enhancing our ability to automate end-to-end journeys across various applications.
It creates constant visibility into the test process, showing the status, bugs, and automated test results.
The integration with internal applications and CollabNet is made possible through exposed APIs, allowing necessary integrations.
We can create a requirement for stability metrics with the test cases to ensure all requirements are covered.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| OpenText Application Quality Management | 9.4% |
| Eggplant Test | 2.9% |
| Other | 87.7% |


| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 4 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 3 |
| Large Enterprise | 14 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 41 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 32 |
| Large Enterprise | 160 |
Eggplant Test stands out with its AI-driven and image recognition features, facilitating quick bug detection across multiple systems. Its ease of use, coupled with robust integration capabilities, makes it a top choice for efficient and comprehensive testing solutions.
Offering OCR, image recognition, and extensive AI capabilities, Eggplant Test enhances automation and reduces testing time. Known for its versatility, it operates independently from system constraints and supports scriptless testing. With a user-centric design, the tool integrates with platforms like GitHub and operates on diverse operating systems. Despite advancements, considerations include its affordability, installation complexities, and need for better text recognition and stability. Its success is bolstered by seamless scripting, robust reporting features, and the option for digital twin utilization, making it ideal for real-world user action simulations.
What are the most important features of Eggplant Test?Industries utilize Eggplant Test primarily for regression and GUI automation testing, especially in desktop applications. Its capacity for post-development validation and vulnerability scanning supports businesses with testers having minimal coding experience. Deployed on virtual machines, it effectively tests web pages, Windows apps, and streaming devices, simulating real-world user actions efficiently. Eggplant Test's role in simplifying robotic process automation and functional testing is significant, offering a spectrum of operational support across varied sectors.
OpenText Application Quality Management offers centralized data management, traceability, and integration capabilities. It aids in handling requirements, test planning, and defect tracking while supporting both manual and automated testing. Challenges exist in deployment and browser compatibility.
Known for its robust reporting and flexibility, OpenText Application Quality Management is tailored for large organizations requiring a comprehensive solution supporting lifecycle coverage and seamless tool integration. Users can consolidate testing processes, manage requirements, and centralize reporting across manual and automated testing. While some face issues with project tracking, outdated interfaces, and limited browser compatibility beyond Internet Explorer, it remains widely used for regression and performance testing. Integration with tools like JIRA and support for tools such as UFT and ALM PC underscore its utility.
What are the key features of OpenText Application Quality Management?In industries such as finance and healthcare, OpenText Application Quality Management is implemented to ensure rigorous testing standards. It supports test case creation and execution, defect tracking, and requirements management. Integration with JIRA and performance testing tools make it suitable for organizations needing synchronized testing environments.
We monitor all Test Management Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.