Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Dynamic Capacity Intelligence vs Tone Mainframe Management comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Dynamic Capacity Intelligence
Ranking in Mainframe Management
15th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Tone Mainframe Management
Ranking in Mainframe Management
12th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2025, in the Mainframe Management category, the mindshare of Dynamic Capacity Intelligence is 0.7%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Tone Mainframe Management is 1.3%, up from 1.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Mainframe Management Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Tone Mainframe Management1.3%
Dynamic Capacity Intelligence0.7%
Other98.0%
Mainframe Management
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Rocket Software, BMC and others in Mainframe Management. Updated: September 2025.
867,783 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Comparisons

No data available
No data available
 

Also Known As

CA Dynamic Capacity Intelligence
OMC-FLASH JES Spool Viewing and Management, DYNA-STEP Dynamic STEPLIB and Library Management, STEPLIB-Rx TSOPLUS Replacement, OMC and OMC-PRINT, ACC and SyBridge
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Irdeto, Novapost, Vodafone Turkey
Citibank, Bank and Trust, Telecom Italia
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Rocket Software, BMC and others in Mainframe Management. Updated: September 2025.
867,783 professionals have used our research since 2012.