DX NetOps vs OP5 Monitor comparison

Broadcom and ITRS are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. Broadcom is ranked #36 with an average rating of 8.8, while ITRS is ranked #38 with an average rating of 9.0. Broadcom holds a 0.7% mindshare in NMS, compared to ITRS’s 0.7% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Broadcom users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of ITRS users who would recommend it.

DX NetOps

Read 10 DX NetOps reviews

1,522 Views
1,355 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

OP5 Monitor

Read 7 OP5 Monitor reviews

1,534 Views
1,212 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

DX NetOps

OP5 Monitor

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 10, 2024

In the network management space, OP5 Monitor and DX NetOps offer different advantages. OP5 Monitor presents a cost-effective option with positive customer support, while DX NetOps offers advanced features suited for comprehensive network management, giving it an edge for certain users.

Features: OP5 Monitor provides customizable dashboards, efficient alert management, and seamless integration with diverse systems. DX NetOps offers advanced network performance monitoring, robust analytical capabilities, and detailed reporting tools.

Room for Improvement: OP5 Monitor could enhance its feature set, expand its analytical capabilities, and provide more detailed reporting tools. DX NetOps could improve its simplicity in setup, make its pricing more accessible, and streamline its alert management system.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OP5 Monitor is known for its straightforward deployment with minimal configuration, alongside responsive customer service. DX NetOps, although more complex to set up, provides extensive documentation and support suitable for larger networks.

Pricing and ROI: OP5 Monitor targets small to medium enterprises with competitive pricing, offering solid ROI. DX NetOps demands a higher initial investment but promises advanced capabilities, justifying long-term ROI, particularly for large-scale implementations.

To learn more, read our detailed DX NetOps vs. OP5 Monitor Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

DX NetOps vs. OP5 Monitor

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

DX NetOps

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

36th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

AIOps (19th)

OP5 Monitor

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

38th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

4.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

IT Infrastructure Monitoring (36th)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of DX NetOps is 0.7%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OP5 Monitor is 0.7%, down from 0.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
DX NetOps	0.7%
OP5 Monitor	0.7%
Other	98.6%

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

Balabrahmam_Chakka

Senior Program Manager at Tata Consultancy Services

Has provided topological insights and dashboard-driven network visibility across complex environments

DX NetOps can be improved by expanding its integrations with different tools, as it can currently integrate with Spectrum and other Broadcom products. It would be beneficial to gain integration capabilities with tools such as New Relic or SolarWinds. Integration with DX NetOps occurs through API, which fetches metrics from those tools, and this is currently happening in our area, with DX NetOps receiving data not only from Spectrum but also from New Relic and SolarWinds. DX NetOps could be improved by providing more communication methods beyond SNMP traps to accommodate different private clouds, especially as customers increasingly adopt vendor-specific clouds. For example, Sainsbury's uses SAP cloud, SAS, and Oracle cloud, where monitoring is not currently possible through DX NetOps and Spectrum, which are limited to certain mechanisms. Within the organization, SNMP is usable, but to display metrics from outside the organization, different communication methods such as agent-based connections, TCP/IP, or secured connections are necessary—features not currently available in DX NetOps and Spectrum.

Read full review

Sumanth Arshanapally

Senior Analyst at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

Monitoring ease and cost-saving benefits enhance operational efficiency

The monitoring in OP5 Monitor is very easy because we can directly use custom plugins. We can write custom scripts and use those scripts directly. It's very low cost, open, and the dashboards are easy to see. We can extract the reports easily, and this is very easy to compare. Real-time monitoring in OP5 Monitor provides data every one minute or every five minutes, enabling us to get live data from the last one minute or last five minutes. OP5 Monitor gave us proper server availability, so we can always check whether a server goes down or the server CPU and memory decreases. Before reaching a particular bottleneck situation, we identified and fixed the issue, which helped us from a cost-saving business perspective. It helped us avoid application downtime.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"DX NetOps network monitoring and fault tolerance are the absolute best in the market, especially for the Indian market."

"It's good for root cause analysis for network problems and network link problems."

"A highly scalable solution."

"The best features I've seen so far with DX NetOps are that it can work with large scale systems, and it has a lot of functionalities and matrices."

"The AI is the best feature in this solution."

"The solution is stable."

"I rate the stability of the product as ten on a scale of one to ten, indicating that it is very stable."

"The product features include automation through AI, allowing out-of-the-box analysis of performance data, building baseline trends, and enabling configuration of dynamic thresholds relative to collected data."

More DX NetOps pros

"It monitors and continuously tests everything that is of importance to you and your users. It could be everything from monitoring disk space to CPU usage to memory. It could include determining if the response time in your e-commerce platform is quick enough, or whether you have too many bounces from some of the pages on your website. You want to monitor anything that could cost you money or time or resources. You can do that with this system. It's very flexible."

"We can also observe whatever we want, and there are no limitations."

"The best feature is that it is very relatable, stable, and scalable. The logger is a part of the software, but it's not the most important point of it."

"OP5 Monitor is a great choice due to its being built on an open-source monitoring tool and provides ample opportunity for customization based on specific support requirements. It is also user-friendly and easy to manage with a wide range of plugins available for use. In comparison to other enterprise tools, such as Micro Focus, OP5 Monitor stands out for its features and cost-effectiveness, making it the best tool in the market. Customization is one of the key strengths of the tool and provides a lot of capabilities. Additionally, it is easy to find support and plugins for the tool through online resources."

"With limited hardware or a virtual machine, you can address a huge network, hundreds of thousands of elements that need to be monitored. Other commercial software is not on that level."

"The monitoring in OP5 Monitor is very easy because we can directly use custom plugins; we can write custom scripts and use those scripts directly, it's very low cost, open, and the dashboards are easy to see."

"The API makes it pretty easy to integrate with any system."

Cons

"Technical support needs to be better. They need to be more knowledgeable and responsive."

"DX NetOps is somewhat convoluted, and some of the programming constructs can be documented or driven through languages such as Python, Perl, and shell scripting, but they have their proprietary language, which may not be very user-friendly."

"It would be useful to have more AI features."

"Technical support could be more responsive."

"Lacks dashboards and better integration with other solutions."

"One improvement that could make the product better is to streamline its modules into a more cohesive solution."

"The licensing cost of DX NetOps is expensive, not very affordable, and on the top of the price range in the market."

"DX NetOps could be improved by providing more communication methods beyond SNMP traps to accommodate different private clouds, especially as customers increasingly adopt vendor-specific clouds."

More DX NetOps cons

"They need to improve the dashboard interface."

"OP5 Monitor could include application monitoring in addition to infrastructure monitoring. If application business transactions were monitored, it would be helpful."

"We do not get performance reports properly."

"The user interface is not what we are used to these days, and should be improved."

"OP5 lacks some visualization, a feature that makes some other products nice. Op5 is built for purpose, which is fine, but if you compare it with some new products, the visualization is not so appealing, especially for management... If you don't need fancy visualizations, OP5 is fine."

"IT environments today are in constant flux. This is driven by the newer cloud technologies such as Kubernetes and Docker, etc. The whole Nagios-based monitoring system that OP5 is created on top of, is based on a host-service model. There is a need for a strategy on what to do with more dynamic environments. There is some cool stuff going on in that direction."

"The solution is useful for tweaking. However, there have been some negative experiences, such as limited report capabilities. The only report available is in PDF format, making it difficult for teams managing multiple servers to extract data in Excel format. The speaker recommends that the team improve the report capabilities to better serve users."

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"It was not expensive. And because it's less demanding in terms of hardware, you don't have to pay for another SQL or other database license, and you can have a huge installation on one machine..."

"The cost of the license and support are separate. If you want platinum call support, it will cost more than a regular call. I did not opt for it, as it is an additional cost."

"OP5 has a very low price as a solution, compared to many other solutions out there."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

17%

Computer Software Company

12%

Healthcare Company

Manufacturing Company

Government

14%

Manufacturing Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	5

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Large Enterprise	5

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for DX NetOps?

The pricing is fair for the level of enterprise capability it provides. Proper sizing and planning during deployment helps optimise licensing and overall cost. Anyone adopting it should account for...

See all answers

What needs improvement with DX NetOps?

I would like DX NetOps to integrate with all Broadcom products in the future to make it closer to a rating of 10. I would particularly like it to integrate with the Symantec portfolio and the Carbo...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for DX NetOps?

I use DX NetOps for large-scale network monitoring, fault detection, and performance analysis. My work involves evaluating how well it handles distributed environments, event correlation, and proac...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for OP5 Monitor?

The price for OP5 Monitor is fine, but we don't know the exact price because it was managed by us; the customer themselves bought it and gave it to us to monitor.

See all answers

What needs improvement with OP5 Monitor?

OP5 Monitor could include application monitoring in addition to infrastructure monitoring. If application business transactions were monitored, it would be helpful. For application-related issues, ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for OP5 Monitor?

Our previous use case for OP5 Monitor was server monitoring.

See all answers

Comparisons

LogicMonitor vs DX NetOps

Compared 13% of the time

ManageEngine OpManager vs DX NetOps

Compared 12% of the time

WhatsUp Gold vs DX NetOps

Compared 9% of the time

DX Spectrum vs DX NetOps

Compared 8% of the time

SolarWinds NPM vs DX NetOps

Compared 7% of the time

More DX NetOps Competitors

Zabbix vs OP5 Monitor

Compared 14% of the time

Nagios Core vs OP5 Monitor

Compared 13% of the time

Opsview vs OP5 Monitor

Compared 10% of the time

PRTG Network Monitor vs OP5 Monitor

Compared 9% of the time

Splunk Observability Cloud vs OP5 Monitor

Compared 7% of the time

More OP5 Monitor Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

DX NetOps

January 2026

Download DX NetOps product report

Buyer's Guide

OP5 Monitor

January 2026

Download OP5 Monitor product report

Overview

DX NetOps by CA Technologies, a Broadcom company, improves your time to value through advanced AI capabilities and unified network visibility that delivers simplified NetOps intelligence into the user experience that traverses modern architectures. DX NetOps accomplishes this through high scale, unified network monitoring that enables full-stack analytics for assuring traditional and modern architectures. DX NetOps converts inventory, topology, device metrics, faults, flow and packet analysis into actionable intelligence for network operations teams. Complimented by our AIOps solution, DX NetOps enables IT teams to establish proactive, autonomous remediation capabilities across the applications, infrastructure, and networks that fuel superior user experiences.

Broadcom

OP5 Monitor - The Complete Monitoring Solution

OP5 Monitor is a flexible and highly scalable monitoring solution for all sizes of environments. Use just one product to monitor your IT environment regardless of location, whether on-premise, in dynamic environments, public cloud or a hybrid of these.

Digital transformation adds extra layers and complexity to the IT estate by creating a hybrid IT environment of both static and dynamic environments, that can be difficult to monitor efficiently. ITRS OP5 Monitor gives enterprises full visibility over their entire IT estate through a single pane of glass, allowing them to consolidate monitoring tools and cut down costs.

ITRS

Sample Customers

Fujitsu

Svenska Spel, Carus, VGL, Tele2, Viking Line, Clas Ohlson, Vanderlande, Försäkringskassan

Buyer's Guide

DX NetOps vs. OP5 Monitor

December 2025

Free Report: DX NetOps vs. OP5 Monitor

Find out what your peers are saying about DX NetOps vs. OP5 Monitor and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our DX NetOps vs. OP5 Monitor report.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.