No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Dell SC Series vs VMAX [EOL] comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Dell SC Series
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.5
Number of Reviews
55
Ranking in other categories
Frame-Based Disk Arrays (2nd), All-Flash Storage (18th)
VMAX [EOL]
Average Rating
9.0
Number of Reviews
16
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Featured Reviews

RafaelGamaluis - PeerSpot reviewer
Architect Engineer, IT INFRASTRUCTURES Project Manager at Vilavi
User interface offers clarity and detailed information while technical support consistently delivers
The best features of Dell SC Series are stability and replication. The replication solution is excellent, and they have a solution named Live Migration. It is a robust platform. The interface and the GUI (graphical user interface) for administrating the Compellent are exceptional, with abundant information that is very clear. The management capabilities are excellent, and the stability of our storage hardware is remarkable.
it_user1075341 - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Systems Engineer at a financial services firm with 201-500 employees
Resilient storage solution with zero downtime that is easy to implement and has good support
The way you configure larger size volumes needs improvement. Currently, the one that we have is a single volume limit of 240 gigs. If you wanted bigger than that you have to do meta volumes to combine them. My understanding is the VMAX3 and the PowerMax, did away with that, making it a lot easier to provision storage than in the past. Scalability with the 2013 version was an area that needed improvement, but they have fixed it with later products. All of the issues that I am currently facing with this version, for example, being able to create larger volumes and making it easier to manage, have all been implemented in the new versions of this solution.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Technical support is good."
"Performance-wise it's high speed. It's also more stable and scalable."
"It's the storage backbone for our virtual environment."
"The most valuable feature is the speed for the end-user."
"In terms of stability, it's good enough. It's okay."
"Easy management of volumes: You can create volumes and easily assign them to VMware clusters, increasing their size."
"With mixed workloads, we are seeing at least a 15 to 20 percent improvement."
"The flexibility of this solution has been valuable for our business."
"Resilience, speed, flexibility, system reliability, and a strong refresh strategy are the most valuable features."
"It is a high end storage, minimal downtime, reliable, good performance, get speedy support when we need."
"This solution is resilient."
"Furthermore, EMC support is second to none, EMC engineers will visit your site to replace a disk or component before you are even aware that there is a problem (via ESRS – see below)."
"The most valuable features are the interface and performance."
"If someone is looking for a product that can give the best performance under heavy load then this is the product they must go for."
"A rock solid foundation to deploy applications which cannot incur a disruption of service."
"I like the many new features, especially the all-flash solution."
 

Cons

"In some customer cases, customers experienced more performance or latency."
"We had times that we needed a file service solution. We've used FluidFS, but it's a solution that is being transitioned out."
"Dell could improve the upgrading process. It was the lifecycle that made it very short."
"The interface could be improved. It should have an application point of view."
"We had some issues with the battery in the previous version that we were unable to resolve."
"In the future, I want any box that comes on-premises to have the provision to integrate with cloud storage."
"From a performance point of view, it's getting a bit old."
"In terms of what could be improved, I would say the lack of reporting would be the main issue."
"I'm always interested in ways we can scale out and avoid monolithic migrations from one array to another every four to five years."
"I would like this solution to integrate the solution that Dell EMC vPlex offers."
"Better speed to release new features that have become industry standards. EMC created so many standards in the past. Now, it seems they are playing a me-too game and lagging behind in some areas, specifically data reduction."
"Manageability is a bit of a challenge, as the user interface to access the array is not very user-friendly."
"I'd like to see improvements where we can scale out an existing array and remove older controllers\drives\etc., within the same subsystem."
"Resilience replication, reporting, and performance need to be improved."
"It is still expensive."
"The only draw back is you don’t get multiple point in time copies."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Always keep in mind, this is not just a enclosure with disks is a complete SAN as a service. There is software, license, and storage in one single solution."
"It's a very affordable solution."
"It is one of the most cost effective systems for us. We have been able to run it longer than most, getting the most benefit and money out of it."
"We were able to afford two tiers of flash storage at a price where the competition was giving us one tier or just a handful of discs."
"The scalability seems a bit more expensive than even buying a brand new one so far. That has been kind of a drawback."
"This product is too expensive compared to others, and I don't see any value in using it."
"It's absolutely affordable. Again, not having to do a forklift upgrade like some of the others have had to do in the past, it's very affordable for our customers and they continue to buy."
"Support typically depends on the array. It can range anywhere from $7,000 to a couple of hundred thousand dollars."
"Our licensing fees are billed on a yearly basis."
"There are additional costs to the standard licensing fee, and it just depends on the package."
"Our licensing fees are paid on a yearly basis."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Frame-Based Disk Arrays solutions are best for your needs.
886,349 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
14%
Outsourcing Company
9%
Construction Company
7%
Performing Arts
6%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business26
Midsize Enterprise10
Large Enterprise20
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business2
Midsize Enterprise6
Large Enterprise17
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Dell SC Series?
In our case, we received favorable pricing with Dell because of our strong partnership. While I acknowledge that Dell SC Series can be expensive for many companies, we received good discounts. The ...
What needs improvement with Dell SC Series?
For us, it is a great product. The deduplication and compression could potentially be improved, though they are already good. We cannot identify any significant areas that need improvement.
What is your primary use case for Dell SC Series?
We use Dell SC Series in a VMware environment.
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Also Known As

SC Series Storage, Compellent
Symmetrix VMAX
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

TGen, Frost Science, Gerrie Electric
Wentworth-Douglas Hospital, Kindred Healthcare, Cosentry, Sumitomo Life Insurance Company, Shriners, BZWBK
Find out what your peers are saying about Hitachi Vantara, Dell Technologies, IBM and others in Frame-Based Disk Arrays. Updated: March 2026.
886,349 professionals have used our research since 2012.