Dell PowerEdge FX [EOL] vs Lenovo Edge Servers comparison

Dell Technologies and Lenovo are both solutions in the Rack Servers category. Additionally, 92% of Dell Technologies users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Lenovo users who would recommend it.

Dell PowerEdge FX [EOL]

Read 13 Dell PowerEdge FX [EOL] reviews

92% willing to recommend

Lenovo Edge Servers

Read 2 Lenovo Edge Servers reviews

426 Views
426 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Dell PowerEdge FX [EOL]

Lenovo Edge Servers

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 26, 2025

Dell PowerEdge FX EOL and Lenovo Edge Servers compete in the server market. Lenovo Edge Servers seem to have an advantage due to advanced features and support, while Dell PowerEdge FX EOL offers competitive pricing appealing to budget-conscious buyers.

Features: Dell PowerEdge FX EOL is known for its modular architecture, integrated systems providing flexibility, and scalability. Lenovo Edge Servers offer innovative features including enhanced remote management, energy-efficient designs, and cutting-edge technology that may justify the additional cost.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Dell PowerEdge FX EOL is favored for straightforward deployment models and satisfactory customer service, making it suitable for smaller setups. Lenovo Edge Servers provide comprehensive deployment solutions with structured support services beneficial for larger-scale operations.

Pricing and ROI: Dell PowerEdge FX EOL offers a lower setup cost, appealing to businesses with constrained budgets prioritizing economy. Lenovo Edge Servers, though initially more expensive, offer higher ROI over time, attracting buyers focused on maximizing returns through advanced functionalities.

To learn more, read our detailed Rack Servers Report (Updated: January 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Rack Servers

January 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 880,901 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Dell PowerEdge FX [EOL]

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

8.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Lenovo Edge Servers

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Rack Servers (12th)

Featured Reviews

Mahendra Panchotiya

IT Lead at Meditab Software, Inc.

Offers a user-friendly interface and saves costs in data centers

Dell PowerEdge FX is very good and user-friendly, with a console that is easy to manage, and it is budget-friendly compared to other products. Dell PowerEdge FX has made management very good and easy for us, and we have created virtual machines on these PowerEdge servers as well. The modular design of Dell PowerEdge FX is very beneficial for our IT operations because it is small and compact, fitting easily into our data center rack while saving physical space and power. They have a capable technical support team that helps to resolve issues, and their regular updates to hardware components and communication keep us up to date with challenges. Dell PowerEdge FX has some features that we noticed for supporting AI initiatives or data-intensive applications, but we are planning to explore all the features in depth.

Read full review

Hawi Nadew

Data center and cloud solution engineer at IE Network Solutions PLC

A budget-friendly tool that offers good stability

I don't have much to comment on what requires improvement in the product because my company is more engaged with Dell's servers than Lenovo's ones. I'm not that much familiar with Lenovo. My company has seen that the servers from Lenovo offer good performance and high scalability, so I don't see any scope for improvement in the solution. With Lenovo, when it comes to its HCI-related part, which includes ThinkAgile, users may face issues as VMware licenses are not linked with ThinkAgile. With ThinkAgile in the picture, there are two different vendors, Lenovo and VMware. Suppose VMware and Lenovo come together, then they produce a common product. In the case of the servers under Lenovo, the virtualization software is again both from VMware and Dell, and the licenses are deployed on the server. Different vendors manage the servers from Lenovo that fall under ThinkAgile and VMware, so if there is a way that allows Lenovo and VMware to produce a system together like ThinKAgile, then it would be a good improvement.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The product seamlessly integrates with the storage portfolio."

"The best feature is PowerEdge's ability to stack up eight blade servers in one 2U chassis."

"We like PowerEdge for its high-performance computing architecture."

"The features that I have found most valuable are that it has very robust servers and a very heavy load. We've been working on servers now for 10 years and those servers are still up and running. Those servers are still very powerful until today."

"The most valuable feature of Dell PowerEdge FX is you can customize the solution to your specifications, such as speed. Additionally, part orders are shipped and received quickly when a part needs to be replaced."

"The product's initial setup phase was simple and easy."

"It has extremely high performance, and it is easy to manage."

"My advice to new users evaluating Dell PowerEdge FX is that it is definitely value for money, and you should consider it for purchase."

More Dell PowerEdge FX [EOL] pros

"I like Lenovo's XClarity Controller, and the ability to control and deploy Edge Servers through this XClarity interface."

"It is a stable solution. The product doesn't have any problems when it comes to stability."

Cons

"When it comes to Dell PowerEdge FX, the area of concern revolves around the delivery time where improvements are required."

"It should have more simplified management. It is a common problem where vendors think that they have simplified a solution, but the users don't look at it in the same way. A vendor thinks that there are only ten steps for a task, but we consider them as many steps. It should also have more support for NVMe. For high performance and speed, there should also be more network cards for the fiber channel and ethernet."

"They could improve from a manufacturing perspective."

"There are times when a part might break down and we need to have Dell replace it."

"I don't have any technical issues, but I would like to see the commercial side improve as compared to all other OEMs."

"The system is good, but compared to open-source and assembled servers, it is somewhat costly."

"In terms of the cost, it is a little bit high, meaning, there is some difference in the cost compared to the equivalent product with HP servers."

"The positioning of the power supply is not ideal. Both of them are on the same side, so you need to untie the cabling when you're installing the server. Another thing is storage separation. The storage can only be used by a particular server blade. I want the ability to use a storage unit for more than one server."

More Dell PowerEdge FX [EOL] cons

"With Lenovo, when it comes to its HCI-related part, which includes ThinkAgile, users may face issues as VMware licenses are not linked with ThinkAgile."

"Airflow in the servers can be a problem. Sometimes we cannot add CPU to Edge Servers because there's not enough airflow in the appliance."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price of Dell PowerEdge FX is affordable, and when compared to other solutions, such as Lenovo and HPE it is less expensive. There are any extra costs other than the standard solution."

"Compared to other brands, this solution is the cheapest. I would rate the pricing as a five out of five."

"Payments are generally made towards the perpetual-based licensing costs attached to the solution, but people can also opt for subscription-based licenses."

"The price of the license is expensive."

"The cost of Dell PowerEdge FX depends on the configuration we are using. We usually pay $5,000 to $10,000 based on the configuration, including RAM and storage."

"I rate the product price a four on a scale of one to ten, where one is a high price, and ten is a low price."

"The solution is available to users at a low price."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Rack Servers solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

880,901 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

15%

Computer Software Company

13%

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	2

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Dell PowerEdge FX?

The product's initial setup phase was simple and easy.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Dell PowerEdge FX?

The cost of Dell PowerEdge FX depends on the configuration we are using. We usually pay $5,000 to $10,000 based on the configuration, including RAM and storage.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Dell PowerEdge FX?

The system is good, but compared to open-source and assembled servers, it is somewhat costly. If it were cheaper, it would be even better. I would prefer the next releases of Dell PowerEdge FX to b...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

HPE Apollo Systems vs Dell PowerEdge FX [EOL]

Compared 29% of the time

HPE Moonshot vs Dell PowerEdge FX [EOL]

Compared 17% of the time

Lenovo ThinkSystem Rack Servers vs Dell PowerEdge FX [EOL]

Compared 15% of the time

Oracle SPARC Servers vs Dell PowerEdge FX [EOL]

Compared 12% of the time

Dell PowerEdge R-Series vs Dell PowerEdge FX [EOL]

Compared 10% of the time

More Dell PowerEdge FX [EOL] Competitors

Dell PowerEdge R-Series vs Lenovo Edge Servers

Compared 49% of the time

HPE ProLiant DL Servers vs Lenovo Edge Servers

Compared 14% of the time

Dell PowerEdge XR-Series vs Lenovo Edge Servers

Compared 14% of the time

HPE Moonshot vs Lenovo Edge Servers

Compared 14% of the time

Intel Server System vs Lenovo Edge Servers

Compared 9% of the time

More Lenovo Edge Servers Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Dell PowerEdge FX [EOL]

January 2026

Download Dell PowerEdge FX [EOL] product report

Buyer's Guide

Rack Servers

January 2026

Download Lenovo Edge Servers product report

Also Known As

PowerEdge FX

ThinkSystem Edge Servers, ThinkSystem SE Series, Lenovo SE Series, Lenovo ThinkSystem Edge Servers

Overview

Dell PowerEdge FX [EOL] offers a blend of high performance, power efficiency, and scalability, featuring robust servers and seamless integration for virtualization, enterprise applications, and cloud hosting.

Dell PowerEdge FX [EOL] provides a reliable platform for Hyper-V workloads, web servers, virtual desktops, and database installations, meeting diverse sector requirements such as finance, manufacturing, and pharmaceuticals. It integrates seamlessly with storage solutions, enables quick part replacements, and supports virtualization and server consolidation, enhancing data analytics and enterprise applications. However, users seek improvements in documentation, NVMe support, network card availability, and operating system integration, while addressing concerns about power supply positioning and cost. Automation enhancements and a prolonged lifecycle are also sought-after updates.

What are the most important features of Dell PowerEdge FX?

Stability: Known for dependable operation with minimal failures, ensuring continuous uptime.
High Performance: Delivers impressive processing speeds catering to extensive workloads.
Easy Management: Features an intuitive management interface for streamlined operations.
Robust Servers: Enables stacking of blade servers within one chassis for efficient resource use.
Power Efficiency: Optimized for energy use, reducing operational costs.
High Scalability: Accommodates growing IT needs with flexible expansion options.

What benefits should users consider in reviews?

Ease of Customization: Adaptable to specific business needs and easy integration with existing infrastructure.
Reliable Remote Management: iDRAC interface provides dependable remote control capabilities.
Minimal Failures: Demonstrates consistent stability and reliability for critical operations.
Seamless Integration: Works well with storage solutions and enterprise applications enhancing usability.
Quick Replacement Parts: Facilitates swift maintenance and part replacement to minimize downtime.

In industries like finance, manufacturing, and pharmaceuticals, PowerEdge FX is implemented to support data analytics, enterprise applications, and server consolidation. Leveraged for hosting and virtualization, companies use it for vital applications such as SAP S/4HANA, Microsoft Exchange, and backend systems, ensuring reliable and powerful performance.

Dell Technologies

Designed and built with the unique requirements for Edge servers in mind, it is versatile enough to stretch the limitations of server locations, providing a variety of connectivity and security options and easily managed with Lenovo XClarity Controller. The ThinkSystem SE350 is a rugged compact-sized Edge solution with a focus on smart connectivity, business security, and manageability for the harsh environment.

Lenovo

Sample Customers

Tracewell, Govers, AXA ASSISTANCE ITALIA

Information Not Available

Find out what your peers are saying about Dell Technologies, Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Lenovo and others in Rack Servers. Updated: January 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

880,901 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Rack Servers vendors.

We monitor all Rack Servers reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.