DD Boost vs Dell Avamar comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

DD Boost
Ranking in Deduplication Software
4th
Average Rating
8.8
Number of Reviews
33
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Dell Avamar
Ranking in Deduplication Software
3rd
Average Rating
7.8
Number of Reviews
83
Ranking in other categories
Backup and Recovery (11th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2024, in the Deduplication Software category, the mindshare of DD Boost is 4.1%, down from 7.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Dell Avamar is 9.5%, up from 8.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Deduplication Software
Unique Categories:
No other categories found
Backup and Recovery
4.4%
 

Featured Reviews

CB
Apr 26, 2024
Can stack backups on the servers, optimizing backup storage utilization
The Data Domain has applications in technology. It's advantageous to have DD Boost integrated into the main order because it enhances the capabilities of the Data Domain. Boost can handle both backup and application processes efficiently. However, if you opt for Data Domain without Boost, there might be limitations on the installation side compared to using another vendor with different technologies. Many backup software solutions support Data Domain, and it's straightforward to integrate. It only requires a plugin installed on the server side for backups. DD Boost functionality varies depending on your backup software. Some backup software may offer it as a built-in feature or provide an easy-to-install plugin. Once enabled, it dynamically optimizes the backup process, improving efficiency. For instance, certain VPN software packages may already include this functionality. Overall, I rate the solution a ten out of ten.
Vivek Jaiswal - PeerSpot reviewer
Feb 22, 2024
A backup solution for endpoints and virtual servers
Previously, I also used Commvault alongside Avamar. Commvault is very challenging to configure. It is resource-intensive, whether as software or an appliance. Unlike Dell, they don't offer their own OEM box but rely on other servers. If clients purchase their servers and storage, Commvault only provides the software for installation on those systems. Furthermore, Commvault blames server or operating system quality issues, adding to the complexity. I encountered numerous problems with Commvault. Avamar is more satisfactory since all support responsibilities fall under Dell, simplifying the process compared to dealing with multiple vendors. This centralized support from Dell has been reliable over the past seven to eight years.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The most valuable feature of this solution is that it can support both the CIFS and NFS protocols simultaneously."
"Very stable solution."
"DD Boost's best features are deduplication and compression."
"The solution is very easy to manage. That's its most valuable feature."
"The most valuable feature is the support for plug-ins."
"The time taken for backup is very fast."
"DD Boost can stack backups on the servers, optimizing backup storage utilization. All resources are utilized efficiently. Without such optimization, backup processes can lead to bottlenecks or excessive resource utilization, impacting server services."
"The product is necessary in order to communicate with both Data Domain and NetWorker devices."
"The product is very powerful and offers very good performance."
"Source based deduplication is the most attractive feature as it drastically reduces the backup window."
"Easy to configure and highly reliable for backup."
"The most valuable feature is the virtual backup."
"The solution scales well."
"Dell EMC Avamar is easy to work with and is user-friendly."
"The backup and recovery speed is very fast."
"Avamar has long been the best in its class, but that's changing as new solutions emerge. However, Dell has traditionally been a leader in deduplication and compression. Avamar enabled us to shift data from on-premise local appliances to data centers and multi-tenant infrastructure. That's a powerful feature. because customers can back up to the cloud without upgrading o high-capacity links or congesting their backups."
 

Cons

"The solution could improve by adding more flexibility for the customers here in Thailand. Some of the small capacity models of the solution are not needed by our customers. There should be a more flexible version of the solution."
"The solution needs to be more user-friendly for the end-users."
"DD Boost's technical support could be better."
"Some competitors may not allow the use of DD Boost with their data management systems. The application process is not determined at the source site but on the estimation side."
"DD Boost could improve the solution by offering additional customizations that build upon existing features such as deduplication ratios. The primary objective of the solution is to create backups of existing data and push that data out to clients' backup systems. If they can make the process faster and introduce more enhancements, it would greatly benefit the backup environment."
"The product has low capacity."
"The solution doesn't scale. If you hit your capacity, you need to buy a new device."
"The main issue I've identified is that when backing up a final backup from the branch server, we don't have deduplication functionality."
"The solution, in the future, should offer support for mobile."
"Interfaces need to be improved."
"A huge storage space needs to be bought with Dell Avamar, even when it's unnecessary for an organization"
"It's not the best solution for big databases."
"The screen design is a bit back-dated."
"It would be helpful if there was cloud support."
"It would be helpful if the product offered more integration potential."
"The client caches and deduplication system have a few problems."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"My company must pay approximately 10,000 USD annually, making it an expensive product."
"The pricing is competitive when compared to other vendors."
"DD Boost's price is good for its features."
"The pricing is high compared to the competition and should be reconsidered."
"The solution is very good because it is easy to use and it speeds up the backup and lowers the requirement for the storage rate. It is capable of encryption, compression, and deduplication and it is fast for sending all of the data over the network because it sends only the change blocks from the client to the DD server."
"You don't have to pay additional costs."
"The solution is expensive."
"There is a need to make yearly payments towards the licensing charges attached to the product. The price of the product is on a higher scale, meaning not everybody can afford it."
"Its licensing is weird. It is not just the licenses; we also purchase hardware. With most software products, such as Veeam, Commvault, and Data Protector, there is no hardware purchase at the same time. Because Avamar and Data Domain are tied together, they have an integrated pipe. You can separate them, but basically, they're designed to work as a couple. Because the Data Domain backend is designed to do dedupe and compression, we get 60:1. When you count it, you count it as a straight compression, but of course, that's with dedupe and some other stuff. You have to buy the hardware, the licensing, and the software at the same time. So, it's not just software."
"It was approximately $70-80,000 when it was under support, but right now EMC has not been supporting this product for two years."
"This is a fairly expensive solution. It cost approximately 21,000 each year."
"It might not be beneficial to smaller businesses due to its high cost."
"Licensing was generally on a per VM or terabyte basis. They changed their licensing model a couple of times and turned it into socket-based licensing, which is an improvement in their licensing model."
"It is very expensive. It's a trust based licensing. So that's an ethical challenge."
"I rate the pricing a seven out of ten because it is expensive."
"Licensing fees are paid annually."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Deduplication Software solutions are best for your needs.
793,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
17%
Financial Services Firm
17%
Government
7%
Manufacturing Company
6%
Computer Software Company
14%
Financial Services Firm
13%
Government
10%
Manufacturing Company
10%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about DD Boost?
The time taken for backup is very fast.
What needs improvement with DD Boost?
In one and half years at our company, we have faced only one challenge with DD Boost, which is the password expiry. By default, the password of DD Boost expires in thirty days, after which a query ...
What's the difference between Dell EMC Avamar and Dell EMC NetWorker?
From the very beginning, Dell EMC NetWorker considers users and those who might potentially become users. In terms of both pricing and setup, this product offers an experience that is significantly...
What do you like most about Dell EMC Avamar?
It's stable and offers good performance.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Dell EMC Avamar?
The solution is costly. Competitors are less expensive. However, Dell Avamar is the right tool if we want to protect our critical systems and receive proper engineering support.
 

Also Known As

No data available
Avamar
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
Dodge County, St Laurence's College, FieldCore (a GE Company), Comanche County Memorial Hospital, Getronics, Lewisville Independent School District, EnvisionRxOptions, Cincinnati Bell Technology Solutions
Find out what your peers are saying about DD Boost vs. Dell Avamar and other solutions. Updated: July 2024.
793,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.