"It's a stable solution."
"The most valuable features are the performance and the duplication."
"Very stable solution."
"The solution is very good because it is easy to use and it speeds up the backup and lowers the requirement for the storage rate. It is capable of encryption, compression, and deduplication and it is fast for sending all of the data over the network because it sends only the change blocks from the client to the DD server."
"The initial setup is very straightforward."
"Scalable and stable solution for backup purposes, with good encryption and huge data conversion features."
"If you have a large enough storage capacity then you can take an ample amount of data."
"The initial setup is one of the most user-friendly B2B user solutions. It's good, it's easy. Deployment usually takes less than one day. You only need one person for deployment and maintenance."
"The hardware is strong and all the equipment has a good infrastructure. Personally, I think it's the best storage product in HPE for small to medium-sized businesses."
"Deduplication is the most valuable feature."
"The most valuable features are the deduplication and compression capabilities."
"The solution is stable."
"Deduplication and compression are in a good ratio. It supports the HPE Catalyst protocol, which is much faster than NFS and other protocols. We use CommVault and Veeam, and these two solutions support the Catalyst protocol very well and are integrated at high speed. It is faster than normal access."
"The scalability is very good."
"Integration could be better."
"The product has low capacity."
"The solution could improve by adding more flexibility for the customers here in Thailand. Some of the small capacity models of the solution are not needed by our customers. There should be a more flexible version of the solution."
"It would be good if the product could be useful not just for general backup. Its pricing is also expensive, and it can be a difficult application, particularly when you need to write a script for anything you would like to do."
"The solution doesn't scale. If you hit your capacity, you need to buy a new device."
"Cloud integration needs to be simplified."
"HPE StoreOnce should come with a detailed installation guide."
"One item I wanted to see is SSD drives as a cache, and that was, for a time, still lacking in StoreOnce, however, they have done it now. It's not available yet, however, it will be shortly."
"The solution could always be less expensive."
"The user interface of HPE StoreOnce should be more user-friendly. Additionally, the configuration and troubleshooting could be better."
"The GUI and its user-friendliness have some room for improvement."
"The solution should continue to refine its integration capabilities. I also see they are starting to use cloud integration as well, which is good, but they should do more to integrate with it."
"The web interface, ease of use, and GUI all need to be improved."
DD Boost is ranked 7th in Deduplication Software with 6 reviews while HPE StoreOnce is ranked 4th in Deduplication Software with 10 reviews. DD Boost is rated 8.6, while HPE StoreOnce is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of DD Boost writes "Very fast with good dashboards and has the potential for discounted pricing". On the other hand, the top reviewer of HPE StoreOnce writes "Easy to set up with great deduplication and easy expansion capabilities". DD Boost is most compared with Veritas NetBackup Appliance, Dell Avamar, Dell PowerProtect DD (Data Domain), NetApp FAS Series and Quantum DXi Series, whereas HPE StoreOnce is most compared with Dell PowerProtect DD (Data Domain), Veeam Backup & Replication, ExaGrid EX Series, Commvault Complete Data Protection and Dell PowerVault. See our DD Boost vs. HPE StoreOnce report.
See our list of best Deduplication Software vendors.
We monitor all Deduplication Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
