No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Data Hub vs IBM InfoSphere Information Governance Catalog comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 3, 2026

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Data Hub
Ranking in Metadata Management
4th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
4.8
Number of Reviews
22
Ranking in other categories
AI Observability (8th)
IBM InfoSphere Information ...
Ranking in Metadata Management
10th
Average Rating
7.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.7
Number of Reviews
9
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Metadata Management category, the mindshare of Data Hub is 2.7%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of IBM InfoSphere Information Governance Catalog is 2.9%, down from 3.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Metadata Management Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Data Hub2.7%
IBM InfoSphere Information Governance Catalog2.9%
Other94.4%
Metadata Management
 

Featured Reviews

Akashkhurana Hirana - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Software Engineer 2 at Porch
Metadata management has streamlined lineage tracking and data discovery for our teams
The best features Data Hub offers include its integration capability with many popular tools like Apache Airflow, Snowflake, dbt, Looker, Apache Kafka, and BigQuery. These tools provide us with data in various places, and we commonly use Apache Airflow for the DAG, while utilizing BigQuery as our database and Apache Kafka for consuming messaging queues. Data Hub easily connects with all these tools and features excellent data discovery and visualization capabilities. We can see data visibility, where it comes from, its upstream and downstream relationships. If we remove a column, we can assess the impact of that change. Furthermore, if there are duplicate datasets being used by different teams that do not communicate regularly, onboarding all data to Data Hub allows us to identify these duplicates easily. Out of all those features, I believe data discovery and impact analysis are the most valuable for my team because when we want to add or drop a column, we can assess the impact analysis to understand the downstream effects. This helps us know who owns a dataset, and we can easily contact the owner. Tracking the data lineage back to the source table is also a key benefit. Data Hub has positively impacted my organization by significantly reducing manual work that was previously needed to identify upstream and downstream data relationships, as well as recognizing duplicate datasets. If a data contract is broken, we now easily get notified of those issues, making the process much easier and more efficient. It is particularly useful for data engineers and platform teams to check for problems directly within Data Hub. Data Hub has saved our team a lot of time. For example, in a large company like Porch, if I want to know whether a specific dataset exists, I can check Data Hub, as it serves as a centralized point for managing the metadata of our data. While it does not contain all data, it does contain the metadata necessary for understanding the dataset's origin. If a dataset does not exist, I can simply see who the owner is and reach out to them, which reduces the dependency on others by providing direct access to information in Data Hub.
MF
Data Architect at a insurance company with 10,001+ employees
Provides good catalog integration but requires too much coding
This is a complex solution and quite expensive. The technology has changed and I think IBM needs to be more flexible with their licensing model. We've been with them for over 10 years and they were unable to provide decent options for us. As the consumer, they weren't offering much flexibility and certainly not the support we were looking for given our long-standing relationship with them. There is also too much coding required compared with other solutions where you can do a lot directly in the environment and see how the policies apply.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"We made it a place where all stakeholders in our company could log in and see which data were used for which data marts, which column values meant for which definitions, and how they were measured."
"Data Hub has positively impacted our organization by centralizing and co-locating all data through metadata, and we have made this our enterprise metadata catalog rather than having disorganized information across different teams."
"Data Hub has positively impacted my organization by functioning as an all-in-one solution."
"We have seen a return on investment from using Data Hub, as it saves our data governance team time by collating metadata and viewing the live data dictionary, and it is very helpful in building data quality for the company, leading to approximately thirty percent improvement in efficiency."
"Data Hub has positively impacted my organization by helping me with the data governance aspect."
"Data Hub has positively impacted my organization as teams can now be directly dependent on one source of truth for all their data needs."
"Data Hub had a positive impact on my organization by disclosing to the organization and to business users what existed in the data lake."
"Data Hub has positively impacted our organization by reducing the knowledge transition period from three months to one month for new team members, enabling them to refer to the complete lineage without depending heavily on others, which is a substantial improvement."
"It is easy to use."
"The feature I found most valuable in IBM InfoSphere Information Governance Catalog is the lineage as it's very powerful and it provides data analytics in terms of where the data lives and where it goes. The interface is also clear, though it could still be sorted out, but the lineage is the most powerful thing in the solution."
"Anyone looking into using IBM InfoSphere Information Governance Catalog should go for it because it's a leading governance provider, and IBM is known across the globe."
"IBM tools always get inherent trust from companies."
"It helped us streamline and organize our data."
"IBM InfoSphere Information Governance Catalog is a stable product."
"The ability to create special rules inside the solution using Portuguese is the most valuable feature."
"The best feature of IBM InfoSphere Information Governance Catalog for me is that it's easy to use and only requires a little bit of manual intervention. Once you discover the data sources, everything flows into the tool automatically, so you do not have to map it manually. There's been a lot of automation in the solution which I like best."
 

Cons

"From our understanding, we could not really enjoy the scalability of the data."
"Sometimes when it goes out of memory due to multiple jobs in progress, some records are dropped because the executor is dropped without completing the entire process."
"I believe Data Hub could provide more functionalities in the free version."
"I believe the data quality module can always be improved by examining what is available in the market and making appropriate improvements to the tool."
"In terms of ROI, I would say that Atlan is better. The way Data Hub is implemented at the moment, Atlan is much better; it's much, much faster."
"Regarding what I dislike about Data Hub, I think the UI is minimalistic, and I found myself lost sometimes when looking for a specific dataset."
"Additionally, Data Hub has a problem with column-level lineage support, especially regarding non-pro users or those without any plans."
"Integrating Data Hub with our existing tools and systems was not very easy, which is why my rating is an eight."
"The solution has performance issues when scaling up small sets of information such as assets and data lineage to the ITC."
"We are currently evaluating other products because we want to move more quickly than we can with InfoSphere and we're held back because of all the coding."
"The simplicity of usage could improve. Perhaps the simplicity of use for end users, not for system integrators, but for the user, the end users."
"They need to improve asset management."
"There were two failed installations and IBM could never actually get the product to work."
"What I would tell IBM in terms of what needs to change or improve is that the product is too complicated. IBM purchased various components from different vendors over time and certainly in the UK, IBM did not have anybody that had the expertise to be able to get IBM InfoSphere Information Governance Catalog to run properly."
"The scalability has room for improvement."
"Stability is a concern, actually. As a heavy tool, it always has some performance-related issues, and there are some cases that have a constraint on the stability."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"IBM InfoSphere Information Governance Catalog is expensive."
"Licensing for IBM InfoSphere Information Governance Catalog is per user."
"In terms of pricing, I find IBM InfoSphere Information Governance Catalog excessive. It's at the top end of the price range in terms of what you get for your money. It's an expensive product, and contractually, IBM is difficult to deal with. I can't remember the exact cost of IBM InfoSphere Information Governance Catalog, but it could be in the region of three hundred thousand pounds."
"Licensing fees are paid on a yearly basis."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Metadata Management solutions are best for your needs.
909,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
18%
Outsourcing Company
12%
Construction Company
10%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Financial Services Firm
23%
Manufacturing Company
12%
Construction Company
9%
Government
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business5
Midsize Enterprise7
Large Enterprise15
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business3
Midsize Enterprise2
Large Enterprise6
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Data Hub?
Data Hub can be improved with easy accessibility. I think integration with other environments is needed to enhance accessibility.
What is your primary use case for Data Hub?
My main use case for Data Hub is for data governance, specifically the use of data lineage and data catalog. I use Data Hub for data governance and data lineage in my day-to-day work by checking th...
What advice do you have for others considering Data Hub?
I do not have any advice to give to others looking into using Data Hub. I found this interview valuable and do not think anything needs to change for the future. My overall review rating for Data H...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Also Known As

Acryl Data
IBM Information Governance Catalog
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
Rabobank, QuadReal Property Group, Jakarta Smart City
Find out what your peers are saying about Data Hub vs. IBM InfoSphere Information Governance Catalog and other solutions. Updated: August 2026.
909,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.