Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Data Hub vs IBM InfoSphere Information Governance Catalog comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 8, 2026

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Data Hub
Ranking in Metadata Management
7th
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
3.9
Number of Reviews
4
Ranking in other categories
AI Observability (16th)
IBM InfoSphere Information ...
Ranking in Metadata Management
9th
Average Rating
7.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.7
Number of Reviews
9
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Featured Reviews

reviewer2784462 - PeerSpot reviewer
Software Engineer at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
Centralized metadata has empowered governed data discovery and clarified ownership for all teams
The impact is very positive, and there are many benefits for us using Data Hub because it was easier to make data governance, create centralized metadata management, improve data discoverability, and manage data in general. The areas for improvement, in my opinion, are the initial setup and configuration that can be complex without prior experience, especially in large-scale environments. User experience for non-technical users could be further simplified, particularly around advanced metadata concepts. The out-of-the-box governance workflow, for example, approvals and certification, could be more prescriptive for customers at early maturity stages. Data Hub can be improved in the initial setup and configuration that is somewhat complex, and also in operational monitoring that could benefit from more native dashboards and alerts. However, these are not blockers, but areas where additional guidance or product enhancement would further accelerate adoption.
MF
Data Architect at a insurance company with 10,001+ employees
Provides good catalog integration but requires too much coding
This is a complex solution and quite expensive. The technology has changed and I think IBM needs to be more flexible with their licensing model. We've been with them for over 10 years and they were unable to provide decent options for us. As the consumer, they weren't offering much flexibility and certainly not the support we were looking for given our long-standing relationship with them. There is also too much coding required compared with other solutions where you can do a lot directly in the environment and see how the policies apply.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Data Hub proved to be a robust, scalable, enterprise-ready data catalog that is well-suited for AWS-based architecture and complex organizational environments."
"Acryl Data helps with processing large amounts of data as it is a very good tool that gives good flexibility to store a huge amount of data and is easier to use."
"Acryl Data has positively impacted my organization by speeding up all the development."
"Data Hub has positively impacted our organization by bringing the tribal knowledge that resides with team members into a single place where users can discover and understand the data elements before they make use of it."
"The solution allows us to leverage a concept called Open IGC to create custom assets and data lineages that are not technologies typically supported by IBM via connectors."
"The best feature of IBM InfoSphere Information Governance Catalog for me is that it's easy to use and only requires a little bit of manual intervention."
"The valuable feature is that you can connect with multiple types of sources."
"The ability to create special rules inside the solution using Portuguese is the most valuable feature."
"IBM InfoSphere Information Governance Catalog is a stable product."
"IBM tools always get inherent trust from companies."
"It is easy to use."
"Working on the roles, actually, is the most valuable aspect."
 

Cons

"The areas for improvement, in my opinion, are the initial setup and configuration that can be complex without prior experience, especially in large-scale environments."
"I chose seven out of ten because there are better catalogs available in the market that offer more features."
"Sometimes, if the product is new, getting support is difficult and the team was facing some challenges."
"A few years ago, I would have rated the solution an eight or nine. With competition in the market and other products available, IBM needs to focus on fixing existing issues and adding more customizable features that provide the end user with a better product."
"They need to improve asset management."
"There were two failed installations and IBM could never actually get the product to work."
"Sometimes, if the product is new, getting support is difficult and the team was facing some challenges."
"The solution has performance issues when scaling up small sets of information such as assets and data lineage to the ITC."
"An area for improvement in IBM InfoSphere Information Governance Catalog is that it's missing a lot of connectors. Clients complain about not being able to connect some data sources because there's no available connector, so my company raised that issue with IBM. In some cases, third-party connectors are available, but not for all data sources. Another area that needs improvement in the solution is stability because it also has some stability issues. This is the same issue with the other IBM products bundled with IBM InfoSphere Information Governance Catalog. The solution is connected with IBM Infosphere Information Analyzer and IBM InfoSphere DataStage in my company, so if one has issues with stability, the rest of the products are affected as well."
"The simplicity of usage could improve. Perhaps the simplicity of use for end users, not for system integrators, but for the user, the end users."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"IBM InfoSphere Information Governance Catalog is expensive."
"In terms of pricing, I find IBM InfoSphere Information Governance Catalog excessive. It's at the top end of the price range in terms of what you get for your money. It's an expensive product, and contractually, IBM is difficult to deal with. I can't remember the exact cost of IBM InfoSphere Information Governance Catalog, but it could be in the region of three hundred thousand pounds."
"Licensing for IBM InfoSphere Information Governance Catalog is per user."
"Licensing fees are paid on a yearly basis."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Metadata Management solutions are best for your needs.
885,286 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Financial Services Firm
34%
Manufacturing Company
10%
University
7%
Legal Firm
5%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business3
Midsize Enterprise2
Large Enterprise6
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Data Hub?
Data Hub can be improved with more automation; there are some inbuilt automations, such as documenting definitions of data elements using AI, which is useful. I wonder if it can automate the classi...
What is your primary use case for Data Hub?
My main use case for Data Hub is to enrich the metadata to classify for PII data. As an administrator, I crawl a number of data sources and bring the metadata into a single place, then assign the o...
What advice do you have for others considering Data Hub?
I chose seven out of ten because there are better catalogs available in the market that offer more features. The UI, especially when setting up new data sources and crawling them, is a little cumbe...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Also Known As

Acryl Data
IBM Information Governance Catalog
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
Rabobank, QuadReal Property Group, Jakarta Smart City
Find out what your peers are saying about Data Hub vs. IBM InfoSphere Information Governance Catalog and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.
885,286 professionals have used our research since 2012.