CylanceENDPOINT vs Trellix Endpoint Security Platform comparison

BlackBerry and Trellix are both solutions in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category. BlackBerry is ranked #62, while Trellix is ranked #7 with an average rating of 8.0. BlackBerry holds a 0.3% mindshare in EPP, compared to Trellix’s 3.4% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of BlackBerry users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 88% of Trellix users who would recommend it.

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 22, 2026

Trellix Endpoint Security Platform and CylanceENDPOINT are products in the cybersecurity domain. CylanceENDPOINT offers superior features, while Trellix Endpoint Security Platform provides better pricing and support.

Features: Trellix Endpoint Security Platform has comprehensive threat detection capabilities, integration options, and real-time analytics. CylanceENDPOINT provides AI-driven malware prevention, low resource consumption, and potent defensive capabilities with advanced AI.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Trellix Endpoint Security Platform ensures straightforward deployment and flexible integration with robust customer service. CylanceENDPOINT features quick installation with minimal configuration, coupled with efficient support, emphasizing seamless AI integration.

Pricing and ROI: Trellix Endpoint Security Platform offers competitive setup costs aimed at maximizing ROI through long-term strategies. CylanceENDPOINT, although initially pricier, achieves substantial ROI by reducing operational overhead and leveraging preventive capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) Report (Updated: June 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 902,417 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Net...

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2026, in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category, the mindshare of Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks is 3.7%, down from 3.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of CylanceENDPOINT is 0.3%, up from 0.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Trellix Endpoint Security Platform is 3.4%, down from 3.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks	3.7%
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform	3.4%
CylanceENDPOINT	0.3%
Other	92.6%

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

Featured Reviews

ABHISHEK_SINGH

Senior Process Expert at A.P. Moller - Maersk

Gained full visibility and streamlined threat detection through behavior-based insights and AI integration

Initially, we got to have a lot of false positives when we onboarded, but nowadays it's quite smooth. We have fine-tuned our security policies and allowed different levels of policies to get rid of those false positives. Currently, we are getting a fairly good amount of incidents that are not false positives or benign, but actionable items. The process is streamlined. In the initial days, the operations used to get involved in a lot of benign and other activities, but now the process is streamlined. We are leveraging the auto-detection and remediation plans. The operations teams are now more involved in other business roles as well, not just looking into the logs and fetching out what's happening there. They have fixed a lot of things. Initially, they didn't have IAC code drift detection, cloud posture management, or security posture management, but they have those now. They purchased different vendors and did a merger with that. They have now Prisma Cloud that gets integrated and now they are working with Cortex Cloud. Everything that was negative has now been addressed, and the product altogether looks to be in a very better and mature shape now. Currently, it's more or less detecting the workloads with AI-based best practices. Since most organizations are consuming AI agents and other things, we are looking forward to seeing what other feature enhancements Palo Alto can support in that.

Read full review

Raphael Haroun Ikyagh

Network Administrator at Letshego

Stable, good for malware detection and prevention

I use it for general endpoint protection and the usual stuff like malware detection and prevention It secures my environment. One thing that could be easier is initiating scans. If I want to scan an extra drive, it should be more straightforward. It's a bit clunky. I have been using it for…

Read full review

PankajKumar24

IT Manager at Gigabit Technologies Pvt Ltd

Advanced threat prevention has strengthened incident response and customized security workflows

The biggest advantage of Trellix Endpoint Security Platform is the ATP solution, which provides advanced threat prevention. Machine learning algorithms are available in the product as part of the threat anti-malware, including predictive machine learning and behavioral analysis, which are integral to the anti-malware module of EPP. In terms of my experience with the machine learning algorithms for analysis and threat detection, we are analyzing logs provided by Trellix, but we are not able to conduct specific machine learning analysis on those logs. The automated response mechanisms in the products help with incident management because we have to create playbooks in Trellix console for automation, which we need to enable. The customizable dashboard of Trellix Endpoint Security Platform definitely contributes to the decision-making process, as we customize the dashboard according to customer requirements. When it comes to integration aspects, we are able to integrate Trellix Endpoint Security Platform with SIEM or SOAR solutions using the ePO console, which enhances threat detection capabilities. Reporting and analytics aspects have an impact on security posture assessment, as we are able to fetch reports in the ePO console customized according to customer requirements for downloading and sending via email.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I've found the solution to be highly scalable for enterprises."

"Cortex XDR's most valuable feature is its intelligence-based dashboards."

"The tool is designed to scale for large enterprises and handle large volumes of data."

"Traps pays for itself within the first 16 months of a three-year subscription."

"It's a perfect solution. It integrates well into the environment."

"Its ability to react to cyber data attacks is awesome. That is pretty much the use of it. What blows your mind is the ability to access your assets remotely and see what is actually going on with them. You can not only see them in a console. You can also react very rapidly to your assets that are compromised."

"Cortex XDR lets us manage several clients from the same console, and its endpoint defense is more advanced than traditional antivirus."

"Stability is a primary factor, and then there's the ease of distribution and policy management; Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks is very easy to work with, and we're quite happy with them."

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks pros

"It secures my environment."

"McAfee has good support and they are very responsive."

"The solution made it possible for us to have visibility into the amount of malware and threats which were coming into our company, and it has helped to increase staff productivity."

"The compatibility with a variety of laptops is our biggest advantage."

"The performance is good."

"Trellix Endpoint Security offers robust access protection, addressing major concerns in prevention. It provides both application control and user access control within its access protection features."

"It also allows multifunctionality within a single platform."

"Trellix Security Endpoint can promptly isolate any host machines directly from the console. If alerts are received and isolation is necessary, it can be accomplished through the console. The console itself holds significant value, accessible through a browser and allowing remote actions via cloud login."

"My experience with McAfee is very good. They give excellent support, they are proactive to solve issues, and willing to integrate their products."

More Trellix Endpoint Security Platform pros

Cons

"I have run into some detection issues with Cortex XDR. It needs to be better at detection of internal attacks."

"It's more focused on network communication. If a customer wants to increase the level of protection and start working with documents, it's impossible to integrate these features into the system. It's more of a communication-oriented system than a content security-oriented system."

"Currently, we are monitoring all USB drives and ports but we would like to improve our device control capabilities."

"The solution should enhance the ADR and reporting."

"For working with the solution, you only really need a web browser, however, we've found that working on Chrome, for example, is horrible."

"Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks could improve its user interface, which is more complicated compared to competitors such as SentinelOne."

"Cortex XDR is trickier to configure than other Palo Alto products. This is one area where we are not so satisfied."

"In terms of areas of improvement, we have not completed our review of the product. We're also looking at other products. So, it's a little bit hard to tell what could be different because we have not completed the review of this product, but based on our experience so far, its implementation is quite complex."

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks cons

"One thing that could be easier is initiating scans."

"The solution's documentation is not streamlined and is in bits and pieces, which should be in a single format."

"The initial setup isn't so easy. You need to know what you are doing."

"It is a very heavy tool, unfortunately."

"The integration and display of the dashboards have to be done better."

"The price of the solution is high in Asia."

"There are more secure featured solutions from McAfee on the market but for smaller companies like ours, they are too expensive."

"It is a bit technical. The user interface has some significant limitations, mainly when using HIPS on the server side, to protect files from being changed or deleted by hackers, users, or administrators."

"Most of these types of solutions including others, such as Carbon Black and FortiEDR, all have the same features. However, Carbon Black is the leader when it comes to being robust and user-friendly and this solution should improve in those areas to stay more competitive."

More Trellix Endpoint Security Platform cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It has a higher cost than other solutions, like CrowdStrike or Microsoft’s EDR tools, but it reduces the cost of our operations because it’s a new generation antivirus tool."

"It is cost-effective compared to similar solutions. It fits for the small businesses through to the big businesses."

"I don't like that they have different types of licenses."

"It's about $55 per license on a yearly basis."

"When we first bought it, it was a bit expensive, but it was worth it. The licensing was straightforward."

"The cost of Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks is $55 to $90 USD per endpoint per month."

"The pricing seems fair, and I do like the licensing model. You use wherever they are, and it is elastic."

"This is an expensive solution."

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks pricing and cost advice

Information not available

"It is a yearly subscription-based product, which includes the license and hardware. There is also a subscription for technical support up to five years."

"Licensing fees are paid yearly."

"Licensing fees are billed on a yearly basis."

"Compared to Bitdefender, Trellix Endpoint Security is more expensive, but considering it comes with DLP, the solution's price is fine."

"Customers would need to purchase a license. If a customer purchases an MVISION Endpoint license, he may use that license to install ENS. It's a flexible license where you have the option to either use the McAfee security software or the Windows Defender managed by McAfee, which is MVISION Endpoint."

"Its price is very high. It is higher than its competitors, and it should be less."

"The initial price is very good as they give good initial discounts, but it seems a little expensive once you renew the license."

"I rate Trellix Endpoint Security a nine out of ten for pricing."

More Trellix Endpoint Security Platform pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

902,417 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Construction Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Comms Service Provider

No data available

Manufacturing Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Government

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	46
Midsize Enterprise	21
Large Enterprise	52

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	68
Midsize Enterprise	39
Large Enterprise	67

Questions from the Community

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. Sentinel One

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. SentinelOne SentinelOne offers very detailed specifics with regard to risks or attacks. ...

See all answers

Comparing CrowdStrike Falcon to Cortex XDR (Palo Alto)

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. CrowdStrike Falcon Both Cortex XDR and Crowd Strike Falcon offer cloud-based solutions th...

See all answers

How is Cortex XDR compared with Microsoft Defender?

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is a cloud-delivered endpoint security solution. The tool reduces the attack surface,...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

How does McAfee Endpoint Security compare with MVISION?

The flexible manageability of McAfee Endpoint Security is one of our favorite aspects of this solution. You can deplo...

See all answers

How does Crowdstrike Falcon compare with FireEye Endpoint Security?

The Crowdstrike Falcon program has a simple to use user interface, making it both an easy to use as well as an effec...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for McAfee Endpoint Security?

I don't have visibility on pricing because it is negotiated by a different team, as I look after the technical side.

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 10% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Endpoint vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 5% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 4% of the time

Cortex XSIAM vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 3% of the time

TrendAI Vision One – Endpoint Security vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 2% of the time

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks Competitors

ThreatLocker Zero Trust Platform vs CylanceENDPOINT

Compared 43% of the time

Kitecyber Platform vs CylanceENDPOINT

Compared 17% of the time

More CylanceENDPOINT Competitors

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Trellix Endpoint Security Platform

Compared 6% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Endpoint vs Trellix Endpoint Security Platform

Compared 4% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Trellix Endpoint Security Platform

Compared 4% of the time

Symantec Endpoint Security vs Trellix Endpoint Security Platform

Compared 4% of the time

Tanium vs Trellix Endpoint Security Platform

Compared 3% of the time

More Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

June 2026

Download Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks product report

Buyer's Guide

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

June 2026

Download CylanceENDPOINT product report

Buyer's Guide

Trellix Endpoint Security Platform

June 2026

Trellix Endpoint Security Platform report

Download Trellix Endpoint Security Platform product report

Also Known As

Cyvera, Cortex XDR, Palo Alto Networks Traps

No data available

McAfee Endpoint Security, McAfee Endpoint Protection, Intel Security Total Protection for Endpoint, McAfee Complete Endpoint Protection, Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS)

Overview

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks provides advanced threat detection with AI-driven endpoint protection and seamless integration, ensuring multi-layered security and automatic threat response.

Cortex XDR is designed to safeguard endpoints against malware and suspicious activities. It offers advanced threat detection and response capabilities using behavioral analysis, AI, and machine learning. It seamlessly integrates with security infrastructures, providing endpoint security, firewall integration, and enhanced visibility in both cloud-based and on-premises environments.

What are the key features of Cortex XDR?

Advanced Threat Detection: Uses AI and machine learning for proactive threat identification.
Multi-layered Security: Combines various security measures for comprehensive protection.
Endpoint Protection: Safeguards against malware and exploits.
Behavioral Analysis: Monitors suspicious activity for early detection.
Automatic Threat Response: Automates responses to neutralize threats.

What benefits should users expect?

Ease of Use: Simplifies security management with intuitive design.
Resource Efficiency: Minimizes impact on system resources.
Integration Capabilities: Works well with existing security setups.
Reduced Analyst Workload: Automates processes to decrease manual intervention.

Organizations in diverse sectors deploy Cortex XDR to protect against malware, leveraging its advanced threat detection capabilities. Its integration with existing security infrastructures appeals to those seeking comprehensive protection in both cloud and on-premises environments, providing enhanced visibility and threat intelligence.

Palo Alto Networks

CylanceENDPOINT offers a cutting-edge approach to endpoint protection with its AI-driven technology, providing robust defense against cyber threats by leveraging machine learning for rapid threat detection and prevention.

Securing digital environments with CylanceENDPOINT involves utilizing advanced artificial intelligence to proactively identify malware, zero-day exploits, and ransomware before they cause harm. Its streamlined deployment and scalability suit businesses seeking enhanced endpoint security that minimizes system impact while maximizing threat management. With constant innovation, CylanceENDPOINT stays ahead in thwarting sophisticated cyber threats, offering a reliable shield for enterprise networks.

What are the key features of CylanceENDPOINT?

Artificial Intelligence: Employs AI to identify and neutralize threats effectively.
Predictive Analysis: Anticipates potential attacks to prevent breaches ahead of time.
Minimal System Impact: Ensures low performance overhead during scanning and updates.
Scalability: Adapts easily to organizations of all sizes for extensive coverage.
Threat Intelligence: Constant updates to remain vigilant against new attack vectors.

What benefits and ROI should users consider?

Reduced Downtime: Quick threat identification minimizes operational disruptions.
Cost Efficiency: Lower expenses associated with data breach recovery.
Enhanced Security Posture: Strengthens organization's defenses effectively.
Resource Optimization: Frees IT staff to focus on strategic projects by automating tasks.

Implementation of CylanceENDPOINT across industries like healthcare, finance, and manufacturing sees tailored approaches that adhere to sector-specific regulations and environments, allowing seamless integration while ensuring compliance and security. Its adaptability provides industry-relevant solutions that maintain integrity and protect sensitive data from evolving cyber threats.

BlackBerry

Trellix Endpoint Security Platform offers essential features like centralized management, threat prevention, and encryption, facilitating seamless scaling and integration with other systems while prioritizing user security.

This comprehensive platform focuses on endpoint protection, antivirus capabilities, and malware defense. It enhances cybersecurity with data loss prevention, advanced threat detection, and AI-driven features for reliable protection without impacting performance. Central management and advanced reporting streamline integration and ease of use. Flexible policy deployment through the management console and its robust security measures, such as DLP and device control, further increase protection. Challenges include high CPU and memory usage affecting performance, a complex interface, and lengthy deployment. Third-party integration and Windows Hello support need improvement. Additional concerns involve improved threat detection and faster technical support responses.

What are the key features of Trellix Endpoint Security Platform?

Centralized Management: Allows seamless integration and scaling with consistent control across environments.
Threat Prevention: Provides comprehensive antivirus and malware protection to secure systems.
Encryption: Ensures data security with robust encryption techniques.
Advanced Reporting: Facilitates detailed insights and analysis for better decision-making.
AI-Driven Detection: Offers reliable threat detection without impacting system performance.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Comprehensive Protection: Offers extensive security measures for protecting digital environments.
Ease of Integration: Simplifies the process of incorporating into current systems and processes.
Flexible Policy Deployment: Supports adaptable policy management to meet diverse requirements.
Scalability: Enables growth while maintaining efficiency and security.
Robust Security Features: Provides advanced security measures like DLP and device control.

Trellix Endpoint Security Platform is widely implemented in industries such as banking and government for securing mobile and desktop devices. Its capabilities cover network security, device control, and remote access protection, catering to diverse environments by offering robust cybersecurity management against advanced threats.

Trellix

Sample Customers

CBI Health Group, University Honda, VakifBank

Information Not Available

inHouseIT, Seagate Technology

Buyer's Guide

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

June 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about CrowdStrike, Microsoft, SentinelOne and others in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP). Updated: June 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

902,417 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) vendors.

We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.