CylanceENDPOINT vs Trellix Endpoint Security Platform comparison

Why PeerSpot?

BlackBerry and Trellix are both solutions in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category. BlackBerry is ranked #63, while Trellix is ranked #7 with an average rating of 7.9. BlackBerry holds a 0.3% mindshare in EPP, compared to Trellix’s 3.3% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of BlackBerry users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 88% of Trellix users who would recommend it.

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 22, 2026

Trellix Endpoint Security Platform and CylanceENDPOINT are products in the cybersecurity domain. CylanceENDPOINT offers superior features, while Trellix Endpoint Security Platform provides better pricing and support.

Features: Trellix Endpoint Security Platform has comprehensive threat detection capabilities, integration options, and real-time analytics. CylanceENDPOINT provides AI-driven malware prevention, low resource consumption, and potent defensive capabilities with advanced AI.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Trellix Endpoint Security Platform ensures straightforward deployment and flexible integration with robust customer service. CylanceENDPOINT features quick installation with minimal configuration, coupled with efficient support, emphasizing seamless AI integration.

Pricing and ROI: Trellix Endpoint Security Platform offers competitive setup costs aimed at maximizing ROI through long-term strategies. CylanceENDPOINT, although initially pricier, achieves substantial ROI by reducing operational overhead and leveraging preventive capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 914,322 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Net...

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2026, in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category, the mindshare of Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks is 3.8%, up from 3.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of CylanceENDPOINT is 0.3%, up from 0.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Trellix Endpoint Security Platform is 3.3%, down from 3.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks	3.8%
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform	3.3%
CylanceENDPOINT	0.3%
Other	92.6%

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

Featured Reviews

ABHISHEK_SINGH

Senior Process Expert at A.P. Moller - Maersk

Gained full visibility and streamlined threat detection through behavior-based insights and AI integration

Initially, we got to have a lot of false positives when we onboarded, but nowadays it's quite smooth. We have fine-tuned our security policies and allowed different levels of policies to get rid of those false positives. Currently, we are getting a fairly good amount of incidents that are not false positives or benign, but actionable items. The process is streamlined. In the initial days, the operations used to get involved in a lot of benign and other activities, but now the process is streamlined. We are leveraging the auto-detection and remediation plans. The operations teams are now more involved in other business roles as well, not just looking into the logs and fetching out what's happening there. They have fixed a lot of things. Initially, they didn't have IAC code drift detection, cloud posture management, or security posture management, but they have those now. They purchased different vendors and did a merger with that. They have now Prisma Cloud that gets integrated and now they are working with Cortex Cloud. Everything that was negative has now been addressed, and the product altogether looks to be in a very better and mature shape now. Currently, it's more or less detecting the workloads with AI-based best practices. Since most organizations are consuming AI agents and other things, we are looking forward to seeing what other feature enhancements Palo Alto can support in that.

Read full review

Raphael Haroun Ikyagh

Network Administrator at Letshego

Stable, good for malware detection and prevention

I use it for general endpoint protection and the usual stuff like malware detection and prevention It secures my environment. One thing that could be easier is initiating scans. If I want to scan an extra drive, it should be more straightforward. It's a bit clunky. I have been using it for…

Read full review

AmitKumar22

Product Manager at Frontier Business systems

Strong endpoint protection has simplified compliance and reduced effort for large user environments

One of the best features of Trellix Endpoint Security Platform is its endpoint security, and I have been using it for the last four and a half to five years, so I can say this is one of the best EDR endpoint security solutions I have ever seen. The features that make Trellix Endpoint Security Platform stand out for me are ease of use and analytics, which I really appreciate the most. Trellix Endpoint Security Platform positively impacts my organization, ensuring we are compliant with SOC 2, HIPAA, and all other compliance requirements, so there are no issues with that.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The tool is designed to scale for large enterprises and handle large volumes of data."

"The product is mostly automated, and we do not have to make decisions, because all the decisions are made by the product itself and we are not required to create any custom policies since the policies that are created are well defined in the product itself."

"It detected stuff that other things wouldn't detect."

"Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks has helped lighten the load of our security analysts because it was the major tool that we were using and the one we utilized most."

"Palo Alto is the core of the security infrastructure in the environment."

"There has been a significant reduction of approximately 70% to 80% in our internal MTTR and MTTD metrics, now around five to eight minutes whereas previously it was hours, which has helped tremendously."

"The information the dashboard provides is very clear."

"Traps has drastically reduced our endpoint attack surface via advanced detection capabilities, sandboxing of never before seen programs, and by drastically limiting where executables can launch in the first place."

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks pros

"It secures my environment."

"Tech support is responsive. They're good, the very best."

"The solution is really good and competitively priced, so someone wishing to secure his enterprise or make use of it in an inexpensive fashion should do so."

"The investigation and forensic analysis have been most helpful."

"The manageability of the product itself is its most valuable aspect. You have the underlying EPO, and on top of it, you can deploy the various components as you require. This is unlike other solutions like Symantec where you have to deploy everything or nothing. With this solution, you can choose to only deploy antivirus or only deploy a firewall, or only something else. I choose the components and that deployment is done through EPO. It makes manageability very flexible."

"I have found the most valuable features to be the ability to manage the solution from anywhere and having an overview of the companies security."

"The performance is good."

"This product has the capability to check a wide range of vulnerabilities and devices."

"I would recommend this solution to others."

More Trellix Endpoint Security Platform pros

Cons

"The solution should add unwanted malicious hash values to a block list so that whenever the action is triggered, it will automatically prevent the malicious content."

"The solution lags to the real-time scenarios here and there."

"The tool needs to be improved in terms of integration and interface."

"The onboarding process could be better."

"The connection to the internet has not performed as expected."

"The negative aspect I see is the economic model used by Palo Alto."

"There are some default policies which sometimes affect our applications and cause them to run around."

"They have the worst support, as a company, that I have ever worked with, as they are difficult to get a hold of and keep on the phone. They don't know what they are talking about when you get them on the phone. They don't like to respond to messages when you send them to them. They like to "research problems" for weeks on end, then pass you off to somebody else."

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks cons

"One thing that could be easier is initiating scans."

"The solution can be expensive."

"I think Trellix Endpoint Security Platform needs to expand its sales team in India as they have very few sales team members to capture the market."

"Sometimes, while installing the ePO, we were getting so many errors and I don't know why it happened."

"On the older ePO versions, there were some issues at the install, but with the latest version, the installation is smooth."

"One thing I think it should do is alert administration if some attack is happening in local systems."

"In some cases, the detection part was not accurate enough. We even had some incidents that were not detected."

"Impacts performance of the servers quite negatively."

"They can improve its resource consumption, such as memory, and maybe provide better or smaller updates. It always takes a lot of resources, but it has been getting better. I have been using McAfee products for the last 20 years or so, and I know it is getting better."

More Trellix Endpoint Security Platform cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Licensing for Palo Alto Networks Cortex XDR can be costly, especially when it comes to a hundred users. A license is required for each user, and the subscription must be renewed on a yearly basis."

"The price of the solution is high for the license and in general."

"Cortex XDR’s pricing is very reasonable."

"I feel it is fairly priced."

"It has a higher cost than other solutions, like CrowdStrike or Microsoft’s EDR tools, but it reduces the cost of our operations because it’s a new generation antivirus tool."

"The price is on the higher side, but it's okay."

"In terms of the cost Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks is very expensive because we are a Mexican company and when you translate dollars to pesos the cost is very high. The solution is very expensive for Mexican companies. I understand that they have international prices, but I do not think it offsets the price enough for many companies in countries, such as Mexico. The amount it is reduced is not a massive percentage."

"I did PoCs on products called Cylance and CrowdStrike. Although, I consider these products and they were also good, when it come to cost and budgetary factors, Traps has been proven to be better than the other two products. It is quite cost-effective and delivers all the entire solution which we require."

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks pricing and cost advice

Information not available

"The product is expensive."

"It is a yearly subscription-based product, which includes the license and hardware. There is also a subscription for technical support up to five years."

"Trellix Endpoint Security is neither a cheap nor an expensive solution."

"Trellix may cost around $46 to $47 for a single license without an EDR."

"Pricing is reasonable and runs at a cost per user per year."

"Microsoft Defender is not cheap and from a cost perspective, Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) is a better option."

"The pricing is comparable to other solutions on the market."

"MVISION is intended as an enterprise product and it is priced like one. This solution is within the price range of competitors at the enterprise level."

More Trellix Endpoint Security Platform pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

914,322 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Outsourcing Company

12%

Comms Service Provider

12%

Construction Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

No data available

Outsourcing Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Construction Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	47
Midsize Enterprise	21
Large Enterprise	55

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	68
Midsize Enterprise	39
Large Enterprise	67

Questions from the Community

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. Sentinel One

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. SentinelOne SentinelOne offers very detailed specifics with regard to risks or attacks. ...

See all answers

Comparing CrowdStrike Falcon to Cortex XDR (Palo Alto)

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. CrowdStrike Falcon Both Cortex XDR and Crowd Strike Falcon offer cloud-based solutions th...

See all answers

How is Cortex XDR compared with Microsoft Defender?

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is a cloud-delivered endpoint security solution. The tool reduces the attack surface,...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

How does McAfee Endpoint Security compare with MVISION?

The flexible manageability of McAfee Endpoint Security is one of our favorite aspects of this solution. You can deplo...

See all answers

How does Crowdstrike Falcon compare with FireEye Endpoint Security?

The Crowdstrike Falcon program has a simple to use user interface, making it both an easy to use as well as an effec...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for McAfee Endpoint Security?

I don't have visibility on pricing because it is negotiated by a different team, as I look after the technical side.

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 14% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Endpoint vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 5% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 4% of the time

Cortex XSIAM vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 3% of the time

TrendAI Vision One vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 2% of the time

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks Competitors

ThreatLocker Zero Trust Platform vs CylanceENDPOINT

Compared 38% of the time

Kitecyber Platform vs CylanceENDPOINT

Compared 14% of the time

Kaspersky Next XDR Optimum vs CylanceENDPOINT

Compared 6% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs CylanceENDPOINT

Compared 5% of the time

More CylanceENDPOINT Competitors

SentinelOne Singularity Endpoint vs Trellix Endpoint Security Platform

Compared 6% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Trellix Endpoint Security Platform

Compared 5% of the time

Symantec Endpoint Security vs Trellix Endpoint Security Platform

Compared 4% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Trellix Endpoint Security Platform

Compared 3% of the time

HP Wolf Security vs Trellix Endpoint Security Platform

Compared 3% of the time

More Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

September 2026

Download Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks product report

Buyer's Guide

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

September 2026

Download CylanceENDPOINT product report

Buyer's Guide

Trellix Endpoint Security Platform

August 2026

Trellix Endpoint Security Platform report

Download Trellix Endpoint Security Platform product report

Also Known As

Cyvera, Cortex XDR, Palo Alto Networks Traps

No data available

McAfee Endpoint Security, McAfee Endpoint Protection, Intel Security Total Protection for Endpoint, McAfee Complete Endpoint Protection, Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS)

Overview

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks provides advanced threat detection with AI-driven endpoint protection and seamless integration, ensuring multi-layered security and automatic threat response.

Cortex XDR is designed to safeguard endpoints against malware and suspicious activities. It offers advanced threat detection and response capabilities using behavioral analysis, AI, and machine learning. It seamlessly integrates with security infrastructures, providing endpoint security, firewall integration, and enhanced visibility in both cloud-based and on-premises environments.

What are the key features of Cortex XDR?

Advanced Threat Detection: Uses AI and machine learning for proactive threat identification.
Multi-layered Security: Combines various security measures for comprehensive protection.
Endpoint Protection: Safeguards against malware and exploits.
Behavioral Analysis: Monitors suspicious activity for early detection.
Automatic Threat Response: Automates responses to neutralize threats.

What benefits should users expect?

Ease of Use: Simplifies security management with intuitive design.
Resource Efficiency: Minimizes impact on system resources.
Integration Capabilities: Works well with existing security setups.
Reduced Analyst Workload: Automates processes to decrease manual intervention.

Organizations in diverse sectors deploy Cortex XDR to protect against malware, leveraging its advanced threat detection capabilities. Its integration with existing security infrastructures appeals to those seeking comprehensive protection in both cloud and on-premises environments, providing enhanced visibility and threat intelligence.

Palo Alto Networks

CylanceENDPOINT offers a cutting-edge approach to endpoint protection with its AI-driven technology, providing robust defense against cyber threats by leveraging machine learning for rapid threat detection and prevention.

Securing digital environments with CylanceENDPOINT involves utilizing advanced artificial intelligence to proactively identify malware, zero-day exploits, and ransomware before they cause harm. Its streamlined deployment and scalability suit businesses seeking enhanced endpoint security that minimizes system impact while maximizing threat management. With constant innovation, CylanceENDPOINT stays ahead in thwarting sophisticated cyber threats, offering a reliable shield for enterprise networks.

What are the key features of CylanceENDPOINT?

Artificial Intelligence: Employs AI to identify and neutralize threats effectively.
Predictive Analysis: Anticipates potential attacks to prevent breaches ahead of time.
Minimal System Impact: Ensures low performance overhead during scanning and updates.
Scalability: Adapts easily to organizations of all sizes for extensive coverage.
Threat Intelligence: Constant updates to remain vigilant against new attack vectors.

What benefits and ROI should users consider?

Reduced Downtime: Quick threat identification minimizes operational disruptions.
Cost Efficiency: Lower expenses associated with data breach recovery.
Enhanced Security Posture: Strengthens organization's defenses effectively.
Resource Optimization: Frees IT staff to focus on strategic projects by automating tasks.

Implementation of CylanceENDPOINT across industries like healthcare, finance, and manufacturing sees tailored approaches that adhere to sector-specific regulations and environments, allowing seamless integration while ensuring compliance and security. Its adaptability provides industry-relevant solutions that maintain integrity and protect sensitive data from evolving cyber threats.

BlackBerry

Trellix Endpoint Security Platform offers essential features like centralized management, threat prevention, and encryption, facilitating seamless scaling and integration with other systems while prioritizing user security.

This comprehensive platform focuses on endpoint protection, antivirus capabilities, and malware defense. It enhances cybersecurity with data loss prevention, advanced threat detection, and AI-driven features for reliable protection without impacting performance. Central management and advanced reporting streamline integration and ease of use. Flexible policy deployment through the management console and its robust security measures, such as DLP and device control, further increase protection. Challenges include high CPU and memory usage affecting performance, a complex interface, and lengthy deployment. Third-party integration and Windows Hello support need improvement. Additional concerns involve improved threat detection and faster technical support responses.

What are the key features of Trellix Endpoint Security Platform?

Centralized Management: Allows seamless integration and scaling with consistent control across environments.
Threat Prevention: Provides comprehensive antivirus and malware protection to secure systems.
Encryption: Ensures data security with robust encryption techniques.
Advanced Reporting: Facilitates detailed insights and analysis for better decision-making.
AI-Driven Detection: Offers reliable threat detection without impacting system performance.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Comprehensive Protection: Offers extensive security measures for protecting digital environments.
Ease of Integration: Simplifies the process of incorporating into current systems and processes.
Flexible Policy Deployment: Supports adaptable policy management to meet diverse requirements.
Scalability: Enables growth while maintaining efficiency and security.
Robust Security Features: Provides advanced security measures like DLP and device control.

Trellix Endpoint Security Platform is widely implemented in industries such as banking and government for securing mobile and desktop devices. Its capabilities cover network security, device control, and remote access protection, catering to diverse environments by offering robust cybersecurity management against advanced threats.

Trellix

Sample Customers

CBI Health Group, University Honda, VakifBank

Information Not Available

inHouseIT, Seagate Technology

Buyer's Guide

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

September 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, SentinelOne, CrowdStrike and others in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP). Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

914,322 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) vendors.

We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.