CyberArk Identity vs Frontegg comparison

CyberArk and Frontegg are both solutions in the Authentication Systems category. CyberArk is ranked #9 with an average rating of 8.2, while Frontegg is ranked #40. CyberArk holds a 1.7% mindshare in AS, compared to Frontegg’s 0.8% mindshare. Additionally, 96% of CyberArk users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Frontegg users who would recommend it.

CyberArk Identity

Read 29 CyberArk Identity reviews

3,430 Views
858 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

Frontegg

Read 6 Frontegg reviews

916 Views
357 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

CyberArk Identity

Frontegg

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 11, 2024

CyberArk Identity and Frontegg are two competing identity and access management solutions. Frontegg stands out with superior features, though CyberArk Identity has more favorable pricing and support.

What features are offered by CyberArk Identity in comparison to Frontegg?

Users value the robust security features of CyberArk Identity, along with its strong integration capabilities. Frontegg is noted for its developer-friendly tools and customizable authentication flows. Frontegg's feature set is considered more advanced.

What areas of improvement can be found in CyberArk Identity in comparison to Frontegg?

CyberArk Identity could benefit from a more intuitive setup process, improved mobile support, and a better user experience. Frontegg needs enhanced documentation, faster response times for support, and overall better user experience improvements.

How is the ease of deployment and customer service of CyberArk Identity in comparison to Frontegg?

CyberArk Identity's deployment process is straightforward, but customer service experiences are mixed. Frontegg's deployment is praised for simplicity and gets high marks for responsive customer support, having the edge in both areas.

What setup costs and ROI can be seen with CyberArk Identity in comparison to Frontegg?

CyberArk Identity is favored for competitive pricing and perceived value. Despite higher costs, Frontegg offers better ROI due to its comprehensive feature set. Frontegg's pricing model is justified by its advanced features and overall value delivery.

To learn more, read our detailed CyberArk Identity vs. Frontegg Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

CyberArk Identity vs. Frontegg

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 879,672 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

CyberArk Identity

Ranking in Authentication Systems

9th

Ranking in Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM)

6th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Identity Management (IM) (9th), Authorization Software (3rd), Enterprise Password Managers (7th), User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) (9th), Access Management (7th), Active Directory Management (6th), Cloud Resource Access Management (2nd)

Frontegg

Ranking in Authentication Systems

40th

Ranking in Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM)

11th

Average Rating

9.6

Reviews Sentiment

8.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Single Sign-On (SSO) (19th)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Authentication Systems category, the mindshare of CyberArk Identity is 1.7%, up from 1.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Frontegg is 0.8%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Authentication Systems Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
CyberArk Identity	1.7%
Frontegg	0.8%
Other	97.5%

Authentication Systems

Featured Reviews

Hariharan Thangasamy

Cybersecurity Delivery Analyst at Accenture

Has strengthened privileged access control and improved audit visibility through session monitoring and password rotation

On the identity product side, it is awesome. However, they can improve in the documentation parts. For example, if there is a migration process, I can see the maximum customers are moving from self-hosted to on-premises or from on-premises to the cloud. It would be helpful if they released a generalized document for processes such as migration. A clear overview document would assist us in understanding more about the tool, configurations, and automations to enhance our security. Regarding the initial setup of CyberArk Identity, I faced some challenges. At some points, I could not find proper documentation for deploying, enhancing, or integrating with other components. I could not find the proper documentation in the community portal.

Read full review

it_user1650711

Software Engineer at a tech vendor with 51-200 employees

Great technical support, excellent webhooks, and has been very stable

We are using a hybrid deployment model with as much infrastructure off of Frontegg's servers as possible. It's my understanding that we were one of the first customers to do this due to the fact that the setup was not documented well or intuitive. Luckily, Frontegg's developers were very flexible and willing to help work through the process.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I like the RBAC (Role-Based Access Control). It basically involves defining various roles, and then simply assigning those roles to users."

"The UI is very simplified, and the documentation of CyberArk Identity is very crisp and clear."

"CyberArk Identity provides identity governance and gives me control over who and how access to environments occurs, offering significant confidentiality in what is accessed."

"The user self-service program and the Office 365 provisioning service feature are the most valuable. It is a very easy and feature-rich solution that gives priority to the users and security."

"The features that I personally find most effective in terms of security stem from the fact that it is easy to integrate and also the adoption is faster."

"It has aided in troubleshooting by allowing logs to be extracted and sent to a correlation engine, such as QRadar, for notifications or alerts."

"The support of CyberArk Identity is really good."

"It has machine learning and can help clients to learn the environment and understand what is happening."

More CyberArk Identity pros

"The admin portal layer is super useful and saves valuable front-end development time."

"The MFA policy via Frontegg allows us to enable/disable/enforce the Multi-Factor Authentication policy of our users and to enhance security and adhere to modern standards."

"Every feature is multi-tenant by design, making different customer requests effortless to provide."

"We like the SSO, permissions and roles, multiple workspaces, and react login components."

"Their developers were always willing to meet even though we are in very different time zones."

"It has Audit Log and many cool features that if we were to develop them by ourselves, it would require a lot of research and development resources. Frontegg gives us everything we need to ensure that our customers have a safe and reliable authentication system in which they can also manage some of the features and roles by themself which gives them more control over their environment."

Cons

"To enhance the product, they can consider improving the user interface of the software and possibly the customer support team. Sometimes, there is a delay in handling my inquiries via email, which could be addressed for better service."

"Integration or deployment is extremely difficult for CyberArk Identity."

"Some areas experience slowness based on the workload. There's a need to enhance network performance despite the good user experience with access management."

"Integration or deployment is extremely difficult for CyberArk Identity."

"The tool has issues with the third-party SMS gateway. The solution has its own SMS gateway. Integration support is a challenge when we don’t use their SMS gateway. The tool also needs to improve its scalability."

"Something they could improve is the management of multifactor authentication. When you translate the page from one language to another, it can be a difficult process."

"One area for improvement is the complexity of the learning curve for new users."

"Room for improvement for CyberArk Identity might be on the support side, as they constantly improve with new features and remove redundant ones, integrating multiple steps into a single one for easier use; however, this is not just CyberArk Identity, as many vendors start with basic troubleshooting services without recognizing that knowledgeable users often reach out after exhausting those options."

More CyberArk Identity cons

"The PHP SDK is limited. It's not a huge deal as we can just use their web API directly, but it is something to note if you're using PHP.‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‏‏‎ ‎‏‏‎ ‎‏‏‎ ‎‏‏‎ ‎‏‏‎"

"We're hoping to see more user management-related features, according to Frontegg's roadmap."

"Frontegg is fairly stable, however, we are looking forward to some promised capabilities, such as more tightly integrated Feature Flag support."

"The web interface is missing a way to delete a workspace. I have accidentally created a workspace and was not able to delete it. It's a minor thing that should be supported."

"It would be nice to have a backup export with all tenant/users so that in case of a mistake we can have the option to restore the users."

"We really like the ability to add the same user across tenants. From a UX perspective, the flow can be betterized."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing is acceptable. It is worth considering what we are protecting with the amount charged."

"We find that the pricing and licensing of this solution is adequate, as compared to the other competitors in the market."

"There is an initial license and then there is a subscription needed."

"The pricing of CyberArk Identity is competitive."

"It's not that affordable compared to Delinea or other products. They're less expensive and allow more customization. For the cost, it is expensive."

"In terms of pricing, BeyondTrust and CyberArk tend to be more expensive, with CyberArk receiving an eight out of ten, in this regard."

"The solution is cheap and I rate its pricing an eight out of ten."

"There could be some additional costs apart from the licensing costs of the solution when you want to develop connectors in CyberArk Identity."

More CyberArk Identity pricing and cost advice

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Authentication Systems solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

879,672 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

15%

Computer Software Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Healthcare Company

Financial Services Firm

10%

Computer Software Company

10%

Educational Organization

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	20
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	10

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about CyberArk Identity?

The integration capabilities, ability to integrate CyberArk into the overall IBB strategy of our current clients.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for CyberArk Identity?

I am not certain about CyberArk Identity's exact pricing model. For comparison, Okta was around five dollars per user. CyberArk Identity offers good discounts to some clients, which influences thei...

See all answers

What needs improvement with CyberArk Identity?

We do not specifically use the password vaulting feature of CyberArk Identity. The centralized user dashboard of CyberArk Identity has not been that important for us. If it would be possible to sha...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Microsoft Entra ID vs CyberArk Identity

Compared 11% of the time

SailPoint Identity Security Cloud vs CyberArk Identity

Compared 8% of the time

Microsoft Intune vs CyberArk Identity

Compared 6% of the time

Ping Identity Platform vs CyberArk Identity

Compared 6% of the time

Okta Platform vs CyberArk Identity

Compared 5% of the time

More CyberArk Identity Competitors

Auth0 Platform vs Frontegg

Compared 30% of the time

Okta Platform vs Frontegg

Compared 15% of the time

Clerk.com vs Frontegg

Compared 14% of the time

WorkOS vs Frontegg

Compared 13% of the time

Ping Identity Platform vs Frontegg

Compared 11% of the time

More Frontegg Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

CyberArk Identity

January 2026

Download CyberArk Identity product report

Buyer's Guide

Single Sign-On (SSO)

December 2025

Download Frontegg product report

Also Known As

Idaptive

No data available

Overview

CyberArk Identity is a versatile identity management solution suitable for a wide range of enterprises. It is designed to enhance enterprise security and improve user experience. Its focus on security, compliance, and operational efficiency, combined with positive user feedback, makes it a strong contender in the identity management space.

CyberArk Identity offers a robust suite of features to manage user identities and access privileges. It focuses on securing access to resources across various environments, including cloud and on-premises applications. Its capabilities include single sign-on (SSO), multi-factor authentication (MFA), lifecycle management, and privileged access management. These features are engineered to streamline access control, enhance security, and ensure compliance with regulatory standards.

Single Sign-On (SSO) simplifies user access by providing a single authentication point for multiple applications.
Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA) adds an extra layer of security by requiring additional verification methods.
Lifecycle Management automates user account provisioning and deprovisioning, aligning with HR processes and compliance requirements.
Privileged Access Management secures and monitors access to critical systems and data by privileged users.

According to our user interviews, CyberArk Identity is praised for its reliability and user-friendly interface. IT professionals highlight the ease of integration with existing systems, while business executives appreciate the visibility it provides into access and identity management across the organization. Users also commend the responsive customer support, which is crucial for enterprise-level solutions.

IT Professionals found that CyberArk Identity's focus on multi-layered security significantly reduced the risk of data breaches and unauthorized access. With a centralized dashboard and automation features, you can streamline identity and access management tasks, saving time and reducing complexity. Finally, it helps meet various compliance requirements.

CyberArk

Frontegg is a user management platform, designed for the Product-Led Growth (PLG) era. Frontegg provides blazing-fast integration of a powerful user infrastructure, designed to handle modern application use-cases.

Our platform supports app builders by covering all the way from fundamental authentication flows to the most advanced capabilities such as complex organizational structures (multi-tenancy), fine-grained authorization, API-token management, self-service admin portal for end-users, subscription enforcement, single-sign-on (SSO), and much more.

Frontegg’s interfaces are embedded as a UI layer within your app and becomes a customer-facing management interface for your end-users, both on the personal and workspace levels. Frontegg also powers-up your backend through rich SDKs supported in various languages and frameworks.

Pricing: Starts at $249/m

Frontegg

Sample Customers

MLB, Citi, Pfizer, SulAmerica, GE Capital, Shiseido

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

CyberArk Identity vs. Frontegg

December 2025

Free Report: CyberArk Identity vs. Frontegg

Find out what your peers are saying about CyberArk Identity vs. Frontegg and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

879,672 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our CyberArk Identity vs. Frontegg report.

See our list of best Authentication Systems vendors and best Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) vendors.

We monitor all Authentication Systems reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.