CyberArk Identity vs Frontegg comparison

CyberArk and Frontegg are both solutions in the Authentication Systems category. CyberArk is ranked #9 with an average rating of 8.3, while Frontegg is ranked #38. CyberArk holds a 1.7% mindshare in AS, compared to Frontegg’s 0.9% mindshare. Additionally, 96% of CyberArk users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Frontegg users who would recommend it.

CyberArk Identity

Read 29 CyberArk Identity reviews

4,192 Views
1,006 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

Frontegg

Read 6 Frontegg reviews

1,084 Views
444 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

CyberArk Identity

Frontegg

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 11, 2024

CyberArk Identity and Frontegg are two competing identity and access management solutions. Frontegg stands out with superior features, though CyberArk Identity has more favorable pricing and support.

What features are offered by CyberArk Identity in comparison to Frontegg?

Users value the robust security features of CyberArk Identity, along with its strong integration capabilities. Frontegg is noted for its developer-friendly tools and customizable authentication flows. Frontegg's feature set is considered more advanced.

What areas of improvement can be found in CyberArk Identity in comparison to Frontegg?

CyberArk Identity could benefit from a more intuitive setup process, improved mobile support, and a better user experience. Frontegg needs enhanced documentation, faster response times for support, and overall better user experience improvements.

How is the ease of deployment and customer service of CyberArk Identity in comparison to Frontegg?

CyberArk Identity's deployment process is straightforward, but customer service experiences are mixed. Frontegg's deployment is praised for simplicity and gets high marks for responsive customer support, having the edge in both areas.

What setup costs and ROI can be seen with CyberArk Identity in comparison to Frontegg?

CyberArk Identity is favored for competitive pricing and perceived value. Despite higher costs, Frontegg offers better ROI due to its comprehensive feature set. Frontegg's pricing model is justified by its advanced features and overall value delivery.

To learn more, read our detailed CyberArk Identity vs. Frontegg Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

CyberArk Identity vs. Frontegg

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 885,311 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

CyberArk Identity

Ranking in Authentication Systems

9th

Ranking in Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM)

7th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Identity Management (IM) (9th), Authorization Software (3rd), Enterprise Password Managers (9th), User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) (9th), Access Management (8th), Active Directory Management (6th), Cloud Resource Access Management (3rd)

Frontegg

Ranking in Authentication Systems

38th

Ranking in Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM)

12th

Average Rating

9.6

Reviews Sentiment

8.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Single Sign-On (SSO) (22nd)

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Authentication Systems category, the mindshare of CyberArk Identity is 1.7%, up from 1.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Frontegg is 0.9%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Authentication Systems Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
CyberArk Identity	1.7%
Frontegg	0.9%
Other	97.4%

Authentication Systems

Featured Reviews

Hariharan Thangasamy

Cybersecurity Delivery Analyst at Accenture

Has strengthened privileged access control and improved audit visibility through session monitoring and password rotation

On the identity product side, it is awesome. However, they can improve in the documentation parts. For example, if there is a migration process, I can see the maximum customers are moving from self-hosted to on-premises or from on-premises to the cloud. It would be helpful if they released a generalized document for processes such as migration. A clear overview document would assist us in understanding more about the tool, configurations, and automations to enhance our security. Regarding the initial setup of CyberArk Identity, I faced some challenges. At some points, I could not find proper documentation for deploying, enhancing, or integrating with other components. I could not find the proper documentation in the community portal.

Read full review

it_user1660836

DevOps Manager at a computer software company with 11-50 employees

Gives us everything we need to ensure that our customers have a safe and reliable authentication system

It would be nice to have a export button to file with all tenants/users so that in case of a disaster we will have the option to restore the users from file. For security certifications, we need to make sure we can restore all of our products and data in minimal time. We are backing up the data using the API but it will be better to export everything to an external file so in case of a disaster or mistake from our side, we can have the option to reload all the users and assign them to the relevant tenant as fast as possible

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The features are really powerful, providing really good SSO and MFA features and implementation capability, plus an MDM solution, and the cloud-based setup is simple and scalable."

"I found the solution to be stable."

"The initial setup is straightforward. It takes me up to an hour and a half."

"The integration capabilities, ability to integrate CyberArk into the overall IBB strategy of our current clients."

"The feature that we find most valuable is the ability to integrate multiple IDs for on-premises Active Directory."

"Identity is the tool that offers the most seamless integration with UiPath Orchestrator and the most utility from an automation perspective."

"It has aided in troubleshooting by allowing logs to be extracted and sent to a correlation engine, such as QRadar, for notifications or alerts."

"I had one machine that I could not use due to an invalid token. They resolved the problem immediately after I reported it, on the same day, within one hour. It is a very good experience."

More CyberArk Identity pros

"Their developers were always willing to meet even though we are in very different time zones."

"Frontegg's solution fits us very well, as it removes the extra work of developing, maintaining, storing, and securing all of the user-management platforms."

"The admin portal layer is super useful and saves valuable front-end development time."

"Every feature is multi-tenant by design, making different customer requests effortless to provide."

"We like the SSO, permissions and roles, multiple workspaces, and react login components."

"SaaS companies like ours can just focus on what matters and not spend time on building SaaS essentials such as audit logs, SSO etc."

"In addition, I was most impressed with Frontegg's quick turnaround to fix bugs and implement feature improvements."

"Frontegg enabled us to worry less about parts of the system that are not unique to our product, and instead spend more time developing out key value propositions."

More Frontegg pros

Cons

"The solution's difficulty in gaining skill sets should be improved because it's a vertical product."

"One area for improvement is the complexity of the learning curve for new users."

"CyberArk Identity could improve by having the ability to better manage the network, such as Cisco. There seem to be some issues in this area."

"Room for improvement for CyberArk Identity might be on the support side, as they constantly improve with new features and remove redundant ones, integrating multiple steps into a single one for easier use; however, this is not just CyberArk Identity, as many vendors start with basic troubleshooting services without recognizing that knowledgeable users often reach out after exhausting those options."

"It was pretty complex to implement CyberArk Identity. We had some help from a partner, and that helped a lot. But even for the partner, it was really difficult to streamline the process of implementing."

"At the moment CyberArk needs to enrich Conjur and it needs to be made more viable so that its adoption can be made much faster."

"I faced some challenges during the initial setup of CyberArk Identity. At some points, I could not find proper documentation for deploying, enhancing, or integrating with other components."

"CyberArk Identity's GUI is an area with certain shortcomings that need improvement."

More CyberArk Identity cons

"We really like the ability to add the same user across tenants. From a UX perspective, the flow can be betterized."

"The web interface is missing a way to delete a workspace. I have accidentally created a workspace and was not able to delete it. It's a minor thing that should be supported."

"It would be nice to have a backup export with all tenant/users so that in case of a mistake we can have the option to restore the users."

"It would be nice to have a export button to file with all tenants/users so that in case of a disaster we will have the option to restore the users from file."

"We're hoping to see more user management-related features, according to Frontegg's roadmap."

"The PHP SDK is limited."

"Frontegg is fairly stable, however, we are looking forward to some promised capabilities, such as more tightly integrated Feature Flag support."

"We really like the ability to add the same user across tenants. From a UX perspective, the flow can be betterized."

More Frontegg cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Their pricing is obviously a lot higher than many vendors in the marketplace but their service is also unmatched."

"There could be some additional costs apart from the licensing costs of the solution when you want to develop connectors in CyberArk Identity."

"In terms of pricing, BeyondTrust and CyberArk tend to be more expensive, with CyberArk receiving an eight out of ten, in this regard."

"CyberArk Identity is an expensive solution."

"I think it is a fairly priced tool. I rate the tool between six and seven on a scale of one to ten where one is expensive, and ten is cheap."

"The solution is cheap and I rate its pricing an eight out of ten."

"The pricing of CyberArk Identity is competitive."

"I would rate the tool’s pricing a seven out of ten. The product’s pricing is expensive and is on a yearly basis. You will need to pay around 10,000 GBP for 500 users."

More CyberArk Identity pricing and cost advice

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Authentication Systems solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

885,311 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

14%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Computer Software Company

Healthcare Company

Government

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Educational Organization

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	20
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	10

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about CyberArk Identity?

The integration capabilities, ability to integrate CyberArk into the overall IBB strategy of our current clients.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for CyberArk Identity?

I am not certain about CyberArk Identity's exact pricing model. For comparison, Okta was around five dollars per user. CyberArk Identity offers good discounts to some clients, which influences thei...

See all answers

What needs improvement with CyberArk Identity?

We do not specifically use the password vaulting feature of CyberArk Identity. The centralized user dashboard of CyberArk Identity has not been that important for us. If it would be possible to sha...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

SailPoint Identity Security Cloud vs CyberArk Identity

Compared 9% of the time

Microsoft Entra ID vs CyberArk Identity

Compared 6% of the time

Okta Platform vs CyberArk Identity

Compared 6% of the time

Microsoft Intune vs CyberArk Identity

Compared 4% of the time

Ping Identity Platform vs CyberArk Identity

Compared 4% of the time

More CyberArk Identity Competitors

Auth0 Platform vs Frontegg

Compared 19% of the time

Okta Platform vs Frontegg

Compared 16% of the time

WorkOS vs Frontegg

Compared 12% of the time

Microsoft Entra ID vs Frontegg

Compared 9% of the time

Fortinet FortiAuthenticator vs Frontegg

Compared 9% of the time

More Frontegg Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

CyberArk Identity

March 2026

Download CyberArk Identity product report

Buyer's Guide

Single Sign-On (SSO)

March 2026

Download Frontegg product report

Also Known As

Idaptive

No data available

Overview

CyberArk Identity is a versatile identity management solution suitable for a wide range of enterprises. It is designed to enhance enterprise security and improve user experience. Its focus on security, compliance, and operational efficiency, combined with positive user feedback, makes it a strong contender in the identity management space.

CyberArk Identity offers a robust suite of features to manage user identities and access privileges. It focuses on securing access to resources across various environments, including cloud and on-premises applications. Its capabilities include single sign-on (SSO), multi-factor authentication (MFA), lifecycle management, and privileged access management. These features are engineered to streamline access control, enhance security, and ensure compliance with regulatory standards.

Single Sign-On (SSO) simplifies user access by providing a single authentication point for multiple applications.
Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA) adds an extra layer of security by requiring additional verification methods.
Lifecycle Management automates user account provisioning and deprovisioning, aligning with HR processes and compliance requirements.
Privileged Access Management secures and monitors access to critical systems and data by privileged users.

According to our user interviews, CyberArk Identity is praised for its reliability and user-friendly interface. IT professionals highlight the ease of integration with existing systems, while business executives appreciate the visibility it provides into access and identity management across the organization. Users also commend the responsive customer support, which is crucial for enterprise-level solutions.

IT Professionals found that CyberArk Identity's focus on multi-layered security significantly reduced the risk of data breaches and unauthorized access. With a centralized dashboard and automation features, you can streamline identity and access management tasks, saving time and reducing complexity. Finally, it helps meet various compliance requirements.

CyberArk

Frontegg is a user management platform, designed for the Product-Led Growth (PLG) era. Frontegg provides blazing-fast integration of a powerful user infrastructure, designed to handle modern application use-cases.

Our platform supports app builders by covering all the way from fundamental authentication flows to the most advanced capabilities such as complex organizational structures (multi-tenancy), fine-grained authorization, API-token management, self-service admin portal for end-users, subscription enforcement, single-sign-on (SSO), and much more.

Frontegg’s interfaces are embedded as a UI layer within your app and becomes a customer-facing management interface for your end-users, both on the personal and workspace levels. Frontegg also powers-up your backend through rich SDKs supported in various languages and frameworks.

Pricing: Starts at $249/m

Frontegg

Sample Customers

MLB, Citi, Pfizer, SulAmerica, GE Capital, Shiseido

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

CyberArk Identity vs. Frontegg

March 2026

Free Report: CyberArk Identity vs. Frontegg

Find out what your peers are saying about CyberArk Identity vs. Frontegg and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

885,311 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our CyberArk Identity vs. Frontegg report.

See our list of best Authentication Systems vendors and best Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) vendors.

We monitor all Authentication Systems reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.