CrowdStrike Observability [EOL] vs Devo comparison

Why PeerSpot?

CrowdStrike and Devo are both solutions in the Log Management category. Additionally, 100% of CrowdStrike users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 92% of Devo users who would recommend it.

CrowdStrike Observability [...

Read 8 CrowdStrike Observability [EOL] reviews

100% willing to recommend

Devo

Read 27 Devo reviews

7,610 Views
3,957 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

CrowdStrike Observability [...

Devo

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 26, 2026

Devo and CrowdStrike Observability compete in the realm of data analytics and observability solutions. Devo seems to have an advantage for users seeking extensive data manipulation and fast analytics, while CrowdStrike Observability is preferred for comprehensive data protection and predictive capabilities.

Features: Devo focuses on high-speed search, real-time analytics, and modular UI, allowing for efficient work with large datasets and flexible workflows without heavy vendor reliance. Activeboards and CyberChef enhance its analytical capabilities. CrowdStrike Observability emphasizes comprehensive data protection with predictive analytics, agent-less data collection, and an intuitive dashboard for enhanced user interface experiences.

Room for Improvement: Devo could improve its Activeboards' visual appearance, cloud SaaS integrations, pre-built monitoring capabilities, data ingestion processes, and technical support response times. CrowdStrike Observability faces challenges with complex module integration, lengthy issue resolution, user interface simplification, and report retention.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Devo supports both on-premises and cloud deployments, with quick deployment and an integrative support team, although technical support responsiveness needs improvement. CrowdStrike Observability offers hybrid deployment with agile methods, focusing on flexibility and customer needs with professional and flexible support ensuring smooth execution.

Pricing and ROI: Devo employs a straightforward pricing model based on data ingestion, offering 400 days of data storage without hidden costs. It provides high value and predictable pricing without extra charges for features. CrowdStrike Observability is considered expensive, akin to a Rolls-Royce, but it's justified by its comprehensive capabilities, limiting accessibility for smaller organizations.

To learn more, read our detailed Log Management Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Log Management

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 913,630 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

CrowdStrike Observability [...

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

4.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Devo

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Log Management (17th), Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) (17th), IT Operations Analytics (7th), AIOps (16th)

Featured Reviews

HectorRios

IT COMMUNICATIONS AND NETWORKS at Américas BPS

Has provided reliable alerts and helped identify infrastructure issues through detailed reporting

The best features of CrowdStrike Observability include the way they show issues to the client or agent, and their data collection method is interesting because they use an agent-less approach in some cases, collecting data from infrastructure such as firewalls. Additionally, they have the agent, but the presentation in the management console is excellent as we have observability end-to-end with the servers and all the services configured in the use cases. The intelligent alerting feature is excellent and configured on our console, being highly effective as it detects real alerts and just warnings or real issues. Identifying performance bottlenecks is important because they collect numerous MD5 or hash keys including movements or playbooks. The way they organize that in the console is excellent, allowing you to have reports detecting issues, which not only includes detection but also provides solutions to those issues.

Read full review

Usama Khan

Team Lead Soc at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

Advanced threat hunting has improved SOC visibility and now supports faster incident response

Devo can improve in how its connectors enhance integration with third-party tools. Devo's architecture works by having you deploy a relay server in the data center of the client side and Devo SIEM is basically on the AWS cloud. There are specific ports which are enabled on the relay server, which are 514 and 13000, 13151, 152. However, when we talk about databases and custom integrations, there are not default ports in the relay server. No default ports are defined. For JDBC drivers, the port number is 1433, but it is not in the relay server. You have to add it manually. For Oracle RDBMS, the port is 1521, and it is also not there by default. I would appreciate more third-party integrations including Fortinet and others. Machine learning models can also be improved. Playbooks in the SOAR can also be improved. Regarding playbooks for automation, we utilize playbooks for automation in SOAR for automated IOC blocking on a firewall, on a web application firewall, on DNS security, etc. The only option for us to run the playbook is to schedule the job for it. However, if I want to manually run the playbook, there is no option for doing so. This needs improvement.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The price is worth it."

"I find the most effective feature of CrowdStrike Observability to be its cloud vision and attack surface vision, which enhance network traffic analysis."

"The best features of CrowdStrike Observability include the way they show issues to the client or agent, and their data collection method is interesting because they use an agent-less approach in some cases, collecting data from infrastructure such as firewalls."

"The log aggregation and correlation of data are notable features that enhance our operations."

"The intelligence database provided by CrowdStrike is very impressive."

"The intelligent alerting feature is excellent and configured on our console, being highly effective as it detects real alerts and just warnings or real issues."

"In the logs and the trajectory, it shows detailed information about where the source of infection comes from, how it travels, and how to reach there."

"CrowdStrike Observability offers strong predictive analytics capabilities, and the intelligent alerting system helps minimize noise and optimize IT resources effectively."

More CrowdStrike Observability [EOL] pros

"The querying and the log-retention capabilities are pretty powerful. Those provide some of the biggest value-add for us."

"I'm so happy with the platform."

"The ROI has been great as we could launch it in a few months instead of a couple of years, and when you put all the costs together, it is less to have done it than with the open source approach."

"Even if it's a relatively technical tool or platform, it's very intuitive and graphical. It's very appealing in terms of the user interface. The UI has a graphically interface with the raw data in a table. The table can be as big as you want it, depending on your use case. You can easily get a report combining your data, along with calculations and graphical dashboards. You don't need a lot of training, because the UI is relatively very intuitive."

"More than anything, we have seen ROI in the amount of time saved during investigations."

"When we show the people who are in charge of getting funding that we saved this number of man-hours, which correlates to this number of dollars, they're more willing to fight to get that funding for the next fiscal year."

"But from a SaaS standpoint, if not best-in-breed, Devo is certainly in the top-two or top-three."

"The ability to have high performance, high-speed search capability is incredibly important for us. When it comes to doing security analysis, you don't want to be doing is sitting around waiting to get data back while an attacker is sitting on a network, actively attacking it. You need to be able to answer questions quickly. If I see an indicator of attack, I need to be able to rapidly pivot and find data, then analyze it and find more data to answer more questions. You need to be able to do that quickly. If I'm sitting around just waiting to get my first response, then it ends up moving too slow to keep up with the attacker. Devo's speed and performance allows us to query in real-time and keep up with what is actually happening on the network, then respond effectively to events."

More Devo pros

Cons

"The customer service is not satisfactory for me. The support is only available in English, and my users in LATAM regions such as Peru and Colombia require local language support, which is not currently provided."

"We had some difficulties at the beginning, but at this moment they are improving, so probably in some months I will give them a ten."

"From the different deployments I have worked with, the shortcomings of CrowdStrike Observability are often because of what clients are able to share with CrowdStrike."

"The pricing is very high and small companies cannot afford it. They should reduce the price because the backend infrastructure is the same."

"For reporting or log management, having a longer duration for backup without needing to purchase a paid subscription would be beneficial. Currently, there is a default ninety-day backup period."

"Integration with Huawei should be more straightforward."

"Technical support received a rating of 4 out of 10."

"The areas of CrowdStrike Observability that have room for improvement include the approach towards customer issues, where resolution takes time."

"Some basic reporting mechanisms have room for improvement. Customers can do analysis by building Activeboards, Devo’s name for interactive dashboards. This capability is quite nice, but it is not a reporting engine. Devo does provide mechanisms to allow third-party tools to query data via their API, which is great. However, a lot of folks like or want a reporting engine, per se, and Devo simply doesn't have that. This may or may not be by design."

"The biggest area with room for improvement in Devo is the Security Operations module that just isn't there yet."

"Where Devo has room for improvement is the data ingestion and parsing. We tend to have to work with the Devo support team to bring on and ingest new sources of data."

"Both response time and support quality need attention."

"One improvement area for Devo could be simplifying some configuration and improving the onboarding for new analysts because it is quite complex for fresher or new analysts who are handling Devo."

"There's always room to reduce the learning curve over how to deal with events and machine data. They could make the machine data simpler."

"I would like to have the ability to create more complex dashboards."

"Technical support needs to be more direct. For example, when we submit a ticket, the support team will delegate a task to the operations team, for example, or various other teams."

More Devo cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"Pricing is based on the number of gigabytes of ingestion by volume, and it's on a 30-day average. If you go over one day, that's not a big deal as long as the average is what you expected it to be."

"[Devo was] in the ballpark with at least a couple of the other front-runners that we were looking at. Devo is a good value and, given the quality of the product, I would expect to pay more."

"It's very competitive. That was also a primary draw for us. Some of the licensing models with solutions like Splunk and Sentinel were attractive upfront, but there were so many micro-charges and services we would've had to add on to make them what we wanted. We had to include things like SOAR and extended capabilities, whereas all those capabilities are completely included with the Devo platform. I haven't seen any additional fee."

"I'm not involved in the financial aspect, but I think the licensing costs are similar to other solutions. If all the solutions have a similar cost, Devo provides more for the money."

"I like the pricing very much. They keep it simple. It is a single price based on data ingested, and they do it on an average. If you get a spike of data that flows in, they will not stick it to you or charge you for that. They are very fair about that."

"Devo is a hosted or subscription-based solution, whereas before, we purchased QRadar, so we owned it and just had to pay a maintenance fee. We've encountered this with some other products, too, where we went over to subscription-based. Our thought process is that with subscription based, the provider hosts and maintains the tool, and it's offsite. That comes with some additional fees, but we were able to convince our upper management it was worth the price. We used to pay under 10k a year for maintenance, and now we're paying ten times that. It was a relatively tough sell to our management, but I wonder if we have a choice anymore; this is where the market is."

"Devo is definitely cheaper than Splunk. There's no doubt about that. The value from Devo is good. It's definitely more valuable to me than QRadar or LogRhythm or any of the old, traditional SIEMs."

"Our licensing fees are billed annually and per terabyte."

More Devo pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Log Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

913,630 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

16%

Construction Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

13%

Outsourcing Company

11%

Construction Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	3

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	10
Midsize Enterprise	6
Large Enterprise	12

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with CrowdStrike Observability?

From the different deployments I have worked with, the shortcomings of CrowdStrike Observability are often because of what clients are able to share with CrowdStrike. If there are limitations in wh...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for CrowdStrike Observability?

We are currently using a complete suite of anti-malware software and other security products in our company. I have worked with both the on-premises version and the cloud version, but I am more fam...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering CrowdStrike Observability?

I am probably familiar with CrowdStrike Observability. I first heard of CrowdStrike Observability a couple of years ago, and I only really started looking into it about a year ago. I cannot comment...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Devo?

The price is considered okay.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Devo?

Perhaps Devo could add some features in the future on the network part. Specifically, I think they could improve network traffic analysis capabilities.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Devo?

I have been using Devo as a partner and system integrator for three years. For log monitoring, the clients' use cases can utilize Devo perfectly. Compliance and security operation monitoring are th...

See all answers

Comparisons

Datadog vs CrowdStrike Observability [EOL]

Compared 8% of the time

Wazuh vs CrowdStrike Observability [EOL]

Compared 8% of the time

Lumen Security Log Monitoring vs CrowdStrike Observability [EOL]

Compared 6% of the time

XpoLog vs CrowdStrike Observability [EOL]

Compared 5% of the time

Elastic Stack vs CrowdStrike Observability [EOL]

Compared 5% of the time

More CrowdStrike Observability [EOL] Competitors

Splunk Enterprise Security vs Devo

Compared 8% of the time

LogRhythm SIEM vs Devo

Compared 6% of the time

New Relic vs Devo

Compared 4% of the time

Datadog vs Devo

Compared 3% of the time

IBM Security QRadar vs Devo

Compared 2% of the time

More Devo Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

CrowdStrike Observability [EOL]

September 2026

Download CrowdStrike Observability [EOL] product report

Buyer's Guide

Devo

September 2026

Download Devo product report

Overview

CrowdStrike Observability provides comprehensive endpoint security and threat protection through an intuitive platform, leveraging advanced analytics and centralized data management to minimize system impact and enhance detection capabilities.

With features like log aggregation, data correlation, and an extensive intelligence database, CrowdStrike Observability effectively tracks hardware, software inventory, and threats using an agent-less data collection approach. Its cloud vision and attack surface vision improve network traffic analysis, while predictive analytics and intelligent alerting reduce unnecessary noise. Despite its strengths, integration with Huawei remains a challenge, and users indicate the need for improved customer service and seamless integration with other security products. Modules complexity can hinder understanding, and there is demand for longer backup durations without additional costs. Users often request the inclusion of XDR features at no additional charge, while CrowdStrike continues to enhance reporting, log management, and feature additions. Common applications include endpoint security, AI-based EDR and XDR solutions, and fraud protection with a focus on detection and prevention in cloud environments.

What are the key features of CrowdStrike Observability?

Log Aggregation: Collects and centralizes log data for enhanced analysis.
Data Correlation: Links data points to identify patterns and threats.
Intelligence Database: Provides extensive threat intelligence for proactive security.
Minimal System Impact: Ensures efficient performance with low resource usage.
Predictive Analytics and Alerting: Minimizes false alerts and enhances decision-making.

What benefits or ROI should users expect?

Enhanced Threat Detection: Leverages powerful analytics to identify threats proactively.
Cost-effective Cloud Storage: Centralizes data, though cloud storage is an additional cost.
Improved IT Resource Optimization: Identifies performance bottlenecks for better resource management.

In finance and cybersecurity industries, CrowdStrike Observability plays a crucial role, offering endpoint security and log management solutions. Financial organizations employ it for fraud protection and maintaining security in both local and cloud infrastructures, relying on its AI-based EDR and XDR capabilities for comprehensive coverage. Integration with Google Cloud is prevalent, facilitating enhanced threat detection and prevention strategies.

CrowdStrike

Devo offers powerful visual analytics, real-time data querying, and log integration capabilities within a cloud-native, multi-tenant architecture, supporting extended data retention ideal for long-term analysis and compliance.

Devo is recognized for its Activeboards, which facilitate visual analytics. High-speed search capabilities and real-time analytics enable efficient data manipulation and querying. Its multi-tenant architecture supports effective data segregation and customization tailored to distinct business needs, enhancing its value for handling complex log integrations. With extended data retention of 400 days and a cloud-native architecture, Devo is a robust platform for long-term analysis and compliance requirements. Though opportunities exist to improve browser stability on large searches, SOAR integrations, and its parser capabilities, Devo remains essential for incident response and security monitoring, offering centralized data storage and analysis.

What are Devo's most important features?

Activeboards: Facilitate visual analytics and data exploration.
High-Speed Search: Enables fast data querying and manipulation.
Real-Time Analytics: Supports instant insights and decision-making.
Multi-Tenant Architecture: Allows effective data segregation and customization.
Extended Data Retention: Offers 400-day log retention for compliance and analysis.
Complex Log Integration: Handles intricate data sources effortlessly.

What benefits and ROI should organizations look for in reviews?

Visual Insights: Enhance understanding through interactive dashboards.
Performance Efficiency: Saves time with high-speed data search and real-time results.
Customization Flexibility: Fits specific business requirements with multi-tenant architecture.
Long-Term Compliance: Ensures alignment with extended data retention needs.
Centralized Monitoring: Enables comprehensive incident response and security monitoring.

Devo is extensively used in industries focused on incident response and digital forensics, centralizing data for security monitoring across hybrid environments. Organizations benefit from its ability to store and analyze aggregated logs, creating alerts and dashboards to enhance visibility for network and endpoint activities in multi-domain settings.

Devo

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

United States Air Force, Rubrik, SentinelOne, Critical Start, NHL, Panda Security, Telefonica, CaixaBank, OpenText, IGT, OneMain Financial, SurveyMonkey, FanDuel, H&R Block, Ulta Beauty, Manulife, Moneylion, Chime Bank, Magna International, American Express Global Business Travel

Find out what your peers are saying about Splunk, Wazuh, Datadog and others in Log Management. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

913,630 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Log Management vendors.

We monitor all Log Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.