No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Creatio Studio vs PhixFlow comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 14, 2026

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Creatio Studio
Ranking in Low-Code Development Platforms
4th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
6.4
Number of Reviews
30
Ranking in other categories
Business Process Management (BPM) (4th), Rapid Application Development Software (10th), Business Orchestration and Automation Technologies (9th)
PhixFlow
Ranking in Low-Code Development Platforms
68th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2026, in the Low-Code Development Platforms category, the mindshare of Creatio Studio is 2.4%, up from 1.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of PhixFlow is 0.5%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Low-Code Development Platforms Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Creatio Studio2.4%
PhixFlow0.5%
Other97.1%
Low-Code Development Platforms
 

Featured Reviews

BK
Creatio Consultant at AavishkarIT Solutions Pvt Ltd
Automation has transformed banking workflows and drives custom process optimization
Based on my six years of experience, I see that Studio Creatio is continuously improving its workflows, materials, and capabilities. I still see potential improvements in certain areas. For example, some capabilities that the system does not have need to be identified so that customers are aware of what is not possible. The system should be designed to allow customers to connect with any system seamlessly rather than just through marketplace applications. It should have the capability to connect with any other system without limitation, as in some projects, while it was able to connect with 100 other systems, there were one, two, or a few that were not compatible. Regarding needed improvements, with respect to use cases and documentation, more comprehensive use cases and in-depth scenarios covering real business situations and solutions are definitely needed. Mobile users are quite frustrated, so the system needs more modern features, modern user interfaces, and an independent development module for the mobile app. The current mobile app is outdated, and I cannot customize it accordingly. Something new in this area is necessary.
Use PhixFlow?
Leave a review
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Low-Code Development Platforms solutions are best for your needs.
920,336 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Construction Company
13%
Comms Service Provider
11%
Outsourcing Company
11%
Manufacturing Company
11%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business16
Midsize Enterprise6
Large Enterprise7
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Studio Creatio?
My experience with pricing, setup costs, and licensing indicates that it was a bit expensive, but since it is a tool that is quite innovative and among the top leaders, it makes sense.
What needs improvement with Studio Creatio?
Creatio Studio can be improved in the area of AI-assisted development, which is currently being developed and is in beta as far as I know. This enhancement will allow you to develop more quickly.
What is your primary use case for Studio Creatio?
My main use case for Creatio Studio involves doing projects for different customers, including banks and people that need to use Creatio Studio. I do the development for them.I worked on a project ...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Comparisons

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

First United Bank & Trust, Josera, BSN Sports, Colgate-Palmolive, Guided Care, Maryland Department of Disabilities, Vodafone, Sureserve
1. Atlassian 2. Cisco 3. Google 4. IBM 5. Intel 6. Microsoft 7. Oracle 8. SAP 9. Salesforce 10. VMware 11. Adobe 12. Autodesk 13. Canonical 14. Dassault Systems 15. Dell 16. Ericsson 17. Facebook 18. GE 19. HP 20. Huawei 21. Intuit 22. Klarna 23. LinkedIn 24. McKinsey 25. Mercedes-Benz 26. Netflix 27. Nike 28. Pinterest 29. Qualcomm 30. Red Hat 31. SAP Concur 32. Spotify
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Mendix, OutSystems and others in Low-Code Development Platforms. Updated: October 2026.
920,336 professionals have used our research since 2012.