CoSoSys Endpoint Protector vs Digital Guardian comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between CoSoSys Endpoint Protector and Digital Guardian based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Data Loss Prevention (DLP) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed CoSoSys Endpoint Protector vs. Digital Guardian Report (Updated: May 2023).
709,643 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"Endpoint Protector's best features are its protection and user-friendliness.""It is fantastic in terms of the granularity of the policies. It has many built-in policies, and we can add or create more policies as well. It is perfect, and it gives us more options. We have some users who go outside and then come inside. With EPP, we can even control those users who are outside. If they need to access the media that we are using right now, we can provide OTP messages so that they can access the media even when they are outside of their organization. With our previous solution, we were facing some issues in doing this.""We like that content-aware and device controls can easily be managed. They're not complicated. You don't need to be a rocket scientist to understand them.""I like the data protection feature. Our users were working on a client's CRM application with a lot of client-related EIA information. We did not want the users to be able to send any of this data outside. I also like its ability to protect against data leaks via emails and social media. I like that you can deploy it quickly, and it requires no training.""The device control is a big deal for us because we can actually lock out removable drives and different types of hardware. It allows us to have better control over what end-users plug into their computers, and we can have deny lists and tighten our security posture."

More CoSoSys Endpoint Protector Pros →

"It has been scalable.""The most valuable feature of Digital Guardian is its reputation. They have scored high on the Gartner Magic Quadrant.""There is a built-in endpoint detection response that helps save money.""It has the added advantage of offering forensic analysis.""We have been able to monitor access to files from each of our workstations.""Some of the features that are highly appreciated are its robust data loss prevention capabilities, flexible deployment options, and the ability to monitor data transfer across multiple vectors.""It can scale from 100 to 10,000. There's no problem with the scalability."

More Digital Guardian Pros →

Cons
"The reports and analysis could be improved. There could be a little more data, and the logs could be a little more granular, but it's nothing major. It does what it needs to do, and it's fine.""Endpoint Protector would be improved with more DLP templates.""Because it is only an Endpoint Protector at this point in time, it does not have a network DLP component. There's only an endpoint DLP component. In the future, it would be good if a network DLP component could be embedded and extended to have network DLP capabilities.""We are using it to only apply media restrictions. When we are installing a new agent, we have to install EPP manually on a device. It would be great if the installations can be done from the server instead of me going to each PC or device to implement EPP or using a policy. They should have some sort of system so that a domain admin can install EPP on all PCs from a central manager.""It would be better if they had an inbound restriction feature. For example, I work out of my home from my personal computer. All my policies can be deployed while working. When I am done, I should be able to use my machine as my personal machine, and all these policies should be waived. In the next release, I want time bound restriction of the policies because most of these users were working out of home and using their personal computers."

More CoSoSys Endpoint Protector Cons →

"There are a lot of issues with the current version of the Endpoint agent. It's not stable, it's resource-consuming, and there are some performance issues. If they could improve the stability of the agent it would be great.""The initial setup is a bit more complex than other solutions.""When considering potential areas for improvement, it may be beneficial for Digital Guardian to optimize its processes and reduce the computational demands on the system, particularly with regard to high CPU usage. Although Digital Guardian offers numerous benefits, it can consume a substantial amount of RAM and CPU power.""It would be helpful if there was an on-premise version of the solution for companies that cannot use the cloud, such as government sectors.""Technical support could be better.""Digital Guardian is an excellent solution but our experience with the partner has been the most horrible experience we have ever had with any partner.""The solution has complexities around policy creation and deployment."

More Digital Guardian Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "From what we've seen, their pricing is a lot lower than the other stuff we've looked at. I actually don't have any concerns with their pricing. They were probably the most reasonable company out there for the features that were offered. It was pretty straightforward in terms of licensing, and you just pay for the license."
  • "We have a limited budget for our media section. When we purchased it last year, we migrated from a different solution to this solution, and at that time, they told us that the cost will remain the same, but this year, they increased the price by 20% or something like that. I am not sure about the exact price, but let's say from 8,000, it increased to 10,000. It was a huge gap, and we couldn't bear this cost because we have a limited budget. When we spoke to them, they understood our problem and reduced it to the same price that we had last year."
  • "The pricing is very competitive and is cheaper in comparison to that of other solutions. It makes it an easy decision to go with EPP for the data loss prevention infrastructure."
  • "We found the pricing pretty attractive. However, volume-based pricing wasn't available."
  • More CoSoSys Endpoint Protector Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "The price of Digital Guardian is expensive."
  • "The cost was around $300,000."
  • "The price of Digital Guardian is on the higher end compared to other vendors."
  • More Digital Guardian Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Loss Prevention (DLP) solutions are best for your needs.
    709,643 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:I like the data protection feature. Our users were working on a client's CRM application with a lot of client-related EIA information. We did not want the users to be able to send any of this data… more »
    Top Answer:We found the pricing pretty attractive. However, volume-based pricing wasn't available. On a scale from one to ten, I would give pricing a seven.
    Top Answer:It would be better if they had an inbound restriction feature. For example, I work out of my home from my personal computer. All my policies can be deployed while working. When I am done, I should be… more »
    Top Answer:The most valuable feature of Digital Guardian is its reputation. They have scored high on the Gartner Magic Quadrant.
    Top Answer:It would be helpful if there was an on-premise version of the solution for companies that cannot use the cloud, such as government sectors.
    Ranking
    Views
    27,461
    Comparisons
    4,065
    Reviews
    4
    Average Words per Review
    800
    Rating
    8.8
    Views
    5,954
    Comparisons
    3,839
    Reviews
    6
    Average Words per Review
    611
    Rating
    7.0
    Comparisons
    Learn More
    Overview

    Content Aware Protection
    Scanning data in motion
    Monitor, control and block file transfers. Detailed control through both content and context inspection.

    Device Control
    USB & peripheral port control
    Lockdown, monitor and manage devices. Granular control based on Vendor ID, Product ID, Serial Number and more.

    Enforced Encryption
    Automatic USB encryption
    Encrypt, manage and secure USB storage devices by safeguarding data in transit. Password-based, easy to use and very efficient.


    eDiscovery
    Scanning data at rest
    Discover, encrypt and delete sensitive data. Detailed content and context inspection through manual or automatic scans

    Digital Guardian Endpoint Data Loss Prevention (DLP) protects sensitive data on all your endpoints. It protects intellectual property and personal information. An endpoint agent that captures and records all system, user and data events on or off the network. It has a granular control of all data movement that can be configured to automatically block, justify or encrypt sensitive data in or attached to email, files moved to removable drives, cloud storage, or web - malware and malware-free - before sensitive data is lost. It has a built-in advanced data classification that creates and modifies classification and usage policies through content inspection, context-awareness and user classification. It provides design policies with controls that won't block actions that comply with corporate policy so employees remain productive while the data stays safe.

    Offer
    Learn more about CoSoSys Endpoint Protector
    Learn more about Digital Guardian
    Sample Customers
    Samsung, Toyota, Philips, Zeppelin, Western Union, eBay
    The Fifth Avenue Theatre, Jabil Circuit
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Aerospace/Defense Firm17%
    Comms Service Provider17%
    Financial Services Firm17%
    Marketing Services Firm17%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company22%
    Comms Service Provider12%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Financial Services Firm6%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company16%
    Financial Services Firm12%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Insurance Company7%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business47%
    Midsize Enterprise37%
    Large Enterprise16%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business30%
    Midsize Enterprise18%
    Large Enterprise52%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business73%
    Large Enterprise27%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business20%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise67%
    Buyer's Guide
    CoSoSys Endpoint Protector vs. Digital Guardian
    May 2023
    Find out what your peers are saying about CoSoSys Endpoint Protector vs. Digital Guardian and other solutions. Updated: May 2023.
    709,643 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    CoSoSys Endpoint Protector is ranked 4th in Data Loss Prevention (DLP) with 5 reviews while Digital Guardian is ranked 6th in Data Loss Prevention (DLP) with 7 reviews. CoSoSys Endpoint Protector is rated 8.8, while Digital Guardian is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of CoSoSys Endpoint Protector writes "Makes management and upgrades easier and provides better control". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Digital Guardian writes "Highly customizable, helpful support, and multiple modules available". CoSoSys Endpoint Protector is most compared with Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention, Symantec Data Loss Prevention, Zscaler Cloud DLP and GTB Technologies Inspector, whereas Digital Guardian is most compared with Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, Symantec Data Loss Prevention, Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention and Code42 Incydr. See our CoSoSys Endpoint Protector vs. Digital Guardian report.

    See our list of best Data Loss Prevention (DLP) vendors.

    We monitor all Data Loss Prevention (DLP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.