Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Coralogix vs webMethods.io comparison

Coralogix and IBM are both solutions in the API Management category. Coralogix is ranked #16 with an average rating of 8.2, while IBM is ranked #9 with an average rating of 8.1. Coralogix holds a 0.1% mindshare in APIM, compared to IBM’s 2.3% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of Coralogix users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 94% of IBM users who would recommend it.
Coralogix
Read 11 Coralogix reviews
  • 76 Views
  • 41 Comparison Views
92% willing to recommend
webMethods.io
Read 92 webMethods.io reviews
  • 2,801 Views
  • 1,597 Comparison Views
94% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 17, 2024

Coralogix and webMethods.io are competitive products in data management and integration. Coralogix is stronger in real-time analytics, while webMethods.io excels in integration and automation, making it versatile for complex environments.

Features: Coralogix provides advanced alerting, real-time data indexing, and high-performance visualization tools. webMethods.io offers extensive API management, B2B integration, and IoT readiness, which help in integrating multiple systems effectively.

Room for Improvement: Coralogix could enhance its integration capabilities and automation features. Additionally, improving its scalability in diverse environments would be beneficial. webMethods.io can focus on simplifying the user interface and reducing initial setup complexity. Enhancing real-time analytics capabilities might also be advantageous.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Coralogix offers straightforward deployment with robust support ensuring efficient use. webMethods.io features seamless cloud deployment with strong customer service and integration assistance, particularly suitable for enterprises undergoing digital transformation.

Pricing and ROI: Coralogix provides competitive pricing with scalable analytics solutions focusing on cost-efficiency. webMethods.io may require a higher initial investment, yet it often delivers significant ROI through its comprehensive integration potential and automation efficiencies.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Coralogix vs. webMethods.io Report (Updated: April 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Coralogix vs. webMethods.io
April 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 855,080 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Coralogix
Ranking in API Management
16th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
11
Ranking in other categories
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability (20th), Log Management (19th), Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) (22nd), Streaming Analytics (12th), Anomaly Detection Tools (1st)
webMethods.io
Ranking in API Management
9th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
92
Ranking in other categories
Business-to-Business Middleware (3rd), Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) (3rd), Managed File Transfer (MFT) (9th), Cloud Data Integration (6th), Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) (5th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the API Management category, the mindshare of Coralogix is 0.1%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of webMethods.io is 2.3%, up from 1.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
API Management
 

Featured Reviews

reviewer1915599 - PeerSpot reviewer
Good capabilities, has a helpful interface and is straightforward to set up
We have asked for a couple of features from the company already. What typically happens is a lot of people - and developers are one of the biggest consumers of this product - go to this product to optimize their investigation process and specific configurations. That increases our data flow at times, so the cost changes. And a lot of changes happen due to that. We have asked the company to auto-revert the changes after a while so that the system works typically. We want it to work at what it is expected to work at and not really based on the updated configuration which one developer has decided to change.
Read full review
MohanPrasad - PeerSpot reviewer
Smooth integration and enhanced deployment with high licensing cost
webMethods.io was used to integrate APIs through the webMethods.io platform, trigger database events, and connect backend APIs through a Java backend. It was used extensively for integration purposes in my organization Integration became smoother, troubleshooting was easier, and deployment and…
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The best feature of this solution allows us to correlate logs, metrics and traces."
"The log monitoring is good, and the dashboards that we create are beneficial."
"The most valuable feature of Coralogix is that it is a very good vendor for metrics."
"The solution offers very good convenience filtering."
"The initial setup is straightforward."
"Coralogix scales well, and I will rate it nine out of ten."
"Numerous data monitoring tools are available, but Coralogix somehow fine-tunes our policies and effectively supports our teams."
"The overall stability and reliability of Coralogix are excellent, and I rarely encounter issues."
More Coralogix pros
"The core product can be used not only for automatic file transfers between applications, but also as an Enterprise Service Bus (ESB)."
"It's easy to construct new interfaces like apps and client portals."
"webMethods Trading Networks is a good solution for interacting with outside of the organization. We can integrate the solutions with multiple outside the organization."
"Ease of implementation and flexibility to hold the business logic are the most valuable features."
"It's a good tool, and it has a stable messaging broker."
"I like the tool's scalability."
"They are the building blocks of EAI in SAG products, and they offer a very good platform."
"ActiveTransfer lets us maintain the file in the staging area before we transfer it. After that, we can remove the file to make sure that the reconciliation process is done. Sometimes we will zip and unzip the files, but if we have a GKB file, we often ignore it."
More webMethods.io pros
 

Cons

"The customizable dashboards haven't really helped with my company's efficiency at all, and I think there's room for improvement."
"From my experience, Coralogix has horrible Terraform providers."
"The documentation of the tool could be improved"
"The user interface is not intuitive, especially when first onboarding, and improvements could be made here."
"It would be helpful if Coralogix could integrate the main modules that any organization requires into a single subscription."
"We want it to work at what it is expected to work at and not really based on the updated configuration which one developer has decided to change."
"Coralogix should have some AI capabilities to auto-detect anomalies and provide suggestions. The increasing volume of data and the resulting bandwidth charges are concerns."
"Coralogix should have some AI capabilities to auto-detect anomalies and provide suggestions."
More Coralogix cons
"The deployment should be simplified."
"The interface needs some work. It is not very user-friendly."
"The solution has big instances when deployed under microservices or in a containerized platform. They need to improve that so that it is competitive with other integration solutions, like Redis and Kafka. Deployments under microservices with those solutions are much more lightweight, in the size of the runtime itself, compared with Software AG."
"With respect to the API gateway, the runtime component, the stability after a new release is something that can be improved."
"On the monitoring side of things, the UI for monitoring could be improved. It's a bit cumbersome to work with."
"When migration happens from the one release to an upgraded release from Software AG, many of the existing services are deprecated and developers have to put in effort testing and redeveloping some of the services. It would be better that upgrade releases took care to support the lower-level versions of webMethods."
"The product needs to be improved in a few ways. First, they need to stabilize the components of the whole platform across versions. Also, they should stop replacing old components with brand new ones and, rather, improve by evolution."
"The price should be reduced to make it more affordable."
More webMethods.io cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The cost of the solution is per volume of data ingested."
"The platform has a reasonable cost. I rate the pricing a three out of ten."
"Currently, we are at a very minimal cost, which is around $400 per month since we have reduced our usage. Initially, we were at $900 per month."
"We are paying roughly $5,000 a month."
"This is not a cheap solution but, compared to other products such as those offered by IBM, the pricing is similar."
"Based on our team discussions and feedback, it is pretty costly because they charge us for each transmission."
"The vendor is flexible with respect to pricing."
"Most of my clients would like the price of the solution to be reduced."
"There are no hidden costs in addition to the standard licensing fees for webMethods. For corporate organizations, it's a very cheap or fairly priced product, but for growing or small businesses, it's quite expensive. These businesses would probably need to consider an enterprise services bus at some point. Thus, from a pricing point, it closes out non-cooperate businesses."
"The product is very expensive."
"It's a good deal for the money that we pay."
"The product is expensive."
More webMethods.io pricing and cost advice
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which API Management solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
855,080 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
14%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Healthcare Company
8%
Computer Software Company
14%
Financial Services Firm
13%
Manufacturing Company
13%
Retailer
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Coralogix?
Numerous data monitoring tools are available, but Coralogix somehow fine-tunes our policies and effectively supports our teams.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Coralogix?
The pricing is expensive. We need to reduce logs to manage costs. Despite the expense, I believe it is worth the money to have Coralogix as a tool.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Coralogix?
We need to reduce the number of logs generated by our system, which are substantial. We require some form of grouping or categorization of logs to identify them better. Additionally, we find that t...
See all answers
What do you like most about Built.io Flow?
The tool helps us to streamline data integration. Its BPM is very strong and powerful. The solution helps us manage digital transformation.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Built.io Flow?
webMethods.io is expensive. We have multiple components, and you need to pay for each of them.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Built.io Flow?
webMethods.io needs to incorporate ChatGPT to enhance user experience. It can offer a customized user experience.
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Datadog vs Coralogix Logo
Datadog vs Coralogix
Compared 30% of the time
New Relic vs Coralogix Logo
New Relic vs Coralogix
Compared 11% of the time
Grafana vs Coralogix Logo
Grafana vs Coralogix
Compared 11% of the time
Elastic Search vs Coralogix Logo
Elastic Search vs Coralogix
Compared 8% of the time
Sentry vs Coralogix Logo
Sentry vs Coralogix
Compared 7% of the time
More Coralogix Competitors
IBM App Connect vs webMethods.io Logo
IBM App Connect vs webMethods.io
Compared 9% of the time
IBM Integration Bus vs webMethods.io Logo
IBM Integration Bus vs webMethods.io
Compared 7% of the time
Apigee vs webMethods.io Logo
Apigee vs webMethods.io
Compared 7% of the time
Boomi iPaaS vs webMethods.io Logo
Boomi iPaaS vs webMethods.io
Compared 4% of the time
IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services vs webMethods.io Logo
IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services vs webMethods.io
Compared 4% of the time
More webMethods.io Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Coralogix
May 2025
Coralogix reportDownload Coralogix product report
Buyer's Guide
webMethods.io
May 2025
webMethods.io reportDownload webMethods.io product report
 

Also Known As

No data available
Built.io Flow, webMethods Integration Server, webMethods Trading Networks, webMethods ActiveTransfer, webMethods.io API
 

Overview

Coralogix is a stateful streaming data platform that provides real-time insights and long-term trend analysis with no reliance on storage or indexing, solving the monitoring challenges of data growth in large-scale systems.

Ingest log, metric, and security data from any source for a single, centralized platform to monitor and alert on your applications. As data is ingested, Coralogix instantly narrows millions of events down to common patterns for deeper insights and faster troubleshooting. Proactive data storage optimization enables up to 70% savings on monitoring costs with better performance.

Coralogix

webMethods.io Integration is a powerful integration platform as a service (iPaaS) that provides a combination of capabilities offered by ESBs, data integration systems, API management tools, and B2B gateways.

IBM
 

Sample Customers

Payoneer, AGS, Monday.com, Capgemini
Cisco, Agralogics, Dreamforce, Cables & Sensors, Sacramento Kings
Buyer's Guide
Coralogix vs. webMethods.io
April 2025
Free Report: Coralogix vs. webMethods.io
Find out what your peers are saying about Coralogix vs. webMethods.io and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
855,080 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Coralogix vs. webMethods.io report.
See our list of best API Management vendors and best Cloud Data Integration vendors.

We monitor all API Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.