Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Continuous Dynamic (formerly WhiteHat Dynamic) vs w3af comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Continuous Dynamic (formerl...
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) (7th)
w3af
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
Application Security Tools (42nd)
 

Mindshare comparison

Continuous Dynamic (formerly WhiteHat Dynamic) and w3af aren’t in the same category and serve different purposes. Continuous Dynamic (formerly WhiteHat Dynamic) is designed for Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) and holds a mindshare of 5.4%, up 3.9% compared to last year.
w3af, on the other hand, focuses on Application Security Tools, holds 0.3% mindshare, up 0.1% since last year.
Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Continuous Dynamic (formerly WhiteHat Dynamic)5.4%
OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing17.7%
HCL AppScan14.0%
Other62.9%
Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST)
Application Security Tools Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
w3af0.3%
SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube)20.5%
Checkmarx One10.4%
Other68.8%
Application Security Tools
 

Featured Reviews

it_user245412 - PeerSpot reviewer
The product and customer service is extremely efficient but I would like to see more research and code examples.
* The continuous online scanning capabilities and reporting features. * The SaaS product features accessible from a browser make managing our online systems easy. * The ability to review security items quickly along with being able to retest vulnerabilities on our schedule make the Sentinel product an invaluable tool for our company’s product security requirements.
OS
It's buggy and seems to try to do too many things, but having this on a USB drive has been valuable.
I tried to install this on numerous systems and eventually, with help, I got it running. It needs far too many dependencies installed and there's too much messing about to be of much use. Once running, it's buggy and begs the question can it be relied upon? Even within Kali it reports website time-outs, yet Zap or Burp are able to do a successful scan. I wanted this to work so much and be able to use it as an additional check of my results but have now binned it.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) solutions are best for your needs.
868,759 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
16%
Computer Software Company
13%
Healthcare Company
10%
Manufacturing Company
8%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
No data available
 

Also Known As

Sentinel Dynamic, WhiteHat Security Application Security Testing, Synopsys WhiteHat Dynamic
No data available
 

Overview

Find out what your peers are saying about HCLSoftware , Rapid7, OpenText and others in Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST). Updated: August 2025.
868,759 professionals have used our research since 2012.