No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Conga Contract Lifecycle Management (CLM) vs Infor CloudSuite comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Conga Contract Lifecycle Ma...
Ranking in Product Configuration and Quoting
1st
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
34
Ranking in other categories
Contract Management Software (1st)
Infor CloudSuite
Ranking in Product Configuration and Quoting
10th
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.1
Number of Reviews
19
Ranking in other categories
CRM (23rd), ERP (13th), Enterprise Asset Management (EAM) (3rd), Local Government CRM (3rd), Warehouse Management (3rd), Cloud HCM (12th), Financial Close Software (12th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2026, in the Product Configuration and Quoting category, the mindshare of Conga Contract Lifecycle Management (CLM) is 6.2%, up from 4.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Infor CloudSuite is 3.7%, up from 1.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Product Configuration and Quoting Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Conga Contract Lifecycle Management (CLM)6.2%
Infor CloudSuite3.7%
Other90.1%
Product Configuration and Quoting
 

Featured Reviews

Sakshi Thakur - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Manager at a legal firm with 1,001-5,000 employees
Automation has transformed complex contract lifecycles and now supports high-volume workflows
The only drawback of Conga Contract Lifecycle Management (CLM) is that it does not work for small-scale business areas because I have implemented it for one customer with four or five pages of templates and three to four record types. For that small business, Conga Contract Lifecycle Management (CLM) does not work well because it is a bit complicated. Sometimes all customers need is a click of a button to go in and do things, and Conga Contract Lifecycle Management (CLM) is a bit complicated for such kinds of businesses. There are definitely areas where Conga Contract Lifecycle Management (CLM) could be easier to use for smaller businesses, particularly making processes more streamlined and user-friendly.
AA
Project Manager, Program at SPTLabtech
Integrated planning has improved document automation but reporting and user experience still need work
There are areas where Infor CloudSuite can improve. I have touched on the pros and key strengths of Infor CloudSuite, but end-user feedback indicates that there are several areas where the user experience can improve. For instance, when it comes to reporting, it comes with a very limited number of reports, and the standard reports are clunky, requiring a technical resource or developer to enhance or make them presentable. Another area is user experience; it takes several clicks to get to the information, and the user interface isn't that intuitive. Compared to other solutions, such as top-tier options such as Oracle or SAP, this stands out as an area needing improvement. When it comes to integration, Infor CloudSuite does offer a great deal of flexibility. It comes with APIs, so you can integrate with any third-party systems you may use. On that front, it's sufficient; however, it does require some specialized resources, as it's not a layman's job, and developers need to help with the integration. This is generally the case for any ERP. The user interface could indeed be better, and there is a steep learning curve for users; it takes time for them to get accustomed to Infor CloudSuite's interface and forms. However, once users adapt, it becomes easier and smoother to navigate. There are great features associated with Infor CloudSuite, such as DataViews and Birst as a business intelligence tool, which can be integrated with the basic product. Implementing Birst isn't plug-and-play; it requires a team of technical resources to execute. Additionally, there is a feature that allows integration with Excel, which can be installed by your IT team.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"In terms of overall efficiency, our working efficiency has improved by 60% primarily because the number of errors has drastically reduced with the inbuilt AI capabilities of Conga Contract Lifecycle Management (CLM) and its integration."
"The automation and document generation in Conga Contract Lifecycle Management (CLM) have made things easier for my team, saving time and reducing errors."
"The valuable aspects are ease and speed."
"A 25% to 40% reduction in standard agreements is what we have achieved, and the centralized repository also improved the reporting on contract renewals and expiration and helped the team to identify and address those bottlenecks more quickly."
"The X-Author 2.0 is the most dominating feature that Conga Contract Lifecycle Management (CLM) has in a contract lifecycle management compared to any other management package in the CLM space."
"The overall process of contract review, which used to take at least two weeks, has reduced to a couple of days now, including all the communications and internal discussions, representing a huge improvement."
"Conga Contract Lifecycle Management (CLM) has positively impacted my organization as it is faster compared to others."
"Conga Contract Lifecycle Management (CLM) has positively impacted my organization or my work by making the whole contract process much faster and much more organized."
"What I appreciate most about Infor CloudSuite is the out-of-box standard functionality; it really can function to meet the needs of any company."
"Some valuable features include improved transparency in sales processes, which has been vital for our operations."
"It offers a facility to get data quickly."
"CloudSuite came out on top."
"From a product perspective, it's more lenient and suitable for using features in finance, such as reconciling our payments, accounts payable, accounts receivable, etc."
"The product's most valuable feature is production planning. It is one of the core features."
"The employee interface, specifically the UI, is one of the most valuable features in Infor CloudSuite, and after implementing it, I have seen numerous improvements in the UI space, including simplified navigation that has become easier with every CU, which is positive."
"If you are working in the food and beverage industry, I would say it's a perfect solution."
 

Cons

"I chose a nine because sometimes I feel that opening Conga Composer feels a bit heavy, and occasionally I need to refer to additional documents to complete specific tasks, which is the only reason preventing a perfect score."
"Conga Contract Lifecycle Management (CLM) can be improved because implementation can be complex, and the loading process could be enhanced."
"I would tell others looking into using Conga Contract Lifecycle Management (CLM) that it is useful, but the licenses are a bit expensive compared to the other contract lifecycle managements in the market."
"They are somewhat reliable, but they are not completely reliable."
"Template management could be more user-friendly."
"I rate Conga Contract Lifecycle Management (CLM) a seven due to issues I experience during document generation, specifically when newly generated quotes do not download correctly, causing replication of previous quotes, which can be frustrating and problematic in client interactions."
"The only drawback of Conga Contract Lifecycle Management (CLM) is that it does not work for small-scale business areas because I have implemented it for one customer with four or five pages of templates and three to four record types."
"I cannot say Conga Contract Lifecycle Management (CLM) is stable. Sometimes it throws some issues."
"In Germany, there aren't enough IT specialists for customization and software development, causing projects to take too long."
"The price of the solution is not good. In Europe, it's difficult to find people who already know Infor, which was a problem during implementation."
"The price of the solution is not good."
"It takes time to properly learn what the product can do."
"There is room for improvement in the pricing. For us, it's the pricing aspect. Since we're South African, it's difficult when it's a dollar-based product."
"The solution's support service could be better."
"Infor OS is powerful, but the documentation is terrible."
"Currently, there are some challenges with handling large reports, possibly due to setup limits or issues with the solution."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"The platform's pricing depends on the specific number of users."
"The product is expensive. I rate the pricing a five out of ten."
"I'm working for a German company, but I'm located in Portugal. In the German market, Infor's price isn't an issue for clients, but Infor is losing market share every year to SAP in Portugal. Portuguese clients find SAP more affordable. Infor needs to work on this."
"It is a cost-effective solution."
"The pricing is not built on a standard model."
"As for pricing, I secured a favorable deal at around $80,000 yearly for five years, but it was a one-time opportunity."
"For on-premise installations, the licensing is yearly."
"I feel it is not very cheap, very economical but also not very expensive."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Product Configuration and Quoting solutions are best for your needs.
915,341 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
13%
Computer Software Company
11%
Legal Firm
10%
Outsourcing Company
8%
Manufacturing Company
13%
Construction Company
11%
Comms Service Provider
10%
Healthcare Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business11
Midsize Enterprise3
Large Enterprise25
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business9
Midsize Enterprise9
Large Enterprise4
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Conga Contract Lifecycle Management (CLM)?
Regarding pricing, it is a little bit higher, but when we go for bulk purchase, we do receive some discounts.
What needs improvement with Conga Contract Lifecycle Management (CLM)?
Conga Contract Lifecycle Management (CLM) could be improved as sometimes when we click on the document, it indicates success without generating a document, requiring us to check the logs. Having a ...
What is your primary use case for Conga Contract Lifecycle Management (CLM)?
My main use case for Conga Contract Lifecycle Management (CLM) is generating documents, so once we click on a button, the document should be generated in the back end and that should sit in the not...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Infor CloudSuite CRM?
Infor CloudSuite is cheaper than SAP and the license is on a yearly basis.
What needs improvement with Infor CloudSuite CRM?
There are areas where Infor CloudSuite can improve. I have touched on the pros and key strengths of Infor CloudSuite, but end-user feedback indicates that there are several areas where the user exp...
What is your primary use case for Infor CloudSuite CRM?
I can highlight a couple of other scenarios regarding my main use case or how I've implemented Infor CloudSuite. One is Infor Document Management, which I've seen in the past with other ERP systems...
 

Also Known As

The Apttus Intelligent Cloud, Conga CLM AI
SyteLine
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Akamai Technologies, Axis Stars, BlackBaud, Cadence, Ceridian, Citrix
PRIDE Industries
Find out what your peers are saying about Conga Contract Lifecycle Management (CLM) vs. Infor CloudSuite and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.
915,341 professionals have used our research since 2012.