No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Conga CPQ vs Conga Contract Lifecycle Management (CLM) comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Conga Contract Lifecycle Ma...
Ranking in Product Configuration and Quoting
1st
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
34
Ranking in other categories
Contract Management Software (1st)
Conga CPQ
Ranking in Product Configuration and Quoting
10th
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
3
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2026, in the Product Configuration and Quoting category, the mindshare of Conga Contract Lifecycle Management (CLM) is 5.9%, up from 4.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Conga CPQ is 2.3%, up from 2.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Product Configuration and Quoting Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Conga Contract Lifecycle Management (CLM)5.9%
Conga CPQ2.3%
Other91.8%
Product Configuration and Quoting
 

Featured Reviews

Sakshi Thakur - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Manager at a legal firm with 1,001-5,000 employees
Automation has transformed complex contract lifecycles and now supports high-volume workflows
The only drawback of Conga Contract Lifecycle Management (CLM) is that it does not work for small-scale business areas because I have implemented it for one customer with four or five pages of templates and three to four record types. For that small business, Conga Contract Lifecycle Management (CLM) does not work well because it is a bit complicated. Sometimes all customers need is a click of a button to go in and do things, and Conga Contract Lifecycle Management (CLM) is a bit complicated for such kinds of businesses. There are definitely areas where Conga Contract Lifecycle Management (CLM) could be easier to use for smaller businesses, particularly making processes more streamlined and user-friendly.
reviewer2853033 - PeerSpot reviewer
Salesforce Technical Lead at a outsourcing company with 501-1,000 employees
Configuring complex customized quotes has improved flexibility but still needs smoother approvals
There are many out-of-the-box features available in Conga CPQ compared to other CPQ systems, and we can easily customize the entire CPQ itself using many customizations and APIs that are not available in other systems. Out-of-the-box APIs are the best features that Conga CPQ offers, as everything can be customizable. The product bulk loader is a feature that has helped my team significantly. For instance, in other CPQ systems, implementing similar features requires extensive customization. However, with Conga CPQ, using the Add Multi-Prod API, we only need a CSV file with product codes and quantities. We check for any active price list items and prepare a wrapper class to input data to that API, which simplifies creating a cart with products. Conga CPQ positively impacts my organization with many ongoing projects involving its features. People appreciate its extensive features and the support from the Conga team, who respond immediately to any cases we raise.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Because of these processes, the customer can send out thousands of contracts in one go instead of creating them and having a lot of people appointed to do this job, and it is a one-person job now."
"Conga Contract Lifecycle Management (CLM) has positively impacted my organization, and I have noticed improvements in productivity, accuracy, and turnaround times."
"Conga Contract Lifecycle Management (CLM) has positively impacted my organization by automating contract generation."
"In my experience, the best features of Conga Contract Lifecycle Management (CLM) include the way they handle dynamically changing agreements and manage the approvals within the system, which is great."
"Conga Contract Lifecycle Management (CLM) has positively impacted my organization or my work by making the whole contract process much faster and much more organized."
"The valuable aspects are ease and speed."
"Globally, the overall time to contract is now seven to ten days, and this has been greatly appreciated by our Legal Ops head."
"Conga Contract Lifecycle Management (CLM) has positively impacted my organization by significantly decreasing the time required for generating contracts and agreements for customers."
"Conga CPQ offers the best features, particularly pricing, allowing me to achieve complex pricing with ease, such as using the totaling callback and base price callback."
"For complex pricing and orders, if organizations want more efficiency and error tracking, Conga CPQ is a strong choice."
"There are many out-of-the-box features available in Conga CPQ compared to other CPQ systems, and we can easily customize the entire CPQ itself using many customizations and APIs that are not available in other systems."
 

Cons

"The only drawback of Conga Contract Lifecycle Management (CLM) is that it does not work for small-scale business areas because I have implemented it for one customer with four or five pages of templates and three to four record types."
"The improvement I would consider is that the UI should be improved, including the colors."
"Template management could be more user-friendly."
"For improvements in Conga Contract Lifecycle Management (CLM), I think that for sending contract approvals, the customer signing process needs to be implemented after verifying the necessary details, which I expect to see in the future."
"I chose a nine because sometimes I feel that opening Conga Composer feels a bit heavy, and occasionally I need to refer to additional documents to complete specific tasks, which is the only reason preventing a perfect score."
"Sometimes their support is not very efficient."
"I believe Conga Contract Lifecycle Management (CLM) should improve by including e-sign directly in the CLM without a third-party integration."
"Sometimes I feel that the generation of templates in Conga Contract Lifecycle Management (CLM) is slow or it breaks somewhere."
"After converting to Conga LP revenue life cycle platform, we identified several areas for improvement. We run into more sync issues and data synchronization problems."
"However, I am currently facing many difficulties with data synchronization, and it has several loopholes not working as expected in Turbo, such as validation callbacks working fine in Turbo but failing in RLP."
"There are a few manual steps we need to take, such as handling a complex approval process in Conga CPQ."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Product Configuration and Quoting solutions are best for your needs.
914,322 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
13%
Computer Software Company
11%
Legal Firm
11%
Outsourcing Company
8%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business11
Midsize Enterprise3
Large Enterprise25
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Conga Contract Lifecycle Management (CLM)?
Regarding pricing, it is a little bit higher, but when we go for bulk purchase, we do receive some discounts.
What needs improvement with Conga Contract Lifecycle Management (CLM)?
Conga Contract Lifecycle Management (CLM) could be improved as sometimes when we click on the document, it indicates success without generating a document, requiring us to check the logs. Having a ...
What is your primary use case for Conga Contract Lifecycle Management (CLM)?
My main use case for Conga Contract Lifecycle Management (CLM) is generating documents, so once we click on a button, the document should be generated in the back end and that should sit in the not...
What needs improvement with Conga CPQ?
Conga CPQ could be improved as it has recently launched Conga RLP, a Revenue Lifecycle Platform, to enhance performance. However, I am currently facing many difficulties with data synchronization, ...
What is your primary use case for Conga CPQ?
I use out-of-the-box objects like price list item and price list to create a product and show it in the catalog, such as category, category hierarchy, and product hierarchy, while using attributes ...
What advice do you have for others considering Conga CPQ?
I would rate Conga CPQ an eight out of ten. I chose eight out of ten for Conga CPQ because, as I mentioned, I can handle complex pricing and approvals effectively. However, the two points deducted ...
 

Also Known As

The Apttus Intelligent Cloud, Conga CLM AI
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Akamai Technologies, Axis Stars, BlackBaud, Cadence, Ceridian, Citrix
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Conga CPQ vs. Conga Contract Lifecycle Management (CLM) and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.
914,322 professionals have used our research since 2012.