No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Conga CPQ vs Conga Contract Lifecycle Management (CLM) comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Conga Contract Lifecycle Ma...
Ranking in Product Configuration and Quoting
1st
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
34
Ranking in other categories
Contract Management Software (2nd)
Conga CPQ
Ranking in Product Configuration and Quoting
7th
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
4
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2026, in the Product Configuration and Quoting category, the mindshare of Conga Contract Lifecycle Management (CLM) is 6.4%, up from 4.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Conga CPQ is 2.7%, up from 2.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Product Configuration and Quoting Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Conga Contract Lifecycle Management (CLM)6.4%
Conga CPQ2.7%
Other90.9%
Product Configuration and Quoting
 

Featured Reviews

Sakshi Thakur - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Manager at a legal firm with 1,001-5,000 employees
Automation has transformed complex contract lifecycles and now supports high-volume workflows
The only drawback of Conga Contract Lifecycle Management (CLM) is that it does not work for small-scale business areas because I have implemented it for one customer with four or five pages of templates and three to four record types. For that small business, Conga Contract Lifecycle Management (CLM) does not work well because it is a bit complicated. Sometimes all customers need is a click of a button to go in and do things, and Conga Contract Lifecycle Management (CLM) is a bit complicated for such kinds of businesses. There are definitely areas where Conga Contract Lifecycle Management (CLM) could be easier to use for smaller businesses, particularly making processes more streamlined and user-friendly.
reviewer2853033 - PeerSpot reviewer
Salesforce Technical Lead at a outsourcing company with 501-1,000 employees
Configuring complex customized quotes has improved flexibility but still needs smoother approvals
There are many out-of-the-box features available in Conga CPQ compared to other CPQ systems, and we can easily customize the entire CPQ itself using many customizations and APIs that are not available in other systems. Out-of-the-box APIs are the best features that Conga CPQ offers, as everything can be customizable. The product bulk loader is a feature that has helped my team significantly. For instance, in other CPQ systems, implementing similar features requires extensive customization. However, with Conga CPQ, using the Add Multi-Prod API, we only need a CSV file with product codes and quantities. We check for any active price list items and prepare a wrapper class to input data to that API, which simplifies creating a cart with products. Conga CPQ positively impacts my organization with many ongoing projects involving its features. People appreciate its extensive features and the support from the Conga team, who respond immediately to any cases we raise.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Globally, the overall time to contract is now seven to ten days, and this has been greatly appreciated by our Legal Ops head."
"Conga Contract Lifecycle Management (CLM) has positively impacted my organization by automating contract generation."
"Conga Contract Lifecycle Management (CLM) has delivered measurable improvements in both time and cost savings for our organization, significantly reducing manual processing time, shortening contract turnaround times from days to hours, minimizing compliance risk, and improving overall operational efficiency and resource utilization."
"Conga Contract Lifecycle Management (CLM) has positively impacted my organization, and I have noticed improvements in productivity, accuracy, and turnaround times."
"Conga Contract Lifecycle Management (CLM) has a very positive impact on our organization, especially in terms of efficiency and visibility."
"Conga Contract Lifecycle Management (CLM) had a positive impact by streamlining the contract management process and reducing manual effort."
"Overall, Conga Contract Lifecycle Management (CLM) helped streamline contract creation, approval, execution, and renewal processes while reducing manual effort and improving compliance."
"Conga Contract Lifecycle Management (CLM) has positively impacted my organization because I can store the terms and conditions between the two parties in the template, and I can share product-related data with the two parties to store prices and other relevant information."
"After the Conga CPQ implementation was done, the business increased rapidly; they can create the products and do all those things within one day, go live within one week, and the users can sell the products within one or two weeks, increasing profits and sales."
"Conga CPQ offers the best features, particularly pricing, allowing me to achieve complex pricing with ease, such as using the totaling callback and base price callback."
"For complex pricing and orders, if organizations want more efficiency and error tracking, Conga CPQ is a strong choice."
"There are many out-of-the-box features available in Conga CPQ compared to other CPQ systems, and we can easily customize the entire CPQ itself using many customizations and APIs that are not available in other systems."
 

Cons

"I chose a nine because sometimes I feel that opening Conga Composer feels a bit heavy, and occasionally I need to refer to additional documents to complete specific tasks, which is the only reason preventing a perfect score."
"I see one blind spot for Conga Contract Lifecycle Management (CLM) in that additional logic features depending upon user types and customer types would be helpful."
"Conga Contract Lifecycle Management (CLM) has too much customization, making it not that easy to scale it up and scale it out."
"The only issue was in X-Author 2.0 where there was a bug; whenever the agreement document was opened and we were already logged in to X-Author 2.0, it was automatically checking out that particular agreement document."
"The improvement I would consider is that the UI should be improved, including the colors."
"The user interface can sometimes feel complex for new users and may require additional training."
"Conga Contract Lifecycle Management (CLM) can be improved in terms of UI and functionality, as it needs to be more clean and polished."
"There were many bugs with Conga Contract Lifecycle Management (CLM) application that could be improved."
"After converting to Conga LP revenue life cycle platform, we identified several areas for improvement. We run into more sync issues and data synchronization problems."
"However, I am currently facing many difficulties with data synchronization, and it has several loopholes not working as expected in Turbo, such as validation callbacks working fine in Turbo but failing in RLP."
"There are a few manual steps we need to take, such as handling a complex approval process in Conga CPQ."
"Conga CPQ has some drawbacks. If you have a larger number of products that should be added to the cart, the cart is taking so much time to load."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Product Configuration and Quoting solutions are best for your needs.
921,148 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
13%
Computer Software Company
11%
Legal Firm
10%
Outsourcing Company
8%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business11
Midsize Enterprise3
Large Enterprise25
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Conga Contract Lifecycle Management (CLM)?
Regarding pricing, it is a little bit higher, but when we go for bulk purchase, we do receive some discounts.
What needs improvement with Conga Contract Lifecycle Management (CLM)?
Conga Contract Lifecycle Management (CLM) could be improved as sometimes when we click on the document, it indicates success without generating a document, requiring us to check the logs. Having a ...
What is your primary use case for Conga Contract Lifecycle Management (CLM)?
My main use case for Conga Contract Lifecycle Management (CLM) is generating documents, so once we click on a button, the document should be generated in the back end and that should sit in the not...
What needs improvement with Conga CPQ?
Conga CPQ has some drawbacks. If you have a larger number of products that should be added to the cart, the cart is taking so much time to load. In that case, sales users should wait for some time....
What is your primary use case for Conga CPQ?
The main use case for using Conga CPQ is to make the business very easy and configure the products. Users can see the price, prepare a quotation with point-and-click tools and buttons, and it is ve...
What advice do you have for others considering Conga CPQ?
It is a private cloud. Our organization is using a private cloud from the client's suggested one. We are not using any public cloud to deploy the sources to other environments. We are using Bitbuck...
 

Also Known As

The Apttus Intelligent Cloud, Conga CLM AI
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Akamai Technologies, Axis Stars, BlackBaud, Cadence, Ceridian, Citrix
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Conga CPQ vs. Conga Contract Lifecycle Management (CLM) and other solutions. Updated: November 2026.
921,148 professionals have used our research since 2012.