Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Collibra Platform vs Informatica Test Data Management (TDM) comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Collibra Platform
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.3
Number of Reviews
74
Ranking in other categories
Data Governance (2nd), Metadata Management (1st), AI Governance (1st)
Informatica Test Data Manag...
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.0
Number of Reviews
13
Ranking in other categories
Test Data Management (4th)
 

Mindshare comparison

Collibra Platform and Informatica Test Data Management (TDM) aren’t in the same category and serve different purposes. Collibra Platform is designed for Data Governance and holds a mindshare of 8.6%, down 13.8% compared to last year.
Informatica Test Data Management (TDM), on the other hand, focuses on Test Data Management, holds 10.5% mindshare, down 16.4% since last year.
Data Governance Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Collibra Platform8.6%
Microsoft Purview Data Governance11.5%
Varonis Platform7.0%
Other72.9%
Data Governance
Test Data Management Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Informatica Test Data Management (TDM)10.5%
Perforce Delphix20.4%
Broadcom Test Data Manager13.3%
Other55.8%
Test Data Management
 

Featured Reviews

reviewer2696502 - PeerSpot reviewer
Data and Analytics Manager at a insurance company with 10,001+ employees
It enables data governance with customizable workflows and effective customer support
There is an issue with Collibra Catalog's pricing model, especially for organizations with many databases, as the initial package comes with a limited number of connectors. This can lead to manual efforts to connect more databases, increasing costs. It would be beneficial if they offered more connectors as part of the initial package.
Raj Sethupathi - PeerSpot reviewer
Data Integration Consultant GCP/AWS at a consultancy with 10,001+ employees
Seamlessly connects with the ETL engine and has its own policy pack, reducing the need for custom coding
I've only worked with versions 9.7 and 10.5.1, and I'm not familiar with the newest features in the current version, 10.5.1. However, I'm sure they have incorporated AI capabilities, as that is the current industry trend. It is this new buzzword. Informatica itself introduced CLAIRE AI. I am four versions behind. So, it would be good if I upgraded. Plus, Informatica has rebranded this TDM. It's not even originally from Informatica. They purchased the company that makes the application around 2010. Informatica has purchased so many companies for different purposes, like business-to-business, test data management, and more. They change the trade name so frequently. It used to be ILM, Informatica Lifecycle Management, then they changed it to something else, then Test Data Management, and then Security Governance and Policy Management or something like that. It's all different names for the same product. Frequent rebranding and name changes can create confusion for customers.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"On a scale of 1 to 10, I would rate Collibra Data Intelligence Platform a 10."
"The data lineage capability is valuable as it shows how different sources are connected and how data flows, which is crucial for projects like migrations. Moreover, data lineage visualization in Collibra Catalog aids our data governance initiatives."
"The most valuable features of Collibra Catalog are its customizability and ease of use."
"The most valuable features of Collibra Lineage are the multiple options for automation. Additionally, if you have a scenario where automation does not work, you have the option to manually create the lineage. The solution does not force you to always go through an automated way where you have broken lineage and you are stuck without a lineage."
"We have had no complaints about the stability."
"The most important feature in Collibra Governance is the ability to gather data or a collection of data into one repository. If a client creates a repository at his place, then it will get updated to the cloud automatically."
"We achieved 30% of time saved, and the platform is easy to use."
"It is user-friendly."
"The tool enabled us to leverage Teradata Parallel Transporter to write the masked data efficiently to our Teradata warehouse."
"Organizations working on different projects can benefit from this tool."
"Informatica TDM is also developer-friendly, making it easy for ETL developers to pick up and use without extensive training."
"These products are highly scalable in my experience; they are scalable both horizontally (grid, multi-node environment) and vertically (more CPU cores), and they are also scalable in terms of the pushdown capability to the database engine or Hive."
"Informatica is highly scalable."
"The most valuable feature of TDM is its ability to mask data while maintaining referential integrity."
"Informatica’s support for the entire platform is very good and this product is no exception."
"The most valuable feature of TDM is its ability to mask data while maintaining referential integrity."
 

Cons

"There are a lot of gaps in Collibra's support and documentation."
"What I use it for is fairly rudimentary, and I don't have any complaints about it. I haven't tried to stretch the boundaries at all, but it would be nice if there were capabilities built within the system to somehow help enforce the quality and consistency across related elements that are built in the catalog. It could have intelligent capabilities built in to help maintain the quality of the data and information, such as natural language processing, machine learning, and so on."
"We would like to have out-of-the-box automation."
"We are not able to ingest all the data in Collibra, and that's why we cannot do element-to-element level data tracking."
"The tool's overall functionalities need to improve since, nowadays, many tools, from a business perspective, are easy to use."
"Pricing policy of the product is an area with certain shortcomings that needs improvement."
"There's still room for improvement in Collibra Governance. Right now, the solution focuses more on publishing and subscription where metadata is being consumed from all systems and processes within Collibra Governance. I'd like to see more features around external systems that let those systems start consuming or start referring things from Collibra Governance automatically, in particular, more API-based integrations, so the solution can truly work as an enterprise governance tool at the heart of the organization. There have been many cases where business stakeholders feel, "Okay. I'll be doing a manual activity because every time I have to maintain and make sure that the solution is working, for example, ensuring the reporting works, I have to go to Collibra Governance." I want this step taken out of the equation, and it has to be an automatic conversion or automatic notification that something has changed. Scalability also needs improvement in the solution. If there could be some sort of self-service where people can customize the solution a bit more, that would make Collibra Governance better. What I'd like to see in the next release of the solution is an enhanced search feature because it's what users want to use. You want to search for a term and get all details in one go. Right now, if you type a term in the Collibra Governance global search function, it returns a lot of results that you need to know how to filter and what to filter, so there should be automatic filters that give accurate information to somebody who does a search on the solution. I want Collibra Governance to provide a capability where you can search and get relevant information."
"It should have more integrations with things like CyberArk because its main purpose is GDPR implementation. We have to have more scope for things that implement more privacy. CyberArk makes sure your credentials are vaulted and your things are secure when you're creating your integrations or connecting to an application. I do believe that they are working on this feature."
"The UI experience is a little bit old. When applying more than 80 columns, it means doing it in phases, as it won't allow it in one go."
"Frequent rebranding and name changes can create confusion for customers."
"When it came time to upgrade from 9.7 to 10.1, we could upgrade all the other products, but there was an issue with TDM. It seemed like they weren't ready for the upgrade."
"They have to create more transformations that can be utilized in the tool."
"The response from Informatica support was nil."
"Probably the ideal time testing site, utilizing self-service for real-time testing, could be an area for improvement."
"If there were some methods to mask data in the cloud, then that would be good."
"A lot of improvement is needed, mainly due to the fact that the tool is very slow."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is substantial, and we do pay yearly."
"There are different levels of licenses. For example, some users can only do read-only licenses, and others have the stewardship license where they can give access to users."
"The product is highly priced compared to other vendors."
"I am not so much aware of price details. Initially, there was an add-on NuSoft license to use the DVC connector that NuSoft gives to create integrations, but Collibra is now phasing out of it slowly. Collibra is cutting ties with them is what we have been led to believe, and we have started developing on Spring Boot, which is open source."
"I think they have a trust issue. I did not like the way they recently went through the process. They were like, "Finish this SOW first, only then will we sign the other SOW." Or, "Finish this code." I didn't like that much."
"We purchase its annual license. There is an extra cost for additional users."
"Collibra offers a per-user licensing model."
"I think it is on a yearly basis, but I'm not involved with the pricing session, so I have no idea. There are several licenses for different models. You get one license per product, but a lot of features are controlled separately through different licenses. So, as and when you want to use a feature, you have to procure the license for that feature."
"It's expensive because the license needs to be bought for some time period. It's not pay as you go."
"The cost is not an issue for enterprises, but for smaller businesses, it could be."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Governance solutions are best for your needs.
884,933 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Answers from the Community

AM
Data Warehouse Analyst at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees
Dec 2, 2021
Dec 2, 2021
Depending on your requirement you would want to select the right tool to achieve your requirement based on the suggestions below. 1. Data Discovery and Obfuscation with Classification you would need a tool that is capable of handling referential integrity ensuring that when a data is Identified as PII (Personally Identifiable Information) is obfuscated correctly e.g. If Jim is Obfuscated to Jac...
See 2 answers
Ronald D'Souza - PeerSpot reviewer
Presales Consultant for CA Southern Africa at Hyperion Holding Pty Ltd
Dec 1, 2021
Depending on your requirement you would want to select the right tool to achieve your requirement based on the suggestions below. 1. Data Discovery and Obfuscation with Classification you would need a tool that is capable of handling referential integrity ensuring that when a data is Identified as PII (Personally Identifiable Information) is obfuscated correctly e.g. If Jim is Obfuscated to Jack then any relatable references of Jim is always masked as Jack. Cross Reference mapping is a key in Test Data Management that deals with taking data from Production and making it available in Non-Prod sanitizing the data to have meaningful information but not identifiable information.  Once the data rules for sanitization are defined applying the data rules in the most efficient way will be another criteria to consider. You would not want your data not to be available during the process of obfuscation or have a DB performance issue. You should also consider capabilities like continuality in case your obfuscation process fails midway  you would want to continue from the last updated record (Informatica Test Data Manager for relational database only, Broadcom Test Data Manager for relational database only and some non-relational databases and flat files, Collibra for structured and some unstructured data source) 2. How often will my data be refreshed, If it is very often then you would want to subset the data to only include changes in your refresh as the obfuscation process is resource-intensive and could lead to performance degradation on a continuous refresh of a large database.  (Informatica Test Data Manager for relational database only, Broadcom Test Data Manager for relational database only and some non-relational databases and flat files, Collibra for structured and some unstructured data source) 3. How often does my database need restore for testing and how often would you get conflict due to multiple tests running on the same environment. You would want to consider virtualizing the data like Virtual Machine to prevent regular restore and having a quick checkpoint to roll to once testing is completed and also giving the capability to the tester to have their own test environment (Broadcom Test Data Manager for a relational database). 4. Is data generation your requirement, do you need to add missing data or generate data for a newly developed system. Would you want to generate data that meet negative and positive test case scenarios? E.g. Getting a valid Social Security number that is usable but has no actual entity to be identified to, Generating a Visa card dummy number that will pass visa validation but is not a valid card (Informatica Test Data Manager for relational database only, Broadcom Test Data Manager for relational database only and some non-relational databases and flat files) 5. Data Discovery would also be a good to have feature, like the capability to scan data and column in your data source and identify information that could be PII data - (Informatica Test Data Manager for relational database only, Broadcom Test Data Manager for relational database only and some non-relation databases, Collibra for structured and some unstructured data source) 6. Classification of the databased on discovery and risk of the data in the data source (Informatica Test Data Manager support, Broadcom Test Data Manager support, Collibra supports) 7. How diverse is my data sources. does my data reside on the same database or multiple databases, are the relationship that exists across databases and are all the databases supported by the tool.  8. Do data only reside in the database or in a Flat file, will the tool be capable of providing test data management to flat-file like CSV, XML and so on. 
CF
Co Founder at ACONDA
Dec 2, 2021
With just those few requirements, I'd opt for a simpler tool such as the one by dScribe from a cataloging point of view.  If validation of the actual data is a requirement then the most complete offering today is Collibra's.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
18%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Computer Software Company
9%
Insurance Company
6%
Financial Services Firm
16%
Insurance Company
11%
Computer Software Company
9%
University
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business20
Midsize Enterprise9
Large Enterprise55
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business3
Midsize Enterprise1
Large Enterprise10
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Collibra Data Intelligence Platform?
A separate team did the setup for this tool and was involved in setting it up. When they were doing the setup, it was a significant upfront investment in terms of the configuration, modeling, and g...
What is your primary use case for Collibra Data Intelligence Platform?
I am a user who has worked at companies that use Collibra Platform as their data catalog and data intelligence platform tool. My first company, MetLife, used Collibra Platform, but I wouldn't know ...
What advice do you have for others considering Collibra Data Intelligence Platform?
My advice to others looking into using Collibra Platform is to use it in cloud because that is the best solution. I give this review a rating of 10 out of 10.
What needs improvement with Informatica Test Data Management (TDM)?
A lot of improvement is needed, mainly due to the fact that the tool is very slow. There are numerous issues, and we have reported these to the Informatica vendor. They don't seem to be focusing mu...
What is your primary use case for Informatica Test Data Management (TDM)?
We cannot provide production data to our testing teams, so we use TDM to encrypt or mask the data and create a copy for them. Many teams rely on our data, and TDM helps maintain data security by ma...
What advice do you have for others considering Informatica Test Data Management (TDM)?
TDM is a worthwhile recommendation if the customer is interested, but for small-scale companies that do not want to spend a lot, it might be too costly. I'd rate the solution seven out of ten.
 

Also Known As

Data Intelligence Platform, Collibra AI Governance, Collibra Catalog, Collibra Governance, Collibra Lineage, Collibra Privacy & Risk
Informatica TDM
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

AXA XL, DNB, Adobe, PMI, Holland America Line, UC Davis Health, Cox Automotive
Vale, Hot Telecommunication
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Collibra, Informatica and others in Data Governance. Updated: March 2026.
884,933 professionals have used our research since 2012.