Cohesity Data Cloud vs IBM Tivoli CDP for Files comparison

"Cohesity Data Cloud is user-friendly, and anyone can use this tool; the support is really good, especially the web support, and the dashboard and everything are good."

"Cohesity Data Cloud comes with a different flavor where they provide global deduplication across multiple platforms, which provides a tremendous return on investment from a storage perspective because if you have a segment that can be deduplicated in one box and you have multiple boxes, you cannot repeat the deduplication function across different hardware."

"My favorite feature of Cohesity Data Cloud is the setup, as it is very fast compared to other solutions; I have worked in different clouds, and Cohesity Data Cloud stands out as superior."

"I find the most important feature to be data protection."

"Its big data and archive data features are the features that I have found most valuable. I can use it in a big virtual environment."

"It is easy to install and use."

"I rate the Cohesity Data Cloud solution a ten out of ten. It's an easy-to-use product that provides substantial value and security."

"The hyper-converged architecture and scalability are hugely important for growing service companies."

"The restoration and infrastructure is extremely reliable."

"Sometimes the support team does not provide proper assistance during critical issues from the cloud end."

"It has never been touted as a tier-one storage platform, and that would be a benefit. They are currently working on solving that issue."

"Sometimes the support team does not provide proper assistance during critical issues from the cloud end."

"In terms of functionality, Helios has been effective, but sometimes it doesn't show the exact cluster name for backups."

"The downside of Cohesity Data Cloud is that it is not supporting a legacy environment."

"The only concern I have with cloud implementation is that if you have a presence on-premises, trying to use the cloud may become a performance challenge."

"There is limited support for legacy systems, which is something that could be improved."

"The primary drawback is the need to transfer large amounts of data to the cloud via an internet connection, requiring significant bandwidth."

"We would like to have the opportunity to omit data from being backed up. For example, we have three virtual machines, each with three disks. When running the backup, it will automatically take each disk rather than allowing us to select what data we want backed."

"Regarding pricing, it's very costly and I rate it a four."

"It's priced properly for the market."

"Competing products sometimes use deceptive marketing to make their products seem a lot cheaper. Comparing apples-to-apples, DataPlatform wins out."

"It's expensive, but it's worth for it due to the volume of critical information within our database. We are currently paying about $22,000 per year."