CodeSonar vs SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) comparison

CodeSecure and Sonar are both solutions in the Application Security Tools category. CodeSecure is ranked #30, while Sonar is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.3. CodeSecure holds a 1.5% mindshare in AS, compared to Sonar’s 20.4% mindshare. Additionally, 87% of CodeSecure users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 81% of Sonar users who would recommend it.

CodeSonar

Read 7 CodeSonar reviews

2,608 Views
1,800 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

SonarQube Server (formerly ...

Read 117 SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) reviews

38,362 Views
24,552 Comparison Views

81% willing to recommend

CodeSonar

SonarQube Server (formerly ...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 21, 2025

SonarQube Server and CodeSonar are competitors in the field of code analysis tools. SonarQube appears to have an advantage due to its extensive integration options and cost-effectiveness.

Features: SonarQube Server supports a wide range of programming languages and offers integration into CI/CD pipelines, customizable dashboards, and extensive plugin availability. It is also noted for its open-source model, which makes it accessible to various organizations. CodeSonar excels in deep static analysis, particularly in detecting runtime errors and identifying security threats. It is highly regarded for its thorough security scanning capabilities and effective code defect identification.

Room for Improvement: SonarQube Server could benefit from improved support for additional programming languages, simplified configuration complexity, and stronger security vulnerability scanning. CodeSonar would improve with enhancements in custom rule definition, broader language support, and a more user-friendly interface for easier rule application.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: SonarQube Server offers flexibility with deployment options across hybrid, public, and private clouds, along with community support and comprehensive documentation. CodeSonar primarily supports on-premises deployments and requires dedicated centralized technical support, which may limit adaptability in dynamic or cloud-based environments.

Pricing and ROI: SonarQube provides significant value through its open-source and community versions, appealing to organizations seeking cost-effective solutions. Its paid editions offer additional features, enhancing its adaptability to enterprise needs and delivering a good ROI by improving code quality. CodeSonar, though more expensive, justifies its price with thorough analysis and reliability in sensitive environments, but may be a concern for budget-conscious buyers.

To learn more, read our detailed CodeSonar vs. SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

CodeSonar vs. SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube)

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 872,778 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

CodeSonar

Ranking in Application Security Tools

30th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Static Code Analysis (10th)

SonarQube Server (formerly ...

Ranking in Application Security Tools

1st

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

117

Ranking in other categories

Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (1st), Software Development Analytics (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Application Security Tools category, the mindshare of CodeSonar is 1.5%, up from 1.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) is 20.4%, down from 25.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Security Tools Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube)	20.4%
CodeSonar	1.5%
Other	78.1%

Application Security Tools

Featured Reviews

Mathieu ALBRESPY

Intigration Developer at ez-Wheel

Nice interface, quick to deploy, and easy to expand

This is the first time I've used this kind of software. It was the only one we could apply to analyze with MISRA rules. At my new company, I tried to use Klocwork. I tried to use it, just once so I cannot compare it exactly with CodeSonar. I also have a plugin for my Visual Studio and I try to make it work. It's not easy, however, I don't think that we have this kind of functionality with CodeSonar. It can do some incremental analysis. However, since this feature is also available on CodeSonar, it would be a good idea to have a plugin on Visual Studio just to have a quick analysis.

Read full review

Sthembiso Zondi

Head of Software Engineering at ronaldmariah@gmail.com

Consistent improvements in code quality and security with effective integration and reliable technical support

The features of SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) that I find most useful are the suggestions received from reviewing the code. When they review the code, they provide suggestions on how to fix it, and we find those very useful from a development perspective. We use SonarQube Server's (formerly SonarQube) centralized management and visualization of code quality metrics on the dashboard because that's the executive dashboard that we send to the executives to show where we are in terms of quality, security, and where the company can improve. We use that for organizational improvement purposes. The ability to tailor metrics tracking in SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) has been beneficial to my team. There are team-specific dashboards which are related to specific repositories they utilize, and we have that aggregative dashboard that shows the whole organization's performance. We can drill down per specific repository, which makes it easier for the team to improve specific things.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"What I like best about CodeSonar is that it has fantastic speed, analysis and configuration times. Its detection of all runtime errors is also very good, though there were times it missed a few. The configuration of logs by CodeSonar is also very fantastic which I've not seen anywhere else. I also like the GUI interface of CodeSonar because it's very user friendly and the tool also shows very precise logs and results."

"The most valuable features of CodeSonar were all the categorized classes provided, and reports of future bugs which might occur in the production code. Additionally, I found the buffer overflow and underflow useful."

"The most valuable feature of CodeSonar is the catching of dead code. It is helpful."

"There is nice functionality for code surfing and browsing."

"The tool is very good for detecting memory leaks."

"It has been able to scale."

"CodeSonar’s most valuable feature is finding security threats."

"The reporting and the results are quick. It gets integrated within the pipeline well."

"The tool helps us to monitor and manage violations. It manages the bugs and security violations."

"There are many options and examples available in the tool that help us fix the issues it shows us."

"I follow Quality Gate's graduation model within organization, and it is extremely helpful for me to benchmark products."

"It provides the security that is required from a solution for financial businesses."

"SonarQube is a fantastic tool which saves us precious time."

"It is working fine. It provides a good value for money."

"It helps our developers work more efficiently as we can identify things in a code prior to it being pushed to where it needs to go."

More SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) pros

Cons

"It was expensive."

"There could be a shared licensing model for the users."

"In a future release, the solution should upgrade itself to the current trends and differentiate between the languages. If there are any classifications that can be set for these programming languages that would be helpful rather than having everything in the generic category."

"In terms of areas for improvement, the use case for CodeSonar was good, but compared to other tools, it seems CodeSonar isn't a sound static analysis tool, and this is a major con I've seen from it. Right now, in the market, people prefer sound static analysis tools, so I would have preferred if CodeSonar was developed into a sound static analysis tool formally, in terms of its algorithms, so then you can see it extensively used in the market because at the moment, here in India, only fifty to sixty customers use CodeSonar. If the product is developed into a sound static analysis tool, it could compete with Polyspace, and from its current fifty customers, that number could go up to a hundred."

"The scanning tool for core architecture could be improved."

"CodeSonar could improve by having better coding rules so we did not have to use another solution, such as MISRA C."

"It would be beneficial for the solution to include code standards and additional functionality for security."

"Currently requires multiple tools, lacking one overall tool."

"The learning curve can be fairly steep at first, but then, it's not an entry-level type of application. It's not like an introduction to C programming. You should know not just C programming and how to make projects but also how to apply its findings to the bigger picture. I've had users who said that they wish it was easier to understand how to configure, but I don't know if that's doable because what it's doing is a very complicated thing. I don't know if it is possible to make a complicated thing trivially simple."

"For improvement, this solution could be offered on Docker and the cloud and the support for this solution could be improved. Customizing rules could also be made simpler."

"SonarQube could improve its static application security testing as per the industry standard."

"Any suggestions for potential improvements may include bill of materials functionality."

"The reporting can be improved."

"There could be better integration with other products."

"It would be a great add-on if SonarQube could update its database for vulnerabilities or plugging parts."

More SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The application’s pricing is high compared to other tools."

"Pricing is a bit costly."

"The solution's price depends on the number of licenses needed and the source code for the project."

"Our organization purchased a license to use the solution."

"It's an open-source product."

"I requested this license for one million lines of code and they accepted this."

"We use the tool's community edition."

"The solution has a free version and a license version. The license is priced reasonably, the cost of hiring one programmer is more expensive than the solution."

"We're using an older version because it is the open-source flavor of it and we can continue using it at no cost. We're not paying any licensing at all, which was another factor in choosing this route so that we can learn and grow with it and not be committed to licenses and other similar things. If we choose to get something else, we have to relearn, but we don't have to relicense. Basically, we're paying no license costs."

"This is open source."

"We are using the community version of the solution and we plan on purchasing licenses for the upgraded version soon. There is a limitation on how many lines of code can be scanned and this is why we are going to purchase a license for an increased amount."

"The beauty of this solution is the free open-source version is capable enough in doing pretty much what an enterprise-level version can do."

More SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

872,778 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

24%

University

10%

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

15%

Computer Software Company

14%

Manufacturing Company

14%

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	5
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	2

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	32
Midsize Enterprise	21
Large Enterprise	75

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Is SonarQube the best tool for static analysis?

I am not very familiar with SonarQube and their solutions, so I can not answer. But if you are asking me about which tools that are the best for for Static Code Analysis, I suggest you have a look...

See all answers

Which gives you more for your money - SonarQube or Veracode?

SonarQube is easy to deploy and configure, and also integrates well with other tools to do quality code analysis. SonarQube has a great community edition, which is open-source and free. Easy to use...

See all answers

How would you decide between Coverity and Sonarqube?

We researched Coverity, but in the end, we chose SonarQube. SonarQube is a tool for reviewing code quality and security. It helps to guide our development teams during code reviews by providing rem...

See all answers

Comparisons

Coverity Static vs CodeSonar

Compared 26% of the time

Polyspace Code Prover vs CodeSonar

Compared 8% of the time

Axivion Static Code Analysis vs CodeSonar

Compared 4% of the time

Helix QAC vs CodeSonar

Compared 4% of the time

Klocwork vs CodeSonar

Compared 3% of the time

More CodeSonar Competitors

Checkmarx One vs SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube)

Compared 22% of the time

GitHub Advanced Security vs SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube)

Compared 9% of the time

Coverity Static vs SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube)

Compared 9% of the time

Veracode vs SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube)

Compared 6% of the time

OpenText Core Application Security vs SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube)

Compared 2% of the time

More SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Application Security Tools

October 2025

Download CodeSonar product report

Buyer's Guide

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube)

October 2025

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) report

Download SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) product report

Also Known As

No data available

Sonar

Overview

GrammaTech enables organizations to develop software applications more efficiently, on-budget, and on-schedule by helping to eliminate harmful defects that can cause system failures, enable data breaches, and ultimately increase corporate liabilities in today’s connected world. GrammaTech is the developer of CodeSonar, the most powerful source and binary code analysis solution available today. Extraordinarily precise, CodeSonar finds, on average, 2 times more serious defects in software than other static analysis solutions. Designed for organizations with zero tolerance for defects and vulnerabilities in their applications, CodeSonar provides static analysis for applications where reliability and security are paramount - widely used by software developers in avionics, medical, automotive, industrial control, and other mission-critical applications. Some of GrammaTech's customers include Toyota, GE, Hyundai, Kawasaki, LG, Lockheed Martin, NASA, Northrop Grumman, Panasonic, and Samsung.

CodeSecure

SonarQube Server enhances code quality and security via static code analysis. It detects vulnerabilities, improves standards, and reduces technical debt, integrating into CI/CD pipelines.

SonarQube Server is a comprehensive tool for enhancing code quality and security. It offers static code analysis to identify vulnerabilities, improve coding standards, and reduce technical debt. By integrating into CI/CD pipelines, it provides automated checks for adherence to best practices. Organizations use it for code inspection, security testing, and compliance, ensuring development environments with better maintainability and fewer issues.

What are the key features of SonarQube Server?

Support for 20+ languages: Extensive programming language support suitable for diverse coding environments.
Custom coding rules: Allows for tailored rule sets to match specific coding standards.
Flexible quality gates: Define criteria for code acceptance at various intervals.
CI/CD integration: Seamless integration with Continuous Integration/Continuous Deployment tools.
Rich interface: User-friendly dashboard with detailed visual insights.

What benefits should users expect from SonarQube Server?

Improved code quality: Enhanced analysis contributes to fewer bugs and improved coding practices.
Security enhancements: Identifies and mitigates security vulnerabilities pre-emptively.
Maintainability: Reduces technical debt, yielding long-term development efficiency.
Customizable: Flexibility in configuration aligns with specific project needs.

Many industries implement SonarQube Server to uphold coding standards, maintain security protocols, and streamline their software development lifecycle. In sectors like finance and healthcare, adhering to regulations and ensuring reliable software is critical, making SonarQube Server invaluable. It is often integrated into CI/CD pipelines, ensuring that code changes meet set standards before deployment. This approach enhances productivity and maintains compliance with industry-specific requirements.

Sonar

Sample Customers

Viveris, Micrel Medical Devices, Olympus, SOFTEQ, SONY

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

CodeSonar vs. SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube)

September 2025

Free Report: CodeSonar vs. SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube)

Find out what your peers are saying about CodeSonar vs. SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

872,778 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our CodeSonar vs. SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) report.

See our list of best Application Security Tools vendors.

We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.