No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

CodeScene vs Nagios Core on CentOS comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

CodeScene
Average Rating
10.0
Reviews Sentiment
8.3
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
Static Code Analysis (30th)
Nagios Core on CentOS
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
4.9
Number of Reviews
15
Ranking in other categories
Operating Systems (OS) for Business (23rd)
 

Mindshare comparison

CodeScene and Nagios Core on CentOS aren’t in the same category and serve different purposes. CodeScene is designed for Static Code Analysis and holds a mindshare of 0.9%.
Nagios Core on CentOS, on the other hand, focuses on Operating Systems (OS) for Business, holds 0.2% mindshare, up 0.0% since last year.
Static Code Analysis Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
CodeScene0.9%
Veracode11.1%
Checkmarx One8.9%
Other79.1%
Static Code Analysis
Operating Systems (OS) for Business Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Nagios Core on CentOS0.2%
Ubuntu Linux8.1%
Windows 117.5%
Other84.2%
Operating Systems (OS) for Business
 

Featured Reviews

Vishal-Goyal - PeerSpot reviewer
Chief Architect at Persistent Systems
Great for identifying hotspots, has an excellent knowledge map, and makes it easy to find files
The three main aspects we like are: 1. Hotspots: This is the core of the product and helps us to focus on the smaller and most impactful areas of the codebase. 2. Code Health and Code Complexity: This helps us understand the issues and what we need to fix and how. CodeScene provides a summary of the method and function level and helps focus on a smaller section of the files instead of looking at everything all at once. 3. Knowledge Map: This helps us understand team dynamics such as how developers have worked on the code and how fragmented the code is. There's information around knowledge loss and knowledge islands that is very informative.
reviewer2836233 - PeerSpot reviewer
Infrastructure Analyst at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
Monitoring has reduced outages and improves proactive issue resolution across our infrastructure
Regarding complexity, I think there is no feature like InfluxDB AI, so it may require more expertise to configure. There are also some migration challenges in adopting the new dashboards, so it takes some time to train the staff, but it is not a big concern. I think it is better to add some advanced features. I do not think there are so many things that need to be improved in Nagios Core on CentOS. If it is better to customize the dashboard or if we can get something like a modern view, it will be helpful for the dashboard. I felt very happy with Nagios Core on CentOS. Why I took off one point is that I think it is better suited for a small or medium setup. If large enterprises can use Nagios Core on CentOS, it will be helpful. It also requires manual editing of the config file, so it is a little bit time-consuming. The web interface is functional, but compared to some other latest AI monitoring platforms, it is a little bit lacking. I think the AI platform would score higher, but it is good. The reporting is just basic, so if we compare it with Grafana, it needs richer insights.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"CodeScene provides a summary of the method and function level and helps focus on a smaller section of the files instead of looking at everything all at once."
"Alerting in Nagios Core on CentOS is instantaneous and more accurate."
"Using Nagios Core on CentOS had a significant positive impact on the organization at Infosys where I used it by improving system availability, reducing downtime, and enabling proactive issue resolution."
"Nagios Core on CentOS has positively impacted my organization by being very helpful budget-wise, as we rely on open source due to budget constraints for each division."
"Nagios Core on CentOS positively impacts our organization by helping us address problems before they become critical."
"Nagios Core on CentOS has positively impacted my organization by reducing downtime in systems because sometimes there are services that were down, and with a trigger, I can start them again."
"Since using Nagios Core on CentOS, I have noticed specific improvements in downtime and how quickly my team can respond to issues."
"Nagios Core on CentOS has impacted my organization positively because it is impactful to the business, and if the production server is down, Nagios Core on CentOS will check certain services, which impacts production."
"Time-saving and money-saving are good parts of implementing Nagios Core on CentOS because before Nagios Core on CentOS, we manually monitored everything and required more human intervention, and through Nagios Core on CentOS, time consumption and other factors have been reduced, which is a good thing for our organization and in a 24/7 environment it is more beneficial."
 

Cons

"The generated reports could be improved further."
"The main concern is that CentOS support has ended and its life cycle has reached its conclusion, which is why we moved over to other operating systems."
"Nagios Core on CentOS requires human intervention for monitoring; we must monitor the services in a 24/7 environment, and I believe this needs to be improved."
"In the modern world, we need Kubernetes and OpenShift support for Nagios, and it would be better to support the Kubernetes and OpenShift platforms."
"Nagios Core on CentOS could use a better UI."
"Nagios Core on CentOS could be improved with an official Docker image from Nagios Core."
"Regarding features, I have tried the application monitoring feature, which is not that great but still useful; for open source, it is very helpful, though there are improvement areas in the application side."
"Nagios Core on CentOS needs to improve the templates to send messages to IT companies and also integrate with different systems or improve integrations with QNAP, Synology, Ubiquiti, and different applications."
"Nagios Core on CentOS is very stable and reliable, but it can be significantly improved in terms of automation, scalability, and usability."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Static Code Analysis solutions are best for your needs.
909,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Construction Company
52%
Comms Service Provider
8%
Outsourcing Company
7%
Financial Services Firm
6%
Construction Company
36%
Comms Service Provider
8%
Financial Services Firm
8%
Outsourcing Company
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business5
Midsize Enterprise4
Large Enterprise10
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Nagios Core on CentOS?
I do not handle the pricing, setup cost, and licensing for Nagios Core on CentOS as my manager takes care of that.
What needs improvement with Nagios Core on CentOS?
Nagios Core on CentOS requires human intervention for monitoring. We take 24/7 monitoring on Nagios Core on CentOS, which is a drawback. We must monitor the services in a 24/7 environment, and I be...
What is your primary use case for Nagios Core on CentOS?
We use Nagios Core on CentOS for server monitoring purposes, including ping response and other health checks. We monitor whether the server's health is fine or not. Nagios Core on CentOS operates w...
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

sky, philips, soundcloud,
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Veracode, Checkmarx, Perforce and others in Static Code Analysis. Updated: August 2026.
909,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.