Codebeamer vs Kovair ALM Studio comparison

PTC and Kovair are both solutions in the Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites category. PTC is ranked #5 with an average rating of 7.7, while Kovair is ranked #33. PTC holds a 8.8% mindshare in ALM, compared to Kovair’s 0.3% mindshare. Additionally, 93% of PTC users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Kovair users who would recommend it.

Codebeamer

Read 17 Codebeamer reviews

3,344 Views
3,277 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

Kovair ALM Studio

Read 1 Kovair ALM Studio review

182 Views
171 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Codebeamer

Kovair ALM Studio

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Codebeamer and Kovair ALM Studio based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Atlassian, Microsoft, Nutanix and others in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites.

To learn more, read our detailed Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 869,089 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Codebeamer

Ranking in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites

5th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Kovair ALM Studio

Ranking in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites

33rd

Average Rating

10.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites category, the mindshare of Codebeamer is 8.8%, up from 6.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Kovair ALM Studio is 0.3%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Codebeamer	8.8%
Kovair ALM Studio	0.3%
Other	90.9%

Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites

Featured Reviews

SHRINIVAS ALAGERI

Architect at itcinfotech

Built-in project management modules simplify processes while compatibility improvements are needed

Codebeamer could improve its customization capabilities and integration options. For instance, older versions of PDM Windchill face compatibility issues with newer versions of Codebeamer, requiring users to downgrade Codebeamer to establish integration. The installation on Linux can be tricky, and backward compatibility needs enhancement. Also, Codebeamer struggles with some DevOps integrations and lacks AI features for enhanced user assistance.

Read full review

it_user790575

WebsiteDevelopment at a tech services company

We increased our development and testing team velocity and were able to manage traceability

Integration with Jama, Jira, Jenkins pipeline, Selenium, etc. ALM Studio helped us to create and connect with all these tools Through this integration, we could increase our development and testing team velocity, were able to manage traceability, and deliver software faster. Easy to .…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It is a stable solution."

"The solution easily replaces IBM DOORS, which no longer offers maintenance in China."

"Codebeamer stands out against competition due to these features."

"Codebeamer is user-friendly"

"There is a lot of complexity involved, meaning it can do many things, which can be quite useful."

"The platform provided the flexibility to expand our business processes, accommodating or altering them to suit the requirements of a changing environment."

"Other benefits observed from using Codebeamer include its excellent release management and access management features."

"CodeBeamer provides full traceability, excellent collaboration, regulatory compliance, and instant reporting with its holistic approach from requirement management to testing."

More Codebeamer pros

"Wide range of adapters/connectors which allow connectivity to any tools."

"We increased our development and testing team velocity, were able to manage traceability, and deliver software faster."

Cons

"Codebeamer is not completely compatible with our internal network setup."

"Codebeamer could improve its customization capabilities and integration options."

"One improvement could be to reduce the system or server requirements. For a client with a medium configuration server, Codebeamer did not work initially until the system was upgraded."

"It would be helpful if Codebeamer's overall processing and integration with software like Jira could be improved."

"We would like to see more industry-specific features that are tailored to the vertical markets."

"There should be more integration tools available. Although Codebeamer has a substantial amount of integration options with multiple tools, new technologies and software constantly emerge."

"What is really disappointing is that some features which have been promised for years are still not mature enough to use."

"Certain areas in Codebeamer could be improved, like addressing small issues, glitches, or bugs."

More Codebeamer cons

"Needs an easier and less heavy UI."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"They're not the most expensive product on the market, but they're not the cheapest either — I'd say codeBeamer ALM is moderately priced."

"Pricing is good when compared to similar ALM solutions."

"Codebeamer is not a cheap solution."

"It is reasonably priced and in accordance with the industry standards."

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

869,089 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

32%

Computer Software Company

14%

Healthcare Company

Retailer

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	8

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about codeBeamer ALM?

The platform provided the flexibility to expand our business processes, accommodating or altering them to suit the requirements of a changing environment.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for codeBeamer ALM?

Codebeamer is fairly priced against competition. Customers prefer it due to its pricing, scalability, features, functionality, and integration with multiple tools. On a scale of one to ten, I would...

See all answers

What needs improvement with codeBeamer ALM?

I would like to improve the speed of Codebeamer, and what I believe is lacking is a way to define or set up role-specific user interfaces. Codebeamer is a very powerful tool, but the experienced us...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

PTC Integrity vs Codebeamer

Compared 26% of the time

Polarion ALM vs Codebeamer

Compared 26% of the time

Jira vs Codebeamer

Compared 15% of the time

Microsoft Azure DevOps vs Codebeamer

Compared 9% of the time

IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management (ELM) vs Codebeamer

Compared 7% of the time

More Codebeamer Competitors

No data available

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Codebeamer

October 2025

Download Codebeamer product report

Buyer's Guide

Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites

September 2025

Download Kovair ALM Studio product report

Also Known As

codeBeamer ALM

No data available

Overview

codeBeamer ALM is a market-leading Application Lifecycle Management platform. It is holistically integrated, and is packed with features that help you develop better products faster. Scale, monitor, control, and report on your entire development lifecycle conveniently, and comply with safety-critical regulations. Cut development time and costs.

PTC

Kovair ALM Studio is a comprehensive Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) product that can provide all the development functions from Requirements to Release with complete capabilities. This includes process workflow, project management, reports/dashboards and 3rd party tools integrations.

With capabilities like real-time cross-tool data based reports, dashboards, and bi-directional traceability cutting across all phases of ALM, Kovair ALM unifies all phases of Software Development Lifecycle - SDLC and keeps every stakeholder informed about the development progress, product quality and release predictability.

Kovair also supports integration with 3rd party application development and IT tools from popular vendors like HP, IBM, Microsoft, Atlassian, BMC as well as Open sources to provide customers a wide range of solutions.

All these capabilities of Kovair ALM lead to better governance and team productivity across project lifecycle which are crucial to release quality and on-time delivery.

More details - https://www.kovair.com/alm-studio/

Kovair

Sample Customers

Medtronic, Align Technology, Daimler, Samsung, Harman, Dassault

Medha Servo Drives, Applied Materials, Office of Systems Integration

Buyer's Guide

Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites

September 2025

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Atlassian, Microsoft, Nutanix and others in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

869,089 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites vendors.

We monitor all Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.