Code42 Incydr vs Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention comparison

Code42 Incydr and Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention compete in data security and loss prevention. Code42 Incydr appears stronger in proactive data protection with its insider threat detection capabilities, whereas Microsoft Purview integrates deeply within the Microsoft ecosystem, beneficial for organizations using Microsoft services.

Features: Code42 Incydr offers real-time risk detection, insider threat insights, and customizable risk-scoring. Microsoft Purview provides extensive policy configuration, integration with Microsoft services like Azure and Office 365, and the ability to auto-classify sensitive data.

Room for Improvement: Code42 could enhance integration with non-Microsoft ecosystems, improve automation of compliance processes, and optimize resource usage further. Microsoft Purview might consider expanding functionality beyond Microsoft environments, reducing initial configuration complexities, and enhancing cross-platform data governance capabilities.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Code42 Incydr is known for its straightforward setup and exceptional customer service. Microsoft Purview benefits from integration within Microsoft environments, though deployment may require more configuration efforts for non-Microsoft users. Both have responsive support, but Code42 stands out for its user focus.

Pricing and ROI: Code42 Incydr involves a higher initial cost, justified by its targeted insider threat protection. Microsoft Purview offers a cost-effective solution within the Microsoft suite, maximizing ROI in Microsoft 365 environments. While Code42 is suitable for those needing specialized protection, Microsoft Purview appeals to cost-conscious organizations leveraging the Microsoft ecosystem.