Code42 Incydr vs Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Code42 Incydr and Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Data Loss Prevention (DLP) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Code42 Incydr vs. Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention Report (Updated: May 2023).
709,643 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"Risk factors can be adjusted for all intricate details.""There are a couple of things. One of them is that they have what they call Incydr. Their detection and response solution to the insider threat area is called Incydr. That gives visibility to the clients that have widely dispersed employee bases due to work from home, or that had a dispersed workforce predating any of the work from home requirements. Even though they might not be inside the organization physically, they're inside the organization. It allows us to get some visibility into what people are doing, what the context is, and how to control what might be the potential for intellectual property theft or file exposure."

More Code42 Incydr Pros →

"Because everything is on Microsoft and we use Azure, integration with the product is easier. That's the most important thing when you use many Microsoft products. It's easier to integrate everything in one place.""It has helped our clients to reduce the time to action on insider threats because it can be integrated.""The product is easy to configure.""There's a good amount of documentation in case you run into any problems."

More Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention Pros →

Cons
"You can't always filter out data that you'd like to.""In a couple of instances, we had a little bit of trouble in getting it distributed throughout the organization. We ultimately managed to do it, but they talk about it being a pretty simple process, and it became a little laborious. It would just turn away. The agents were not being distributed. It was just churning and churning and churning. When we were looking for specific categories of data, it was getting bogged down, but that was not even so much Code42, although some of it was their issue."

More Code42 Incydr Cons →

"The solution should provide better integration with other systems.""There is no AIP for Linux systems. That's a setback. Another thing it's lacking is libraries to work with Python. It has libraries for C# and C++, for example, but not for Python and, these days, Python is very useful.""I would like Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention to be on the source code or SQL databases. It is difficult to do classification and labeling when you have a third-party source code or a third-party Oracle database. It is seamless when it comes to Microsoft documents but is not so with third-party source codes. Microsoft needs to work on it a little bit more.""Technical support is awful."

More Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "It was expensive. It was more expensive than Eureka, and it was more expensive than Barracuda Backup, but what we got was a full team. They didn't come in and nickel and dime us. They provided the assistance we needed. They didn't say that they need to charge us for something or it is going to take another statement of work. It was all bundled into it... We pay for the software maintenance. It is probably 18% or 20% of the license fee for rev releases."
  • More Code42 Incydr Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention is part of a bundle and is not sold as a standalone product."
  • "The product has the best price-to-performance ratio."
  • More Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Loss Prevention (DLP) solutions are best for your needs.
    709,643 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:Risk factors can be adjusted for all intricate details.
    Top Answer:In a couple of instances, we had a little bit of trouble in getting it distributed throughout the organization. We ultimately managed to do it, but they talk about it being a pretty simple process… more »
    Top Answer:When I first became acquainted with Code42, we were implementing it at an employer I worked with, and that was a successful implementation. I now work for a consulting firm, and we do system… more »
    Top Answer:Because everything is on Microsoft and we use Azure, integration with the product is easier. That's the most important thing when you use many Microsoft products. It's easier to integrate everything… more »
    Top Answer:Despite some setbacks regarding the premium features for automating and integrating in Power Apps—you can only use the handiest stuff if you pay a premium price—there are many good things that come… more »
    Top Answer:There is no AIP for Linux systems. That's a setback. Another thing it's lacking is libraries to work with Python. It has libraries for C# and C++, for example, but not for Python and, these days… more »
    Ranking
    Views
    3,246
    Comparisons
    2,510
    Reviews
    2
    Average Words per Review
    1,697
    Rating
    8.5
    Views
    7,298
    Comparisons
    4,365
    Reviews
    4
    Average Words per Review
    767
    Rating
    8.3
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Code42 Next-Gen DLP, Code42 Next-Gen Data Loss Protection, Code42 Forensic File Search, Code42 Backup + Restore
    Microsoft Endpoint Data Loss Prevention, MS Endpoint DLP, Microsoft Endpoint DLP
    Learn More
    Overview

    Detect file exfiltration via web browsers, USB, cloud apps, email, file link sharing, Airdrop, and more. See how files are moved and shared across your entire organization – without the need for policies, proxies or plugins. Incydr automatically identifies when files move outside your trusted environment, allowing you to easily detect when files are sent to personal accounts and unmanaged devices.

    Incydr prioritizes file activity based on 120+ contextual Incydr Risk Indicators (IRIs). This prioritization works on day 1 without any configuration. Incydr’s risk scoring logic is use case-driven and transparent to administrators. Incydr uses Watchlists to programmatically protect data from employees who are most likely to leak or steal files, such as departing employees.

    Take action with appropriate responses to contain, resolve and educate on detected risk. Use Incydr Flows or SOAR integrations to initiate response controls that are proportionate to an activity’s risk severity. You’ll stop data leaks without getting in the way of employee collaboration and sanctioned file activity.

    Improving your Insider Risk posture requires a change in employee behavior. Code42 Instructor provides bite-sized training to employees, delivered when they need it. Use Instructor in tandem with Incydr to send responsive video lessons when employees put data at risk. You’ll ensure appropriate data governance and compliance with security standards and corporate policies as well as report on the positive impact of your Insider Risk Management program.

    Founded in 2001, the company is headquartered in Minneapolis, Minnesota, and backed by Accel Partners, JMI Equity, NEA, and Split Rock Partners. For more information, visit code42.com.

    At Microsoft, our mission is to empower every person and every organization on the planet to achieve more. Our mission is grounded in both the world in which we live and the future we strive to create. Today, we live in a mobile-first, cloud-first world, and the transformation we are driving across our businesses is designed to enable Microsoft and our customers to thrive in this world.

    Offer
    Learn more about Code42 Incydr
    Learn more about Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention
    Sample Customers
    Adobe, Okta, Samsung, Taylormade, Boston University, Lending Club, North Highland, Stanford University, Ping Identity, Qualcomm, Pandora.
    Information Not Available
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    University18%
    Healthcare Company11%
    Media Company8%
    Non Profit8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company24%
    Financial Services Firm8%
    Government6%
    Healthcare Company6%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm18%
    Computer Software Company13%
    Manufacturing Company9%
    Insurance Company6%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business30%
    Midsize Enterprise31%
    Large Enterprise39%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business29%
    Midsize Enterprise11%
    Large Enterprise60%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business18%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise68%
    Buyer's Guide
    Code42 Incydr vs. Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention
    May 2023
    Find out what your peers are saying about Code42 Incydr vs. Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention and other solutions. Updated: May 2023.
    709,643 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Code42 Incydr is ranked 8th in Data Loss Prevention (DLP) with 2 reviews while Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention is ranked 7th in Data Loss Prevention (DLP) with 4 reviews. Code42 Incydr is rated 8.6, while Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Code42 Incydr writes "Provides comprehensive visibility and protection, helps in identifying the gaps in security, and comes with excellent onboarding support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention writes "Gives us great visibility into data governance, and integration with Microsoft solutions is easier". Code42 Incydr is most compared with CrowdStrike Falcon, D3 Security, Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention, Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks and Elastic Security, whereas Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention is most compared with Symantec Data Loss Prevention, Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention, Zscaler Cloud DLP, Amazon Macie and GitGuardian Internal Monitoring. See our Code42 Incydr vs. Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention report.

    See our list of best Data Loss Prevention (DLP) vendors.

    We monitor all Data Loss Prevention (DLP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.