CloudVision vs ScienceLogic comparison

Read 46 ScienceLogic reviews

5,321 Views
2,341 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

CloudVision

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between CloudVision and ScienceLogic based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Cloud Monitoring Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed CloudVision vs. ScienceLogic Report (Updated: March 2026).

CloudVision vs. ScienceLogic

Download the complete report

Helped 885,311 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

CloudVision

Ranking in Cloud Monitoring Software

54th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

ScienceLogic

Ranking in Cloud Monitoring Software

14th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Event Monitoring (7th), Unified Communications Monitoring (1st), Network Monitoring Software (14th), Server Monitoring (10th), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (14th), IT Operations Analytics (4th), AIOps (9th)

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Cloud Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of CloudVision is 0.3%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ScienceLogic is 2.6%, up from 2.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Cloud Monitoring Software Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
ScienceLogic	2.6%
CloudVision	0.3%
Other	97.1%

Cloud Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

Nimit Puvar

A VP Enterprise Sales at Ashtech Infotech (India) Pvt.Ltd.

Clients experience effective network management and comprehensive monitoring

Arista currently provides their solution for their own Arista products only. A problem occurs because customers do not have only Arista products. Sometimes they have different kinds of products available in their network. For monitoring that network, they have to either procure more solutions from third parties or they have to procure the provider OEM to manage their switches. If Arista can integrate third-party switches for monitoring purposes, it will be beneficial for the customers. Arista and other competitors such as Cisco or HPE Aruba have their own benefits. Cisco and Aruba face the challenge of having multiple OS for networking their products, whereas Arista has a single OS across their products. This is very beneficial for customers as they only have to manage a single OS.

Read full review

Pallagani Siva Koteswararao

Assistant Consultant at Tata Consultancy

Comprehensive monitoring streamlines operations with room for user support enhancement

I am interested in improving the flexibility of ScienceLogic's user interface, configuration, and customization. I am particularly keen on learning about issues raised by the ScienceLogic support team. Whenever we encounter difficulties, I raise vendor cases and am eager to deepen my understanding of those cases. Additionally, I want to learn more about ScienceLogic's dashboards, which display crucial metrics about collectors, their health, and devices aligned to them. The dashboard should be more detailed. Regarding improvements to ScienceLogic's technical support, my last company was IBM in India, and I worked on IBM MQ monitoring until my last day. I engaged with the LogicMonitor support team for MQ-level incidents, but these issues remained unresolved even after 10 to 15 days. On my last working day, I assisted with one such vendor case, and I am unsure if that issue was ever resolved. ScienceLogic's technical support should respond more efficiently in terms of time. During my time working on MQ-level cases, including a power pack upgrade that did not fix the issues faced, I provided all necessary steps with the help of the middleware team. However, there were still gaps that needed addressing.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"A single point of management and monitoring, as well as upgradation and update is valuable."

"The product provides a central management feature. It helps in eliminating human errors. It doesn't have a lot of bugs for software."

"The customer service at ScienceLogic is one of the best I've experienced over the last 13 years of my career."

"ScienceLogic is an excellent all around suite of tools."

"Life before ScienceLogic was quite responsive, although we did managed services to a degree, they were more of a point in time check for the health of the client system rather than real time deep analysis, but now we’re able to resolve client problems not only before they have a problem but also, when we have to troubleshoot, we can look back in time and get a picture of what was going on with the network to avoid repeat occurrences."

"ScienceLogic is multi-tenant from the ground up, starting at the code level."

"ScienceLogic's custom enablement, which I can achieve as a Python developer, is unique."

"It is very easy to configure because we are using an agent-less version. You can very quickly implement a collector for monitoring device servers."

"When it comes to features, the power pack is the most valuable."

"Their customer service is unparalleled."

More ScienceLogic pros

Cons

"CloudVision could have a user-friendly interface."

"Arista currently provides their solution for their own Arista products only. A problem occurs because customers do not have only Arista products."

"Error information doesn’t have a good information if something goes wrong while doing a device discovery (I tried this a while back- couldn’t be more specific)."

"Addressing duplicate IPs: There is the ability to edit the DB and fix this, but adding some logic to understand them would be a plus."

"The overall product rating is six out of ten. It's suitable for specific customers, although slower in implementation and offering tougher ROI compared to some."

"ScienceLogic does not have application monitoring; we definitely need something integrated within ScienceLogic to monitor applications so that we don't have to rely on monitoring tools to monitor other applications."

"Before ScienceLogic, our monitoring was fairly difficult to do. We were kind of limited in our capabilities."

"There is room for improvement in the speed of setting up the service and integrating PowerPacks."

"I would like to see out-of-the-box standard dashboards for common services."

"Reporting is still a gigantic pain point, we invest a lot of cycles in manufacturing reports off-board -#notfun."

More ScienceLogic cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"CloudVision is an expensive product. We purchase its yearly license."

"The solution is license-based. It's between $8 and $15, depending on what you need from the product."

"It comes with the OS built in, so no need to purchase an OS license or DB license."

"Decide what you want to monitor and only monitor those items. Absorb other elements as you grow."

"Pricing between the two is quiet large therefore you can save some money if you don't require to collect all info on each device."

"Plan for adding more to it. Once you see EM7 in action, you will want to keep adding systems to monitor."

"Its price could be lower, but for what you pay, you got a lot of value from its features and functionalities. Customers always want a discount or a cheaper solution."

"I'm not the best person to discuss pricing, but what I do know is that it's a use-and-go structure. You use this much storage and pay this much for it. That's how it is. Every time, we continue to add a large amount of data to the environment."

"The pricing model for ScienceLogic could improve."

More ScienceLogic pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

885,311 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Financial Services Firm

12%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Government

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	13
Midsize Enterprise	11
Large Enterprise	24

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with CloudVision?

What is your primary use case for CloudVision?

We are using the same products. We implement CloudVision, but have not implemented the security portion of that.

What advice do you have for others considering CloudVision?

It depends upon the nature of the business of the customers. If a customer is in the finance sector and they require very fast reply time, then they have a larger benefit compared to normal manufac...

What do you like most about ScienceLogic?

The tool is quite easy to deploy, and it offers very good support.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ScienceLogic?

ScienceLogic is not that expensive and is cost-effective overall.

What needs improvement with ScienceLogic?

ThousandEyes vs CloudVision

Comparisons

Compared 65% of the time

Opsview vs CloudVision

Compared 35% of the time

More CloudVision Competitors

Datadog vs ScienceLogic

Compared 6% of the time

LogicMonitor vs ScienceLogic

Compared 6% of the time

WhatsUp Gold vs ScienceLogic

Compared 5% of the time

Dynatrace vs ScienceLogic

Compared 4% of the time

Nagios XI vs ScienceLogic

Compared 4% of the time

More ScienceLogic Competitors

Product Reports

Cloud Monitoring Software

Download CloudVision product report

Download ScienceLogic product report

Overview

CloudVision offers advanced network visibility and management, designed to enhance operational efficiency for tech-savvy businesses. Its innovative approach caters to dynamic environments, ensuring seamless experiences.

CloudVision is tailored for enterprises needing consistent network performance and robust analytics. It provides comprehensive visibility into network operations, allowing businesses to monitor, manage, and optimize their environments effectively. Users benefit from its seamless integration capabilities, providing a centralized view of the entire network. The platform's adaptability ensures it meets the growing demands of modern IT infrastructures.

What are the key features?

Network Automation: Simplifies repetitive tasks with automated processes.
Real-time Analytics: Offers detailed insights to improve decision-making.
Scalability: Easily adapts to growing network demands.
Seamless Integration: Combines with existing systems for enhanced functionality.
Simple Setup: Quick deployment process minimizes downtime.

What benefits should users examine?

Cost Efficiency: Reduces operational costs with automated solutions.
Improved Performance: Enhances network reliability to support critical operations.
Time Savings: Frees up resources for strategic tasks by automating routine work.
Increased Visibility: Provides comprehensive monitoring for proactive management.
Enhanced Security: Mitigates risks with real-time threat detection.

In financial services, CloudVision streamlines data flow, ensuring transactions remain secure and uninterrupted. Healthcare institutions leverage it for reliable patient data management, enhancing service delivery. Its adoption in retail enables seamless connectivity across multiple locations, improving customer experiences.

Arista

ScienceLogic excels in customizable dashboards, seamless integrations, and real-time data analysis, supporting diverse IT environments with multi-tenant capabilities.

ScienceLogic provides robust infrastructure and network monitoring, catering to cloud, applications, and server environments. It supports hybrid setups, integrating with CMDB and ticketing systems while automating incident management. ScienceLogic's PowerPacks eliminate visibility gaps and its adaptable nature supports modern and legacy systems. Offering agentless monitoring, it ensures efficient operations with scalable infrastructure support and detailed reporting. However, the interface complexity and need for professional support can present usability challenges. Enhancements in reporting, application coverage, API support, and customization are desirable for improved user experience.

What are ScienceLogic's most important features?

Customizable Dashboards: Tailor views for precise monitoring across different environments.
PowerPacks: Extensive device integrations reduce visibility gaps.
Real-time Data Analysis: Enables quick decision-making with up-to-date insights.
Seamless Integration: Compatible with multiple platforms to unify IT systems.
Adaptive Infrastructure: Supports both modern and legacy systems with ease.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Operational Efficiency: Automates event management and simplifies monitoring tasks.
Scalable Support: Grows with the organizational needs, accommodating larger infrastructures.
Comprehensive Reports: Provides complete oversight for informed strategic planning.
Enhanced Adaptability: Unifies diverse technological environments efficiently.

ScienceLogic is often implemented across industries requiring detailed attention to infrastructure and network monitoring. It finds utility in managing hybrid environments, integrating seamlessly with essential systems like CMDB and ticketing platforms. Its scalability and adaptability are valued in unifying complex, diverse environments under one monitoring platform.

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Kellogg Company, Booz Allen, Cisco, Red Bull, Fidelus, Telstra, Comcast, CSC, Peak 10, HughesNet, Hosting, Datapipe, US Army, Equinix, Rite Aid, Carbonite, Sybase, Carpathia, AT&T, ePlus, Dimension Data, Virtustream, Boeing, Honeywell

CloudVision vs. ScienceLogic