Cloudflare Web Application Firewall vs Uplynk comparison

Cloudflare and Uplynk are both solutions in the Web Application Firewall (WAF) category. Cloudflare is ranked #6 with an average rating of 8.5, while Uplynk is ranked #31 with an average rating of 7.8. Cloudflare holds a 7.5% mindshare in WAF, compared to Uplynk’s 0.8% mindshare. Additionally, 95% of Cloudflare users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Uplynk users who would recommend it.

Cloudflare Web Application ...

Read 24 Cloudflare Web Application Firewall reviews

5,220 Views
2,728 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Uplynk

Read 6 Uplynk reviews

467 Views
67 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Cloudflare Web Application ...

Uplynk

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 5, 2025

Uplynk and Cloudflare Web Application Firewall compete in web application security and content delivery. Cloudflare Web Application Firewall is preferred for its advanced features, despite higher costs.

Features: Uplynk provides adaptive bitrate streaming, easy integration options, and is well-suited for media content delivery. Cloudflare Web Application Firewall offers comprehensive security with DDoS protection, threat intelligence, and customizable rules. Cloudflare's extensive security capabilities distinguish it significantly from Uplynk's media-centric features.

Room for Improvement: Uplynk could enhance its security features, scalability options, and technical documentation. Cloudflare Web Application Firewall might improve its user interface for ease of use, provide more transparent pricing, and expand its support service for non-technical users.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Uplynk is known for its straightforward deployment and responsive support, ideal for media delivery. Cloudflare Web Application Firewall, with a globally distributed network, offers scalability but requires more technical knowledge, providing broader reach at the cost of user-friendliness.

Pricing and ROI: Uplynk offers a cost-effective model with favorable returns for media-focused organizations. Cloudflare Web Application Firewall requires higher investment but delivers solid ROI through enhanced security and performance. Its value is seen in its comprehensive capabilities compared to Uplynk's affordability.

To learn more, read our detailed Cloudflare Web Application Firewall vs. Uplynk Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Cloudflare Web Application Firewall vs. Uplynk

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 859,129 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cloudflare Web Application ...

Ranking in Web Application Firewall (WAF)

6th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Uplynk

Ranking in Web Application Firewall (WAF)

31st

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Data Replication (9th), CDN (8th), Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection (18th)

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Web Application Firewall (WAF) category, the mindshare of Cloudflare Web Application Firewall is 7.5%, up from 6.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Uplynk is 0.8%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Web Application Firewall (WAF)

Featured Reviews

SachidDoshi

Senior Enterprise Security Architect at HGS - Hinduja Global Solutions

Offers a huge signature repository and is superiorly effective in mitigating DDoS attacks

The solution's learning curve can still be further reduced, which presently stands at two or three months. The product has a custom rule set that users can modify and manifest as needed. The vendor can probably shorten the learning curve using cutting-edge technologies like AI. The solution provider can also work around the web applications and identify the toolset that needs to be implemented to deploy the solution in less time. The vendor has launched a SASE product that can function with Cloudflare Web Application Firewall, but many improvements are needed in terms of features, such as the web filtering feature, and CASB has not yet been added.

Read full review

Eduardo Oviedo-Blanco

CTO and Game Developer at Solospace

A CDN solution to enhance loading times and streamline navigation

When one of the primary nodes spanning from North to South America, from the northern US to the southern US, became operational, it had a big impact. It can be challenging to explain its advantages to clients. The technical nature of the marketing material is too technical for stakeholders. Integrating the solution was straightforward, requiring no extra effort. Edgio Global CDN operates, resembling familiar cloud services but offering elevated functionality. Unlike platforms such as Google Cloud Platform or RIN geared towards development teams, Edgio emphasizes client-facing services that are integral to our operations. Overall, I rate the solution a nine out of ten.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The security features are valuable. The particular feature we use is called OWASP."

"The Cloudflare Web Application Firewall's most valuable feature is its ease of configuration."

"The integration of Cloudflare with Cloud Suite is its most valuable feature."

"Someone with a basic understanding of networking and security will be able to implement the firewall's basic features within 15 minutes."

"It is configurable via API."

"Cloudflare WAF provides protection through rules and functionalities like Cloudflare's SDRAP."

"There is a huge signature repository"

"It's pretty convenient and pretty easy to set up and run. And then kind of for static content, it also offers caching."

More Cloudflare Web Application Firewall pros

"The product is easy to use and easy to implement."

"The customer support and service responsiveness were excellent."

"It's super easy to use and integrate with."

"The tool's most valuable feature is the Uplynk platform for streaming purposes."

"The Rules Engine V4 is the most valuable feature."

Cons

"Cloudflare Web Application Firewall should include port forwarding features."

"We have noticed some latency when the call goes through the firewall. That could be improved."

"They have some limitations with third-party integrations."

"The solution's learning curve can still be further reduced"

"The dashboard could be more user-friendly."

"The product can improve by having more multitenancy capability, which is currently not available."

"The notification part could be improved. It's very much connected to Web Application Firewall, rate-limiting, and DDoS protection."

"There could be an option to duplicate the cluster to maintain the consistency of rules."

More Cloudflare Web Application Firewall cons

"We could not create more than 15 custom rules."

"The web interface of the Verizon Edgecast portal is very old. It's not user-friendly, slow, and it is missing some valuable features like the ability to make bulk changes."

"The tool needs to resolve its lack of innovation."

"In the next release, I would like to see more global endpoints for their CDN and a lower price."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The annual licensing fee is $10,000 USD."

"The solution's pricing option needs to be more transparent for enterprise clients."

"Cloudflare Web Application Firewall is more affordable than other solutions."

"Cloudflare offers different types of subscriptions for businesses, enterprises, and personal users, and the pricing is negotiable."

"We pay $210 per month for CloudFlare WAF."

"The pricing model is very straightforward compared to the competition. You just pay per month for the product and usage."

"The solution is expensive."

"It is not too pricey."

More Cloudflare Web Application Firewall pricing and cost advice

"Be careful about the options because to have all the features can be very expensive."

"The product is cheaper compared to other solutions."

"When I modeled it out, we are spending somewhere between $600 to $800 a month with Verizon EdgeCast."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Web Application Firewall (WAF) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

859,129 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

15%

Educational Organization

11%

Financial Services Firm

Comms Service Provider

Computer Software Company

14%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Comms Service Provider

11%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Cloudflare Web Application Firewall?

The product has a valuable security control functionality.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cloudflare Web Application Firewall?

The price of Cloudflare Web Application Firewall is reasonable.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Cloudflare Web Application Firewall?

I cannot say much about areas of improvement for Cloudflare Web Application Firewall because I haven't gone through deep understanding of it, as I am still learning. However, they need to improve t...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Edgio Global CDN?

The pricing was initially very expensive. However, after improving and restructuring the application, it became more affordable and now offers reasonable pricing.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Edgio Global CDN?

Regarding improvements, I focused on testing and compatibility to ensure reliability across various mobile devices. By writing comprehensive tests and leveraging Expo's capabilities, I ensured cons...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Edgio Global CDN?

I usually use the product for mobile development. At my last company, OmniTier, I worked as a senior principal software engineer, and one of my responsibilities was leading mobile app development. ...

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Azure Application Gateway vs Cloudflare Web Application Firewall

Compared 16% of the time

Fortinet FortiWeb vs Cloudflare Web Application Firewall

Compared 16% of the time

AWS WAF vs Cloudflare Web Application Firewall

Compared 8% of the time

Akamai App and API Protector vs Cloudflare Web Application Firewall

Compared 7% of the time

Barracuda WAF-as-a-Service vs Cloudflare Web Application Firewall

Compared 7% of the time

More Cloudflare Web Application Firewall Competitors

Azure Front Door vs Uplynk

Compared 20% of the time

Cloudflare vs Uplynk

Compared 17% of the time

Akamai vs Uplynk

Compared 15% of the time

Windows Azure CDN vs Uplynk

Compared 14% of the time

Fastly vs Uplynk

Compared 7% of the time

More Uplynk Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cloudflare Web Application Firewall

June 2025

Cloudflare Web Application Firewall report

Download Cloudflare Web Application Firewall product report

Buyer's Guide

Data Replication

June 2025

Download Uplynk product report

Also Known As

Cloudflare WAF

Edgio, Limelight Content Delivery, Limelight Orchestrate Delivery, Limelight Origin Storage, Global CDN, Verizon EdgeCast

Overview

Cloudflare Web Application Firewall's intuitive dashboard enables users to build powerful rules through easy clicks and also provides Terraform integration. Every request to the WAF is inspected against the rule engine and the threat intelligence curated from protecting over 27 Million websites. Suspicious requests can be blocked, challenged or logged as per the needs of the user while legitimate requests are routed to the destination, agnostic of whether it lives on-premise or in the cloud. Analytics and Cloudflare Logs enable visibility into actionable metrics for the user.

Cloudflare

Uplynk is a robust platform providing CDN integration and optimized streaming services, improving user experience and application performance. It offers control over CDN caching, redirects, and asset transformations, supporting seamless asset management and mobile security.

Uplynk enhances application performance through efficient API calls, optimized web server loads, and robust CDN configurations. It ensures high availability and performance by leveraging Verizon EdgeCast CDN, crucial for managing high-volume traffic on e-commerce platforms. Though Uplynk excels in asset caching and mobile security with JWT tokens and AES encryption, some users note its global reach needs improvement, and its interface lacks modern user-friendliness. Deployment of new rules can be slower compared to competitors, while documentation and rate limiting features require enhancement. Despite this, Uplynk remains a preferred choice for organizations seeking streamlined web server load optimization and enhanced application performance.

What are Uplynk's key features?

Rules Engine V4: Manages CDN caching, redirects, and asset transformations.
Seamless Integration: Easily integrates with Verizon's existing offerings.
Efficient API Calls: Enhances streaming and application performance.
Staging Support: Testing in staging environments without impacting production.
Mobile Security: Includes JWT tokens and AES encryption.

What benefits should users expect in reviews?

Improved Load Times: Efficient CDN configurations enhance site speed.
Enhanced User Navigation: Optimized performance for high-volume traffic.
DDoS Protection: Layer 3, 4, and 7 protection for comprehensive security.
Performance Optimization: Mobile development and streamlined caching.

Organizations deploy Uplynk to optimize web server load, enhance streaming service performance and support high-traffic volume management, especially in e-commerce. Its security measures, combined with Verizon EdgeCast CDN, ensure high availability and reliable performance, enhancing mobile engagement through specialized frameworks.

Uplynk

Sample Customers

crunchbase, udacity, marketo, okcupid, zendesk

TD Ameritrade, Plus500, Solvay Bank, Yahoo, Deckers Brands, and Coach

Buyer's Guide

Cloudflare Web Application Firewall vs. Uplynk

June 2025

Free Report: Cloudflare Web Application Firewall vs. Uplynk

Find out what your peers are saying about Cloudflare Web Application Firewall vs. Uplynk and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

859,129 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Cloudflare Web Application Firewall vs. Uplynk report.

See our list of best Web Application Firewall (WAF) vendors.

We monitor all Web Application Firewall (WAF) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.