Claroty Platform vs Splunk User Behavior Analytics comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The product helps mitigate potential threats, especially if its users have signature rules. The product also provides alerts."

More Claroty Platform Pros →

"It's easily scalable.""The most valuable features are its data aggregation and the ability to automatically identify a number of threats, then suggest recommended actions upon them.""It is a solution that helps test and measure customer satisfaction.""This is a good security product.""It's straightforward in terms of configuration and troubleshooting and log management and monitoring as well. These are the edge points in addition to it being a modular solution where you can capitalize on your current licenses with extra licensing models, which can match the customer's business requirement and it can help the customer to design or to actually plan for their own roadmap.""The product is at the forefront of auto-remediation networking. It's great.""The solution is fast, flexible, and easy to use.""The most valuable feature is the ability to search through a large amount of data."

More Splunk User Behavior Analytics Pros →

Cons
"The product's integration capabilities are an area of concern where improvements are required."

More Claroty Platform Cons →

"They should work to add more built-in correlation searches and more use cases based on worldwide customer experiences. They need more ready-made use cases.""The initial setup was complex because some of the configurations that we required needed customization.""We want to have an automated system for bot hunting that enables us to detect anomalies predictively based on historical data. It would be helpful if Splunk included process mining as an alternative option. We have a threat workflow, but it would be useful if we could supplement that with some process mining capabilities over time.""If the price was lowered and the setup process was less complex, I would consider rating it higher.""I'm not aware of any lacking features.""The correlation engine should have persistent and definable rules.""The solution is much more expensive than relative competitors like ArcSight or LogRhythm. It makes it hard to sell to customers sometimes.""It could be easier to scale the solution if you are using it on-premise, not in the cloud."

More Splunk User Behavior Analytics Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "I hope we can increase the free license to be more than 5 gig a day. This would help people who want to introduce a POC or a demo license for the solution."
  • "My biggest complaint is the way they do pricing... You can never know the pricing for next year. Every single time you adjust to something new, the price goes up. It's impossible to truly budget for it. It goes up constantly."
  • "There are additional costs associated with the integrator."
  • "The licensing costs is around 10,000 dollars."
  • "Pricing varies based on the packages you choose and the volume of your usage."
  • "I am not aware of the price, but it is expensive."
  • More Splunk User Behavior Analytics Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cyber-Physical Systems Protection solutions are best for your needs.
    765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:Nozomi Networks and Claroty Platform are both leading operational technology (OT) security solutions offering a wide range of features, including asset discovery, risk assessment, and threat… more »
    Top Answer:We are really pleased with Splunk and its features. It would be practically impossible to function without it To provide a general overview of the system, it's important to note that the standard… more »
    Top Answer:I am not aware of the price, but it is expensive. A rough estimate would be around 150 gigabytes, given the huge amount of data. At the moment there are no additional costs for maintenance.
    Top Answer:Currently, we do not have any specific improvement projects in progress. However, we have partnered with some companies that are constantly working on improving the system. Therefore, I believe it's… more »
    Ranking
    Views
    133
    Comparisons
    110
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Views
    2,029
    Comparisons
    1,307
    Reviews
    5
    Average Words per Review
    374
    Rating
    8.6
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Caspida, Splunk UBA
    Learn More
    Splunk
    Video Not Available
    Overview

    Claroty Secure Remote Access minimizes the risks remote users, including employees and 3rd parties, introduce to OT networks. It provides a single, manageable interface that all external users connect through, prior to performing software upgrades, periodic maintenance, and other support activities on assets within industrial control system networks.

    Splunk User Behavior Analytics is a behavior-based threat detection is based on machine learning methodologies that require no signatures or human analysis, enabling multi-entity behavior profiling and peer group analytics – for users, devices, service accounts and applications. It detects insider threats and external attacks using out-of-the-box purpose-built that helps organizations find known, unknown and hidden threats, but extensible unsupervised machine learning (ML) algorithms, provides context around the threat via ML driven anomaly correlation and visual mapping of stitched anomalies over various phases of the attack lifecycle (Kill-Chain View). It uses a data science driven approach that produces actionable results with risk ratings and supporting evidence that increases SOC efficiency and supports bi-directional integration with Splunk Enterprise for data ingestion and correlation and with Splunk Enterprise Security for incident scoping, workflow management and automated response. The result is automated, accurate threat and anomaly detection.
    Sample Customers
    Rockwell Automation
    8 Securities, AAA Western, AdvancedMD, Amaya, Cerner Corporation, CJ O Shopping, CloudShare, Crossroads Foundation, 7-Eleven Indonesia
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company14%
    Manufacturing Company13%
    Energy/Utilities Company12%
    Government5%
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm44%
    Insurance Company11%
    Government11%
    Security Firm11%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm15%
    Computer Software Company14%
    Government10%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business19%
    Midsize Enterprise12%
    Large Enterprise69%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business31%
    Midsize Enterprise31%
    Large Enterprise38%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business20%
    Midsize Enterprise11%
    Large Enterprise69%

    Claroty Platform is ranked 2nd in Cyber-Physical Systems Protection with 1 review while Splunk User Behavior Analytics is ranked 11th in Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) with 17 reviews. Claroty Platform is rated 8.0, while Splunk User Behavior Analytics is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Claroty Platform writes "Provides good visibility of the devices in a user's environment". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Splunk User Behavior Analytics writes "Easy to configure and easy to use solution that integrates with many applications and scripts ". Claroty Platform is most compared with Nozomi Networks, Dragos, Tenable OT Security, Darktrace and SCADAfence, whereas Splunk User Behavior Analytics is most compared with Darktrace, Microsoft Defender for Identity, IBM Security QRadar, Varonis Datalert and Cynet.

    We monitor all Cyber-Physical Systems Protection reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.