Claroty Platform vs Kandji comparison

"I like how the tool does passive and active discovery and threat detection and shows risks, recommendations, and vulnerabilities. It gives risk scores and gathers everything in one place - IP, device name, etc. We can integrate it with other tools for overall network mapping. It's useful for audits, compliance, and monitoring of all devices in the industry. It provides both monitoring and control. We also have SRA for incident response, which lets us search all alerts if we deploy the Claroty Platform."

"Claroty provides continuous threat protection and identifies pre-empty stuff and false positives."

"The platform ensures security without imposing significant delays."

"Claroty assigns a score based on how well you are doing in the course. If you skip a video, your score decreases, making it essential to watch the content attentively."

"The solution offers comprehensive tools that greatly enhance your IT operations if implemented correctly."

"The main advantage of Claroty, when compared to its competitors, is integrated secure remote access."

"Customer service is number one and the best."

"Claroty identifies all vulnerabilities available in our environment."

"I highly recommend Kandji to others looking into using it since I have not seen any game-breaking issues; it is highly reliable, scalable, improves security, and reduces the time individuals need to spend on system configuration for security updates."

"It's a very easy plug-and-play solution where you can just enroll the devices and choose the features you want."

"There is room for improvement in the user interface to make it more vibrant and interactive, similar to IT tools. Improvements could also be made in the Secure Remote Access (SRA) user interaction and graphical representations of recordings."

"I think the only issue is that the hardware Claroty uses is expensive."

"Occasionally, I face a login problem despite entering the correct password."

"The product's integration capabilities are an area of concern where improvements are required."

"There are a few protocols that Claroty doesn't currently support."

"Claroty Platform could improve the pricing to get more acceptability in the market."

"For improvement, I think the training could be more practical. We have external training, but they're mostly theoretical. I want the solution to provide hands-on lab experience to help users learn better."

"Claroty Platform only gives the vulnerabilities based on the make and model of the devices, so it doesn't provide any resolution or any detailed explanation of how one can resolve such issues."

"Kandji should give open customization."

"The licensing for physical devices is cheap, but the software version is expensive. The software version costs around 26-28 dollars. I was surprised and even double-checked. It was shocking."

"The tool is quite expensive."

"It's a bit expensive compared to other solutions."

"Users have to pay a yearly licensing fee for Kandji, which is expensive."