Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Citrix DaaS (formerly Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops service) vs LogMeIn Central comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Citrix DaaS (formerly Citri...
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
6.6
Number of Reviews
127
Ranking in other categories
Application Virtualization (1st), Remote Access (4th), Virtual Desktop Infrastructure (VDI) (3rd), Desktop as a Service (DaaS) (1st)
LogMeIn Central
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
19
Ranking in other categories
Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) (14th)
 

Mindshare comparison

Citrix DaaS (formerly Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops service) and LogMeIn Central aren’t in the same category and serve different purposes. Citrix DaaS (formerly Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops service) is designed for Application Virtualization and holds a mindshare of 25.8%, up 25.5% compared to last year.
LogMeIn Central, on the other hand, focuses on Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM), holds 3.2% mindshare, down 4.7% since last year.
Application Virtualization Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Citrix DaaS (formerly Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops service)25.8%
Microsoft App-V21.9%
Parallels Remote Application Server (RAS)16.7%
Other35.599999999999994%
Application Virtualization
Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
LogMeIn Central3.2%
Kaseya VSA18.2%
NinjaOne13.5%
Other65.1%
Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM)
 

Featured Reviews

Mohd Abdul Aziz Shah Sulaiman - PeerSpot reviewer
High security has ensured safe access that's very lightweight
The security layer is very high because I cannot copy-paste outside of the VDI. Screenshots are not possible, as everything will appear black. Within the VDI, users are focused on their specific tasks. It is a lightweight application that incorporates multi-factor authentication. It allows contact centers to work from home, using the VDI for application access while ensuring the person accessing the machine is the one doing the work. The security layer is robust, preventing copy-pasting outside the VDI or screenshotting.
Kelsey Braun - PeerSpot reviewer
Has good stability and an easy initial setup process
We use the solution for remote access control and endpoint protection features The solution has the best remote access control and protection features. They should provide intermediate device limit options. It would be helpful for users who require more remote control capabilities than the lower…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Remote work has been enhanced"
"The initial setup is easy."
"For our company's customers, I feel that the product is stable."
"The product is simple to set up, and its deep integration with Microsoft is also a valuable feature."
"The feature that I like is that it is fast."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is that it supports team clients."
"It is a stable solution. We don't usually have problems with the platform...It is a very scalable solution."
"Citrix DaaS (formerly Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops service) is highly recommended due to its ability to flawlessly handle 100% of the apps it packages, compared to App-V, which struggled with 20% to 30% of apps."
"I would not want to tell other companies about it because it is so powerful, it does so much, and it makes me look so good."
"I like the security aspect, that I can glance down and see quickly who's up to date on patches, and who has virus concerns."
"It is convenient for my workers to be at home. Therefore, it is easier for them as their second job to do the work. That is a plus, and I improve productivity."
"The initial setup was very easy."
"The ability to remotely access machines with no user intervention required at the remote terminal. Other software we used needed someone to click a link and do a download for me to provide support. Now, with LogMeIn Central, I can get in and fix things while they are away from their desks."
"One of the improvements they made was a LogMeIn Central client - that was a couple years ago - and that has been great. You no longer have to use their web interface. There's actually a client that you can install, which lists all of the machines and servers that you can access. That works really well."
"Provides remote access, allows me to get inside our network to be able to fix problems."
"Remote access is really the biggest one, because in order to be able to support my clients from wherever I am, that is the biggest feature."
 

Cons

"The ITSM adapters need to be enhanced."
"There is room for slight improvement in performance optimization and interface refinement."
"This solution is resource-intensive, it takes a lot of Bandwidth and a lot of the resources of the server."
"Compared with the Outlook mobile app, the Citrix mobile app shows some lag in authentication."
"The solution's cost has almost doubled this year, and it could be made cheaper."
"As an end-to-end solution for implementing Zero Trust principles I would rate it a six or a seven out of 10, because it doesn't cover all aspects of Zero Trust. There are quite a few aspects you need to cover."
"We have had issues with certain aspects, which is why we are looking for alternatives. For example, the firewall solution from Citrix is a bit complicated. Integration is hard."
"Their customer support can be improved a lot as it lacks a lot of knowledgeable help."
"Do not use the technical support."
"Sometimes it just fails to load."
"The update issues are an absolute pain. It says it is updating things, but the updates do not go through, and you try your hardest to get the updates to go through and they don't. You go to the PC, but there is no update there, then you go back and it says there are updates."
"It's not really a true RMM product but more of just a remote access."
"The initial load is terribly slow and often has delays with the login page loading."
"It needs backwards compatibility for non-Microsoft-supported operating systems, for example, XP and 2003. In situations where I have no options but to run older operating systems, I would like for it to be backwards compatible."
"Compared to other products, I feel that their biggest weakness has been customer service. They are very nice, but things take forever to resolve. It has been a major issue there. Otherwise, we're happy. We haven't moved away from them because we haven't found anybody with comparable pricing for our business model."
"I do not like the antivirus."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"You can buy an on-cloud or on-prem license. You can switch between on-cloud users and on-prem users. Its licensing is cheap. It is from $8 to $15 per user. It is not that expensive when you compare the cost of buying new hardware with the cost of the license. For example, at $15 per user, it costs around $180 for a year, which is cheaper than buying a $600 PC that at a certain stage, you will again have to change because its hardware is not supported. It may also get damaged or stolen. So, you can compare the cost of the actual hardware that you have to buy and the time spent in supporting the clients with the cost of its license."
"The solution is expensive and I give the cost a four out of ten."
"It is an expensive solution. I rate its pricing a nine out of ten."
"Citrix solutions cost a lot in comparison with competitors, like Azure Virtual Desktop or VMware Horizon. Those solutions cost around 50 to 60 percent less, per month per user, than Citrix."
"We are just now approaching the end of our initial purchase, which was an excellent price for us as an academic institution. We got a very good deal to get us on board. That license is up for renewal in about a year, and we are nervously waiting to see what the pricing will be."
"Citrix licensing is expensive."
"It is quite expensive, but so are the competitors on the market."
"The Citrix license model has changed. It costs around $240 per user for a single username, but a concurrent license costs double."
"We are an educational institution, so anything to make it cheaper would be better because we don’t grow money on trees."
"It really is an expensive product for me.​"
"It's probably worth the value, but the price increases over the last five years are getting harder to justify."
"The price needs improvement. It is ridiculously expensive now, and no features have really changed."
"The solution's price is reasonable."
"Pricing is a little on the expensive side, compared to what TeamViewer has offered."
"It sucks that I am paying for LogMeIn Central, LogMeIn Pro, and LogMeIn Rescue, plus LogMeIn Ignition, which is the mobile app​. It costs me a lot of money every month at LogMeIn. ​"
"We went with it for pricing reasons, that it was the biggest bang for our buck, by combining the ability to have a central security console, as well as a central point for user administration."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Virtualization solutions are best for your needs.
872,029 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
21%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Financial Services Firm
8%
Government
7%
Insurance Company
8%
Educational Organization
8%
Computer Software Company
8%
Performing Arts
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business43
Midsize Enterprise21
Large Enterprise68
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business14
Midsize Enterprise1
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops?
My focus has primarily been on publishing virtual applications.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops?
I rate the product’s pricing a seven out of ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive.
What needs improvement with Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops?
I have found that Citrix DaaS is still a complex product, especially on the desktop side, which affects scalability. Although it works well on the apps side, the desktop aspect still has room for i...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Also Known As

XenDesktop, XenApp (Citrix Virtual Apps), Citrix Workspace
No data available
 

Interactive Demo

Demo not available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Exelon, Aeronamic, AIDS Healthcare Foundation, Alameda County Medical Center, Alaska Department of Fish & Game, Aloysius Stichting, Amarchand Mangaldas, AmBev, Amnet Technology Solutions, Arval
Au Bon Pain, BELL (Building Educated Leaders for Life)
Find out what your peers are saying about Citrix, Microsoft, Parallels and others in Application Virtualization. Updated: October 2025.
872,029 professionals have used our research since 2012.