"Good manageability, and stability."
"Cisco Wireless always has the latest technology that supports WiFi 5 and 6."
"Some of the features I find valuable are the FlexConnect and overall it is a good global solution."
"Setting up Cisco Wireless is pretty straightforward. It takes about an hour or two, and we can handle it in-house. To deploy one project, it takes two to three for a single controller."
"Its stability is most valuable."
"From my experience, I have found Cisco Wireless to be scalable."
"The capacity, security, downloading, and exporting data are all very good. It's user-friendly, but if I look at Meraki versus normal Cisco equipment, then I think that Meraki will be much more user-friendly."
"This solution is highly stable. We have only had one issue in seven years."
"The installation process is nice and easy."
"The installation process is very easy."
"The Artificial Intelligence on offer is very useful."
"There are some areas of improvement needed in roaming and streaming."
"Its licensing model and cost should be improved."
"Room for improvement wise, the wireless coverage of Cisco's equipment could be better for the price position. That is, I think that the radius for the coverage could be better to make it worth the price that we pay for it."
"It's end-of-life, it will be end-of-support in the next two years. The APs are also end-of-life."
"This solution is very expensive, which means we often have to go for cheaper options instead."
"The price should be reduced. It should be cheaper."
"Apple is definitely causing a lot of issues by turning on more security features on its equipment. It is causing more problems on the business side. One is what they call a randomized Mac address that Apple has put out. As far as I know, Cisco doesn't have a fix for that."
"Cisco's architecture is becoming complex."
"The support on offer to other vendors switching - like Aruba or Ruckus - could be improved."
"The solution could offer more integration with other products."
"We would prefer it if the solution could be less expensive."
Cisco Wireless is ranked 3rd in Wireless LAN with 80 reviews while Juniper WLC Series is ranked 14th in Wireless LAN with 3 reviews. Cisco Wireless is rated 8.2, while Juniper WLC Series is rated 9.4. The top reviewer of Cisco Wireless writes "Robust with a good level of performance and very helpful technical support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Juniper WLC Series writes "Stable with good AI capabilities and helpful technical support". Cisco Wireless is most compared with Aruba Wireless, Ruckus Wireless, Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN, Ubiquiti WLAN and NETGEAR Insight Access Points, whereas Juniper WLC Series is most compared with Aruba Wireless, Mist AI and Cloud, Ruckus Wireless, Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN and ExtremeCloud IQ. See our Cisco Wireless vs. Juniper WLC Series report.
See our list of best Wireless LAN vendors.
We monitor all Wireless LAN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
