Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM) vs Wiz Code comparison

Cisco and Wiz are both solutions in the Risk-Based Vulnerability Management category. Cisco is ranked #19, while Wiz is ranked #13 with an average rating of 8.7. Cisco holds a 2.7% mindshare in RBVM, compared to Wiz’s 2.3% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Cisco users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Wiz users who would recommend it.

Cisco Vulnerability Managem...

Read 1 Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM) review

1,035 Views
652 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Wiz Code

Read 3 Wiz Code reviews

2,351 Views
588 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Cisco Vulnerability Managem...

Wiz Code

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Feb 8, 2026

Cisco Vulnerability Management and Wiz Code are cybersecurity and vulnerability management tools. While Cisco shines with its extensive analytics and system integration, Wiz Code appeals with advanced scanning and innovative technology.

Features: Cisco offers comprehensive analytics, vulnerability prioritization, and strong integration with existing systems. Wiz Code provides cutting-edge anomaly detection, a cloud-native architecture, and modern solutions that attract tech-forward customers.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Cisco integrates smoothly with existing infrastructure and benefits from its dedicated support framework, facilitating the onboarding process. Wiz Code's cloud-native platform ensures a quick and efficient deployment, attracting businesses that value rapid implementation and agility.

Pricing and ROI: Cisco may have higher initial setup costs but delivers ROI through comprehensive analytics and risk reduction over time. Wiz Code offers competitive pricing that presents immediate value with its scalable technology, appealing to those seeking quick setup and lower initial investment.

To learn more, read our detailed Risk-Based Vulnerability Management Report (Updated: February 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Risk-Based Vulnerability Management

February 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 882,160 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cisco Vulnerability Managem...

Ranking in Risk-Based Vulnerability Management

19th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cisco Security Portfolio (11th)

Wiz Code

Ranking in Risk-Based Vulnerability Management

13th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

4.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Vulnerability Management (37th), Cloud Security Remediation (1st), Application Security Posture Management (ASPM) (8th), Continuous Threat Exposure Management (CTEM) (6th)

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Risk-Based Vulnerability Management category, the mindshare of Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM) is 2.7%, up from 2.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Wiz Code is 2.3%, up from 1.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Risk-Based Vulnerability Management Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Wiz Code	2.3%
Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM)	2.7%
Other	95.0%

Risk-Based Vulnerability Management

Featured Reviews

AshishPaliwal

Self-employed at Self-employed

Offers contextual prioritization and risk-based remediation of vulnerability

An improvement would be some sort of an integration with any GRC suite. There are a lot of GRC suites available, like Archer, MetricStream, Rsam, Protiviti, for example. So how would a solution like this work if my company has already invested thousands or maybe millions in a GRC solution? Do I still need it and how does it fit into an existing SAP environment? There could be interoperability, having more data sources, integrating Splunk, Qualys, FireEye, Rapid7, Carbon Black. I'm sure all that can be done to an extent, with a little more insight and a little more accuracy on the industry numbers and trends. I'd like the solution to offer any sort of assistance in any way with the remediation part, not just identification of vulnerability risk, and that is second.

Read full review

reviewer2618736

Security Manager at a consultancy with 10,001+ employees

Continuous code security has reduced vulnerabilities and provides real-time risk visibility

I have a big improvement in mind for Wiz Code, not a small improvement. When I look at tools such as vulnerability detection tools, I focus on how the reporting could help fast-track risk mitigations. I don't want folks to just look at the severity rating, whether it's critical, high, or medium. I would love to see how that presents a risk. Meaning that if a particular vulnerability is compromised, it could be a low severity, but if it's compromised, what business impact does it have? With capabilities we have in AI and other technologies, I think we could do much more than just sharing vulnerability ratings or severity ratings for folks to act on. That approach is outdated. Something that communicates the value would make sense and could help drive or change habits. That's what I'm thinking, and that's why I say it's a big one, not just something small.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The risk context of any vulnerability is a valuable feature."

"The best features with Wiz Code give you a reasonable picture when it comes to vulnerabilities, which means you see the usual severity levels, you also get to see references on how to remediate vulnerabilities, and the fact that it has a visual dashboard helps all stakeholders, especially folks who need to remediate, to get that picture correctly and then take action."

"In my opinion, all the security features Wiz Code offers are the best."

"Wiz Code has positively impacted my organization through the unified platform that gives the ability to shift left in security and detect issues before they go into production."

Cons

"An improvement would be some sort of an integration with any GRC suite."

"I have a big improvement in mind for Wiz Code, not a small improvement."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I think the pricing is based on the number of endpoints, so it's more subscription-based."

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Risk-Based Vulnerability Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

882,160 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

17%

Retailer

14%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Manufacturing Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Computer Software Company

Retailer

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Wiz Code?

I have no idea about the pricing, setup cost, and licensing for Wiz Code.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Wiz Code?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Wiz Code?

Folks deploying infrastructure with Terraform code need to verify that those deployments do not have vulnerability concerns, and if they do, they need to be remediated, which is the main use case f...

See all answers

Comparisons

Vulcan Cyber vs Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM)

Compared 15% of the time

Qualys VMDR vs Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM)

Compared 12% of the time

Rapid7 InsightVM vs Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM)

Compared 9% of the time

Unified Vulnerability Management vs Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM)

Compared 9% of the time

Brinqa vs Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM)

Compared 8% of the time

More Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM) Competitors

Zafran Security vs Wiz Code

Compared 12% of the time

Prowler vs Wiz Code

Compared 7% of the time

Unified Vulnerability Management vs Wiz Code

Compared 4% of the time

Wiz vs Wiz Code

Compared 4% of the time

XM Cyber vs Wiz Code

Compared 4% of the time

More Wiz Code Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Risk-Based Vulnerability Management

February 2026

Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM) report

Download Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM) product report

Buyer's Guide

Continuous Threat Exposure Management (CTEM)

February 2026

Download Wiz Code product report

Also Known As

Kenna.VM, Kenna Security, Kenna, Kenna Security Platform

Dazz.io

Overview

Cisco Vulnerability Management equips you with the contextual insight and threat intelligence needed to intercept the next exploit and respond with precision.

Prioritization is no longer a dark art—it's data science. Advanced algorithms, combined with rich internal and external intel, offer recommended fixes that will lower risk in as few moves as possible.

Track vulnerability fluctuations and forecast weaponization with up to 94% accuracy, giving you the chance to remediate high-risk vulnerabilities before bad actors can mount an attack.

With more than 19 threat intelligence feeds at your fingertips, you gain a comprehensive view of emerging threats, shifting trends, and your own risk profile.

A single source of data-verified truth aligns security and IT, eliminating friction and freeing up resources. And intuitive, simplified risk scores help you generate reports anyone can understand.

Cisco

Wiz Code is a cutting-edge tool designed to enhance business processes by offering dynamic solutions tailored to meet advanced technological demands. It delivers actionable insights and streamlines operations, making it an indispensable asset for businesses aiming for efficiency.

Renowned for its innovation, Wiz Code addresses complex business challenges through its robust features. With its adaptability, it assists organizations in optimizing workflows and improving productivity. By integrating advanced analytics, it offers unrivaled accuracy and speed, empowering decision-makers to act swiftly and confidently. Its broad array of functionalities ensures that companies can scale their operations while minimizing costs, thus optimizing overall performance.

What are the key features of Wiz Code?

Advanced Analytics: Provides deep insights for data-driven decisions.
Scalability: Easily supports growing business demands.
Seamless Integration: Connects smoothly with existing systems.
Real-time Reporting: Delivers up-to-date information instantly.
Automated Workflows: Reduces manual tasks to boost efficiency.

What benefits or ROI should users consider?

Cost Efficiency: Significantly reduces operational expenses.
Increased Productivity: Automates processes leading to greater output.
Improved Decision Making: Offers insights that enhance strategic planning.
Flexible Deployment: Adapts to different business environments with ease.

Industries implementing Wiz Code see streamlined operations, particularly in finance, healthcare, and logistics. In finance, it optimizes transaction processing and compliance checks. Healthcare providers rely on it for patient management and data analysis, while logistics companies benefit from improved supply chain management and inventory tracking. Its flexibility allows it to fit seamlessly into these sectors, driving efficiency and fostering growth.

Wiz

Sample Customers

TransUnion

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Risk-Based Vulnerability Management

February 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Qualys, Tenable, Rapid7 and others in Risk-Based Vulnerability Management. Updated: February 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

882,160 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Risk-Based Vulnerability Management vendors.

We monitor all Risk-Based Vulnerability Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.