IT Central Station is now PeerSpot: Here's why

Cisco UCS E-Series Servers vs NEC Sigmablade-H comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Featured Review
Buyer's Guide
Blade Servers
June 2022
Find out what your peers are saying about Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Cisco, Dell Technologies and others in Blade Servers. Updated: June 2022.
610,336 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "It's expensive, they are quite pricey."
  • More Cisco UCS E-Series Servers Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Blade Servers solutions are best for your needs.
    610,336 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:They are really easy to maintain. I've added RAM to them. I've done a lot of other things with the virtualization.
    Top Answer:It's expensive, they are quite pricey. For the to penetrate the African market, price require a review.
    Top Answer:In terms of what needs improvement, I would say the biggest pain point for us is the matrix for the firmware upgrades. It is a pain. You look at that thing, you might as well be reading Greek. You… more »
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Ranking
    7th
    out of 23 in Blade Servers
    Views
    211
    Comparisons
    57
    Reviews
    3
    Average Words per Review
    960
    Rating
    8.0
    22nd
    out of 23 in Blade Servers
    Views
    30
    Comparisons
    12
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    UCS E-Series Servers
    Sigmablade-H
    Learn More
    Overview

    Cisco UCS E-Series Servers are next-generation, power-optimized, x86, Intel Xeon 64-bit blade servers designed to be deployed in Cisco Integrated Services Routers Generation 2 (ISR G2) and the Cisco 4451-X ISR. These price-to-performance-optimized single-socket blade servers balance simplicity, performance, reliability, and power efficiency. They are well suited for applications and infrastructure services typically deployed in small offices and branch offices.

    The NEC N8405-024F Blade Enclosure (SIGMABLADE-H) can integrate a maximum of 16 servers' functions into one blade enclosure by housing a maximum of 16 CPU blades and 8 pass-through cards or switch modules in a case of 10U (about 445mm). 

    Offer
    Learn more about Cisco UCS E-Series Servers
    Learn more about NEC Sigmablade-H
    Sample Customers
    Navaho,  MiroNet AG, Columbia Sportswear
    Miyakonojo City Council
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Comms Service Provider31%
    Government17%
    Computer Software Company10%
    Educational Organization8%
    No Data Available
    Buyer's Guide
    Blade Servers
    June 2022
    Find out what your peers are saying about Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Cisco, Dell Technologies and others in Blade Servers. Updated: June 2022.
    610,336 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Cisco UCS E-Series Servers is ranked 7th in Blade Servers with 3 reviews while NEC Sigmablade-H is ranked 22nd in Blade Servers. Cisco UCS E-Series Servers is rated 8.0, while NEC Sigmablade-H is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Cisco UCS E-Series Servers writes "Easy to configure and operate". On the other hand, Cisco UCS E-Series Servers is most compared with HPE Synergy, whereas NEC Sigmablade-H is most compared with .

    See our list of best Blade Servers vendors.

    We monitor all Blade Servers reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.