Cisco UCS E-Series Servers vs HPE Integrity comparison

Cisco and Hewlett Packard Enterprise are both solutions in the Blade Servers category. Cisco is ranked #12 with an average rating of 8.0, while Hewlett Packard Enterprise is ranked #9 with an average rating of 7.8. Cisco holds a 2.4% mindshare in Blade Servers, compared to Hewlett Packard Enterprise’s 2.6% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Cisco users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 90% of Hewlett Packard Enterprise users who would recommend it.

Cisco UCS E-Series Servers

Read 8 Cisco UCS E-Series Servers reviews

292 Views
120 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

HPE Integrity

Read 20 HPE Integrity reviews

407 Views
249 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

Cisco UCS E-Series Servers

HPE Integrity

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Feb 3, 2025

HPE Integrity Servers and Cisco UCS E-Series Servers compete in the enterprise hardware market, each with distinct advantages. Cisco UCS E-Series appears to have the upper hand due to its scalability and seamless integration capabilities.

Features: HPE Integrity boasts high-performance computing suited for mission-critical tasks, high availability, and fault-tolerant architecture. Cisco UCS E-Series is recognized for its scalability, easy integration with Cisco environments, and advanced networking capabilities.

Room for Improvement: HPE Integrity could enhance its scalability and offer more flexible deployment options. Cisco UCS E-Series might benefit from improvements in its thermal management, expandability beyond networking, and enhanced warranty options.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Cisco UCS E-Series offers streamlined deployment due to integration with Cisco’s solutions and robust customer support with proactive engagement. HPE Integrity provides a comprehensive deployment approach with tailored support for complex enterprise needs.

Pricing and ROI: HPE Integrity involves higher initial setup costs but promises long-term ROI with superior performance and reliability. Cisco UCS E-Series offers a cost-effective initial investment and quicker ROI, appealing to enterprises needing rapid expansion within existing infrastructures.

To learn more, read our detailed Cisco UCS E-Series Servers vs. HPE Integrity Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Cisco UCS E-Series Servers vs. HPE Integrity

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 850,028 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cisco UCS E-Series Servers

Ranking in Blade Servers

12th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

HPE Integrity

Ranking in Blade Servers

9th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Blade Servers category, the mindshare of Cisco UCS E-Series Servers is 2.4%, up from 0.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of HPE Integrity is 2.6%, down from 2.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Blade Servers

Featured Reviews

DavidMbugua

Group General Manager-ICT at SkyLink

Stable product with efficient security features

We use Cisco UCS E-Series Servers to host enterprise systems The product's most valuable features are stability, speed, and scalability. We rarely encounter downtime issues, and it has an expandable memory storage. Additionally, it blends well with Cisco's security tools. The platform's pricing…

Read full review

Linda Belebesi

Unix System Engineer at Road Accident Fund

Highly stable, straightforward, and easy to use

In terms of improvement, the operating system development is slow, making it hard to keep up with modern tech and integrate with third-party products. Unlike other platforms, it lacks easy integration with popular cloud services like Office 365. This means if you are using HPE, you might face challenges connecting to the cloud and need to rely more on on-premises servers. Also, the support is lacking in some third-party products, limiting your options.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable features are that they are efficient and easy to setup."

"The product's most valuable features are stability, speed, and scalability."

"They are really easy to maintain. I've added RAM to them. I've done a lot of other things with the virtualization."

"The Cisco chassis is very easy to configure and any network engineer or expert can configure the solution and easily integrate it with the chassis."

"Cisco has better visibility and manageability for disaster recovery."

"The server management and automation capabilities have been outstanding in automation, greatly benefiting our IT team."

"The product is overall stable."

"Stability-wise, it is a good product that remains stable."

"It is very fast and easy to use."

"HPE Integrity is a reliable solution, but you'll need to refurbish the hardware because it's approaching the end of sale."

"What I like about HPE Integrity servers is how stable and easy to use they are."

"The product's most valuable features are troubleshooting and monitoring."

"The benefit provided by the solution for my organization stems from the fact that it provides maximum reliability and availability to users."

"We have what is called a chief data care center support. This is the highest level of support they have. We have been very happy with the support we have received."

"The tool provides good performance and productivity."

"This is a reliable server, and many applications are integrated there."

Cons

"I would like to see improvements in VMware integration with Cisco, especially in terms of documentation and integration tools. Support of NVIDIA integration would also make it better."

"The product should also be available in a standard edition or a standard license since currently there is a need to pay for an extra license, which is very expensive, especially when considering the budgeting part of our company."

"The biggest pain point for us is the matrix for the firmware upgrades. It is a pain. You look at that thing, you might as well be reading Greek. It would be a whole lot better if they could clean up their documentation on it."

"It is not a solution that is cloud ready."

"The platform's pricing needs improvement. There could be more collaborative tools included."

"The processing capacity could be improved."

"One thing that could be improved is the cost - it is very high for this Blade chassis as compared to other vendors. Especially in Asia. Asian customers mostly prefer a cost effective, cheaper solution."

"The tool must be made compatible with multi-vendor ecosystems."

"The manageability must be improved."

"HPE Integrity is a pain. HPE hasn't put much work into developing the solution in the past few years because it will be discontinued soon."

"The monitoring is an area that needs some improvement."

"HPE Integrity needs improvement in terms of pricing for scalability."

"The virtualization of HPE Integrity could be simplified. We have discussed this issue with HPE and hopefully, they will have an update."

"Unlike other platforms, it lacks easy integration with popular cloud services like Office 365."

"HPE Integrity has always been one step behind in areas like virtualization technologies, cloud enablement, the speed of backups, and replication."

"Pricing is very high."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution is expensive."

"The product is expensive."

"It's expensive, they are quite pricey."

"The pricing of the solution is reasonable. From a commercial point of view, the prices are okay."

"There is a need to pay towards the licensing costs of the solution. The most expensive server from Cisco is Cisco UCS B-Series."

"Price-wise, the solution is very expensive."

"HPE Integrity's pricing could be better."

"The price is not very expensive."

"There is no license required to use HPE Integrity."

"The pricing is the best."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Blade Servers solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Computer Software Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Cisco UCS E-Series Servers?

The product's most valuable features are stability, speed, and scalability.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cisco UCS E-Series Servers?

The product is expensive. I rate its pricing a five out of ten.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Cisco UCS E-Series Servers?

The platform's pricing needs improvement. There could be more collaborative tools included.

See all answers

What do you like most about HPE Integrity?

The tool provides good performance and productivity.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for HPE Integrity?

The pricing is the best. It is suitable for us. I rate the pricing a nine out of ten.

See all answers

What needs improvement with HPE Integrity?

Pricing is very high. It should be less. In comparison to other brands like Dell or Cisco, I think HPE is not CTS. HPE should not be CTS. It should be less than Cisco and IBM. IBM has higher costs....

See all answers

Comparisons

Cisco UCS B-Series vs Cisco UCS E-Series Servers

Compared 45% of the time

Supermicro SuperBlade vs Cisco UCS E-Series Servers

Compared 32% of the time

HPE Synergy vs Cisco UCS E-Series Servers

Compared 23% of the time

More Cisco UCS E-Series Servers Competitors

HPE Superdome X vs HPE Integrity

Compared 58% of the time

Supermicro SuperBlade vs HPE Integrity

Compared 42% of the time

More HPE Integrity Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cisco UCS E-Series Servers

April 2025

Download Cisco UCS E-Series Servers product report

Buyer's Guide

HPE Integrity

April 2025

Download HPE Integrity product report

Also Known As

UCS E-Series Servers

HP Integrity Superdome , HP Integrity, SGI Altix

Overview

Cisco UCS E-Series Servers are next-generation, power-optimized, x86, Intel Xeon 64-bit blade servers designed to be deployed in Cisco Integrated Services Routers Generation 2 (ISR G2) and the Cisco 4451-X ISR. These price-to-performance-optimized single-socket blade servers balance simplicity, performance, reliability, and power efficiency. They are well suited for applications and infrastructure services typically deployed in small offices and branch offices.

Cisco

HP Integrity solutions provide an unparalleled portfolio of resilient systems for mission-critical environments. When availability matters, the new HP Integrity NonStop X enables you to stay ahead of your competition by mitigating the risk of downtime and effortlessly meeting your business processing, OLTP, and database requirements all with an industry-standard x86 architecture.

Hewlett Packard Enterprise

Sample Customers

Navaho, MiroNet AG, Columbia Sportswear

Home Credit Bank

Buyer's Guide

Cisco UCS E-Series Servers vs. HPE Integrity

April 2025

Free Report: Cisco UCS E-Series Servers vs. HPE Integrity

Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco UCS E-Series Servers vs. HPE Integrity and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Cisco UCS E-Series Servers vs. HPE Integrity report.

See our list of best Blade Servers vendors.

We monitor all Blade Servers reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.