Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Cisco UCS Director vs Quest Foglight Hybrid Cloud Manager [EOL] comparison

Cisco and Quest Software are both solutions in the Cloud Management category. Additionally, 73% of Cisco users are willing to recommend the solution.
Cisco UCS Director
Read 15 Cisco UCS Director reviews
  • 614 Views
  • 583 Comparison Views
73% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 23, 2025

Cisco UCS Director and Quest Foglight Hybrid Cloud Manager compete in cloud management, offering unique advantages. Cisco UCS Director tends to shine with its orchestration capabilities and efficient setup, while Quest stands out with its rich monitoring features and detailed analytics, justifying any higher costs through comprehensive offerings.

Features: Cisco UCS Director focuses on orchestrating and automating data center resources, provides strong integration with various platforms, and offers efficient virtualization management. Quest Foglight Hybrid Cloud Manager is known for its broad monitoring capabilities, in-depth analytics across hybrid environments, and extensive visibility that supports complex environments.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Cisco UCS Director offers straightforward deployment with robust guidance and support, ideal for organizations seeking efficient setup. Quest Foglight Hybrid Cloud Manager provides complex deployment options with extensive customization, alongside comprehensive customer service options.

Pricing and ROI: Cisco UCS Director is cost-effective with lower initial setup costs, leading to faster ROI through efficient deployment and management. Quest Foglight Hybrid Cloud Manager, despite potential higher upfront costs, offers significant returns due to superior monitoring and analytics, supporting its premium pricing.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Cloud Management Report (Updated: August 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Cloud Management
August 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 867,370 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Cisco UCS Director
Average Rating
7.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.7
Number of Reviews
15
Ranking in other categories
Cloud Management (21st)
Quest Foglight Hybrid Cloud...
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Featured Reviews

Sunny Nair - PeerSpot reviewer
Good multi-cloud management capability, but third-party and legacy integration needs improvement
Normally, UCS Director is used primarily for orchestration, but when we look at a non-Cisco data infrastructure components, the UCS Director needs a bit more improvement in terms of integration with third-party systems and with existing older systems. I feel that more development or a more integrated road map should be set up so that it becomes a common platform for any infrastructure. In the next release of this solution, I would like to see changes in the navigation controls of UCS Director. That would be helpful. Modifying the icons that are available for use, as well as virtualization aspects.
Read full review
Use Quest Foglight Hybrid Cloud Manager [EOL]?
Share your opinion
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Management solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
867,370 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
20%
Financial Services Firm
12%
Manufacturing Company
12%
Government
8%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business4
Midsize Enterprise1
Large Enterprise11
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Cisco UCS Director?
Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cisco UCS Director?
While the pricing might be seen as expensive, it provides value for money due to reliable service and excellent technical support.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Cisco UCS Director?
It should be more of a cloud-based architecture for Cisco UCS Director, and it should be affordable to small customers as well because the pricing is a major challenge when we talk about Cisco UCS ...
See all answers
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Comparisons

Cisco Intersight vs Cisco UCS Director Logo
Cisco Intersight vs Cisco UCS Director
Compared 36% of the time
VMware Aria Automation vs Cisco UCS Director Logo
VMware Aria Automation vs Cisco UCS Director
Compared 27% of the time
Morpheus vs Cisco UCS Director Logo
Morpheus vs Cisco UCS Director
Compared 13% of the time
IBM Turbonomic vs Cisco UCS Director Logo
IBM Turbonomic vs Cisco UCS Director
Compared 12% of the time
OpenNebula vs Cisco UCS Director Logo
OpenNebula vs Cisco UCS Director
Compared 12% of the time
More Cisco UCS Director Competitors
No data available
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Cisco UCS Director
September 2025
Cisco UCS Director reportDownload Cisco UCS Director product report
Buyer's Guide
Cloud Management
August 2025
Quest Foglight Hybrid Cloud Manager [EOL] reportDownload Quest Foglight Hybrid Cloud Manager [EOL] product report
 

Also Known As

No data available
Foglight Hybrid Cloud Manager
 

Overview

Cisco UCS Director enables automated delivery of physical and virtual data center resources, empowering data centers to move at the speed of business.

Cisco

Quest Foglight Hybrid Cloud Manager [EOL] offered a comprehensive solution for managing cloud-native and hybrid IT infrastructures. It was designed to support enterprises in optimizing operations and ensuring seamless performance across private and public cloud environments.

Initially aimed at helping organizations transition to hybrid cloud architecture, Quest Foglight Hybrid Cloud Manager [EOL] facilitated effective monitoring and management of disparate IT resources. It provided tools to manage environments through consolidated dashboards, allowing IT teams to maintain control over both cloud and on-premises data. These capabilities allowed enterprises to address specific challenges related to hybrid cloud management by improving efficiency, reliability, and scalability.

What were the most important features?
  • Unified Monitoring: Enabled oversight across cloud and on-premises environments.
  • Performance Management: Offered analytics for optimizing applications and resources.
  • Cost Optimization: Assisted in minimizing cloud expenditure through analytics.
  • Scalability: Supported the scaling of resources based on demand fluctuations.
What benefits should users look for in reviews?
  • Increased Efficiency: Streamlined operations by integrating hybrid environments.
  • Optimized Resource Utilization: Enhanced ability to manage costs and resources effectively.
  • Improved Performance: Assured application and service reliability through monitoring.
  • Enhanced Scalability: Allowed for easy scaling of resources to meet dynamic demands.

Quest Foglight Hybrid Cloud Manager [EOL] found particular use in industries requiring robust IT infrastructure management, such as finance and healthcare. By providing tools that could effectively manage disparate IT resources, companies were able to ensure regulatory compliance, optimize resource allocation, and improve service delivery. This adaptability made it a useful tool in sectors where data integrity and operational efficiency are critical.

Quest Software
 

Sample Customers

Entel, Data#3, Cegal, NESIC, LightEdge
Information Not Available
Buyer's Guide
Cloud Management
August 2025
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Nutanix, VMware, IBM and others in Cloud Management. Updated: August 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
867,370 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our list of best Cloud Management vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.