Cisco Sourcefire SNORT vs KerioControl comparison

Cisco and GFI are both solutions in the Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) category. Cisco is ranked #13 with an average rating of 8.5, while GFI is ranked #14 with an average rating of 9.0. Cisco holds a 3.0% mindshare in ID, compared to GFI’s 3.0% mindshare. Additionally, 95% of Cisco users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 88% of GFI users who would recommend it.

Cisco Sourcefire SNORT

Read 20 Cisco Sourcefire SNORT reviews

2,183 Views
1,856 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

KerioControl

Read 58 KerioControl reviews

7,233 Views
2,170 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

Cisco Sourcefire SNORT

KerioControl

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 19, 2024

Cisco Sourcefire SNORT and KerioControl are network security solutions. KerioControl has the upper hand due to its comprehensive features and value despite SNORT's pricing and support advantages.

Features: Cisco Sourcefire SNORT features advanced threat detection, real-time traffic analysis, and open-source intrusion protection. KerioControl includes firewall capabilities, VPN support, and content filtering, focusing on integrated security management.

Room for Improvement: Cisco Sourcefire SNORT could benefit from a simplified deployment process, improved user interface, and enhanced customer support. KerioControl might enhance its malware protection, expand its reporting features, and improve its scalability options.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Cisco Sourcefire SNORT requires substantial technical expertise for deployment, appealing to knowledgeable network professionals. In contrast, KerioControl offers ease of deployment with straightforward configurations and is praised for accessible and supportive customer service.

Pricing and ROI: Cisco Sourcefire SNORT is attractive for budget-conscious businesses due to its lower initial cost but might have hidden management expenses. KerioControl's higher initial price is offset by its all-in-one suite, offering great ROI with its simplified setup and comprehensive functionality.

To learn more, read our detailed Cisco Sourcefire SNORT vs. KerioControl Report (Updated: June 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Cisco Sourcefire SNORT vs. KerioControl

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 902,988 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cisco Sourcefire SNORT

Ranking in Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS)

13th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

KerioControl

Ranking in Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS)

14th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Firewalls (27th), Unified Threat Management (UTM) (8th)

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2026, in the Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) category, the mindshare of Cisco Sourcefire SNORT is 3.0%, up from 2.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of KerioControl is 3.0%, down from 3.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Cisco Sourcefire SNORT	3.0%
KerioControl	3.0%
Other	94.0%

Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS)

Featured Reviews

reviewer2772102

Cloud Architect at a consultancy with 1-10 employees

Logging and customizable rules have helped improve threat monitoring and detection

The logging is mainly what I consider one of the best features with Cisco Sourcefire SNORT. Being able to log and store it in a file allows you to push it to a centralized repository. The logging and reporting help improve incident response. You should always be logging threats, any sort of misconfiguration, and anything that could be an issue. It's important to at least log and monitor it. The basic rules provide a good baseline in assessing Cisco Sourcefire SNORT's ability in providing real-time analytics for threat detection, but as a professional, you should look to constantly modify that baseline. They provide extensive customizability so you can define your own rules. The customizability allows it to be adaptable in protecting against diverse network threats to the constant change.

Read full review

Constantnos Achilleos

Product manger at Asbis Mediteranean

Leveraging geo-tagging and web filtering for enhanced network security

The solution is used for site-to-site VPN connections and it is valued for its cost efficiency and easy connectivity. It is especially beneficial for multi-site VPNs and is used in about fifteen different components KerioControl has provided a financial benefit as it allows purchasing one license…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"With Cisco Sourcefire SNORT, we've been able to prevent and detect intrusion in our network and actually decrease our SLA (Service Level Agreement)."

"I like most of Cisco's features, like malware detection and URL filtering."

"We primarily use this solution as an intrusion prevention system for external firewalls and deploy the solution on-premises."

"The solution is stable."

"The most valuable feature is the visibility that we have across the virtual environment."

"The whole solution is very good, and stable."

"The solution is rather easy to use."

"The most valuable feature is the ability to automatically learn the traffic in our environment, and change the merit recommendations based on that."

More Cisco Sourcefire SNORT pros

"The most valuable features of KerioControl are ease of configuration, user-friendliness, and comfortable to use. It is an all-in-one solution, it comes with many features, such as a firewall, antivirus software, and network protection."

"Kerio is a lot clearer to set up to do particular things, whereas when I do it on a Cisco or a FortiGate I have to go fight with it per week sometimes to do something I can do in 20 minutes on Kerio."

"All of the features of Kerio Control are equally good. Most valuable to us are the firewall rules, the intrusion detection system, and IP address features."

"The solution provides feasibility regarding cyber privacy."

"We have many customer sites and the solution gives us control over bandwidth internet."

"Kerio's VPN has easily saved us 50 percent, maybe more, in terms of time spent on support."

"The product is brilliant."

"We went from a very secure, regulated on-prem environment to a diverse working from home environment overnight, and Kerio was key to that."

More KerioControl pros

Cons

"The customization of the rules can be simplified."

"This solution needs to be more customizable."

"The pricing needs to be improved."

"While the alerts they offer are good, it could improve it in the sense that they should be more detailed to make the alerts more useful to us in general. Sometimes the solution will offer up false positives. Due to the fact that the alerts aren't detailed, we have to go dig around to see why is it being blocked. The solution would be infinitely better if there was just a bit more detail in the alert information and logging we receive."

"The initial setup is a little difficult compared to other products in the market. It depends on the environment. If we are doing any migration, it might take months in a brown-field environment."

"I don't think this solution is a time-based control system, because one cannot filter traffic based on time."

"With the next release, I would like to see some PBR, so that you can do the configuration with the features."

"I want to see a better dashboard for the product. The dashboard can be a bit modified or enhanced."

More Cisco Sourcefire SNORT cons

"Support responses need improvement."

"I find it a bit costly to pay for the products that I am not using. They need to change their model in such a way that you don't have to pay for the products that you are not using. Its local support and scalability are also not good. I am looking forward to a more scalable product that will be able to grow with time and technology."

"If I would suggest anything, it would be to expand on its multifactor authentication to be a little bit more user-friendly."

"They don't provide content filtering when it comes to search engine results. We had an incident on the network where a blocked site was showing up in search results. We are in a school environment, so we have blocked a site with some of the explicit content so that kids wouldn't see it. When one of them did a search, the results came on the search engine part. When you try to drill down to the website, it blocks, but when you search by image, it brings up all the images. That's one of the reasons why we are looking at Juniper."

"They should add wireless features."

"There were certain things I didn't know about it, but I've always been able to just contact our IT company. They've been able to walk me through certain things. It was quite a monumental task to set up a public site. Support really had to help me with setting up the VLANs and walk me through it. It was not possible for me to figure that out on my own, but that's what they're here for. That could have been a little bit easier laid out."

"I would like to see a little improvement in their technical support when you have a problem. I may be a little jaded because I came from Kerio when we could call and get a person on the phone who worked on the product. Every tech had their own demo setup. They had instant messaging capability with the developers. If we found a problem, then we could get a result for it quickly. Now, the product seems to be 24 hours. They have also gone to the model that if you need quicker support, then they now charge you additional for the exact same level of support that they used to give. I am assuming it's the exact same level of support that they say it is. I'm not paying extra for it. That's the biggest flaw with the product."

"Improvements are needed to the Next Generation Firewall Protection, specifically with user-level protection."

More KerioControl cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Licensing for this solution is paid on a yearly basis."

"The cost is per port and can be expensive but it does include training and support for three years."

"We have a three-year license for this solution."

"I don't know the exact amount, but most of the time when I go to a company with a proposition, they will say, "This thing that you are selling is good, but it's expensive. Why don't you propose something like FortiGate, Check Point, or Palo Alto?" Cisco device are expensive compared to other devices."

"If one is an extremely expensive product, and ten is cheap, I rate the tool's price as a five."

"It gets expensive pretty quickly if you need to purchase license packs."

"I pay approximately $50 for the solution on an annual basis."

"KerioControl's pricing is good."

"I am living in Iran and we cannot buy the product from Kerio because of sanctions."

"The pricing is in-line with our expectations in terms of the quality that we get for it."

"Pricing is good, but the licensing took a lot of time."

"Licensing is easier with Kerio Control. With FortiGate, we realized the licensing is really hectic, because if you skip one year, you have to back pay that year. If you skip two years, you have to back pay two years. With Kerio Control, if a license expires, one year later you can just reactivate and go on."

"The fixed model of users and devices is a bit of a problem for us. We want to be able to expand it fast and not have to contact our supplier first to get a license... If they had a larger fixed price with unlimited users or devices, that would help. Now, it's five users each time. A pack of 100 or 200 users for a certain price would make it more dynamic and user-scalable."

More KerioControl pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

902,988 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Construction Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Comms Service Provider

University

Computer Software Company

12%

Comms Service Provider

11%

Construction Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	6
Midsize Enterprise	8
Large Enterprise	7

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	44
Midsize Enterprise	9
Large Enterprise	3

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cisco Sourcefire SNORT?

If one is an extremely expensive product, and ten is cheap, I rate the tool's price as a five. There are some other tools in the market that are more expensive than Cisco. There are no additional c...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Cisco Sourcefire SNORT?

I have not had much experience with the community-driven rule set while utilizing Cisco Sourcefire SNORT. I don't have experience with recognizing zero-day vulnerabilities, but based on my knowledg...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Cisco Sourcefire SNORT?

Endpoint protection is the main use case. The main aspect involves specifying different rules, and when network traffic hits these rules, it will try to block the traffic or at least log the traffi...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for KerioControl?

KerioControl offers good pricing as one license covers all features needed without extra payment. The price for the product is rated as ten out of ten.

See all answers

What needs improvement with KerioControl?

Regarding KerioControl's application awareness and control feature, I have not used it much.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for KerioControl?

With KerioControl, we usually use them for site-to-site VPNs for most of our clients. With multiple offices, we use KerioControl as our solution.

See all answers

Comparisons

ExtremeCloud IQ vs Cisco Sourcefire SNORT

Compared 9% of the time

Splunk User Behavior Analytics vs Cisco Sourcefire SNORT

Compared 9% of the time

Cisco Secure IPS (NGIPS) vs Cisco Sourcefire SNORT

Compared 9% of the time

TrendAI Tipping Point vs Cisco Sourcefire SNORT

Compared 8% of the time

More Cisco Sourcefire SNORT Competitors

Fortinet FortiGate vs KerioControl

Compared 10% of the time

Netgate pfSense vs KerioControl

Compared 9% of the time

OPNsense vs KerioControl

Compared 8% of the time

Sophos UTM vs KerioControl

Compared 8% of the time

WatchGuard Firebox vs KerioControl

Compared 4% of the time

More KerioControl Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cisco Sourcefire SNORT

June 2026

Download Cisco Sourcefire SNORT product report

Buyer's Guide

KerioControl

June 2026

Download KerioControl product report

Also Known As

Sourcefire SNORT

No data available

Overview

Cisco Sourcefire SNORT is a versatile cybersecurity tool offering threat detection, scalability, and integration with Cisco tools. It is recognized for ease of configuration and comprehensive protection, making it suitable for intrusion prevention and firewall applications.

Cisco Sourcefire SNORT provides advanced malware protection and integrates seamlessly with Cisco products. It enables automatic IPS tuning, real-time visibility, and intelligent security automation, which together enhance network security. Users benefit from its URL filtering, email spam elimination, and it delivers low false positives. Though highly effective, feedback highlights a desire for improvements in stability, dashboard effectiveness, traffic blocking customizations, and integration with Cisco DNA Center. Cost concerns and calls for cloud-based deployments also emerge in user feedback. Technical support and performance are also discussed, with VPN configuration posing challenges.

What are the key features of Cisco Sourcefire SNORT?

Threat Detection: Identifies and mitigates network threats efficiently.
Scalability: Easily adapts to growing network demands.
Cisco Integration: Works smoothly with existing Cisco infrastructure.
Advanced Malware Protection: Provides comprehensive security against sophisticated threats.
Real-Time Visibility: Offers live insights into network activity.
Automatic IPS Tuning: Adjusts security policies dynamically.

What benefits can be found in user reviews?

Ease of Configuration: Streamlined setup process.
Comprehensive Protection: Low false positive rates ensuring broader security.
Robust Support: Access to extensive Cisco support network.

Organizations primarily deploy Cisco Sourcefire SNORT for network security in sectors like finance and healthcare. Used extensively in data centers with Cisco Firepower, it provides intrusion prevention, URL filtering, and VPN security. Pre-configured settings make it practical for on-premises deployment, ensuring secure user-to-server and server-to-server interactions.

Cisco

KerioControl is a comprehensive network security solution integrating firewall, antivirus, and VPN in an easy-to-use interface for small to medium businesses seeking robust protection.

KerioControl offers a blend of essential security features wrapped in a user-friendly graphical interface that enables effective network management. It supports firewall protection, intrusion detection, real-time monitoring, and flexible VPN capabilities ensuring high reliability and productivity. Despite being suitable for small to medium enterprises, improvements could enhance its overall performance, such as better GUI updates, stronger connectivity, and advanced VPN functionality. Common uses include unified threat management, bandwidth management, remote access, and web filtering.

What are the important features of KerioControl?

Ease of Use: Intuitive interface for effortless security management.
Firewall and VPN Integration: Combines essential security tools seamlessly.
Real-time Monitoring: Offers constant insight into network activities.
Intrusion Detection: Advanced system for prevention and alerts.
Bandwidth Management: Efficient allocation for optimized network usage.

What benefits and ROI should users consider?

Cost Savings: Economical security solution for smaller businesses.
Productivity Gains: Simplified management increases operational efficiency.
Enhanced Security: Comprehensive coverage with antivirus and malware protection.
Remote Access: Streamlined management of multiple sites and networks.

KerioControl is effectively implemented in industries needing strong security measures, supporting small to medium businesses in sectors like IT services, retail, and education. It's particularly well-suited for companies requiring efficient threat management and convenient internet service management across various sites.

GFI

Sample Customers

CareCore, City of Biel, Dimension Data, LightEdge, Lone Star College System, National Rugby League, Port Aventura, Smart City Networks, Telecom Italia, The Department of Education in Western Australia

Triton Technical, McDonald's

Buyer's Guide

Cisco Sourcefire SNORT vs. KerioControl

June 2026

Free Report: Cisco Sourcefire SNORT vs. KerioControl

Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco Sourcefire SNORT vs. KerioControl and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

902,988 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Cisco Sourcefire SNORT vs. KerioControl report.

See our list of best Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) vendors.

We monitor all Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.