Cisco Secure Email vs TitanHQ SpamTitan comparison

Cisco and TitanHQ are both solutions in the Email Security category. Cisco is ranked #5 with an average rating of 8.1, while TitanHQ is ranked #14 with an average rating of 9.0. Cisco holds a 4.7% mindshare in Email Security, compared to TitanHQ’s 1.4% mindshare. Additionally, 93% of Cisco users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 97% of TitanHQ users who would recommend it.

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Feb 8, 2026

Cisco Secure Email and TitanHQ SpamTitan are prominent email security products competing in the market with robust features to shield against threats like spam, malware, and phishing. Cisco Secure Email has an edge with advanced threat protection capabilities, but TitanHQ SpamTitan stands out for its affordability and user-friendly interface, making it particularly appealing to small and medium-sized businesses.

Features: Cisco Secure Email is known for its protection against email threats using Advanced Malware Protection, reputation filtering, and comprehensive email security solutions. Meanwhile, TitanHQ SpamTitan is recognized for its ease of setup, customizable email filtering rules, and an intuitive interface that provides a seamless user experience. In terms of value, SpamTitan's affordability and effective basic security features make it accessible to smaller enterprises.

Room for Improvement: Cisco Secure Email could benefit from modernizing its user interface, reducing complexity for new users, and enhancing email log synchronization with reporting tools. It is also considered expensive for smaller organizations. On the other hand, SpamTitan could improve by addressing false positive rates, offering better reporting capabilities, and allowing more frequency customization of quarantine reports. Both solutions would gain from enhanced third-party integration and streamlined interfaces.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Cisco Secure Email supports a broad deployment range across on-premises, public, and hybrid cloud environments, though it requires knowledgeable staff for complex configurations. Its customer support is generally well-rated despite some response time concerns. SpamTitan offers an easy deployment process, particularly in cloud and hybrid settings, requiring less expertise to manage. Its customer service is noted for being responsive and helpful, aiding in its smooth operation.

Pricing and ROI: Cisco Secure Email tends to be on the pricier end, detailed by user count and included features, presenting a significant investment for comprehensive security. Despite its costs, it can lead to savings through the prevention of breaches. SpamTitan offers competitive pricing with no hidden fees, making it an attractive option for businesses seeking robust security without high costs. Both solutions provide good ROI in terms of security effectiveness, subject to budget constraints and business size.

To learn more, read our detailed Cisco Secure Email vs. TitanHQ SpamTitan Report (Updated: April 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Cisco Secure Email vs. TitanHQ SpamTitan

April 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 893,438 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cloudflare One

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the Email Security category, the mindshare of Cloudflare One is 1.7%, up from 1.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Cisco Secure Email is 4.7%, down from 6.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of TitanHQ SpamTitan is 1.4%, up from 1.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Email Security Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Cisco Secure Email	4.7%
TitanHQ SpamTitan	1.4%
Cloudflare One	1.7%
Other	92.2%

Email Security

Featured Reviews

Cobe Van Coller

Network Architect at IP Dimension

Cloud security has improved remote access and has reduced costs for smaller client sites

I have used Cloudflare One's Identity-Aware Proxy, and it is quite straightforward from what I have seen so far. The app registration on the Azure side integrates fully into Cloudflare, and I am very satisfied with that part because it is easy to set up. The integration of Cloudflare One's Secure Web Gateway and Zero Trust Network Access works without any issues. That part is pretty automatic, and if you complete the rest of the setup, it comes together by itself with no issues from my side. What makes it nice is that we can actually start replacing on-site firewalls at this stage for the smaller clients because it does not matter if they go to a coffee shop or work from home; they are still secured by the same connection. The hops get shorter and you get better latency. We have done testing to see if it is better. One thing that we did notice with our proof of concept with our current client is that they have people connecting from the UK. When they used their previous VPN solution, uploading CAD drawings and other files to the server took a long time. They mentioned that it is much quicker on Cloudflare One's solution. I definitely believe that is part of the improved performance, and I am satisfied with that as well. What is nice about Cloudflare One is that it makes the setup easier and also easier to train technicians to maintain it. Compared to legacy systems, we do not need to get fancy firewalls in place that are costly. That is definitely also a cost-saver with Cloudflare One.

Read full review

Karthik Sathivel

Technical Associate Network Security at Valuepoint Systems

Email security has protected financial data and provides clear tracking for every branch message

The areas of Cisco Secure Email that could be improved or enhanced are the slowness in the console. I don't think it was a database error or something, but we feel some slowness in configuring DLP and other content filters compared to other consoles. It may have been due to on-premises, but it was much noisy at some times while configuring DLP. When we tried to configure a DLP policy, the console became much slower. In that case, we cannot see what had happened in the mail which was blocked at that time. It may take nearly an hour to get back to normal while configuring policies. That is the major issue in the product.

Read full review

Pusa Alexandru-Catalin

Managing Partner at Cabinet Avocat Pusa Alexandru Catalin

Outdated user-interface and offers basic functionality, they have great marketing but only deliver the basics

I was previously a satisfied customer of OnlyMyEmail. Unfortunately, they had a significant technical failure and couldn't provide security for a week, causing them to lose their biggest client. That's when I switched to Bitdefender for email security. I used Bitdefender. But it didn't meet my needs. I used it for two years. Its technology was far inferior to OnlyMyEmail. I also looked into Censornet. However, I eventually obtained a server license for SpamTitan. Currently, I am one of the slightly happy. customer of SpamTitan. It works when it wants to, it doesn't want, it doesn't work. The main difference between SpamTitan and OnlyMyEmail was accuracy. I never saw false positives with OnlyMyEmail in the ten years I used it. It just worked as it should, and at a very low price. I'm not sure what technology they used, but it was excellent. I was paying around one dollar and something cents per email address per month.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I'm very satisfied with the environment and the dashboard."

"What makes it nice is that we can actually start replacing on-site firewalls at this stage for the smaller clients because it does not matter if they go to a coffee shop or work from home; they are still secured by the same connection."

"Cloudflare Zero Trust Platform removes the risk of exposing the applications to the public."

"Cloudflare is simple to use."

"We mostly use Cloudflare WAF, and gets basic Cloudflaire DDoS, caching as extra bonus . We like the factor these features are all integrated into 1 console, simple to manage."

"Clover is the best product globally."

"It is a stable solution."

"The solution has different options that can be used to differentiate DDoS attacks."

More Cloudflare One pros

"Administration of the email domains and custom filters are easily done via the web interface."

"It does a great job of preventing spam, malware, and ransomware."

"It sends us reports, where we can see if there have been attacks, e.g. DDoS. If so, we can switch to a clean IP."

"From a functionality perspective, the platform is great."

"Capital expenditure is a significant consideration, and the impact on major expenditures prompts a careful analysis before onboarding the new product."

"The user interface was quite friendly, it was quite easy to use, unlike some other Cisco products. Anybody could use it. You don't have to be familiar with IT to be able to handle navigating it."

"IronPort allows visibility into the problem and an easy way to pinpoint policy offenders."

"This is a great product with wonderful support."

More Cisco Secure Email pros

"If all you have is a solution that looks at every piece of email and applies the same types of rules, you don't get a very smart solution. Whereas, if you can do it per mailbox or per domain, like you can with SpamTitan, that means you are effectively able to configure it almost per-user, which is great."

"I like that advanced features such as DKIM signing are integrated into SpamTitan. It works well, and setting up DKIM can be cumbersome for many email servers, particularly with Microsoft Exchange. DKIM signing verifies the sender's authenticity by applying a signature to outgoing emails, and it was straightforward to set up within the solution."

"The solution works really well. For a small nonprofit like us who don't have a large server footprint and rely heavily on cloud services, this is great for all our emails and the mobile workforce that we have. This is a great way to manage the traffic, hopefully keep our people from getting the phishing emails and stuff like that, helping to mitigate the risks."

"The fact that it does exactly what it says on the box is what I find most valuable about SpamTitan. They've reduced our spam by about 99 percent."

"Another feature of SpamTitan that I like is the reporting. We are able to identify the users or accounts that have been attacked most. We can see information that shows us the sites that the user goes to, and that helps in launching an investigation of that user and how they use our resources."

"SpamTitan has made it easier to manage spam. When other solutions I've used quarantined something, an admin had to manually find and release it. With SpamTitan, the end-user can monitor it themselves and release their own quarantined items. It's faster and less work."

"Previously, we were getting too much junk mail in the inbox, and now it gives us more time to focus on work rather than deleting emails."

"SpamTitan has helped us big time with improving our spam catch rate and reduced our false positive rate."

More TitanHQ SpamTitan pros

Cons

"When there are any dynamic changes in complex applications, the tool takes a lot of time, making its analytics-related area a major matter of concern where improvements are needed."

"Cloudflare One is not very powerful, but for what we require, it is basic and sufficient."

"The response time for support must be reduced."

"Cloudflare DDoS has poor technical support."

"Our customers no longer use Cloudflare because its service is subpar."

"I would like them to include a VPN feature to provide a secure connection to the data center."

"They don't have a person to provide support for customers using the solution under their free plan."

"The pricing is an area that can be improved. Pricing, as far as I recall, was the source of our problems."

More Cloudflare One cons

"The user interface of the Email Security Gateway should be improved."

"We have Microsoft and we have the E5 licenses, they have more EDR responses on certain emails. That's something that Cisco ESA on the cloud doesn't have. They don't do anything about MITRE attacks. They only detect if there is a malicious email or a threat and they remove it."

"It would be nice to have an easier way to check on the health of the system, how stressed these appliances are. Sure, you can do it, but it would be helpful to have an easier way to do it, maybe even at a glance."

"Added cost and delay to the network traffic, but performance did remain stable."

"The product's GUI for the dashboard needs improvement."

"We have occasionally had hardware problems because we are using an appliance-based solution, but that might change."

"I would like them to add some clustering or high availability features."

"Having Cisco Email Security as a standalone solution is not good enough. It needs to be combined with another solution."

More Cisco Secure Email cons

"SpamTitan is not particularly configurable. I basically have to accept their parameters for a lot of things."

"From a small business point of view—we're 30 people—there should be a price break before you have 500 people. Small businesses don't have a lot of money."

"I'd like to see something like "My First SpamTitan," by which I mean, "Guide me through the things I need to set, and tell me about the things that you're setting already." That way I would get a good feeling for setting up the product, rather than having to figure it out by myself, which is what I did."

"Some of the menus on the dashboard could be easier to navigate. It takes a little while to find things."

"There is room for improvement in automation; better wizards for deployment, for example."

"The only improvement that comes to mind is updates."

"The SpamTitan user interface is not amazing, but I don't mind it. I know they are releasing a new one soon. I have seen it and it looks a lot better. That has been an area that needs improvement."

"They can increase some of the reporting around user logins. In order for us to make that determination, we have to pull down reports. They could make it a bit easier."

More TitanHQ SpamTitan cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing of the solution is cheap. The licensing cost is also very low. I rate the cost and pricing a three out of ten."

"Cloudflare Zero Trust Platform's pricing is good."

"The pricing is somewhere in the middle. I would rate the pricing a seven out of ten."

"The price tag is no longer $200,000, but rather $300,000 to $400,000. It's twice."

"The solution is not that expensive."

"The solution's pricing lacks transparency."

"My company has to make yearly payments towards the licensing costs attached to the solution. There are no hidden charges apart from the licensing costs of the solution."

"The prices are slightly expensive."

"In addition to the standard licensing, there is a cost for SMARTnet as well."

"It's adapted to the market. It's similar to other vendors. We at least don't have many problems regarding that because Cisco is adaptable on that side. When we present the solutions to the customers, we tend to achieve the goals that the customer has in terms of the budget for such implementations."

"It is an expensive product. I rate its pricing an eight or nine."

"We were using Proofpoint and then we switched to Cisco... reportability was one of the main reasons we switched, but the biggest one was cost. If you can get an equivalent functionality for a better price it's wise to do so. That's what our primary decision came down to: We could get equivalent functionality at a lower price point."

"Compared to Cisco's on-prem service, the cost is the same, but you don't have to pay for the hardware and you don't have to maintain the system, as far as upgrades and hardware failures are concerned. It is cheaper to operate on their cloud service than it is to operate with their on-prem service."

"In my previous organization, avoiding four instances of CryptoLocker within an estimated six month period is approximately $600,000 in lost time and effort. Our five year cost was about a million dollars, and the four outages that we had equated to 65 percent of that five year cost."

"There are additional fees for adding features."

"As per market availability, this solution is more expensive than other vendors."

More Cisco Secure Email pricing and cost advice

"The price point is still of a reasonable nature. It is reasonable for the services that they offer. They are very reasonable, and that is one of the factors why we decided on SpamTitan a long time ago."

"The price is quite advantageous; we were initially surprised at the pricing compared to other solutions, which made us doubt if this was the solution for us. Then, we discovered SpamTitan's features and how cost-effective it is. The sales team does an excellent job making our life easier in terms of pricing, which is another significant advantage of this product."

"I pay $650 per year for 50 licenses."

"The price is good by today's standards. You actually get what you pay for."

"The pricing and licensing are acceptable. The licensing is somewhat different; TitanHQ gives us a peak cap of simultaneous users, which they calculate as the number of email addresses viewed through so many days or weeks. That's considered our number of users, but it isn't always a one-to-one relationship, making it harder to resell. We can't say precisely that the solution costs X per month per user, but that's how we present the price to potential customers, and we just ensure we receive more than we pay to TitanHQ. The licensing hasn't caused us any problems, but it would be better if the pricing were per-user. I know that's not easy to achieve on a technical level."

"Our pricing has pretty much stayed somewhat the same. Sure, there has been an increase or two that keeps up with inflation, but that is everybody. When we switched from AppRiver to SpamTitan, we saved about 20%. That is $1,000 to $2,000 a month. We went to SpamTitan and WebTitan. It was $1,000 savings a month for SpamTitan and another $1,500 a month savings for WebTitan."

"It's a very good product and the pricing and licensing are exceptionally reasonable."

"The pricing for this solution is fair, and comparable with other products."

More TitanHQ SpamTitan pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Email Security solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

893,438 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Construction Company

20%

Comms Service Provider

11%

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

11%

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Government

Computer Software Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Outsourcing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	10
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	12

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	22
Midsize Enterprise	18
Large Enterprise	26

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	54
Midsize Enterprise	13
Large Enterprise	10

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Cloudflare Access?

Cloudflare Access has strong integration with Microsoft, among other platforms. However, when it comes to Kaspersky, ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Cloudflare Access?

Cloudflare Access provides secure access to internal applications for employees, external members of the organization...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Cloudflare Access?

Cloudflare Access is one of the best integrations available. While about two hundred vendors offer similar services, ...

See all answers

What do you like most about Cisco Secure Email?

Cisco Secure Email is a budget-friendly solution.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cisco Secure Email?

The pricing structure is good as it is user-based or email client-based, which is positive for clients.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Cisco Secure Email?

The areas of Cisco Secure Email that could be improved or enhanced are the slowness in the console. I don't think it ...

See all answers

What do you like most about TitanHQ SpamTitan?

It filters some of the spam.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for TitanHQ SpamTitan?

The pricing model is reasonable money for the product. It is rated highly because of its affordability and its great ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with TitanHQ SpamTitan?

If you had asked me a few weeks ago, I would have said the user interface needed improvement, but we've just updated ...

See all answers

Comparisons

Cato SASE Cloud Platform vs Cloudflare One

Compared 5% of the time

Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform vs Cloudflare One

Compared 3% of the time

Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks vs Cloudflare One

Compared 3% of the time

FortiSASE vs Cloudflare One

Compared 3% of the time

Twingate vs Cloudflare One

Compared 3% of the time

More Cloudflare One Competitors

Trellix Collaboration Security vs Cisco Secure Email

Compared 28% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Office 365 vs Cisco Secure Email

Compared 7% of the time

Proofpoint Email Protection vs Cisco Secure Email

Compared 5% of the time

Fortinet FortiMail vs Cisco Secure Email

Compared 5% of the time

Microsoft Exchange Online Protection (EOP) vs Cisco Secure Email

Compared 5% of the time

More Cisco Secure Email Competitors

Proofpoint Email Protection vs TitanHQ SpamTitan

Compared 8% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Office 365 vs TitanHQ SpamTitan

Compared 6% of the time

Microsoft Exchange Online Protection (EOP) vs TitanHQ SpamTitan

Compared 6% of the time

Mimecast Email and Collaboration Threat Protection vs TitanHQ SpamTitan

Compared 6% of the time

IRONSCALES vs TitanHQ SpamTitan

Compared 4% of the time

More TitanHQ SpamTitan Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cloudflare One

May 2026

Download Cloudflare One product report

Buyer's Guide

Cisco Secure Email

May 2026

Download Cisco Secure Email product report

Buyer's Guide

TitanHQ SpamTitan

April 2026

Download TitanHQ SpamTitan product report

Also Known As

Cloudflare Area 1 Email Security, Cloudflare Bot Management, Cloudflare Gateway, Cloudflare Zero Trust Platform, Cloudflare DDoS, Cloudflare SASE & SSE Platform

Cisco Email Security, IronPort, Cisco Email Security, ESA, Email Security Appliances

No data available

Overview

Cloudflare One is a comprehensive platform for security, performance, and connectivity. It provides features like rate limiting, DDoS protection, and application access, tailored to enhance user experience while securing internet access and accelerating communications.

Designed to integrate security measures with ease of use and scalability, Cloudflare One offers a secure web gateway and zero trust network access. These features ensure seamless setup and operation, making connectivity reliable and protected. Users appreciate its integrated console, intuitive interface, and the ability to manage risk effectively. It offers straightforward deployment, improves latency, and boasts cost-effectiveness. While its onboarding process and documentation need enhancement, its value in content delivery and application shielding is notable. Despite challenges in integrating Cloudflare Access with existing VPNs and the need for better automation and support, it remains vital for DNS and infrastructure protection.

What features make Cloudflare One stand out?

Rate Limiting: Controls the traffic rate to prevent abuse.
DDoS Protection: Shields applications from distributed denial-of-service attacks.
Secure Web Gateway: Provides secure internet access with seamless operation.
Zero Trust Network Access: Ensures secure, application-based connectivity without relying on traditional VPNs.
Access for Connectivity: Facilitates access to internal applications securely.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Security: Robust measures for DNS and browsing protection.
Performance: Enhanced site accessibility and communication speed.
Cost-Effectiveness: Offers competitive pricing for its features.
Ease of Deployment: Straightforward and efficient setup process.

In industries like finance, retail, and technology, Cloudflare One is crucial for enabling secure remote access and protecting web applications against dynamic threats. It supports compliance access policies and enhances content delivery, playing a key role in safeguarding digital infrastructure.

Cloudflare

Cisco Secure Email provides email security with advanced threat protection, spam filtering, and easy integration with Cisco Talos, ensuring comprehensive protection against cyber threats like phishing and malware.

Cisco Secure Email offers a comprehensive platform for organizations seeking robust email security. With advanced threat protection and seamless integration with Cisco Talos, it enhances threat intelligence. The tool provides easy-to-use spam blocking and granular policy customization. Effective ransomware, phishing, and malware protection ensures stable network performance. It includes logging and reporting features, along with Active Directory integration, delivering enhanced security without extra hardware. Although it addresses threats efficiently, improvements in synchronization with reporting tools and phishing detection are needed. Organizations find cost and licensing complexities challenging for smaller networks and seek more intuitive configuration, advanced AI threat detection, and comprehensive reporting. Enhanced support, documentation, and cross-platform compatibility are desirable for better management and scalability.

What are the most important features?

Advanced Threat Protection: Guards against cyber threats like malware and phishing
Spam Blocking: Efficiently filters unwanted emails to maintain inbox integrity
Policy Customization: Allows granular control over email security policies
Integration with Cisco Talos: Enhances threat intelligence with global insights
Active Directory Integration: Simplifies user management and enhances security

What benefits and ROI should users consider?

Ease of Use: Intuitive interface provides a straightforward user experience
Network Performance: Maintains speed and reliability while securing emails
Comprehensive Reporting: Offers detailed insights into email threats and responses
No Additional Hardware: Provides complete email security without hardware costs
Enhanced Email Security: Protects against a wide range of email-based threats

In industries like finance, healthcare, and IT, Cisco Secure Email is key to securing email communications. It serves as the primary email gateway in datacenters, scanning and filtering emails to defend against phishing, malware, and spam. Many organizations integrate it with Sophos Antivirus and Talos Threat Intelligence for heightened protection. It plays a crucial role in outbound message control and data loss prevention, ensuring compliance with security policies.

Cisco

TitanHQ SpamTitan provides advanced email security, effective spam reduction, and customization capabilities. It's designed for organizations seeking robust email filtering to combat spam, malware, and viruses.

Featuring a combination of threat intelligence with SPF and DMARC capabilities, TitanHQ SpamTitan enhances security through customizable policy management and geo-blocking, which effectively targets regions with high spam activity. Organizations benefit from managing allow/block lists and leveraging granular filtering options, reducing the burden on help desks with insightful reporting features for tracking email threats. While appreciated for its ease of deployment and low maintenance, users have noted the need for a more intuitive interface and improvements in handling false positives and report controls. It's available for deployment on AWS or on-premises, acting as a gateway antivirus that pre-filters emails for Office 365 and Exchange Servers, integrating seamlessly with firewalls.

What features does TitanHQ SpamTitan offer?

Customizable Policies: Tailor security settings to suit specific requirements.
Intuitive Interface: Simplifies management of email security.
Geo-blocking: Target regions known for high spam activities.
Threat Intelligence: Uses advanced threat detection technologies.
SPF and DMARC: Enhances email authenticity checks.
Quarantine Control: Manage suspicious emails efficiently.

What benefits should be considered?

Reduced Spam: Minimize unwanted emails effectively.
Enhanced Security: Advanced filtering protects against threats.
Lower Help Desk Tickets: Simplified management reduces support needs.
Insightful Reports: Better understanding of email threats.
Easy Deployment: Quick setup on AWS or on-premises.

In industries relying heavily on secure email communications, TitanHQ SpamTitan serves as an essential tool. Whether integrated with Office 365, Exchange Servers, or enhanced by additional firewall protection, it provides a multilayered approach to email security, making it suitable for financial, healthcare, educational, and other sectors needing stringent security measures.

TitanHQ

Sample Customers

23andMe

SUNY Old Westbury, CoxHealth, City of Fullerton, Indra

De Montfort University, Scope Services, Park County School District, NRC, Quality Smith, Toyota, CarTrawler, Videotron

Buyer's Guide

Cisco Secure Email vs. TitanHQ SpamTitan

April 2026

Free Report: Cisco Secure Email vs. TitanHQ SpamTitan

Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco Secure Email vs. TitanHQ SpamTitan and other solutions. Updated: April 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

893,438 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Cisco Secure Email vs. TitanHQ SpamTitan report.

See our list of best Email Security vendors.

We monitor all Email Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.