Cisco Piston Enterprise OS [EOL] vs CloudBolt comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Cisco and CloudBolt are both solutions in the Cloud Management category. Additionally, 100% of Cisco users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 93% of CloudBolt users who would recommend it.

Cisco Piston Enterprise OS ...

Read 1 Cisco Piston Enterprise OS [EOL] review

100% willing to recommend

CloudBolt

Read 12 CloudBolt reviews

3,135 Views
2,602 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

Cisco Piston Enterprise OS ...

CloudBolt

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Cisco Piston Enterprise OS [EOL] and CloudBolt based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Nutanix, Broadcom, IBM and others in Cloud Management.

To learn more, read our detailed Cloud Management Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Cloud Management

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 913,654 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cisco Piston Enterprise OS ...

Average Rating

9.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

CloudBolt

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Management (26th), Cloud Cost Management (33rd)

Featured Reviews

Enterprise677

BS Systems Engineer at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employees

A simple interface and helpful support for a solution that grows with us

It's a flexible enough tool to submit the changes that you want. It gives you the ability to cancel any loop. You can connect new orchestrations together. It offers enough support so that you don't need to have the need to get another device. The user interface is simple and easy to use.

Read full review

AbhishekGupta2

Sr PreSales Cloud Architect at a outsourcing company with 10,001+ employees

Centralized self-service has unified hybrid clouds and has improved governance and cost control

The best features CloudBolt offers include governance and policy control, allowing security teams to set up their specific guardrails with governance at scale. Multi or hybrid cloud abstraction provides a single pane of glass for different types of environments, and self-service catalogs enable technical or business users to request services without multiple tickets. CloudBolt also offers strong integration capabilities that work well with existing tools without disrupting the current environment. From an integration standpoint, CloudBolt works well with various public and private cloud providers, including AWS, Azure, GCP, VMware, and Nutanix, as well as different virtualization software, infrastructure as code templates such as Ansible and Terraform, ITSM tools such as ServiceNow, and CMDB platforms. CloudBolt has positively impacted my organization by managing multiple cloud environments for thousands of users with a complex enterprise workflow that has helped reduce man-hours required for provisioning resources. We have achieved faster delivery through standardized operating procedures and reduced reworks due to automation. The chargeback and showback mechanisms allow us to charge different business units according to their consumption, providing better governance, lower risk, and lower cost, resulting in a good return on investment. Since using CloudBolt, I have seen a 25 to 30 percent reduction in service delivery time and an improvement in efficiency of almost 20 to 25 percent within a timeframe of approximately 8 to 10 months.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It offers enough support so that you don't need to have the need to get another device."

"I strongly recommend the solution to people."

"The best features CloudBolt offers are its speed, which is very fast in terms of provisioning compared to traditional ISO-based methods, and this speed has helped my team and organization; we completed a new site setup in under a few days, which would take about a few weeks using traditional methods."

"CloudBolt's ease of use, coupled with our initial focus on fully automating infrastructure deployment, has won accolades from our internal stakeholders."

"Role-based access control and application blueprinting."

"CloudBolt has positively impacted my organization by reducing the manual provisioning effort, enabling faster environment delivery, and improving governance, standardization, and visibility."

"Making the lifecycle management automated has made life easier."

"Since using CloudBolt, I have seen a 25 to 30 percent reduction in service delivery time and an improvement in efficiency of almost 20 to 25 percent within a timeframe of approximately 8 to 10 months."

"CloudBolt has very good stability; we tested everything on the platform, and it was very good, so we started a partnership with them."

"Customer Service: World class."

More CloudBolt pros

Cons

"The solution is just too expensive, so maybe the pricing could be better."

"The management of SaaS must be improved."

"To improve CloudBolt, I believe the user experience needs enhancement as some users find it somewhat dated compared to newer cloud management platforms."

"I had an issue with the scheduling feature of CloudBolt, but I'm not sure if that's been fixed in the new version."

"The solution is not easy to use. It's not intuitive enough to click anywhere in the solution and make it work."

"The scheduling feature of CloudBolt needs improvement because sometimes, it doesn't work."

"The area of integrating on-prem and cloud needs improvement."

"We did find it was a bit challenging to scale horizontally behind a load balancer in an active/active configuration."

"CloudBolt can be improved in areas such as initial workflow design, product complexity, and customization."

More CloudBolt cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"The system is cheaper if a customer has fewer servers since you pay by the node."

"The solution is reasonably priced."

"I rate the pricing an eight out of ten because the solution is expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

913,654 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Outsourcing Company

15%

Computer Software Company

10%

Healthcare Company

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	11

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What needs improvement with CloudBolt?

We are doing a lot of customization. For example, if I want to do a custom scheme or if I want to do a static IP, these kinds of flows I still need to do very manually or through a script, so it wo...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for CloudBolt?

My main use case for CloudBolt is provisioning servers. We have a VM environment, so we would use a CloudBolt template and then map it to CloudBolt environment and provision the server for our prod...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering CloudBolt?

My advice for others looking into using CloudBolt is that if you are a server admin, it is very useful. I would advise you that CloudBolt will be very useful for your needs.

See all answers

Comparisons

Nutanix Cloud Manager (NCM) vs Cisco Piston Enterprise OS [EOL]

Compared 15% of the time

VMware Aria Automation vs Cisco Piston Enterprise OS [EOL]

Compared 14% of the time

IBM Turbonomic vs Cisco Piston Enterprise OS [EOL]

Compared 14% of the time

VMware Aria Operations vs Cisco Piston Enterprise OS [EOL]

Compared 11% of the time

Abiquo vs Cisco Piston Enterprise OS [EOL]

Compared 4% of the time

More Cisco Piston Enterprise OS [EOL] Competitors

VMware Aria Automation vs CloudBolt

Compared 8% of the time

Morpheus vs CloudBolt

Compared 8% of the time

VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth vs CloudBolt

Compared 7% of the time

IBM Turbonomic vs CloudBolt

Compared 6% of the time

Densify vs CloudBolt

Compared 5% of the time

More CloudBolt Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cloud Management

September 2026

Download Cisco Piston Enterprise OS [EOL] product report

Buyer's Guide

CloudBolt

September 2026

Download CloudBolt product report

Also Known As

Piston Enterprise OS

No data available

Overview

Piston Enterprise OS (pentOS) is an enterprise grade cloud operating system meeting the security and governance needs of enterprises wanting to use OpenStack for their infrastructure services. pentOS is an OpenStack distro that builds on top of the OpenStack codebase adding some proprietary features to meet the security and governance needs of the enterprise customers.

Cisco

CloudBolt provides ease of use, flexibility, and expandability through custom scripts and integration with platforms like AWS and Azure. It offers governance, deployment, and resource control, along with a self-service catalog and role-based access control, enhancing automated efficiency.

CloudBolt stands out for its automation, integration capabilities, and cost management while improving efficiency, reducing service delivery times, and offering dashboard flexibility. It utilizes predefined hooks and customization to optimize processes. Self-service options boost user autonomy in hybrid and multi-cloud environments, supporting policy-driven governance and infrastructure automation for ITSM platforms. Users employ it for cost visibility, role-based access control, and template creation, benefiting financial and government sectors.

What features make CloudBolt stand out?

Ease of Use: Simplifies deployment and management.
Flexibility: Customizable scripts and integrations.
Governance: Streamlines policy-driven controls.
Resource Control: Enhances allocation and management.
Automation: Utilizes predefined hooks for efficiency.
Integration: Broad compatibility with platforms like AWS, Azure.
Cost Management: Chargebacks and showbacks for visibility.

What benefits should organizations consider?

Efficiency Improvements: Boosts operational productivity.
Reduced Service Delivery Times: Speeds up task completion.
Comprehensive Reporting: Custom reports and dashboard flexibility.
Strong ROI: Enhances value with actionable insights.

In industries like finance and government, CloudBolt facilitates centralized provisioning and orchestration across AWS, Azure, and GCP. Users leverage its policy-driven governance and role-based access control to optimize cost and automate substantial IaaS infrastructure, supporting scheduling and blueprint templates for efficiency.

CloudBolt

Sample Customers

Kuwait Petroleum Italia, Ministry of Foreign Affairs

WM, CyWest, Panic, Camden, University of Maryland, Xerox, Neustar, Medidata, Continu, Aruba Networks, Neuberger Berman, Peak6, EverBank, Ascensus, Hosting Edge

Find out what your peers are saying about Nutanix, Broadcom, IBM and others in Cloud Management. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

913,654 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Cloud Management vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.