Cisco Intersight vs Goliath Performance Monitor comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Cisco and Goliath Technologies are both solutions in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category. Cisco is ranked #10 with an average rating of 8.6, while Goliath Technologies is ranked #72. Cisco holds a 1.6% mindshare in IM, compared to Goliath Technologies’s 0.5% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Cisco users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 50% of Goliath Technologies users who would recommend it.

Cisco Intersight

Read 22 Cisco Intersight reviews

7,703 Views
5,392 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Goliath Performance Monitor

Read 5 Goliath Performance Monitor reviews

1,682 Views
1,531 Comparison Views

50% willing to recommend

Cisco Intersight

Goliath Performance Monitor

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

Goliath Performance Monitor and Cisco Intersight compete in the IT performance monitoring and management space. Goliath seems favorable in terms of pricing and support, while Cisco leads in advanced features with a higher cost.

Features: Goliath Performance Monitor includes real-time performance monitoring, root cause analysis, and application availability insights. Cisco Intersight provides cloud-based analytics, predictive insights, and integration capabilities offering a comprehensive IT infrastructure view.

Room for Improvement: Goliath Performance Monitor could enhance its advanced analytical capabilities, integration options, and scalability. Cisco Intersight may improve its initial configuration process, customer service response times, and flexible pricing options.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Goliath Performance Monitor offers intuitive installation with attentive customer service, facilitating quick deployment. Cisco Intersight, being cloud-based, ensures seamless integration but involves significant initial configuration, supported by a robust knowledge base and community.

Pricing and ROI: Goliath Performance Monitor presents a cost-effective solution with clear ROI through reduced downtime and optimized performance, appealing to budget-conscious buyers. Cisco Intersight involves a higher initial investment but offers substantial long-term benefits from its advanced features and scalability, aligning with organizations seeking comprehensive capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed Cisco Intersight vs. Goliath Performance Monitor Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Cisco Intersight vs. Goliath Performance Monitor

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 915,341 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cisco Intersight

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

10th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Management (5th)

Goliath Performance Monitor

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

72nd

Average Rating

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2026, in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category, the mindshare of Cisco Intersight is 1.6%, down from 1.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Goliath Performance Monitor is 0.5%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

IT Infrastructure Monitoring Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Cisco Intersight	1.6%
Goliath Performance Monitor	0.5%
Other	97.9%

IT Infrastructure Monitoring

Featured Reviews

AbhinavSingh

Technical Marketing Engineer Hybrid Cloud Infrastructures at NetApp

Centralized policies have simplified hybrid operations and now support automated workflows

The challenge could be if there are any bugs. Most of the time, you may feel that the TCAM resources are getting full on the Nexus just because of some bug or the configuration is not supported. Or sometimes, if there are any vulnerabilities happening on the current running firmware, those are challenges we have. And if you talk about from the compute side, there were initial bugs such as a CPU throttle issue. Because of that, the chassis was not running in an optimum way. You may see performance issues during that time. For that, Cisco released a patch, and it got fixed. I think Cisco Intersight should allow more automation capabilities. It should be more open, and it should provide more automation capabilities. I think there is also a scope of making it a little bit simpler because a lot of policy and config sometimes becomes confusing for the user because it has a lot of config. Maybe they can do a little bit of simplification with Cisco Intersight.

Read full review

networke29316

Senior Systems Engineer at a energy/utilities company with 201-500 employees

Monitors well with Citrix, stable, and the support is very responsive

It looks like it is easy to scale, but I don't know how far it can go out. We are only a 300, or 400 person company. We are not terribly large. It looks like it should be able to scale up until 10,000 at least. There are two users in the company who use this solution, I use it, and the helpdesk.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Cisco Intersight provides the biggest benefit in the ability to manage a large data center with great visibility, especially compared to Cisco UCS Manager, which is local to a single UCS domain."

"We enjoy having an inside view of all the data centers and all the EdgeX nodes within a single portal rather than going into the EdgeX connections one by one."

"Cisco Intersight has positively impacted my organization by making it a lot quicker to diagnose or foresee problems that might be coming up, and since it is a technology that is at the heart of our infrastructure, it helps us feel safe."

"Scalable portfolio of services for remote device management, with good cloud integration. It's also easy to set up."

"Our organization uses Cisco Intersight since it helps manage our physical infrastructure."

"Intersight is the best solution with the data center, and I like it because of the integration with HashiCorp, Kubernetes, and each cloud, as well as the orchestration of the data center system and integration with Pure Storage, Veeam, HashiCorp, and Umbrella."

"Cisco Intersight allows us to manage our data center remotely, which is crucial as our data center is located in a different physical environment."

"What I like most about Cisco Intersight is its manageability."

More Cisco Intersight pros

"I like that it not only has the ability to monitor but that it can do a lot of specific Citrix monitoring."

"My overall conclusion is that it is a valuable product for simulating Citrix logons because it does it with minimal effort and with a real user account."

"I would definitely give them high praise for what they do, and for being a special niche product."

"I like that the solution offers a diversity of things; it can give you resource monitoring, it can be integrated to detect an application crash, to capture syslog, things like that, and I like the diversity of the dashboard."

"I think Goliath offers a very good tool to do simulated Citrix logons with actual user accounts and that the reports are useful to monitor and debug a session."

"In conclusion, I think Goliath Performance Monitor is a true winner."

"Offers a diversity of features."

Cons

"Regarding improvements for Cisco Intersight, I would say more third-party integration is needed."

"An area for improvement in Cisco Intersight is automation. It needs more automation capabilities. Apart from enhanced automation, I want Cisco Intersight to integrate with third-party monitoring tools in its next release."

"I believe Cisco Intersight's licensing is quite expensive for a public healthcare environment, and I would like to see lower prices for us."

"In the future, the solution needs to plan on an extension to cover a broader range of objects since, at present, there are some Cisco devices within the range of Intersight UCS that it can't manage."

"Cisco Intersight needs some improvement in terms of stability. Hybrid cloud management and proper hyperscaler tie-up are other areas for improvement."

"The unique problem with Cisco Intersight is that it's not supporting some players."

"Regarding pricing for Cisco Intersight, all the prices from different vendors have drastically increased during these four years, so I would say it's expensive."

"Cisco Intersight's license cost is very high compared to AWS and Azure solutions, which have lower initiation costs. The high initial cost is a significant concern."

More Cisco Intersight cons

"With Goliath IT Monitors, the processing speed is very slow."

"The setup is a bit complex."

"Hardware requirements of the management server are kind of steep, 4cpu is quite a number."

"However, its GUI can use a little help. The navigation is not the most straightforward like many other monitoring tools."

"Issues with generating reports; consistency is not there."

"I would love to be able to tell what ISP the user is coming from."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"You can get a free license for monitoring but need to purchase a license if you need extra control."

"Cisco Intersight has competitive pricing. On a scale of one to five, my rating for its pricing is four."

"It's just the standard licensing cost. There are no additional fees."

"Cisco Intersight is not cheap, but it's not the most expensive product either."

"The product is cost-effective."

"The price seems reasonable."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Infrastructure Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

915,341 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

Computer Software Company

Healthcare Company

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	10
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	10

No data available

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Cisco Intersight?

Regarding improvements for Cisco Intersight, I would say more third-party integration is needed. At the moment it does have a basic integration of Pure Storage, so I can add my Pure Storage if I ha...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Cisco Intersight?

My main use case for Cisco Intersight is to register our Cisco UCS servers and apply profiles to our servers with configurations, firmware deployment automatically, and install the operating system...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Cisco Intersight?

I would rate Cisco Intersight a nine out of ten. I give it a nine because personally, I think it is one of the best management tools ever. I have worked before with different server vendors and dif...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Cisco UCS Manager vs Cisco Intersight

Compared 39% of the time

HPE OneView vs Cisco Intersight

Compared 3% of the time

Cisco UCS Director vs Cisco Intersight

Compared 3% of the time

VMware Aria Automation vs Cisco Intersight

Compared 3% of the time

VMware Aria Operations vs Cisco Intersight

Compared 3% of the time

More Cisco Intersight Competitors

ControlUp vs Goliath Performance Monitor

Compared 16% of the time

eG Enterprise vs Goliath Performance Monitor

Compared 14% of the time

Splunk Enterprise Security vs Goliath Performance Monitor

Compared 12% of the time

BMC TrueSight vs Goliath Performance Monitor

Compared 7% of the time

DX Unified Infrastructure Management vs Goliath Performance Monitor

Compared 6% of the time

More Goliath Performance Monitor Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cisco Intersight

October 2026

Download Cisco Intersight product report

Buyer's Guide

Goliath Performance Monitor

September 2026

Download Goliath Performance Monitor product report

Also Known As

Intersight

No data available

Overview

Cisco Intersight delivers advanced data center management with cloud integration, remote server scaling, and predictive analytics, promoting efficient infrastructure management. It supports hybrid environments and is suitable for scaling across enterprises.

Cisco Intersight offers a comprehensive view of data centers with seamless cloud platform integration, enhancing manageability across environments. It is known for workflow automation, inventory management, and predictive analysis, allowing users to optimize workloads. Users leverage its scalability and ease of use, with features that aid in remote management and integration with both Cisco and non-Cisco products. However, improvements are needed in usability, automation, and third-party tool integration, especially for on-premises and hybrid cloud management. Users often face challenges with firmware management and transitioning from UCS Manager. Desired enhancements include better software compatibility, third-party integrations, expanded microservices support, enhanced AI features, and more automation capabilities, addressing setup complexity, support, and high maintenance costs.

What are the main features of Cisco Intersight?

Data Center Management: Provides insights into data centers with comprehensive monitoring.
Cloud Integration: Enables integration with cloud platforms for enhanced workflows.
Remote Management: Facilitates remote management of data center environments.
Predictive Analytics: Offers analysis tools for workload optimization and planning.
Scalability: Capable of scaling with enterprise infrastructure needs.

What are the expected benefits of using Cisco Intersight?

Improved Infrastructure Management: Offers tools for efficient management across environments.
Enhanced Workflow Automation: Reduces manual tasks with automation capabilities.
Cost-Effective Operations: Promotes efficiency and reduces maintenance costs.
Comprehensive Integration: Supports seamless integration with diverse platforms and technologies.
Performance Optimization: Utilizes predictive analytics for optimizing system performance.

In industries where data center management and integration are critical, such as finance, healthcare, and telecommunications, Cisco Intersight is used to monitor and manage infrastructure across multiple sites. Its capability to combine platforms like HyperFlex and VMware allows organizations to maintain hardware status effectively, supporting both on-premises and cloud environments for efficient service delivery.

Cisco

Goliath Performance Monitor delivers comprehensive monitoring to ensure optimal IT performance. Its robust set of tools provides actionable insights for various IT environments, aiding in maintaining system functionality and user satisfaction through real-time data and alerts.

Designed to meet complex IT demands, Goliath Performance Monitor is a reliable choice for organizations aiming to enhance system performance and troubleshoot issues effectively. It supports a range of environments, offering real-time alerts and detailed reporting that empowers IT professionals to make informed decisions promptly. By focusing on user experience, it maximizes efficiency, promising improved service delivery and performance.

What are the key features of Goliath Performance Monitor?

Real-Time Alerts: Provides immediate notifications to prevent system downtime.
Comprehensive Reporting: Offers detailed insights to facilitate in-depth analysis.
Deployment Flexibility: Supports on-premise and cloud infrastructure management.

What benefits should you expect from Goliath Performance Monitor?

Reduced Downtime: Keeps systems operational through proactive monitoring.
Increased Efficiency: Streamlines IT processes with advanced analytics.
Cost Savings: Decreases overhead by optimizing resource use.

Goliath Performance Monitor is particularly beneficial in industries like healthcare and finance, where its monitoring capabilities enhance system reliability and service quality. Its integration into hospital networks, for instance, supports uninterrupted patient care and regulatory compliance through consistent system uptimes.

Goliath Technologies

Sample Customers

EXMAR, RapidScale

Walmart, Facebook, Xerox, UHS, ADP, Wyndham Worldwide

Buyer's Guide

Cisco Intersight vs. Goliath Performance Monitor

September 2026

Free Report: Cisco Intersight vs. Goliath Performance Monitor

Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco Intersight vs. Goliath Performance Monitor and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

915,341 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Cisco Intersight vs. Goliath Performance Monitor report.

See our list of best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors.

We monitor all IT Infrastructure Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.