We performed a comparison between Cisco HyperFlex HX-Series and FlexPod XCS based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Dell Technologies, Nutanix, VMware and others in HCI."The StarWind Virtual SAN management console is intuitive and easy to use."
"The performance of the solution is accurate and concise."
"A typical system administrator with minimal experience in Hyper-V, VMware, or Windows can do VSAN configuration and maintain VSAN operations."
"As the client had acquired another company some distance away, they were concerned about having a single SAN in one location or the other. StarWind vSAN allowed us to keep a copy of the data local to each site without asking the client to pay for two SANs in addition to the two new servers they needed."
"The solution provides great performance for the price it is listed with."
"The best part is the easy way it operates with a very clear GUI without any unnecessary items."
"The price was right."
"The main benefit is that StarWind is almost maintenance-free."
"I like Cisco Intersight."
"Cisco HyperFlex HX-Series is simple to use, user-friendly and has been best for our purposes."
"It is a stable solution...It is a scalable solution."
"It is a stable and scalable solution."
"Cisco provides the ability to configure BIOS, something that no one else can do, on a remote basis. That's really helpful sometimes. The bus-snooping alteration tool for BIOS is fantastic. That's one of the game-changing features that Cisco alone has at this point."
"It is scalable and easy to use."
"Offers very good data protection and provides system uptime availability effectively."
"The most valuable features are scalability and the easy operation - if it works. You can configure everything from just one window."
"The main advantage is consolidating everything into a single rack, which helps optimize power consumption, especially in CRM."
"The consistent delivery that we receive from the products. We deliver it to different customers, and we know it will be a consistent end-to-end solution as well."
"It is absolutely resilient. It has built-in redundancy and multipathing. If there is an issue with one part, it doesn't fail automatically."
"The most valuable feature of this solution is the stability."
"We have had great support, and this is when we have called for any problems, which have been very minimal to start with."
"It's all converged into one consolidated platform, which works well together."
"The solution’s unified support for the entire stack provides one stop shopping."
"For FlexPod, it is always trustworthy. I had previously never seen flex machines from other brands or associated with other products. FlexPod is a large investment and they are good enough to support it."
"The system performs as expected, but we're always looking for performance improvements regarding the best utilization of NVMe disks."
"It runs until it does not - and disaster recovery documentation is sparse and mostly unclear."
"The StarWind Management Console is available only for Microsoft Windows/Windows Server, and should also be available for Linux and macOS, as it would reduce implementation costs."
"Feature-wise we are only waiting for the release of a "planned disaster" feature that would allow us to patch a hypervisor node without having to take the full storage offline."
"This solution should be more self-sufficient, running without creating domains or failover clusters."
"If there was one thing we could request, it would be the ability to shrink volumes. For example, we want to be able to decrease in the size of the volume."
"An update caused a syncing issue and it took over a month to resolve it"
"There is one issue as far as licensing goes and that is a lack of documentation online for users when transitioning from the free version to the paid version, or vice versa."
"The utilization needs to be better. It needs more options."
"The initial setup can be complex."
"Lacks easy integration with other vendors."
"One of the biggest problems with HyperFlex HX is that if you want to adjust your solution in terms of processing power, memory, or disk capacity, you have to buy completely new hosts. From a financial perspective, it can be very expensive to do so, and from a legal perspective, there are all kinds of compliance issues we would have to sort out before buying any new solution or application."
"We had a bit of complexity to think about how to migrate our legacy infrastructure into Cisco HyperFlex."
"The deployment could be made a little bit easier, as we still seem to struggle with it a little bit for a day or so to get it running."
"With the cache disk fails in Cisco, the whole node fails, and the workload goes down."
"The additional feature I would like to see included in the next release of this solution is more security. We want to add more data servers to all the hosts all over the world. We have 140 hosts that connect to one data center in Manila."
"The biggest problem we have seen is, we were using the vStorage which comes with the NetApp environment, a kind of fiber connect. We were missing fibre channel connectivity and we got lots of I/O errors."
"Support could be more integrated. For example, you might call NetApp, and they'll determine that VMware is the issue. It would be helpful if they could automatically engage VMware and bring them onto the same call to transfer ticket information and work together."
"We have had bugs which have been released, even though they have been minor."
"I would like to see more cloud-centric modules that are specific to applications and more software-based solutions. That's all that is missing."
"We would like them to improve the validate designs. It is hard to stay in a supported config with the software and firmware versions of the platform. It's always a concern to ensure things not only work well, but they work at all. If we run into incompatibility inside of the NetApp, Cisco, or VMware versions, it can cause real issues."
"The solution has not reduced our data center costs."
"The GPU based VDA solutions could use improvement."
"We don't see the much DR capability within the FlexPod so for that, we have to maintain our own DR capability with DSRM."
Cisco HyperFlex HX-Series is ranked 8th in HCI with 90 reviews while FlexPod XCS is ranked 2nd in Converged Infrastructure with 295 reviews. Cisco HyperFlex HX-Series is rated 8.0, while FlexPod XCS is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Cisco HyperFlex HX-Series writes "A fast and easy deployment that allows secure access to our medical applications ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of FlexPod XCS writes "Integrates everything so you are using fewer tools". Cisco HyperFlex HX-Series is most compared with VMware vSAN, VxRail, Nutanix Cloud Infrastructure (NCI), Dell PowerFlex and HPE Alletra dHCI, whereas FlexPod XCS is most compared with Dell PowerFlex, Oracle Exadata, Nutanix Cloud Infrastructure (NCI), VxRail and HPE ConvergedSystem.
We monitor all HCI reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
