Cisco FabricPath vs Enterasys Campus LAN Switches comparison

Cisco and Extreme Networks are both solutions in the LAN Switching category. Cisco is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.3, while Extreme Networks is ranked #12. Cisco holds a 3.7% mindshare in LS, compared to Extreme Networks’s 2.7% mindshare. Additionally, 96% of Cisco users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Extreme Networks users who would recommend it.

Cisco FabricPath

Read 31 Cisco FabricPath reviews

682 Views
668 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

Enterasys Campus LAN Switches

Read 3 Enterasys Campus LAN Switches reviews

329 Views
329 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Cisco FabricPath

Enterasys Campus LAN Switches

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Apr 6, 2025

Enterasys Campus LAN Switches and Cisco FabricPath compete in the network infrastructure domain. Cisco FabricPath has the upper hand because of its scalability and high-performance delivery despite Enterasys's advantage in easy integration and management.

Features: Enterasys Campus LAN Switches provide seamless integration, user-friendly management, and network efficiency with simple configuration. Cisco FabricPath offers extensive scalability, resilient network pathways, and robust performance suitable for large-scale environments.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Cisco FabricPath involves more complex deployment due to its advanced features but offers comprehensive support. Enterasys Campus LAN Switches facilitate a straightforward deployment process and strong support, appealing to organizations that prioritize faster setup.

Pricing and ROI: Enterasys Campus LAN Switches offer competitive setup costs and quick ROI for budget-conscious organizations. Cisco FabricPath requires higher initial investment but promises long-term ROI through superior features and network performance.

To learn more, read our detailed Cisco FabricPath vs. Enterasys Campus LAN Switches Report (Updated: February 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Cisco FabricPath vs. Enterasys Campus LAN Switches

February 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 881,757 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cisco FabricPath

Ranking in LAN Switching

4th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Enterasys Campus LAN Switches

Ranking in LAN Switching

12th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

8.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the LAN Switching category, the mindshare of Cisco FabricPath is 3.7%, up from 1.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Enterasys Campus LAN Switches is 2.7%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

LAN Switching Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Cisco FabricPath	3.7%
Enterasys Campus LAN Switches	2.7%
Other	93.6%

LAN Switching

Featured Reviews

AmrFouad

Technical Project Manager at Cairo International Airport Co.

Offers seamless integration and boosts operational efficiency with minimum downtimes

I find stability to be the most effective feature of Cisco FabricPath; it is stable. Cisco FabricPath has good scalability; I don't have any problems with scalability as I can add any switches or distributors without any problem. I utilize the multipath routing architecture feature in Cisco FabricPath, and it's good in load balancing. Cisco FabricPath's compatibility to support Dynamic Layer 2 multipath routing in complex virtualized environments is good; I don't have any problems with it. Nothing comes to mind regarding metrics for using the Layer 2 multipath routing feature; it was good, and there were no problems at all with Cisco FabricPath. Cisco FabricPath's integration with Cisco Nexus works with virtual port channel (VPC) and is good for dual home servers and edge switches. We are using VPC in every layer of the Nexus center. Implementing Cisco FabricPath positively impacted my organization by providing minimum downtimes as the service is always up; everything is working properly with the VPC and Cisco FabricPath. I have experienced operational efficiencies with Cisco FabricPath that are 200% better than the old legacy equipment and protocols.

Read full review

reviewer1319712

Systems Engineer at a tech services company with 11-50 employees

Uniquely unified the hardware in a very smart way and led to improved performance

Security features do exist, and they're mostly common with other switches. What makes these switches unique is the ability to see application layers on the switch, but not directly through the switch. There are tools from Extreme Networks that allow visibility of such traffic, which other switches lack. Extreme CloudIQ analytics can analyze all the traffic on Extreme Switches up to layer seven, offering full visibility. However, this tool is necessary for such detailed analytics and might not be compatible with some third-party products. Improvements are always possible. One suggestion from a customer about Universal switches was to merge the two operating systems into one to create a new, unified OS, but that would take a lot of time and might affect stability. Juniper did that with their firmware and faced customer issues. So, creating a new OS is a tough call. From Enterasys Campus Compass, they're doing well, but the Data Center Switches aren't. Data Center switches, like Extreme Switching for data center networks. Those are separate categories from the Campus Switches.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The solution has excellent stability."

"The technical support we get from Cisco is excellent. It's the best in the industry. We're more than satisfied with the level of service they provide."

"I have experienced operational efficiencies with Cisco FabricPath that are 200% better than the old legacy equipment and protocols."

"Cisco FabricPath is highly beneficial for network performance and relatively easy to implement. It also offers straightforward monitoring capabilities."

"It is stable and reliable."

"The technical assistance is good."

"As I mentioned earlier, the durability, flexibility, and security of Cisco devices are notable. Particularly with switches, the capability to implement multiple VLANs and easily aggregate the network has been advantageous. The ability to have different VLANs and aggregate the network without complications is a key feature of Cisco FabricPath."

"Cisco is the best choice in terms of cost, quality, and post-procurement services."

More Cisco FabricPath pros

"Enterasys Campus LAN Switches is a trustable and powerful solution. The solution has good web management features. You can do whatever you want, like a CLI. The solution is easy to diagnose and manage. I like the Linux-based operating system. If any service crashes, you need to restart the system."

"The performance is good."

"Extreme Networks is the only one that has this kind of universal switch. It simplifies things greatly. Customers no longer have to worry about the price differences between traditional and fabric technology switches, which used to have their own pricing. This has made it easier for us as solution providers to tailor options for our customers with fewer but more suitable choices."

Cons

"While Cisco products are excellent, the problem is the cost. Cisco products are product, Cisco products are very expensive. I rate Cisco FabricPath three out of 10 for affordability."

"The solution is costly."

"The solution should offer better reporting."

"Improvements could be made on specific technical issues such as implementation."

"In Southeast Asian countries like Indonesia and Malaysia, and in the Latin America region, delivery times can be quite lengthy. This is challenging in terms of logistics and customs."

"The initial setup is a little complex."

"The price is a little bit too high."

"Layer 3 does not have higher availability."

More Cisco FabricPath cons

"The tool's price is high. We need a cost-effective service. It also needs to add wireless controller features like Huawei."

"While the support is good, it could be better, and the price could be reduced."

"Security features do exist, and they're mostly common with other switches. What makes these switches unique is the ability to see application layers on the switch, but not directly through the switch. There are tools from Extreme Networks that allow visibility of such traffic, which other switches lack. Extreme CloudIQ analytics can analyze all the traffic on Extreme Switches up to layer seven, offering full visibility. However, this tool is necessary for such detailed analytics and might not be compatible with some third-party products."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"FabricPath is very reasonably priced."

"Cisco is expensive but offers good-quality features, so I would rate it high on the pricing scale."

"The pricing of Cisco FabricPath can be quite high depending on the architecture, but it's justified by the stability it offers."

"The price of Cisco FabricPath could be reduced, it is expensive in the market here in Sri Lanka. The solution is subscriptions based, if the customer wants any future integrations, or if there are any future enhancements they will have to pay. There are different license options available, such as one or three years purchases."

"I rate it seven out of ten on pricing as it's a bit expensive. It would be better if the price were lower, but we prioritize quality over cost."

"The solution falls under the pricier category, but it provides value for the price charged."

"It is very expensive."

"I rate the product's pricing a ten out of ten. Cisco switches cost around 15,000 dollars, and DNS licenses cost around 25,000 dollars. The total amount is 45,000 dollars, which is too expensive."

More Cisco FabricPath pricing and cost advice

"The price itself is good, but the economic crisis is causing them to raise prices occasionally."

"In general, the price could be improved."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which LAN Switching solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,757 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

12%

University

12%

Recreational Facilities/Services Company

Marketing Services Firm

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	11
Midsize Enterprise	6
Large Enterprise	14

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Cisco FabricPath?

The tool makes it easy to manage multi-layer networking and increases network efficiency. I haven't faced any challenges in integrating it into our existing infrastructure.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cisco FabricPath?

Cisco is somewhat expensive, but it provides good quality products and operations, so I can't complain about licensing cost and setup costs. There is room for improvement in terms of pricing for th...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Cisco FabricPath?

In future updates, I would prefer to see features such as more AI functionality or better integration added to Cisco FabricPath; more AI would be useful.

See all answers

What do you like most about Enterasys Campus LAN Switches?

Extreme Networks is the only one that has this kind of universal switch. It simplifies things greatly. Customers no longer have to worry about the price differences between traditional and fabric ...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Enterasys Campus LAN Switches?

The pricing is lower compared to others. The price itself is good, but the economic crisis is causing them to raise prices occasionally. It's out of their control. Prices are going up for most devi...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Enterasys Campus LAN Switches?

See all answers

Comparisons

Juniper QFabric vs Cisco FabricPath

Compared 37% of the time

ExtremeSwitching vs Cisco FabricPath

Compared 27% of the time

Arista Campus LAN Switches vs Cisco FabricPath

Compared 20% of the time

HPE ProCurve vs Cisco FabricPath

Compared 17% of the time

More Cisco FabricPath Competitors

HPE ProCurve vs Enterasys Campus LAN Switches

Compared 32% of the time

ExtremeSwitching vs Enterasys Campus LAN Switches

Compared 27% of the time

Cisco Catalyst Switches vs Enterasys Campus LAN Switches

Compared 23% of the time

Cisco Nexus vs Enterasys Campus LAN Switches

Compared 18% of the time

More Enterasys Campus LAN Switches Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cisco FabricPath

February 2026

Download Cisco FabricPath product report

Buyer's Guide

LAN Switching

February 2026

Download Enterasys Campus LAN Switches product report

Also Known As

FabricPath

No data available

Overview

Cisco FabricPath is a Cisco NX-OS software innovation combining the plug-and-play simplicity of Ethernet with the reliability and scalability of Layer 3 routing. Using FabricPath, you can build highly scalable Layer 2 multipath networks without the Spanning Tree Protocol. Such networks are particularly suitable for large virtualization deployments, private clouds, and high-performance computing (HPC) environments. The benefits of Cisco FabricPath include: Minimal commands per switch ease configuration and operation, Autodiscovery simplifies addition of new links and switches, Provision additional network bandwidth without impacting network, Supports one-, two-, or three-tier architectures, VLAN extensibility across the data center.

Cisco

Enterasys Campus LAN Switches Aggregation / Core Switches is designed for the demanding needs of aggregation, top-of-rack and campus core environments, these switches deliver 10Gb, 40Gb and even 100Gb bandwidth with maximum throughput and reliability.

Extreme Networks

Sample Customers

Bellevue, Calligaris, Electricity Authority of Cyprus, Management Science Associates, Multi-Customer, Oediv, Roper St. Francis, SNAM

Americatel Peru

Buyer's Guide

Cisco FabricPath vs. Enterasys Campus LAN Switches

February 2026

Free Report: Cisco FabricPath vs. Enterasys Campus LAN Switches

Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco FabricPath vs. Enterasys Campus LAN Switches and other solutions. Updated: February 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,757 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Cisco FabricPath vs. Enterasys Campus LAN Switches report.

See our list of best LAN Switching vendors.

We monitor all LAN Switching reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.