Coming October 25: PeerSpot Awards will be announced! Learn more

Cisco ACI vs ECI Mercury [EOL] comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Cisco Logo
7,500 views|3,467 comparisons
Ribbon Communications Logo
views| comparisons
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "This is an expensive solution."
  • "I don't believe there is any licensing required."
  • "Once you sign for the start kit implementation, you have to go all the way through to the implementation, even if you are experiences issues."
  • "It is quite expensive. It is not at all on the cheap or medium side."
  • "Cisco is much more expensive than other vendors, especially when it comes to the licensing."
  • "The cost is fine."
  • More Cisco ACI Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Virtualization solutions are best for your needs.
    632,611 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:There are some very major differences between both the Products and to name a few. -Cisco ACI have physical network gear (9K Switches) where the Code runs in ACI Policy Mode & the UCS server where… more »
    Top Answer:Once you know your way around the Cisco ecosystem, using Cisco ACI is not so difficult. It is a global product, so when you change one interface, changes are automatically reflected on every switch… more »
    Top Answer:One of the most valuable features is centralized management. The other is the ability to create policies by routing.
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Ranking
    2nd
    Views
    7,500
    Comparisons
    3,467
    Reviews
    11
    Average Words per Review
    493
    Rating
    7.8
    Unranked
    In Network Virtualization
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    ECI Mercury NFV, ECI Mercury Network Functions Virtualization
    Learn More
    Overview
    Cisco Application-Centric Infrastructure (ACI) reduces TCO, automates IT tasks, and accelerates data center application deployments. It accomplishes this using a business-relevant Software Defined Networking (SDN) policy model across networks, servers, storage, security, and services.

    Providing end-users with the best low-latency experience, Mercury excels at deploying virtualized network functions at the mobile edge, at the customer premises, and in the network as an edge cloud. Mercury NFV platforms ensure that your network is always ready to respond quickly to new customer service opportunities.

    Offer
    Learn more about Cisco ACI
    Learn more about ECI Mercury [EOL]
    Sample Customers
    Bowling Green State University, du, Qatar University
    Information Not Available
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Comms Service Provider20%
    Financial Services Firm17%
    Computer Software Company9%
    Government7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Comms Service Provider28%
    Computer Software Company16%
    Financial Services Firm9%
    Government8%
    No Data Available
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business17%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise70%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business16%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise70%
    No Data Available
    Buyer's Guide
    Cisco ACI vs. VMware NSX
    September 2022
    Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco ACI vs. VMware NSX and other solutions. Updated: September 2022.
    632,611 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Cisco ACI is ranked 2nd in Network Virtualization with 14 reviews while ECI Mercury [EOL] is ranked unranked in Network Virtualization. Cisco ACI is rated 8.0, while ECI Mercury [EOL] is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Cisco ACI writes "Stable, scalable, and easy to manage". On the other hand, Cisco ACI is most compared with VMware NSX, Nuage Networks and Cisco Enterprise Network Functions Virtualization, whereas ECI Mercury [EOL] is most compared with .

    See our list of best Network Virtualization vendors.

    We monitor all Network Virtualization reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.