Checkmarx One vs Radware AI Security Suite comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Checkmarx and Radware are both solutions in the AI Security category. Checkmarx is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.3, while Radware is ranked #46. Additionally, 88% of Checkmarx users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Radware users who would recommend it.

Checkmarx One

Read 81 Checkmarx One reviews

31,996 Views
3,520 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

Radware AI Security Suite

Read 2 Radware AI Security Suite reviews

1,625 Views
942 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Checkmarx One

Radware AI Security Suite

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 7, 2026

Checkmarx One and Radware Agentic AI Protection compete in application and network security, respectively. Radware Agentic AI Protection seems superior due to its advanced features and perceived user value, despite more favorable pricing and support for Checkmarx One.

Features: Checkmarx One excels in static and dynamic analysis, vulnerability management, and API security, making it comprehensive for application security. Radware Agentic AI Protection stands out for its AI-driven threat detection, traffic analysis, and real-time mitigation capabilities, emphasizing network protection.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Checkmarx One offers a cloud-based deployment with streamlined integration into CI/CD pipelines, providing strong customer service. Radware Agentic AI Protection is recognized for robust on-premises and hybrid deployment options, with dedicated support.

Pricing and ROI: Checkmarx One is known for competitive pricing and demonstrated ROI, benefiting organizations with comprehensive visibility and risk management. Radware Agentic AI Protection demands a higher upfront cost, yet its advanced AI capabilities deliver substantial long-term ROI by preventing sophisticated threats.

To learn more, read our detailed AI Security Report (Updated: October 2026).

Buyer's Guide

AI Security

October 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 921,523 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Checkmarx One

Ranking in Application Security Tools

2nd

Ranking in AI Security

4th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (2nd), Vulnerability Management (13th), Container Security (15th), Static Code Analysis (2nd), API Security (7th), Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) (2nd), DevSecOps (3rd), Risk-Based Vulnerability Management (10th), Application Security Posture Management (ASPM) (4th)

Radware AI Security Suite

Ranking in Application Security Tools

81st

Ranking in AI Security

46th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Generative AI Security (18th), AI Security Services (81st)

Featured Reviews

Shahzad Shahzad

Senior Solution Architect | L3+ Systems & Cloud Engineer | SRE Specialist at Canada Cloud Solution

Enable secure development workflows while identifying opportunities for faster scans and improved AI guidance

Checkmarx One is a very strong platform, but there are several areas where it can improve to support modern DevSecOps workflows even better. For example, better real-time developer guidance is needed. The IDE plugin should offer richer AI-powered auto-fixes similar to SNYK Code or GitHub Copilot Security, as current guidance is good but not deeply contextual for large-scale enterprise codebases. This matters because it reduces developer friction and accelerates shift-left adoption. More transparency control over the correlation engines is another need. The correlation engine is powerful but not fully transparent. Users want to understand why vulnerabilities were correlated or de-prioritized, which helps AppSec teams trust the prioritization logic. Faster SAST scan and more language coverage is needed since SAST scan can still be slow for very large mono-repos and there is limited deep support for new language frameworks like Rust and Go, along with advanced coverage for serverless-specific frameworks. This matters because large organizations want sub-minute scans in CI/CD as cloud-native ecosystems evolve fast. A strong API security module is another area for enhancement. API security scanning could be improved with active testing, API discovery, full Swagger, OpenAPI, drift detection, and schema-based fuzzing. This is important as API attacks are one of the biggest AppSec risks in 2025. Checkmarx One is strong, but I see a few areas for improvement including faster SAST scanning for large mono-repos, deeper language framework support, more transparent correlation logic, and stronger API security that includes discovery and runtime context. The IDE plugin could offer more AI-assisted fixes, and the SBOM lifecycle tracking can evolve further. Enhancing integration with SIEM and SOAR would also make enterprise adoption smoother, and these improvements would help developers and AppSec teams move faster with more accuracy.

Read full review

Matan Tal

Cyber Security Specialist at a healthcare company with 201-500 employees

Security rules have protected AI use and now prevent employees from leaking sensitive data

The best features Radware AI Security Suite offers include the option of the logs and the ability to see all the conversation from the end user with the AI. The logs help me investigate or respond when something looks risky because with the logs and the rules that I create, it helps me to detect issues. Regarding governance and security, the rules and the dashboards that I create are critical. The specific technical demonstrations provided by Radware during my evaluation instilled confidence in its ability to protect my AI agent environment because Radware agentic AI caught my company using Python execution and the prompt injection.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The main advantage of this solution is its centralized reporting functionality, which lets us track issues, then see and report on the priorities via a web portal."

"It's not an obstacle for developers. They can easily write their code and make it more secure with Checkmarx."

"We use the solution for dynamic application testing."

"The identification of verification-related security vulnerabilities is really important and one of the key things, and it also identifies vulnerabilities for any kind of third-party tool coming into the system or any third-party tools that you are using, which is very useful for avoiding random hacking."

"It's been a very positive experience overall."

"The solution overall is very good at detecting and pinpointing vulnerabilities in the code."

"Checkmarx has helped us deliver more secure products. We are able to do static code analysis with the tool before shipping our code to production. When the integration is in the pipeline, this tool gives us early notifications on code fixes."

"The solution is scalable, but other solutions are better."

More Checkmarx One pros

"Radware AI Security Suite's demonstrations instill confidence in us, since we had a great demo and all things regarding that."

"The customer support and technical support are excellent, and they are available to me anytime that I need."

Cons

"Checkmarx could probably do something to improve their license model."

"It would be really helpful if the level of confidence was included, with respect to identified issues."

"One area for improvement in Checkmarx is pricing, as it's more expensive than other products."

"If it is a very large code base then we have a problem where we cannot scan it (if more then ~ 30 mb zip file provided - scan is crashes or takes a lot of time)."

"When we first ran it on a big project, there wasn't enough memory on the computer. It originally ran with eight gigabytes, and now it runs with 32. The software stopped at some point, and while I don't think it said it ran out of memory, it just said "stopped" and something else. We had to go to the logs and send them to the integrator, and eventually, they found a memory issue in the logs and recommended increasing the memory. We doubled it once, and it didn't seem enough. We doubled it again, and it helped."

"Checkmarx needs to be more scalable for large enterprise companies."

"The accessibility for customized Checkmarx rules is currently limited and should be improved."

"They should make it more container-friendly and optimized for the CI pipeline. They should make it a little less heavy. Right now, it requires a SQL database, and the way the tool works is that it has an engine and then it has an analysis database in which it stores the information. So, it is pretty heavy from that perspective because you have to have a full SQL Server. They're working on something called Checkmarx Light, which is a slim-down version. They haven't released it yet, but that's what we need. There should be something a little more slimmed down that can just run the analysis and output the results in a format that's readable as opposed to having a full, really big, and thick deployment with a full database server."

More Checkmarx One cons

"Everything that you mentioned could be improved in Radware AI Security Suite."

"The main areas I see for improvement are performance and the security part."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The number of users and coverage for languages will have an impact on the cost of the license."

"I would rate the solution’s pricing an eight out of ten. The tool’s pricing is higher than others and it is for the license alone."

"I believe pricing is better compared to other commercial tools."

"The pricing is competitive and provides a lower TCO (total cost of ownership) for achieving application security."

"The tool's pricing is fine."

"This solution is expensive. The customized package allows you to buy additional users at any time."

"The pricing was not very good. This is just a framework which shouldn’t cost so much."

"The interface used to create custom rules comes at an additional cost."

More Checkmarx One pricing and cost advice

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which AI Security solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

921,523 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

14%

Manufacturing Company

Outsourcing Company

Computer Software Company

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	32
Midsize Enterprise	9
Large Enterprise	46

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	1
Midsize Enterprise	6

Questions from the Community

What alternatives are there for Fortify WebInspect and Fortify SCA?

I would like to recommend Checkmarx. With Checkmarx, you are able to have an all in one solution for SAST and SCA as well. Veracode is only a cloud solution. Hope this helps.

See all answers

What is the biggest difference between Veracode and Checkmarx?

According to my experience of using both the tools in different organizations Veracode is a Cloud-native, managed AppSec platform with strong focus on ease of use, it is SaaS delivery, and provide...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Checkmarx?

Checkmarx One is a premium solution, so budget accordingly. Make sure you understand how licensing scales with additional applications and users. I advise negotiating multi-year contracts or bundle...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

SonarQube vs Checkmarx One

Compared 20% of the time

Veracode vs Checkmarx One

Compared 3% of the time

Checkmarx SAST vs Checkmarx One

Compared 2% of the time

Snyk vs Checkmarx One

Compared 2% of the time

HCL AppScan vs Checkmarx One

Compared 2% of the time

More Checkmarx One Competitors

Noma Security vs Radware AI Security Suite

Compared 61% of the time

WitnessAI vs Radware AI Security Suite

Compared 39% of the time

More Radware AI Security Suite Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Checkmarx One

November 2026

Download Checkmarx One product report

Buyer's Guide

AI Security

October 2026

Download Radware AI Security Suite product report

Also Known As

No data available

Radware LLM Firewall, Radware Agentic AI Protection

Overview

Checkmarx One delivers robust security through seamless integration with SCM and CI/CD tools, ensuring reliable SAST and SCA. Primarily used by organizations for vulnerability detection, it supports cloud and on-premises deployment to enhance secure coding practices.

Checkmarx One provides organizations with comprehensive tools for secure software development, integrating effectively with CI/CD pipelines to scan thousands of applications. Its capabilities extend to identifying vulnerabilities in both code bases and third-party software. Enhancing workflow by supporting SCM solutions, it assists in maintaining secure coding standards and compliance. While excelling in various areas, it requires improvements in scan speed, reduction of false positives, and broader platform integration, particularly for COBOL and Swift. Its pricing model is noted as high, and demand exists for better tutorials and documentation.

What are the key features of Checkmarx One?

Comprehensive Integration: Seamlessly connects with SCM, CI/CD tools to streamline security workflows.
Accurate SAST and SCA: Precisely identifies vulnerabilities down to the exact line of code.
Custom Rules Configuration: Allows tailored security measures to match specific needs.
Quick Scanning: Provides fast analysis to speed up the development process.
Automated Code Remediation: Helps in efficiently fixing code vulnerabilities.

What benefits should users expect in reviews?

Improved Security: Enhances code safety, reducing vulnerabilities efficiently.
Effective False Positivity Management: Optimizes time spent on genuine issues.
Enhanced Development Processes: Integrates smoothly to boost secure coding initiatives.
Comprehensive Language Support: Facilitates scanning in multiple programming languages, accommodating diverse needs.

Industries implement Checkmarx One for secure coding compliance and vulnerability management across varying environments, choosing between cloud and on-premises deployment based on requirements. Its extensive language support and integration with DevSecOps practices make it a popular choice for organizations aiming to enhance software security.

Checkmarx

Radware Agentic AI Protection is a service that helps organizations discover, govern, and secure the AI agents operating across their environment, including unsanctioned "shadow AI" such as external services like Perplexity used without approval. It continuously maps agents, tools, and their access to enterprise resources such as databases and file repositories, and provides governance reporting aligned with frameworks like ISO 42001, the NIST AI Risk Management Framework, and the EU AI Act. The service evaluates AI risk posture across agents and tools, identifying sensitive data exposure and potential attack paths. It provides real-time, intent-aware behavioral protection against threats specific to autonomous AI systems, including prompt injection, agent behavior hijacking, tool misuse, memory poisoning, and supply chain attacks between agents. It integrates with agent platforms such as Microsoft Copilot, Azure AI Foundry, AWS Bedrock, Anthropic Claude Code, OpenClaw, and N8N.

Radware Agentic AI Protection software utilizes a subscription-based pricing model, typically structured according to the scale and features required by the organization. Pricing may vary based on factors such as deployment size and the range of protection offered, with options for annual or multi-year terms. The software provides flexibility in coverage and can be integrated into broader Radware security solutions to suit different enterprise needs.

Radware

Sample Customers

YIT, Salesforce, Coca-Cola, SAP, U.S. Army, Liveperson, Playtech Case Study: Liveperson Implements Innovative Secure SDLC

Information Not Available

Find out what your peers are saying about Orca Security, TrendAI, Wiz and others in AI Security. Updated: October 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

921,523 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best AI Security vendors and best Application Security Tools vendors.

We monitor all AI Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.