No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Check Point Web Gateway vs TitanHQ WebTitan comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 4, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
5.1
Check Point Web Gateway delivers strong ROI by reducing costs, optimizing bandwidth, and enhancing security, earning high user ratings.
Sentiment score
7.2
TitanHQ WebTitan saves costs, enhances productivity, and offers broad protection, making it a valuable investment despite its expense.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
5.1
Check Point's technical support receives mixed reviews for response times, expertise, and effectiveness, with varied user satisfaction levels.
Sentiment score
8.0
TitanHQ WebTitan support is praised for responsiveness and effectiveness, though improvements in ticketing and communication protocols are suggested.
Our organization has private engineers who are certified by Check Point.
Key Executive at ITBiz Solutions
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.6
Check Point Web Gateway offers robust scalability, outperforming legacy solutions and supporting growth with consistent performance and interoperability.
Sentiment score
7.1
TitanHQ WebTitan efficiently supports scalability, accommodating cloud and on-site deployments with easy resource adjustments for varying user sizes.
The cloud solution can be scalable, but in most cases, it is not because it is bound to specific firewalls.
Senior Security Consultant at Orange Cyberdefense
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
8.3
Check Point Web Gateway is praised for stability, effectiveness in complex environments, and requires occasional updates for optimal performance.
Sentiment score
7.3
TitanHQ WebTitan is highly stable and reliable, with minimal downtime and effective support resolving rare DNS issues.
I don't bother contacting support when there are downtimes and technical issues.
Managing Partner at Cabinet Avocat Pusa Alexandru Catalin
 

Room For Improvement

Check Point Web Gateway needs better support, interface integration, update quality, documentation, cost adjustments, and scalability features.
TitanHQ WebTitan faces login bugs, antivirus issues, deployment challenges, and users seek better customization, support, and Azure AD integration.
Support for operational technology (OT) is not as comprehensive in Check Point Web Gateway as it is in competing products.
Senior Security Consultant at Orange Cyberdefense
Deployment issues on Linux have been noted, especially with agents on endpoints.
Key Executive at ITBiz Solutions
Check Point asks for the registered mail ID and number, which sometimes you can't quickly provide when under pressure because your client's network is down.
Customer Support Executive at simadrig
The technology employed by TitanHQ doesn't learn enough and is still on the basic side.
Managing Partner at Cabinet Avocat Pusa Alexandru Catalin
 

Setup Cost

Check Point Web Gateway is costly, requires evaluation and consultation, but discounts may align pricing with market standards.
Enterprise users find TitanHQ WebTitan competitively priced, offering budget-friendly plans and high satisfaction despite potential additional costs.
Fortinet is the cheaper product, while Palo Alto and Check Point Web Gateway are similarly priced.
Senior Security Consultant at Orange Cyberdefense
The pricing and discounts for Check Point Web Gateway are similar to Fortinet, making it cost-effective with fair pricing.
Key Executive at ITBiz Solutions
The pricing of TitanHQ is more or less similar to other tools.
Managing Partner at Cabinet Avocat Pusa Alexandru Catalin
 

Valuable Features

Check Point Web Gateway ensures robust security with cloud implementation, dynamic policies, threat intelligence, and easy maintenance for organizations.
WebTitan by TitanHQ is user-friendly and cost-effective, offering robust web filtering, easy setup, scalability, and strong integration features.
It provides behavioral analysis and a Copilot feature implemented in the management console, allowing users to receive assistance in an automated format.
Key Executive at ITBiz Solutions
We are satisfied with the effectiveness of the multi-layered defense approach in Check Point Web Gateway.
Customer Support Executive at simadrig
We are using the real-time threat intelligence feature. It helps to manage web threats effectively with qualified alarms.
Senior Security Consultant at Orange Cyberdefense
Two links embedded in the email footer indicating whether the email was spam or not.
Managing Partner at Cabinet Avocat Pusa Alexandru Catalin
 

Categories and Ranking

Check Point Web Gateway
Ranking in Secure Web Gateways (SWG)
19th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
24
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
TitanHQ WebTitan
Ranking in Secure Web Gateways (SWG)
23rd
Average Rating
9.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.3
Number of Reviews
18
Ranking in other categories
Internet Security (13th), Web Content Filtering (6th), Domain Name System (DNS) Security (15th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Secure Web Gateways (SWG) category, the mindshare of Check Point Web Gateway is 1.4%, up from 1.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of TitanHQ WebTitan is 1.3%, up from 1.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Secure Web Gateways (SWG) Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Check Point Web Gateway1.4%
TitanHQ WebTitan1.3%
Other97.3%
Secure Web Gateways (SWG)
 

Featured Reviews

KT
Senior Security Consultant at Orange Cyberdefense
Has improved threat visibility and centralized management but needs wider feature support
We have not worked much with granular control over web usage policies, so I cannot provide detailed feedback. We have not worked with the effectiveness of the multi-layered defense approach in threat prevention. Their product coverage is not as extensive as some competitors. They have fewer products and features compared to competitors. Support for operational technology (OT) is not as comprehensive in Check Point Web Gateway as it is in competing products.
Pusa Alexandru-Catalin - PeerSpot reviewer
Managing Partner at Cabinet Avocat Pusa Alexandru Catalin
Provides basic email protection features but needs improvement in learning capabilities
TitanHQ does a middle-of-the-road job like Bitdefender and SensorNet, and it has a learning feature, though it's not as advanced as previous technology. In the past, I used a far superior product with no false alarms and minimum spam. This tool learned quickly from my inbox, offering simple yet useful features, such as two links embedded in the email footer indicating whether the email was spam or not.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Secure Web Gateways (SWG) solutions are best for your needs.
909,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Construction Company
14%
Financial Services Firm
12%
Healthcare Company
9%
Government
9%
Construction Company
14%
Outsourcing Company
10%
Computer Software Company
9%
Financial Services Firm
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business21
Midsize Enterprise6
Large Enterprise7
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business11
Midsize Enterprise2
Large Enterprise3
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Check Point Web Gateway?
It will be the same pricing as other solutions. Fortinet is the cheaper product, while Palo Alto and Check Point Web Gateway are similarly priced.
What needs improvement with Check Point Web Gateway?
As of now, I did not notice any significant areas for improvement. The interface of Check Point Web Gateway is far better than others and gives a complete and detailed manner of reports, which is v...
What is your primary use case for Check Point Web Gateway?
My main use case for Check Point Web Gateway was web filtering and application control. When I want to block social media, gambling websites, or any adult content, I use advanced web filtering in C...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for TitanHQ WebTitan?
The pricing of TitanHQ is more or less similar to other tools. I would be willing to pay more for a better service.
What needs improvement with TitanHQ WebTitan?
The technology employed by TitanHQ doesn't learn enough and is still on the basic side. I had previously used 'only my email' service, which had superior features, went bankrupt due to technical is...
What is your primary use case for TitanHQ WebTitan?
I mainly use TitanHQ for email protection, specifically for no false alarms and minimal spam.
 

Also Known As

No data available
WebTitan, WebTitan Web Filter
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Morton Salt, Medical Advocacy and Outreach, BH Telecom, Lightbeam Health Solutions, X by Orange, Cadence, Nihondentsu, Datastream Connexion, Good Sam, Omnyway, FIASA, Pacific Life, Banco del Pacifico, Control Southern, Xero, Centrify, Tradair, Laterlite, Phoenix International, Unisinos, Wilkin Chapman, Connexus Energy, Mutua Universal, Smart & Final, Central New Mexico Community Colleg, Grupo Financiero Multiva
Clarks, Pepsi, Purple, Comcast, Virgin, McDonalds, Sprint, Adtran, Xirrus, Eir, ViaSat
Find out what your peers are saying about Check Point Web Gateway vs. TitanHQ WebTitan and other solutions. Updated: August 2026.
909,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.