Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) vs GitLab Premium comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Check Point Software Technologies and GitLab are both solutions in the Application Security Tools category. Check Point Software Technologies is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.7, while GitLab is ranked #28 with an average rating of 8.3. Check Point Software Technologies holds a 1.1% mindshare in AS, compared to GitLab’s 0.3% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Check Point Software Technologies users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of GitLab users who would recommend it.

Check Point WAF (formerly C...

Read 81 Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) reviews

12,844 Views
3,853 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

GitLab Premium

Read 5 GitLab Premium reviews

1,602 Views
609 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Check Point WAF (formerly C...

GitLab Premium

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 13, 2026

Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) and GitLab Premium serve different niches; Check Point WAF is focused on web application security, while GitLab Premium is a comprehensive DevOps platform. GitLab Premium stands out for its extensive development functionalities, making it more valuable overall.

Features: Check Point WAF offers features like advanced threat detection, threat intelligence, and scalability which are essential for organizations focusing on security. GitLab Premium provides features such as continuous integration, version control, and project management, which are crucial for software development teams.

Room for Improvement: Check Point WAF could enhance reporting capabilities, streamline integration with third-party applications, and improve user interfaces. GitLab Premium might benefit from more intuitive user training, better cloud service integrations, and reduced deployment times.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Check Point WAF offers a straightforward setup with robust support services facilitating rapid deployment. GitLab Premium, although providing comprehensive documentation and support, might require additional effort to deploy due to its rich set of features.

Pricing and ROI: Check Point WAF generally has lower setup costs and offers a favorable ROI through its security-focused features. GitLab Premium, despite a higher initial investment, provides a significant ROI due to its comprehensive DevOps capabilities that enhance development workflows efficiently.

To learn more, read our detailed Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) vs. GitLab Premium Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) vs. GitLab Premium

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 915,341 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Check Point WAF (formerly C...

Ranking in Application Security Tools

4th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Data Loss Prevention (DLP) (6th), Web Application Firewall (WAF) (5th), DevSecOps (2nd)

GitLab Premium

Ranking in Application Security Tools

28th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

5.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2026, in the Application Security Tools category, the mindshare of Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) is 1.1%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of GitLab Premium is 0.3%. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Security Tools Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF)	1.1%
GitLab Premium	0.3%
Other	98.6%

Application Security Tools

Featured Reviews

Krishnakumar Mahadevan

CISO at Spink Solutions Private Limited

Cloud security has strengthened risk posture and improved advanced threat visibility

There are some API gateway and API securities I mentioned. If these are incorporated with AI-related features, particularly those seven key vulnerabilities I mentioned—token theft and tool poisoning—that would be beneficial. AI-related features are not included yet in Check Point CloudGuard WAF. However, they are present in FortiGate. That is the advantage of FortiGate now. FortiGate is stopping all AI-related vulnerabilities now. FortiGate has this capability. It is unfortunate that even Palo Alto also lacks one or two of these features. Check Point Quantum is very good, without a doubt. However, their capabilities are not in comparison with Palo Alto. There are some features, but there are some gaps in comparison with Palo Alto.

Read full review

Bharadwaj Deepak Mohapatra

DevOps Engineer at ENTERPRISE SYSTEM SOLUTIONS LIMITED

Have managed internal projects efficiently but face challenges with user interface and navigation

When discussing improvements for GitLab Premium, the main area is the GUI. GitHub's GUI is very good, offering many collaboration options and the ability to customize dashboards. GitHub's look and feel is superior, but GitLab Premium's dashboard is very simple. Regarding capabilities lacking in GitLab Premium, the main concern is the GUI. For example, in GitHub, there is a right side profile where settings can be directly accessed, and there is a direct section for developer mode with clear segregation. In GitLab Premium, when accessing users, confusion sometimes arises between root user and main user. There is an option for groups, but it is not direct. When clicking on groups, it goes to another section where groups must be found. This hierarchy could be more straightforward and direct. The biggest drawbacks of GitLab Premium are GUI and configuration. GUI is the primary concern, but other aspects are good.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Machine learning is a valuable tool for this assessment because it allows for a two-phase approach: secure and non-secure."

"Support is the same with on-premise devices, and it is very good. Since it is cloud-based, I do not need them as much."

"From a security perspective, it is quite good."

"The best features Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) offers in my experience are deployment, reliability, and scalability, and it has positively impacted my organization as a money saver and time saver by providing proper responses within 10 to 20 seconds, resolving queries quickly with excellent accuracy and reliability from its AI capabilities."

"We can ensure that by following and adapting our needs based on these guidelines we will be a great organization with a strong vision and a great security framework established to protect us."

"The tool performs device health checkups and updates us. It helps us to be compliant with regulatory policies."

"Check Point CloudGuard WAF has positively impacted my organization by significantly improving both security and operational efficiency, with a noticeable reduction in web-based threats, especially automated attacks and vulnerability exploits, thanks to its real-time prevention and reputation filter that has streamlined my workflow through automatic policy updates and integration smoothly with my CI/CD pipelines, allowing my DevOps teams to deploy security without delays."

"The first valuable feature is that it is not a complex process to get it up and running. It was not complex at all. We were in a close relationship with the team that developed the app, and it worked in a few hours. The second valuable feature is the information that comes out of it."

More Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) pros

"I would give a rating of eleven in that case, because we never had a downtime with GitLab Premium."

"The biggest benefit from GitLab Premium is that both repository management systems are good, as both GitHub and GitLab are valuable, and the main advantage is that GitLab Premium has community support, making it good in all aspects for small organizations."

"GitLab Premium is much more reliable, quicker, faster, and basically easier to operate compared to GitHub."

"The main benefits I received from GitLab Premium are that I save money and streamline my management process of applications."

"The main benefits from advanced CI/CD capabilities in GitLab Premium include automation to pull and merge the codes together, and it's all done automatically."

Cons

"In terms of features, I do not have any negatives. Their integration is extremely quick. It is better than others I have been involved with in the past. Their pricing model, however, can be better."

"I believe that Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) can be improved, as it is currently in a midway position; it is not much better, but it is not bad."

"The learning curve was a challenge due to initially incorrect configurations. It took approximately a month and a half to understand how the solution works because of inadequate documentation."

"While Check Point CloudGuard WAF is a strong solution, it could be improved in a few areas such as simplifying and customizing the user interface and reporting database."

"I see areas for improvement primarily on the reporting functionality front, as there are very limited functions in the reporting section."

"The interface and deployment require qualified skills and a qualified engineer who knows this product very well."

"Check Point CloudGuard WAF's support is only available in English."

"The web user interface needs some improvement, even though the functionality is good."

More Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) cons

"The automation part could be improved. Nowadays AI is being actively used, and if we could integrate something like ChatGPT with GitLab Premium, it would be easier for us to check logs and debug faster."

"In terms of improvement for GitLab Premium, not necessarily GitLab Premium specifically but GitLab as a whole could enhance features on the project management side."

"It is complex. It takes a good amount of time."

"The biggest drawbacks of GitLab Premium are GUI and configuration. GUI is the primary concern, but other aspects are good."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing is competitive compared to other solutions on the market. So, the licensing cost is average."

"The sales team or account managers from Check Point are top-notch. As I am using other products as well, my pricing was competitive compared to others."

"The base solution costs approximately 30,000 euros, with an additional 2,000 euros per year for licenses and support."

"The tool's licensing costs are yearly and competitive."

"I work for an Indian banking client. In India, companies are on a budget. The company liked Check Point very much, but it was a little bit costly compared to FortiWeb. However, it had more features compared to FortiWeb."

"Considering all the benefits we've observed, we find the price to be satisfactory."

"Check Point CloudGuard WAF is expensive compared to Azure WAF."

"If the pricing for the Infinity platform covers everything, it would be more straightforward. I had a hard time selling it to our CEO as a former CFO because of the differentials. There are different deltas year to year over a five-year period. It is very difficult to explain. It would be easier to digest for our executives if there was a flatter scale"

More Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) pricing and cost advice

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

915,341 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Outsourcing Company

15%

Computer Software Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Construction Company

37%

Comms Service Provider

15%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Transportation Company

10%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	57
Midsize Enterprise	24
Large Enterprise	40

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for CloudGuard for Application Security?

It is a little bit expensive, but the pricing model is acceptable, though a reduction would make it more competitive with leaders such as Palo Alto.

See all answers

What needs improvement with CloudGuard for Application Security?

The false positive rate is a concern, but I could recommend improvements where false positives have to be minimized better. This all depends on how the rules are customized and configured, and it c...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for CloudGuard for Application Security?

The main purpose is to have network security through machine learning, which can offer threat detection and intelligence for my endpoints, and I am looking for application security. I am looking fo...

See all answers

What needs improvement with GitLab Premium?

It could be better, but now that we have migrated to Siemens Energy, GitLab Premium is being actively looked after by another team. We are just making sure that GitLab Premium administration is bei...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering GitLab Premium?

We were on the desktop, and now GitLab Premium is on cloud. I am not really sure about the purchase process for GitLab Premium. I am a GitLab Premium end-user. I give this product a rating of eight...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GitLab Premium?

GitLab Premium is affordable in terms of pricing, while GitHub is a bit pricier. If working with a much more complex and vast organization at the enterprise level, GitHub would be the choice. If op...

See all answers

Comparisons

OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing vs Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF)

Compared 6% of the time

Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention vs Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF)

Compared 6% of the time

AWS WAF vs Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF)

Compared 5% of the time

Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks vs Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF)

Compared 5% of the time

Cloudflare Web Application Firewall vs Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF)

Compared 5% of the time

More Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) Competitors

SonarQube vs GitLab Premium

Compared 57% of the time

Trellix IVX for Enterprise Applications vs GitLab Premium

Compared 22% of the time

OpenText Core Application Security vs GitLab Premium

Compared 21% of the time

More GitLab Premium Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF)

October 2026

Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) report

Download Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) product report

Buyer's Guide

GitLab Premium

September 2026

Download GitLab Premium product report

Also Known As

Check Point CloudGuard Application Security, CloudGuard Application Security, CloudGuard AppSec, Check Point CloudGuard Code Security

No data available

Overview

Check Point WAF offers a robust security framework with AI-driven threat detection and seamless integration, protecting applications and APIs in multi-cloud environments.

Effective in preemptively blocking threats through AI and machine learning, Check Point WAF reduces false positives and operational workload. Its integration capabilities and threat intelligence provide comprehensive protection against zero-day attacks, while centralized management facilitates cost-effective and insightful threat reporting.

What are the main features of Check Point WAF?

AI and Machine Learning: Preemptively blocks threats without signature reliance.
Centralized Management: Simplifies oversight and reduces costs.
Threat Intelligence: Enhances security posture against zero-day attacks.
Ease of Deployment: Quick setup with user-friendly interface.
Comprehensive Protection: Guards against SQL injection and DDoS attacks.

What benefits should be considered by users?

Reduced False Positives: Minimizes operational interruptions.
Cost-effectiveness: Reduces management overhead.
Insightful Reporting: Enables swift response to threats.
Seamless Integration: Enhances security processes with existing tools.

Check Point WAF is employed in industries securing web applications and APIs, especially in multi-cloud environments. It effectively protects backend services, prevents unauthorized access, and monitors traffic, making it suitable for businesses with diverse infrastructures. It ensures compliance with security standards and adapts to fluctuating traffic patterns.

Check Point Software Technologies

GitLab Premium provides enhanced features for CI/CD automation, security management, and version control, favoring a user-friendly interface and integration options suitable for efficient project management.

GitLab Premium is designed for developers looking for robust CI/CD automation, secure management, and efficient version control. Users benefit from its seamless Docker integration, comprehensive project management tools like roadmaps, and the option for on-premises hosting that centralizes applications to cut costs. It supports secure, self-hosted environments which enhance development processes through effective code review and merge requests, valuable for enterprises and small organizations alike. While there is some room for improvement in project management features and the GUI, GitLab Premium's core strengths remain cost-effectiveness and consolidation of tools for security checks, performance testing, and robust project management.

What key features does GitLab Premium offer?

Advanced CI/CD Automation: Streamline pipelines for faster, efficient builds.
Security Management: Manage security with built-in tools.
Version Control: Solid control for code collaboration.
Docker Integration: Simplifies container management.
Project Management Tools: Utilize roadmaps for planning.
On-Premises Hosting: Reduces third-party service reliance.

What benefits or ROI should users expect?

Cost-Effectiveness: Centralizes applications reducing costs.
Efficient Development Processes: Improved code review and merge requests.
Secure Environments: Supports self-hosting for robust security.
Enhancement of Internal Operations: Facilitates internal workflows.

Organizations across industries implement GitLab Premium for consolidating dev tools such as those used in performance testing and security checks. Enterprises value its cost-effectiveness when integrating with automation testing tools like Jenkins or combining with storage solutions like Artifactory and coverage tools such as SonarQube.

GitLab

Sample Customers

Orange España, Paschoalotto

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) vs. GitLab Premium

September 2026

Free Report: Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) vs. GitLab Premium

Find out what your peers are saying about Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) vs. GitLab Premium and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

915,341 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) vs. GitLab Premium report.

See our list of best Application Security Tools vendors.

We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.