Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) vs Fastly comparison

Check Point WAF (formerly C...

Read 11 Fastly reviews

4,660 Views
2,656 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 13, 2026

Fastly and Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) compete in the web application firewall and content delivery network space. Fastly has an edge in rapid deployment and edge computing, whereas Check Point WAF stands out for AI-driven threat prevention and user-friendliness.

Features: Fastly is known for its advanced CDN management through VCL, allowing rapid configuration and version rollback. It ensures edge security and performance with integrations like Akamai and Cloudflare. Check Point WAF leverages AI and machine learning for threat prevention and integrates easily with cloud environments. It provides features like DDoS protection and rate limiting, emphasizing comprehensive security.

Room for Improvement: Fastly's reliance on VCL can be complex for users unfamiliar with the language, and its pricing model can be unpredictable with regional variations. Support improvements could enhance user experience. Check Point WAF would benefit from a more intuitive user interface and better documentation for first-time setups. Advanced AI integration and competitive pricing could further enhance its offering.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Fastly offers robust deployment support via channels like Slack, though initial technical support can be slow. Its hybrid cloud capability provides flexibility. Check Point WAF is adaptable across cloud environments with strong global customer service, though resolution times can vary.

Pricing and ROI: Fastly's competitive, usage-based pricing can be unpredictable, offset by performance benefits and backend cost reductions. Check Point WAF is considered pricey but provides substantial security benefits, with users noting its cost-effectiveness despite higher-than-average pricing.

To learn more, read our detailed Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) vs. Fastly Report (Updated: August 2026).

Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) vs. Fastly

Download the complete report

Helped 909,725 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

ROI

Sentiment score

6.2

Check Point WAF boosts cost savings, efficiency, and security, enhancing ROI through reduced ownership costs and streamlined operations.

Sentiment score

6.0

Fastly boosts return on investment with improved performance, reduced latency, and cuts infrastructure costs by 40-60%.

When we are attacked, we can understand how important the solution is.

For more quotes and insights, download the Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) report

Cyber security manager at a government with 1,001-5,000 employees

When you migrate to the cloud, it feels like saving 90% of your time.

Thanos Constantopoulos

Manager, Managed Security Services at a tech vendor with 51-200 employees

Most of the operations happen in the background, so I do not spend much time on it.

Dialungana Malungo

Principal Cybersecurity Specialist at Unitel S.A.

Realizing a 30 to 50% reduction in latency and page load time, ensuring users experience a seamless workflow.

Senior software engineer at Simplifyvms

I have seen a return on investment, particularly in time savings, especially regarding the changes.

For more quotes and insights, download the Fastly report

Cloud Architect at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

Customer Service

Sentiment score

6.5

Check Point WAF support is responsive and knowledgeable but occasionally delayed, needing improvement in service proficiency and availability.

Sentiment score

6.3

Fastly's customer care is efficient with multi-channel support, but has inconsistencies in response times and transparency across time zones.

They need to increase the number of people for 24/7 support.

Dialungana Malungo

Principal Cybersecurity Specialist at Unitel S.A.

They were responsive even before we committed to buying their solution.

Stilian Elenkov

Infrastructure Manager at FPMH

I also received full technical support, especially during the implementation.

For more quotes and insights, download the Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) report

Cyber security manager at a government with 1,001-5,000 employees

demonstrating the team's technical expertise in CDN and Edge architecture

For more quotes and insights, download the Fastly report

Senior software engineer at Simplifyvms

We have SLAs defined because we opted for enterprise support pricing.

reviewer2161107

Staff Engineer at a retailer with 1,001-5,000 employees

We are not getting quick responses from Fastly technical support engineers.

Patel Parth

Technical support engineer at Adobe

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score

7.2

Check Point WAF excels with scalable, cloud-native design, seamless AWS integration, and adaptable SaaS deployment for multi-cloud support.

Sentiment score

6.4

Fastly is praised for scalability, ease of growth support, cloud flexibility, excellent support, and successful global integrations.

If I need to scale, I open a Whatsapp group with the director and the team, and we quickly proceed to do so.

For more quotes and insights, download the Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) report

Cyber security manager at a government with 1,001-5,000 employees

They have sufficient resources, and there are no challenges from a scalability perspective.

Mantu Shaw

Project Manager at a outsourcing company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Check Point CloudGuard WAF's scalability is very good.

Ruben Ruiz

Sr. VP of Creative & Development at a non-tech company with 51-200 employees

Seamlessly handling massive traffic without requiring backend changes due to its globally distributed Edge network and stateless API-driven design.

For more quotes and insights, download the Fastly report

Senior software engineer at Simplifyvms

Stability Issues

Sentiment score

8.2

Check Point WAF is praised for its exceptional stability and reliability, with users rating it highly for performance and robustness.

Sentiment score

7.3

Fastly is stable and reliable with high uptime, no technical issues, and strong performance in enterprise applications.

It is very stable.

RicardoFernandes1

Team Leader, Cloudops & Cloud Architect at a consultancy with 501-1,000 employees

It is very stable, never crashing or giving me an error that I can see.

Rui Dias

Sysadmin at a government with 501-1,000 employees

I did not have any issues in the last three years during which I had more than ten critical services running on CloudGuard.

Charalampos Symeou

Information Technology - Infrastructure and Security at Cyprus Development Bank

For more quotes and insights, download the Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) report

Highly reliable for enterprise-scale applications with high uptime guarantees.

For more quotes and insights, download the Fastly report

Senior software engineer at Simplifyvms

Room For Improvement

Check Point WAF requires improvements in customization, integration, pricing, and support, with users desiring simplified setup and enhanced features.

Fastly requires improvements in China presence, configuration complexity, pricing, customer support, security features, documentation, and bot detection.

The provider could improve by providing better guidance and support during the configuration process.

Stilian Elenkov

Infrastructure Manager at FPMH

Future releases should include better bot mitigation, behavioral anomaly detection, compliance templates, advanced threat intel integration, and streamlined multi-cloud support to boost protection and usability.

Kresimir Mikolcevic

Senior Cyber Security Engineer at a computer software company with 501-1,000 employees

A machine learning-based adaptive mode could help the WAF learn over time and auto-tune policies.

reviewer2702679

Technical Support Executive at a computer software company with 501-1,000 employees

For more quotes and insights, download the Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) report

I chose 8 out of 10 because it has excellent performance and low latency delivery, making it suitable for larger applications, with strong Edge Caching and instant purging capabilities.

Senior software engineer at Simplifyvms

Fastly could improve by improving the documentation and having some code examples.

For more quotes and insights, download the Fastly report

Cloud Architect at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

Fastly should provide features similar to Cloudflare regarding a block list.

Patel Parth

Technical support engineer at Adobe

Setup Cost

Check Point WAF is seen as costly but justified by its robust features, flexible licensing, and ease of renewal.

Fastly is competitively priced with usage-based costs and customizable options, but some find it expensive with a learning curve.

It is more expensive than f5, where we purchased everything as bundles, and Check Point costs more, but it is worth the money.

For more quotes and insights, download the Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) report

Cyber security manager at a government with 1,001-5,000 employees

It is less costly than Cloudflare, Fortinet, and other vendors.

Mantu Shaw

Project Manager at a outsourcing company with 1,001-5,000 employees

I know that its price is relatively expensive compared to other products but it gives benefits that are worth it.

Baruch Peretz

Ciso at a government with 1,001-5,000 employees

It operates on a pay-as-you-go structure, but costs scale with traffic, requiring monitoring to avoid unexpected spikes based on data transfers and the number of requests handled.

Senior software engineer at Simplifyvms

In terms of price, I find it good.

For more quotes and insights, download the Fastly report

Cloud Architect at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

Valuable Features

Check Point WAF offers AI-driven protection with easy deployment, low false positives, scalability, and integration with Azure, enhancing security.

Fastly CDNs integrate with Signal Sciences WAF for efficient content delivery, enhancing performance with global edge locations and code management.

Upon implementation and evaluation with third-party penetration testing, it meets rigorous security standards required for dealing with financial institutions.

Stilian Elenkov

Infrastructure Manager at FPMH

It can protect against zero-day attacks and hidden anomalies.

Domenico Cacciari

Amministratore Della Sicurezza Di Rete at a government with 1,001-5,000 employees

The solution preemptively blocks zero-day attacks and detects hidden anomalies effectively.

Charalampos Symeou

Information Technology - Infrastructure and Security at Cyprus Development Bank

For more quotes and insights, download the Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) report

The best feature that Fastly offers is the Edge location, which reduces latency, making our applications work smoother because we do not have to constantly call the backend.

Senior software engineer at Simplifyvms

Fastly has a wide number of configuration features that can be performed, and I emphasize that they can be done from code, which makes it much more traceable.

For more quotes and insights, download the Fastly report

Cloud Architect at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

In this project, it is working as a reverse proxy for CDN and WAF, web application firewall, additionally image optimization.

Patel Parth

Technical support engineer at Adobe

Categories and Ranking

Check Point WAF (formerly C...

Ranking in Web Application Firewall (WAF)

5th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Security Tools (5th), Data Loss Prevention (DLP) (8th), DevSecOps (2nd)

Fastly

Ranking in Web Application Firewall (WAF)

24th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

CDN (7th), Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection (11th)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Web Application Firewall (WAF) category, the mindshare of Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) is 2.0%, up from 1.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Fastly is 2.2%, up from 1.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Web Application Firewall (WAF) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF)	2.0%
Fastly	2.2%
Other	95.8%

Web Application Firewall (WAF)

Featured Reviews

Krishnakumar Mahadevan

CISO at Spink Solutions Private Limited

Cloud security has strengthened risk posture and improved advanced threat visibility

There are some API gateway and API securities I mentioned. If these are incorporated with AI-related features, particularly those seven key vulnerabilities I mentioned—token theft and tool poisoning—that would be beneficial. AI-related features are not included yet in Check Point CloudGuard WAF. However, they are present in FortiGate. That is the advantage of FortiGate now. FortiGate is stopping all AI-related vulnerabilities now. FortiGate has this capability. It is unfortunate that even Palo Alto also lacks one or two of these features. Check Point Quantum is very good, without a doubt. However, their capabilities are not in comparison with Palo Alto. There are some features, but there are some gaps in comparison with Palo Alto.

Read full review

Edge caching has transformed response times and delivers faster candidate data globally

Senior software engineer at Simplifyvms

Fastly can be improved in certain areas such as VCL, which is powerful but has a steep learning curve for normal users. A more user-friendly, UI-based configuration could simplify the experience, alongside better templates for common use cases and dashboard improvements, as the current dashboard feels complex for beginners, and pricing can be hard to predict for smaller companies. I chose 8 out of 10 because it has excellent performance and low latency delivery, making it suitable for larger applications, with strong Edge Caching and instant purging capabilities. However, VCL complexity and pricing predictability, especially for smaller companies, along with a user-friendly dashboard are areas impacting my score.

Read full review

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Web Application Firewall (WAF) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

909,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

18%

Outsourcing Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

Construction Company

Comms Service Provider

13%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Outsourcing Company

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	54
Midsize Enterprise	23
Large Enterprise	34

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	6
Large Enterprise	7

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for CloudGuard for Application Security?

It is a little bit expensive, but the pricing model is acceptable, though a reduction would make it more competitive with leaders such as Palo Alto.

What needs improvement with CloudGuard for Application Security?

The false positive rate is a concern, but I could recommend improvements where false positives have to be minimized better. This all depends on how the rules are customized and configured, and it c...

What is your primary use case for CloudGuard for Application Security?

The main purpose is to have network security through machine learning, which can offer threat detection and intelligence for my endpoints, and I am looking for application security. I am looking fo...

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Fastly?

In terms of price, I find it good, and as I mentioned, the implementation cost had some difficulty at the beginning due to the learning curve.

What needs improvement with Fastly?

I think Fastly could improve by improving the documentation and having some code examples so that it is easier for developers, since at the beginning it becomes a bit complicated.

What is your primary use case for Fastly?

My primary use case for Fastly is using it as a CDN to speed up my customers' access to the applications. A specific example of how Fastly has helped improve my customers' access to the application...

OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing vs Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF)

Comparisons

Compared 7% of the time

Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention vs Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF)

Compared 7% of the time

AWS WAF vs Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF)

Compared 6% of the time

Cloudflare Web Application Firewall vs Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF)

Compared 6% of the time

Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks vs Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF)

Compared 6% of the time

More Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) Competitors

Cloudflare vs Fastly

Compared 19% of the time

Akamai vs Fastly

Compared 16% of the time

Imperva Application Security Platform vs Fastly

Compared 10% of the time

Uplynk vs Fastly

Compared 5% of the time

CDN77 vs Fastly

Compared 4% of the time

More Fastly Competitors

Product Reports

Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF)

Download Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) product report

Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) report

Download Fastly product report

Also Known As

Check Point CloudGuard Application Security, CloudGuard Application Security, CloudGuard AppSec, Check Point CloudGuard Code Security

No data available

Overview

Check Point WAF offers a robust security framework with AI-driven threat detection and seamless integration, protecting applications and APIs in multi-cloud environments.

Effective in preemptively blocking threats through AI and machine learning, Check Point WAF reduces false positives and operational workload. Its integration capabilities and threat intelligence provide comprehensive protection against zero-day attacks, while centralized management facilitates cost-effective and insightful threat reporting.

What are the main features of Check Point WAF?

AI and Machine Learning: Preemptively blocks threats without signature reliance.
Centralized Management: Simplifies oversight and reduces costs.
Threat Intelligence: Enhances security posture against zero-day attacks.
Ease of Deployment: Quick setup with user-friendly interface.
Comprehensive Protection: Guards against SQL injection and DDoS attacks.

What benefits should be considered by users?

Reduced False Positives: Minimizes operational interruptions.
Cost-effectiveness: Reduces management overhead.
Insightful Reporting: Enables swift response to threats.
Seamless Integration: Enhances security processes with existing tools.

Check Point WAF is employed in industries securing web applications and APIs, especially in multi-cloud environments. It effectively protects backend services, prevents unauthorized access, and monitors traffic, making it suitable for businesses with diverse infrastructures. It ensures compliance with security standards and adapts to fluctuating traffic patterns.

Check Point Software Technologies

Fastly is a leading provider of content delivery network services that enhances website performance through efficient caching and real-time architecture capabilities.

Fastly integrates CDN technology with advanced web application firewall for comprehensive security. Its global infrastructure supports performance enhancement, rapid deployment, and rollback capabilities. Utilizing the VCL language allows custom caching solutions. Compute@Edge provides extensive architectural flexibility, aiding in HTML manipulation and script execution. Users benefit from its stability and reliability features for seamless network protection, log management, image optimization, and A/B testing. Challenges include limited support in mainland China, inadequate WebSocket protocol implementation, and complex pricing structures.

What are the key features of Fastly?

CDN Integration: Delivers content quickly across global Points of Presence.
Signal Sciences’ WAF: Manages security threats effectively.
VCL Language: Offers customizable caching solutions.
Compute@Edge: Enables flexible architecture for HTML manipulation.
Image Optimization: Enhances performance with dynamic image delivery.

What benefits should users consider in reviews?

Performance Enhancement: Boosts website speed and response time.
Rapid Deployment: Allows for swift implementation and rollback.
Real-Time Visibility: Provides insights into cached content management.
Security and Stability: Ensures reliability against DDoS attacks and other threats.
Flexibility: Offers diverse network protection and infrastructure capabilities.

Fastly is widely implemented in industries needing robust content delivery and security capabilities. Companies use it as a reverse proxy for media delivery, ensuring availability and optimized performance. Its rapid deployment and rollback features are particularly beneficial in technology sectors requiring agile responses to demand shifts.

Sample Customers

Orange España, Paschoalotto

Twitter, Airbnb, Alaska Airlines, Pinterest, Vimeo, The Guardian, The New York Times, Ticketmaster, The Drupal Association, Opera, about.com, imgur, Etsy, Foursquare, GitHub, New Relic, shopify, Shazam, Firebase

Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) vs. Fastly