Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) vs Kaspersky Security for Internet Gateway comparison

Check Point Software Technologies and Kaspersky are both solutions in the Secure Web Gateways (SWG) category. Check Point Software Technologies is ranked #6 with an average rating of 8.6, while Kaspersky is ranked #17 with an average rating of 8.3. Check Point Software Technologies holds a 2.3% mindshare in WSG, compared to Kaspersky’s 0.6% mindshare. Additionally, 97% of Check Point Software Technologies users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Kaspersky users who would recommend it.

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 15, 2025

Check Point Harmony SASE and Kaspersky Security for Internet Gateway both compete in the network security and management sector. Check Point Harmony SASE seems to have the upper hand due to its comprehensive features and flexible deployment options, which cater to a broader range of organizational needs.

Features: Check Point Harmony SASE provides multiple geographic access points, SD-WAN integration, and an always-on VPN that is valuable for global teams. Its zero-trust architecture and policy-based security enhance data protection. Kaspersky Security for Internet Gateway is noted for its strong antivirus protection, URL filtering, and advanced malware detection, effective for businesses with straightforward security requirements.

Room for Improvement: Users suggest Check Point Harmony SASE could benefit from more customization options and real-time alerts, a simplified UI, and faster support response times. Kaspersky Security for Internet Gateway users need improved customer support and pricing structures for various business sizes, along with frequent updates and better mobile security integration.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Check Point Harmony SASE supports deployments in private, public, and hybrid clouds, providing adaptability for different organizational needs. It generally ensures quality technical support with occasional slow response times. Kaspersky Security for Internet Gateway is primarily on-premises with proactive support, though response times are also sometimes slow.

Pricing and ROI: Check Point Harmony SASE offers moderate pricing with flexible SaaS options, seen as cost-effective due to its extensive features, though its minimum licensing can be a hurdle for smaller businesses. It delivers a significant ROI through improved productivity and security. Kaspersky Security for Internet Gateway is considered expensive for some, with suggestions for pricing adjustments for smaller-scale deployments. It offers reasonable ROI for businesses focusing on basic security needs through effective malware protection.

To learn more, read our detailed Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) vs. Kaspersky Security for Internet Gateway Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) vs. Kaspersky Security for Internet Gateway

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,384 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

iboss

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Secure Web Gateways (SWG) category, the mindshare of iboss is 2.1%, up from 1.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) is 2.3%, up from 2.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Kaspersky Security for Internet Gateway is 0.6%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Secure Web Gateways (SWG)

Featured Reviews

Matt Crockford

Head of Cybersecurity at SES Water

It's easy to roll out, and their understanding of our business made it seamless

One aspect we value about iboss is its simplicity. Their customer service is brilliant, and they are super responsive and knowledgeable. It's easy to roll out, and their understanding of our business made it seamless. We were impressed by the solution's mental health function, which can detect if someone needs help. It scans what users are browsing and flags warning signs so we can check to see if they are okay. We've had to use it a couple of times. The user interface is highly intuitive. Our IT team picked it up with minimal training. It's arranged so that it's easy to find where things are. Another advantage is the single pane of glass console, which gives you visibility into what's happening. We're not fully there yet because we haven't implemented zero trust, but we're excited about the possibilities from the demos we've seen. We launched a POC of iboss' ChatGPT Risk Protection feature two weeks ago. AI is a great tool, but you need to be careful what you put into it. My biggest fear is employees inputting sensitive corporate information or customer PII data into one of these chatbots. I was impressed by our trial of the feature. It's exactly what we wanted. Now, when a user goes to ChatGPT, there's a banner warning them not to share information, and we can block conversations containing customer data like bank details and email addresses. I don't want to stop people from using it, but we need visibility. We've only tried it on a test group of 15 people. You can configure it to look for specific keywords or integrate it with your DLP policy if you have that configured

Read full review

Nasseer Qureshi

Pre Sales Consultant at Redington Group

Delivers seamless and secure remote access while enhancing security posture

Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) offers strong features, but there are areas that could be improved. One area for improvement is integration with third-party identity providers. It works with standard SAML and SSO, but we would prefer deeper integrations with solutions such as Ping for more advanced identity-based policies. Additionally, a mobile-specific client or lightweight agent would be helpful for securing access from smartphones, especially in BYOD environments. We would appreciate more granular reporting and analytics, including better drill-down capabilities to investigate specific users or app activity. The logs are comprehensive, but filtering them can sometimes feel messy. The user interface on the management portal could be more intuitive, especially when managing multiple sites or remote offices. Some of the policy configuration steps are nested and could be streamlined.

Read full review

Teeranun Srihong

Senior Consultant at Celar Consulting Co.Ltd.

Schedule the timing for the kids to get onto the internet and easy to use

In different locations, they're priced differently, but that's mainly marketing rather than the product features. I managed to get a cheaper one, so I'm fine with that. Maybe they have too many packages. It's very difficult to differentiate among their own packages. They should have guidance on how the customer would decide. Kaspersky do has some information, but to me, it's not explanatory. Moreover, people are getting internet smart homes and all that. So total security that would cover all those would be good. We have all the connected devices right now. I'm not sure how they're gonna do it, but having a way to help me scan and expose vulnerabilities on those devices would be great. Right now, it protects the PCs, not the IP cameras that we use. And all those things in your home are connected. I don't see that. Maybe I'm not aware if they have any offering, but they probably should think about it. So, I would like to have total coverage for the individual household that would include all of the connected devices.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"iboss is among the few products providing inline filtering where no application is needed on the device."

"I would rate the technical support of iboss a solid 10 without a shadow of a doubt."

"iboss is among the few products providing inline filtering where no application is needed on the device. It operates on the network side and is not device-based. This feature was one of the main reasons why we stayed with them for so long."

"From a use-case scenario, what I like the most is the plug-in. I like the fact that we can do the filtering of these devices offsite independent of the network they are connected to, and we do not have to have traffic coming back inside our network."

"The console is cloud-based, which is something I really appreciate."

"Technical support is pretty sharp and very responsive."

"It was a very easy product to install. It can be deployed very fast."

"Granular setup, which was able to set different levels of filters using the OUs in the AD."

More iboss pros

"Perimeter 81 provides a very secure and non-disruptive experience."

"Harmony SASE helps us to manage compliance by regulating the amount of access to each department and user. We control the relevant apps and websites, which can be accessed from company-owned devices. Harmony SASE uses its own threat intelligence data from the cloud for threat prevention, and detect and manage threats with their own threat intelligence data and SASE firewall features."

"The benefits are really built into the underlying protocol, however, Perimeter81 makes these available in a user-friendly way."

"Protection against threats like ransomware is very effective."

"The tool is easy to use and set up."

"Review of exported and imported packages and protection and content filtering have been useful."

"The product’s ability to block phishing sites is valuable."

"The solution provides us with an easy way to configure and join the VPN with Perimeter 81."

More Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) pros

"I would recommend it to others as it's easy to use."

"The most valuable aspect for me is the user-friendly interface."

"The most valuable features of the solution are the antivirus and child protection features."

"The most valuable feature of Kaspersky Security for Internet Gateway is the antivirus."

"When it comes to threat detection, it is very strict with file downloads and uploads. It sends reports and quarantines suspicious files."

"The password thing is very good, and the overall URL protection."

Cons

"Sometimes, obviously, there are bugs."

"The area I would like to see improvement in is the ability with in the reporter to navigate directly to the content the user is traversing. It is kind of there, but it's not perfect. Quite frequently, I receive links that lead me to pages with error messages."

"File integrity monitoring would be very advantageous as an additional feature."

"The dashboards for local use could be better."

"Sometimes when you call in support, you get someone who is just following a sheet. It feels like a runaround. You feel that you are running into that support wall."

"Regarding pricing, setup costs, and licensing, iboss is not cheap, and that's my only concern."

"The reporting feature needs improvement. It doesn't give you the expected results. It is quite difficult to get the specific reports needed, and it is not as intuitive as the rest of the platform."

"The reporting feature needs improvement."

More iboss cons

"Sometimes downloading PDF files can be slow."

"The complex initial setup phase of the product is an area that can be improved"

"Although the interface is user-friendly, further simplification and customization options tailored for non-technical users would benefit smaller firms without dedicated IT teams. Intuitive dashboards and guided setups can help in reducing the learning curve."

"The platform's pricing can be an issue for smaller companies, as the cost may be higher than for larger organizations."

"Providing USB control in a Linux environment will give more control over data security."

"The solution requires you to buy a minimum of 50 licenses and that is not practical."

"When it comes to firewall configuration, sometimes we encounter issues."

"My customers want more remote functionality. They need another routing option after they connect to the enterprise intranet. For example, let's say a user tries to connect to a remote branch office and headquarters through Harmony Connect. They need a local breakout after connecting to the headquarters, especially in China. They need to put local breakout in the Chinese internet. The current version cannot do something like this."

More Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) cons

"It might be helpful to have notifications on mobile devices, especially if the same browser profile is used on both mobile and laptop."

"In different locations, they're priced differently, but that's mainly marketing rather than the product features."

"The initial setup of Kaspersky Security for Internet Gateway is complex. The full deployment took approximately two weeks."

"I believe the absence of a procedure is the main issue."

"The customer support of the product is an area with shortcomings where improvements are required."

"There is room for improvement in terms of the pricing."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We have not priced the solution recently, but they were competitive with other vendors in the past."

"We had the cost of purchasing a new appliance along with the implementation and licensing costs. However, the following year, the cost of just licensing was similar to what was paid the previous year for a new appliance along with the implementation and licensing costs."

"It is expensive compared to one of its competitors."

"It is probably in line with other solutions, but I do not deal with the financial side."

"It is not expensive, and it is also not cheap. iboss is priced right in the sweet spot for the number of features it offers."

"The overall pricing for iboss is very competitive and transparent."

"The pricing of Check Point is relatively high when compared to other competitors like Palo Alto and Fortinet. While Palo Alto may be on the higher side in terms of cost, Check Point's pricing is similar to that of Fortinet. In some cases, Check Point offers better value for the features it provides. We initially considered other options but ultimately decided to purchase hardware that came with three years of iOS. This approach eliminated the need for any additional costs associated with Check Point. I would rate it 10 out of 10."

"Annual licenses cost $30 to $40 each."

"I consider the product to be a medium-priced solution. There are no additional costs attached to the tool."

"Perimeter 81 charges separately for gateways and VPN connectivity, but compared to Azure, it seemed more reasonable."

"The solution's pricing model may not be suitable for smaller companies, as they might find it expensive. Larger companies tend to receive more value due to many users."

"The solution is priced appropriately considering its uses. For an essential license, a user pays only 30 USD per month. For an enterprise version, the prices can be negotiated with the company."

"The cost of the solution's licenses depends on the particular use cases."

"The product is neither cheap nor expensive."

More Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) pricing and cost advice

"I rate the product's price an eight on a scale of one to ten, where one is very cheap, and ten is very expensive."

"Personal computer licenses can be expensive if you were to scale the solution extensively. However, large companies will most likely use Endpoint solutions and not this one."

"It is expensive."

"The cost is relatively high, and as a licensed product, there are restrictions on the number of users permitted per license."

"I would rate the pricing a seven out of ten, with ten being very expensive and one being cheap. It's neither too cheap nor too expensive."

"I am okay with the pricing."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Secure Web Gateways (SWG) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

Healthcare Company

Computer Software Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Government

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with iboss?

For zero trust implementation, we encountered complexity issues, especially with a large infrastructure company Exxon...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for iboss?

Previously when I used iboss, we did the POC for iboss for ExxonMobil. Four or five people wanted to move from our ol...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for iboss?

Regarding pricing, setup costs, and licensing, iboss is not cheap, and that's my only concern. There are cheaper alte...

See all answers

What do you like most about Perimeter 81?

Even after restarting, it tries to quickly reestablish connection which is very helpful.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Perimeter 81?

It's essential to consider the organization's specific requirements and budget. Here are some general recommendations...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Perimeter 81?

In terms of improvement, Perimeter 81 could enhance its reporting and analytics capabilities to provide more detailed...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Kaspersky Security for Internet Gateway?

I would rate the pricing a six out of ten, with one being very cheap and ten being very expensive. I'm fine with the ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Kaspersky Security for Internet Gateway?

It's just for protecting the PCs that I use in my home internet network and also to protect the data inside. It does ...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Kaspersky Security for Internet Gateway?

My recommendation: First, others need to make sure they understand the type of security they want. There are so many ...

See all answers

Comparisons

Zscaler Internet Access vs iboss

Compared 15% of the time

Cisco Umbrella vs iboss

Compared 15% of the time

Netskope vs iboss

Compared 13% of the time

Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks vs iboss

Compared 11% of the time

Cloudflare One vs iboss

Compared 8% of the time

More iboss Competitors

Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform vs Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81)

Compared 10% of the time

Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks vs Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81)

Compared 9% of the time

Netskope vs Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81)

Compared 8% of the time

Cisco Umbrella vs Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81)

Compared 7% of the time

Cloudflare One vs Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81)

Compared 3% of the time

More Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Competitors

AhnLab V3 Internet Security vs Kaspersky Security for Internet Gateway

Compared 48% of the time

Cisco Umbrella vs Kaspersky Security for Internet Gateway

Compared 33% of the time

Zscaler Internet Access vs Kaspersky Security for Internet Gateway

Compared 19% of the time

More Kaspersky Security for Internet Gateway Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

iboss

August 2025

Download iboss product report

Buyer's Guide

Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81)

August 2025

Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) report

Download Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) product report

Buyer's Guide

Kaspersky Security for Internet Gateway

August 2025

Kaspersky Security for Internet Gateway report

Download Kaspersky Security for Internet Gateway product report

Also Known As

iBoss Cloud Platform

Check Point Quantum SASE

No data available

Overview

iboss offers a comprehensive security platform designed for diverse use cases such as web filtering, data loss protection, corporate proxy services, and URL filtering.

iboss integrates advanced features to address dynamic security needs, leveraging its strength in SASE, ZTNA, AI initiatives, and cloud integration, while ensuring seamless operations for remote work. It excels in historical forensics, malware protection, and flexible cloud deployments. Users benefit from comprehensive traffic scanning, robust malware detection, and PaaS capabilities that reduce hardware management. An intuitive admin console ensures efficient management with content filtering and low false positives. SSL decryption enhances security, while DLP protects data in AI conversations. Deployment is rapid and scalable, allowing effortless integration with emerging technologies.

What features does iboss offer?

Granular Web Filtering: Provides precise control over web content access.
Traffic Scanning: Monitors data through multiple ports for security breaches.
Malware Detection: Ensures superior protection against malware threats.
PaaS Capabilities: Eliminates need for hardware management.
SSL Decryption: Enhances data protection by decrypting secure connections.
DLP Capabilities: Safeguards data during AI interactions.

What benefits and ROI should users consider?

Scalability: Adapts quickly to growing demands and emerging tech integration.
Rapid Deployment: Reduces time to implement security measures.
User-Friendly Admin Console: Facilitates efficient operations management.
Low False Positives: Increases accuracy of threat detection systems.

iboss finds significant application in sectors such as education, where web filtering for K-12 is crucial, and in corporate environments requiring robust proxy services and URL filtering for network security. Its adaptability is essential in scenarios demanding flexible, decentralized security frameworks, particularly for remote work setups.

iboss

Check Point Harmony SASE, formerly Perimeter 81, offers robust security features like split tunneling, MFA, and Zero Trust Network Access focused on secure remote access and optimized connectivity for remote teams.

Check Point Harmony SASE delivers advanced security through a user-friendly interface, efficient VPN connections, and a centralized management console. It enhances security with real-time threat intelligence from ThreatCloud and traffic management via built-in optimization. Firewall as a Service and Secure Web Gateway safeguard against unauthorized access and phishing. While users seek enhanced networking customizations and better integration with identity providers, there's an emphasis on improving reporting, real-time analytics, and policy management. Requests also include a Chrome extension, traffic balancing, and simplified configuration to address some resource-intensive aspects.

What are the key features of Check Point Harmony SASE?

Split Tunneling: Manages internet traffic more efficiently by routing only necessary data through the VPN.
MFA: Provides an additional layer of security through multi-factor authentication.
Zero Trust Network Access: Ensures secure connections by validating every user and device.
ThreatCloud: Enhances protection with real-time threat intelligence.
Firewall as a Service: Protects against unauthorized access and threats.
Secure Web Gateway: Prevents phishing attacks and unauthorized internet access.

How can organizations benefit from using Check Point Harmony SASE?

Improved Security: Real-time threat intelligence and robust authentication minimize risks.
Centralized Management: Simplifies control over network security and policies.
Optimized Connectivity: Efficient traffic routing enhances user experience.
Flexible Integration: Seamlessly integrates with existing IT infrastructure, enhancing strategic security deployment.

Check Point Harmony SASE is used across industries for secure remote access and connectivity, protecting sensitive data, and managing access to corporate resources. It is ideal for those with hybrid cloud models and requires comprehensive security measures combined with existing IT infrastructures to meet specific industry demands.

Check Point Software Technologies

Kaspersky Security for Internet Gateway is a comprehensive security solution designed to protect businesses from a wide range of cyber threats. It provides advanced protection against malware, phishing, spam, and other types of cyber attacks, ensuring that businesses can operate safely and securely online. The solution is easy to deploy and manage, with a user-friendly interface that allows administrators to configure and monitor security policies from a central location. It also includes advanced reporting and analytics tools, enabling businesses to gain insights into their security posture and identify potential vulnerabilities. Kaspersky Security for Internet Gateway uses a range of advanced technologies to provide comprehensive protection against cyber threats. These include signature-based detection, behavioral analysis, and machine learning algorithms, which work together to identify and block malicious activity in real-time. The solution also includes advanced anti-spam and anti-phishing capabilities, which help to prevent employees from falling victim to email-based attacks. It can also be configured to block access to malicious websites and prevent the download of potentially harmful files.

Kaspersky Security for Internet Gateway is a powerful and effective security solution that provides businesses with the protection they need to operate safely and securely online. With its advanced features and easy-to-use interface, it is an ideal choice for businesses of all sizes looking to enhance their cyber security posture.

Kaspersky

Sample Customers

More than 4,000 global enterprises trust the iboss Cloud Platform to support their modern workforces, including a large number of Fortune 50 companies.

Aqua Security, Cognito, Multipoint, Kustomer, Postman, Meredith

Tael, Insolar, Goods.ru, Republic of Serbia

Buyer's Guide

Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) vs. Kaspersky Security for Internet Gateway

July 2025

Free Report: Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) vs. Kaspersky Security for Internet Gateway

Find out what your peers are saying about Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) vs. Kaspersky Security for Internet Gateway and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) vs. Kaspersky Security for Internet Gateway report.

See our list of best Secure Web Gateways (SWG) vendors.

We monitor all Secure Web Gateways (SWG) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.