We performed a comparison between Check Point CloudGuard Code Security and Code42 Incydr based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Data Loss Prevention (DLP) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Its fastest and most outstanding characteristic is ensuring a development line that will not lead to applying applications or code development."
"We have a strong sense of security assurance when utilizing CloudGuard, as it consistently delivers outstanding protection capabilities."
"Automation has helped a lot to identify and automatically execute policies, rules, and blocks due to its machine learning."
"We have had a number of real events where developers accidentally made commits of API keys, and we were able to detect and begin response actions in minutes. We had the API key revoked in less than five minutes in such events."
"Knowing what measures we must take allows us to reduce costs associated with security in the cloud by providing early identification of a risk or a possible security breach."
"The data center security system has provided real-time analytics on performance and data configuration processes."
"Compared to what we used before, it's helping us to be more efficient in managing our traffic."
"Having a cloud detection response helps to very quickly identify security threats in our environment."
"It had the ability to preseed by sending in a data drive and could restore by sending the user a data drive."
"Risk factors can be adjusted for all intricate details."
"t has a very user friendly status bar with common errors and has logs built in to the console so we can review the issues or status of CrashPlan."
"There are a couple of things. One of them is that they have what they call Incydr. Their detection and response solution to the insider threat area is called Incydr. That gives visibility to the clients that have widely dispersed employee bases due to work from home, or that had a dispersed workforce predating any of the work from home requirements. Even though they might not be inside the organization physically, they're inside the organization. It allows us to get some visibility into what people are doing, what the context is, and how to control what might be the potential for intellectual property theft or file exposure."
"Backup and recovery have been great, but I love having the ability to keep the hybrid type build which they offer."
"Code42 Next-Gen DLP is scalable."
"Low system overhead, setting retention policies, ease of use"
"Works in the background and users are able to perform restores."
"There needs to be better security around API integration."
"I am satisfied with the performance and results enhanced by this product since we deployed it."
"They could include web functionalities such as sandboxing."
"There are a lot of opportunities for how they can use their technology to do more. That would be more like sensitive data discovery and other things besides Git Repos, but then you are expanding the scope of what necessarily their product is."
"The enhancements are needed in the logging system and log management processes."
"It is generally difficult to find documentation about the product, and there is relatively little to find."
"The costs are not transparent."
"We need to have many of the baselines or development guides providing less complex writing or development."
"In a couple of instances, we had a little bit of trouble in getting it distributed throughout the organization. We ultimately managed to do it, but they talk about it being a pretty simple process, and it became a little laborious. It would just turn away. The agents were not being distributed. It was just churning and churning and churning. When we were looking for specific categories of data, it was getting bogged down, but that was not even so much Code42, although some of it was their issue."
"I think one we can improve is the compression."
"Reporting could use an overhaul. It is very limited."
"More security would be nice, I would love to be able to remotely brick a stolen laptop and it's hard disk drive (HDD)."
"What I think could be improved is how I get support."
"There doesn't seem to be any feature that is lacking."
"Due to recent changes that effectively abandoned an entire segment of their user base, I no longer trust nor can recommend Code42 products."
"The application, written in Java, required far more system resources on a Client than other solutions."
More Check Point CloudGuard Code Security Pricing and Cost Advice →
Check Point CloudGuard Code Security is ranked 11th in Data Loss Prevention (DLP) with 11 reviews while Code42 Incydr is ranked 15th in Data Loss Prevention (DLP) with 78 reviews. Check Point CloudGuard Code Security is rated 8.4, while Code42 Incydr is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Check Point CloudGuard Code Security writes "Good security and functionality with helpful support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Code42 Incydr writes "Provides comprehensive visibility and protection, helps in identifying the gaps in security, and comes with excellent onboarding support". Check Point CloudGuard Code Security is most compared with Aqua Cloud Security Platform, Snyk and Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention, whereas Code42 Incydr is most compared with Threat Detection, Investigation & Response (TDIR) Platform, Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention, Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention, Morphisec and Backup and Restore for SharePoint & Microsoft Office 365. See our Check Point CloudGuard Code Security vs. Code42 Incydr report.
See our list of best Data Loss Prevention (DLP) vendors.
We monitor all Data Loss Prevention (DLP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
